Compare Simplicity Vacuums Allergy Upright Vacuum, S20EZM vs Dyson Ball Animal 3 Extra Upright Vacuum

Included tools are usually described as basic but useful (commonly crevice and a combo dusting/upholstery tool). Several reviewers want a wider or softer dusting tool, and some add aftermarket pet or specialty attachments.

The Extra bundle's pet-focused tools (pet groom and turbine tool) and core tools (crevice/brush, stair) are widely viewed as useful. Value depends on how often you will use the specialized pet attachments.

A few comments call the vacuum simple, clean, or stylish, while others dislike cosmetic choices or mention broken trim/cover parts that are mostly aesthetic.

At least one long-form review explicitly calls the vacuum stylish, and the design is generally treated as premium-looking. Color and trim differences are also noted between package variants.

Airflow blowback or scatter is specifically mentioned on hard floors by some users, including reports of particles being thrown back toward feet during use.

A recurring minor complaint is blowback or scattering with certain large debris, including spitting kernels or pushing round objects. Changing the head setting or vacuuming path is often described as reducing the issue.

Area rug handling depends heavily on height setting and rug type. Some owners say it works well when adjusted up; others say it can grab edges, chew bindings, or feel too aggressive on certain rugs.

Strong suction can make small/thin rugs harder to vacuum and may drag them around, but the adjustable gates/air-bleed settings help. Homes with heavier rugs or more carpet generally report smoother handling.

Assembly is repeatedly described as simple and quick, typically sliding in the handle and attaching the hose, with minimal screws.

Assembly is generally described as tool-free and quick, with parts snapping into place. One reviewer found setup slightly tricky because the manual relied on photos, but still completed it in about 12 minutes.

The bag-full indicator is viewed as helpful when present, but at least one owner reports it failing to reset after changing bags.

The bagged system is a major selling point: owners like cleaner disposal, consistent suction, and less dust exposure than bagless designs. Bag capacity is often praised, but replacement cost and bag consumption (especially with heavy shedding or wool rugs) are frequent notes.

The bagless bin is repeatedly described as large (about 0.5 gallons / 1.7 liters in reviews) and easy to monitor as it fills. Capacity helps longer cleaning sessions between empties.

Build quality feedback is polarized: some praise sturdy materials (metal brush roll, aluminum wand, rubber bumpers), while others report cheap-feeling plastics, wobble, broken handles/covers, or hose issues over time.

Reviews characterize the vacuum as dense and premium-feeling, with sturdy components and a removable brush roll design. The same build contributes to the heavier carry weight.

High-pile carpet performance is generally strong due to agitation and height settings, but some users find it hard to push or overly aggressive if set too low.

Reviewers say the head design and gate/vent settings help it work on thick or deep-pile carpet without stalling. It can still feel grabby in deeper-clean modes because of the high suction.

Low-pile carpet results are typically positive, especially for everyday pickup and pet hair, though pushing effort can increase if suction is high and height is set low.

Medium-pile carpet cleaning is consistently praised, with multiple reports of lifting matted carpet and pulling embedded dirt and pet hair that previous vacuums missed.

In controlled sand tests on medium-pile carpet, the vacuum scored at or near the top, indicating excellent embedded-dirt pickup. Reviewers also note it avoids bogging on thicker carpet when the head gates are opened.

Some owners mention clogs or brush/belt issues that require disassembly, while others highlight visible clog indicators and easy access to the roller area for checks.

Most reviews emphasize strong clog resistance and fewer mid-clean stoppages, even with heavy pet fur. However, very large or round debris can sometimes lodge in the head until cleared.

Comparisons are common: many say it out-cleans certain Sharks/Dysons on carpet and pet hair, while at least one comparison favors a premium canister for ease and deep extraction despite higher upkeep.

Across comparative reviews, the Ball Animal 3 Extra is portrayed as outperforming cheaper uprights in deep-clean tests and improving on earlier Dyson uprights for hard floors and hair tangles. Some comparisons still highlight tradeoffs like weight, noise, and occasional large-debris scattering.

Controls are usually described as straightforward, with height adjustment settings that are easy to use. The foot pedal placement is occasionally criticized for accidental shutoffs when bumping furniture.

Controls include multiple cleaning modes, brush-roll control, and head gate/air-bleed adjustments that help tune performance by surface. Reviewers sometimes mention a short learning curve in figuring out the best setting.

Cord length perception varies: several reviewers call it long enough (often cited as 30 ft), while others say it is shorter than expected and requires frequent outlet changes in larger spaces.

Multiple reviews cite an extra-long 35-foot cord, giving a large room-to-room cleaning radius. Cord length is consistently positioned as a strength.

Cord wrap is often praised as neat and practical, but multiple users wish for a retractable cord for convenience and to reduce cord management hassles.

