Compare Simplicity Vacuums Allergy Upright Vacuum, S20EZM vs Dyson Ball Animal 3 Extra Upright Vacuum

Tools are useful and available, but Amazon reviewers split over whether the included set is adequate.

Attachments are generally well regarded, especially the pet grooming, turbine, crevice, stair, and upholstery tools, though the Extra package value is debated elsewhere.

The finish and styling draw light but positive comments, with reviewers liking the color or clean design.

A WIRED review explicitly praises the vacuum’s styling while also noting broad floor-surface performance.

Hard-floor debris blowback appears in negative Amazon feedback when litter was thrown back at the user.

Area-rug handling is polarized: some rugs revived, while one flat-weave rug was damaged by the roller.

Area rug handling is mixed: one review says it glides on a thick rug, while others warn it may be too strong or hard to move on carpet.

Assembly is treated as very easy, with reviewers emphasizing the simple handle and hose setup.

Assembly is mixed: one comparison says the Dyson needs quite a bit of assembly, and another found setup slightly tricky.

The bag-full indicator receives both praise for usefulness and complaints when it fails to reset.

The bagged system is a strength because users like simple bag changes, contained dust, and steady suction.

The bin is viewed positively in the hands-on review, mainly because of its large capacity.

Build quality is disputed: video reviewers praise durable parts, while Amazon complaints cite cheap plastic and failures.

Build quality evidence is positive for the wand, which a reviewer describes as high-quality plastic that does not tend to snap.

High-pile and thick carpet performance is generally strong, helped by brush agitation and height adjustment.

High-pile and plush carpet evidence is positive, with reviewers praising thick-carpet deep cleaning and plush-carpet effectiveness.

Low-pile carpet evidence is positive but less detailed, mainly tied to nap revival and general carpet cleaning.

Medium/all-pile carpet evidence is favorable, with reviewers calling the carpet performance outstanding or broadly ideal.

Medium-pile carpet pickup scores very strongly in testing, including a perfect carpet deep-clean score and top sand pickup results.

Clogging prevention is a weakness in Amazon feedback, with users reporting easy clogs and teardown hassle.

Clog prevention is a strength in pet-heavy use, with reviewers highlighting anti-clog design and debris containment in the bin.

Comparative comments often favor the Simplicity over Shark-type vacuums, though Rainbow-style deep cleaning can outperform it.

Comparative evidence is favorable: reviewers say it impressed against other uprights, outshined competition on carpet, and felt like a worthy successor.

Controls are mixed: the height dial is easy, but many users dislike the always-on roller and limited suction control.

Reviewers like the adjustable gates and suction controls because they improve control across surfaces and debris types.

Cord length is mixed across homes: some call it long, while others say larger spaces still require replugging.

Cord length is consistently praised, especially the 35-foot cord and long total cleaning range.

Cord management earns praise for simple wrapping and top cord routing, with some wishing for retractability.

Cord management is praised in the unboxing review because the hook lets the user remove the whole cable in one go.

Crevice pickup is praised when using the crevice tool for narrow gaps and hard-to-reach areas.

Crevice pickup is excellent in comparative testing, where the Dyson edges out the Shark Stratos in deep crevice sand pickup.

Cyclone performance is mixed: one review praises Radial Root Cyclone airflow, while another says the newer cyclone system dirties filters faster.

The dual-motor design is evaluated positively because the brush motor is described as not stealing power from the main motor.

Ease of use is mostly positive, though physical effort and control quirks keep it from being universally easy.

Ease of use is mixed: one reviewer liked how the machine follows the hose, while another said several operations take getting used to.

Edge and baseboard cleaning gets positive mentions from both the attachment layout and edge-cleaning system.

Edge and baseboard cleaning is mixed: one test found the Dyson missed rice near the center, while another called edge cleaning good but not best.

Emptying and mess control are strong because the bag avoids the dirty, dusty bin-cleaning process users dislike.

Emptying and mess control are viewed positively, with reviewers calling the bin hygienic, easy to empty, and clean to handle.

Filtration and dust containment are among the strongest themes, especially for allergies and bagged dust control.

Filtration and dust containment receive strong marks, with reviewers praising HEPA-level containment, allergen capture, and cleaner air while vacuuming.

The floorhead has strong agitation but mixed design feedback because the brush roll cannot be shut off.

The cleaner head is repeatedly praised as a standout feature, with efficient design, a strong seal, and a fantastic updated head.

Hard-floor sealing is weak where reviewers report no squeegee effect and debris being thrown back.

The floorhead seal is praised in comparative testing for forming a tight seal against the floor.

Hair-channel and brushroll serviceability is a concern where users cannot easily clean a locked beater bar.

Hair-removal-channel evidence is mixed to negative: reviewers found balls trapped in the vanes and hair caught on comb teeth despite overall anti-tangle strengths.

Carpet hair pickup is usually praised, especially for dogs, cats, and high-shedding homes.

Hair pickup on carpets is very strong, with lab and review evidence showing most hair picked up and long/pet hair efficiently removed.

Hard-floor hair pickup is praised in Forbes’ evidence that suction lifts hair from both carpets and hard floors.

Hair-wrap/tangle resistance is a concern in pet homes when long hair is linked to brushroll lockup.