Cord hooks and rear storage are mentioned as straightforward for wrapping and quickly releasing the cord. No one highlights a rewind feature, but basic cord handling is described as manageable.

Crevice testing and reviewer feedback indicate excellent groove pickup, with the Dyson scoring at or near the top for lifting sand from a deep crevice. This aligns with its high sealed suction.

Cyclone performance is generally credited for maintaining strong suction and helping prevent clogs. One reviewer felt the newer cyclone setup lets filters get dirty faster than older Dyson designs, suggesting more frequent checks.

Dyson's ball steering is frequently praised for tight turns and easier navigation around furniture. A few reviewers say it takes getting used to, but most find it maneuverable once familiar.

Day-to-day use is often described as simple and satisfying on carpet, but usability drops for some due to weight when carrying, strong pull on thick carpet, short hose frustrations, or brush roll behavior during hose use.

Ease of use is boosted by strong cleaning performance, ball steering, and versatile attachments. The main usability negatives are the heavy body, occasional hard-to-push feel on carpet, and loud operation.

Edge and baseboard cleaning is highlighted positively by some owners, while others still avoid edges on delicate rugs due to brush aggression.

Edge cleaning is generally good on the sides, but multiple tests note weaker pickup at the front edge or centerline near walls, sometimes needing an extra angle or pass. It is solid but not the strongest point.

Hygienic, no-touch emptying is a consistent positive, with reviewers noting you can eject debris without handling dust or fur. This is frequently paired with praise for the large bin.

Filtration is a standout: multiple reviews highlight HEPA-style bags and filters, strong dust containment, and noticeable allergy relief versus bagless vacuums.

Whole-machine HEPA filtration and sealed dust containment are frequently praised, especially by pet owners and allergy-focused reviewers. Washable filters are seen as a plus for long-term ownership.

The floorhead/brush system is powerful but divisive. Many emphasize strong agitation and carpet grooming; many also complain the brush roll runs continuously and can be too aggressive on hard floors and some rugs.

The redesigned floorhead with adjustable gates is frequently credited for better large-debris pickup and improved thick-carpet glide compared to older Dyson uprights. Tradeoffs mentioned include occasional spitting/pushing of bigger pieces and less effective reach at the very front edge for some debris.

A few reviewers report that hair or round debris can snag in the hair-removal comb/vanes and may require pulling it off or opening the head. It is not constant, but it is the main tangle-related annoyance mentioned.

Hair pickup on carpet is repeatedly described as excellent, with pet owners reporting noticeably better results than prior vacuums. Lab-style tests show near-complete hair collection in a few passes.

Detangling features (hair-removal vanes/active combing) are a standout, with multiple tests showing virtually no brush-roll wrap even with long hair. Some reviewers still mention occasional hair catching at the comb area.

Hard-floor fine dust pickup is inconsistent: some users report very clean results, while others say the brush roll and airflow can scatter particles or require switching to other vacuums for hard floors.

Reviews describe strong fine-dust pickup on hard floors, helped by high suction and floorhead details intended to capture small particles. It is commonly positioned as one of the better Dyson uprights for hard floors.

Large debris intake on hard floors gets mixed feedback, including complaints about litter or particles being thrown back during use in some homes.

Adjustable gates help it take in larger debris on hard floors and carpet, and many reviewers see strong pickup overall. Some tests still show it can initially spit or push items like popcorn kernels or plastic balls until the setting or approach is adjusted.

The headlight is frequently mentioned as useful for spotting debris, though at least one owner questions bulb longevity and whether the lights are true LEDs.

Reach is a frequent theme: some are happy with the wand/hose extension for corners and drapes, while others say the permanently attached hose feels too short and can tug the vacuum toward them.

A long hose and wand (15 feet cited in reviews) enables above-floor cleaning and helps reach stairs and furniture. Reviewers often highlight this reach as a practical advantage versus typical uprights.

Maintenance expectations are higher than some modern uprights: multiple owners mention periodic belt changes and watching filters/bags, and a few report recurring belt or brush issues.

Maintenance is often described as easy thanks to washable filters, removable brush roll, and accessible inspection points. Some users still report periodic cleaning around the comb/mesh and more frequent filter attention than expected.

Handling is mixed: some call it easy to maneuver with good wheel roll and a small footprint, while others find it awkward to lift onto steps, hard to push on thick carpet, or unstable/wobbly when parked.

Noise is a common downside. Many describe it as loud, though a few say the tone is acceptable or less irritating than other vacuums.

Noise is a common complaint, with descriptions ranging from loud to screaming if powered on while upright. Measured sound levels in one test place it on the louder side of comparable uprights.

Onboard tool storage is commonly praised as convenient and secure, helping reduce lost tools and making quick transitions easier.