Hair-wrap resistance is one of the clearest strengths, with multiple reviewers reporting virtually no tangles, clean vanes, and self-clearing brush behavior.

Fine dust hard-floor evidence is mixed, with some strong cleaning praise and other hard-floor complaints.

Hard-floor fine dust pickup is praised in testing, with the reviewer saying it handles the finest dust particles well.

Large-debris hard-floor intake is a weakness because users report thrown particles and litter blowback.

Large debris intake is generally strong, but not perfect: some reviews praise larger debris pickup while others note popcorn or similar debris can spit forward.

The headlight is consistently useful in positive feedback, though one reviewer questioned non-LED longevity.

Hose reach is mixed: videos praise long reach, while some owners find the attached hose too short or awkward.

The hose and wand range is praised for above-floor reach and easier high/low cleaning.

Innovation centers on the five-level height system, described as unusual for uprights in this class.

The new cleaner head and adjustable gates are seen as meaningful innovations versus previous Dyson uprights.

Low-profile reach is favorable when reviewers say it gets under furniture better.

The low-profile aspect is modest but positive, with one reviewer noting a slim, short profile and limited under-bed reach.

Maintenance is mixed-to-negative because belts, filters, and brushroll cleaning can require ongoing attention.

Maintenance is viewed positively overall, with a reviewer explicitly calling it very easy.

Handling is mixed: it rolls or maneuvers well for some, but weight and suction make pushing difficult for others.

Maneuverability is mostly praised for the ball steering and tight turns, though one review says the ball-style steering takes some getting used to.

Noise is a recurring concern, though a few users find the tone tolerable or quieter than prior vacuums.

Noise is a recurring drawback, with reviewers noting it is louder than some competitors and describing it as a very loud machine.

Onboard tool storage is a clear convenience when the tools stay accessible and easy to use.

Ownership costs are a concern because OEM bags, belts, and optional pet tools add expense.

Ownership costs are viewed favorably because washable filters and reusable filtration reduce replacement needs.

Longevity feedback is mixed, ranging from multi-year praise to early belt, hose, motor, and handle failures.

Overall opinion is positive but not unanimous: reviewers praise cleaning power while noting convenience and durability tradeoffs.

Overall sentiment is very positive across reviews, with repeated top-choice language, high ratings, and strong owner satisfaction.

Pet-ready performance is a major strength for carpet hair and allergens, though long-haired pets can expose brushroll issues.

Pet-related evidence is highly positive: reviewers praise fur pickup, pet-focused attachments, anti-tangle behavior, and usefulness in shedding-heavy homes.

Value is generally favorable, especially against higher-end vacuums, but ongoing parts costs temper the score.

Value is mixed to negative: reviewers praise performance, but one calls it pricey and another doubts paying extra for bundled tools.

The forward-propel feel helps some users, but others still miss true self-propelled drive.

Stair use is limited by weight and lift-handle complaints despite useful step/edge attachments.

Stair cleaning is a weakness in one review because the upright body and weight make stair use less ideal.

Storage is mostly good thanks to compact footprint, though stability concerns appear in owner feedback.

Its slim, short upright profile is praised for making the vacuum easy to tuck into a corner.

Stuck resistance is favorable on thick carpet because the Ball Animal 3 glides where the earlier fixed-height model bogged down.

Suction is the strongest recurring praise, with multiple reviewers calling it powerful or excellent.

Reviewers consistently describe suction and airflow as a major strength, with lab results and user tests showing strong lift, deep cleaning, and upholstery power.

Heavy-duty suitability is good for frequent pet-home use when the unit stays intact, with workhorse praise from some owners.

Reviewers frame it as a heavy-duty machine, citing powerful air speed, lift, and a Terminator-like readiness for demanding pet messes.

Small-space suitability is strong because several users cite compact footprint and easy closet storage.

For a full-size upright, one review finds the machine relatively compact and suitable for tucking into smaller spaces.

Support and reliability are mixed: warranty backing and refunds help, but some service attempts disappoint.

Surface safety is a serious caveat because the active brush can damage rugs or beat one spot while using the hose.

The pet grooming attachment raises a surface-safety concern because a reviewer found the bristles stiff and would avoid using it on a pet.

Tool changes are usually easy with the included setup, though compatibility with older attachments is limited.

Tool changes are mixed: one reviewer praised the easy teardown and quick-release wand, while another found getting the hose out awkward.

Under-furniture pickup is favorable when the machine or tools reach beneath furniture well.

Under-furniture pickup is limited but possible, with one review noting it can reach under the bed a little.

Above-floor pickup is mixed: hose suction can be strong, but upholstery and long cat hair disappoint some owners.

Above-floor and upholstery pickup is strong, with reviewers praising turbine tools, couch and car-seat cleaning, and no suction loss with attachments.

Versatility is good for carpets, tools, and above-floor cleaning, but hard-floor limitations reduce flexibility.

Reviewers see it as versatile across mess sizes, surfaces, modes, and whole-apartment cleaning, especially with carpets, hard floors, and attachments.

Weight is one of the clearest tradeoffs, with users calling it substantial or hard to push despite cleaning power.

Weight is a consistent downside: reviewers describe it as the heaviest in a comparison, not lightweight, and tiring to lift.

Wool-rug evidence is limited but positive, with one owner saying wool rugs looked better after use.