Core tools like the crevice/brush and stair tool are stored on the vacuum, which reviewers find convenient. Some pet accessories are not stored onboard and may need separate storage.

Ongoing costs are mostly about bags and periodic belts/filters. Many accept the trade for cleaner disposal and better dust control, but some find OEM bags or add-on tools expensive.

Longevity reports are split: some claim many years across prior Simplicity units and expect long service due to replaceable parts, while others report failures around 1 to 2 years, frequent belt breaks, or brush/motor issues.

Overall sentiment is strongly positive, with multiple reviews rating it around 9/10 or calling it a top Dyson upright, especially for pets and carpets. The recurring negatives are price, weight, and noise.

Pet owners frequently praise strong pickup on carpet and reduced lingering hair. A few reports note limitations for long hair on upholstery or brush/belt strain in heavy pet homes.

Pet-focused performance is a highlight: strong hair pickup, detangling design, and HEPA filtration are repeatedly called out for reducing fur and dander. The pet grooming tool is polarizing, with one reviewer disliking the stiff bristles and others finding it intriguing or useful.

Value is usually rated positively for a bagged HEPA-style upright, with several reviewers calling it worth the money. Some disagree when durability or repair frequency becomes an issue.

Multiple sources call it expensive, and one comparison suggests the Extra bundle is not always worth the full premium versus the base model. Reviewers who prioritize pet hair and deep cleaning are more likely to view the cost as justified, especially on sale.

Some users describe a powered-assist or self-propel-like feel, while others explicitly wish it were self-propelled, especially as they age or when cleaning thick carpet.

Stair cleaning is supported via hose/tools and at least one stair-focused attachment mention, but carrying weight and hose tug can make stair work more demanding for some users.

The long hose/wand helps with stair reach, and it can clean stairs effectively with the right attachment. However, several reviewers caution that the heavy upright body can make stair cleaning awkward, especially for limited mobility or narrow stairs.

Several reviewers like the compact footprint and storage friendliness, especially for apartments and tight spaces. Upright stability is occasionally criticized due to wobble or center-of-gravity comments.

Despite being a full-size corded upright, reviewers describe it as relatively slim/short and easy to tuck into a corner. One note: turning it on while still upright can be jarringly loud.

Suction is consistently described as strong, often the primary reason people keep the vacuum. A minority say it is good but not on par with their best prior vacuum, or that strong suction can increase push effort.

Repeated testing and reviews describe extremely strong suction and airflow, including top crevice and embedded-dirt results. The upside is deep cleaning; the downside is that the power can make it harder to push and may tug on thin rugs.

Reviewers describe it as a heavy-duty, industrial-strength option for shedding pets and embedded dirt, suited to larger or carpet-heavy homes. The heavy weight and loudness are the main heavy-duty tradeoffs.

A narrower cleaning path and tight turning help it maneuver in tighter rooms compared with bulkier uprights. The heavy body remains a consideration for small-space storage and carrying.

Support experiences are mixed but lean positive in key stories, including at least one report of a quick refund after failure. Others report difficulty reaching customer service or post-warranty parts frustration.

Support is referenced via a 5-year warranty and mentions of Dyson customer support. No review flags major reliability failures, though long-term durability claims are mostly implied rather than proven.

Tool changes are usually straightforward, especially with the telescoping wand. Compatibility with older hoses or certain attachments is a reported pain point for some owners.

Tool changes are generally described as simple, using quick-release buttons to swap between wand, hose, and attachments. Reviewers note a short learning curve, but day-to-day changes are straightforward.

One review notes it can reach under a bed a little and handle awkward angles thanks to ball steering. It still will not replace a low-profile design for deep under-furniture cleaning.

Above-floor cleaning is generally strong with the wand and crevice tool, but upholstery performance is mixed, including complaints about long pet hair on couches and limited included fabric tools.

Above-floor cleaning is repeatedly praised, with turbine and upholstery tools pulling hair from couches, car seats, and pet beds. One review notes suction remains strong even when using attachments.

Versatility is frequently emphasized: multiple head settings, strong hard-floor and carpet performance, and long-reach above-floor tools support whole-home cleaning. Its limitations show up most on stairs, thin rugs, and edge-front pickup.

Weight impressions vary but cluster around sturdy and somewhat heavy. Many say it feels fine while pushing, but heavier when carrying up stairs or doing repeated back-and-forth on thick carpet.

Weight is consistently flagged as a drawback at roughly 17 pounds, affecting carrying and stair use. The heft is often framed as the tradeoff for strong power and a dense build.

Wool and delicate rug compatibility is a concern in the reviews: some users report damage to a rug or needing to avoid edges, and others note wool rugs fill bags quickly even when they like the cleaning result.