Compare Shark Rotator Powered Lift-Away Upright Vacuum, NV752 vs Kenmore Intuition Bagged Upright Vacuum

Most reviews highlight a strong accessory bundle (crevice, upholstery tools, dusting variants, and often hard-floor and pet tools), plus the option of a caddy on some kits. Complaints focus on missing or downgraded accessories in some packages, limited included brushes, and frustration sourcing compatible add-ons.

Accessories vary by model/package: multiple reviews highlight useful upholstery/pet tools and, in some versions, turbo tools. Value is higher when the kit includes more tools and extra bags, but quality/fit of tools is debated in at least one review.

Design feedback is generally positive, with some reviewers calling the finish modern and attractive. A few owners describe the look as dated or purely utilitarian, but aesthetics rarely impact overall satisfaction compared to performance factors.

Design/finish gets some positive mentions (e.g., sleek styling, chrome/rose-gold accents on certain versions). At least one reviewer considers it more utilitarian/old-school or bulky in practice.

Area rug handling is frequently described as challenging on smaller or lighter rugs due to strong suction, with reports of bunching, stalling, or difficulty pulling backward. Heavier rugs tend to fare better, and using the high-pile/area-rug setting improves usability but does not eliminate the issue.

Assembly is widely described as fast and straightforward, with parts clicking into place cleanly. Unboxing-style reviews often highlight that setup can be done in minutes without special tools.

Assembly is typically described as quick and easy, with straightforward snap-in steps and minimal setup time reported by at least one hands-on review.

Several reviews describe protective shutoff behavior or clear warning indicators when the brush stops or a clog occurs, helping prevent belt damage or overheating. Users who encounter clogs often resolve them by clearing hair/string from the brush roll and obstructions from internal pathways.

A bag-full/level indicator is mentioned as a helpful convenience feature that reduces guesswork and prompts timely bag replacement to keep performance steady.

The bagless dust cup is described as convenient, but capacity is debated: some call it large for longer sessions, while others say usable volume feels smaller than expected (especially in heavy pet homes). Many agree the shape helps collect a lot quickly, which can mean frequent emptying when tackling deep-clean jobs.

Bagged operation is a defining feature. Many reviewers like the cleaner disposal and note synthetic bags can maintain suction reasonably well, but bag capacity and sealing details are debated, and you must keep bags stocked.

Build quality sentiment is mixed: many describe solid plastics and secure connections (sometimes noting a metal wand), while others cite flimsy-feeling latches, hose cracking over time, or dust-cup component breakage. Overall impressions range from sturdy workhorse to cost-optimized in specific parts.

Build quality feedback is split. Some reviews describe a well-designed, feature-rich product for the price, while a technician-style review calls materials and mechanisms cheap/chintzy and not up to older Kenmore expectations.

High-pile carpet performance is generally rated strong when using the high-pile/area-rug setting, and many reviewers highlight effective pet hair removal. Some also report the lack of height adjustment and strong suction can cause rug grabbing, carpet seam lift, or long-term wear on certain rugs.

High-pile/shag performance is described as strong by at least one test source, while other reviewers caution that very thick carpet can be harder to push due to no height adjustment and strong suction (mitigated by a suction release valve on some variants).

Low-pile carpet pickup is consistently strong, with many reviewers describing one-pass improvement and deep debris recovery compared to prior vacuums. The main drawback in low-pile settings is that strong suction can make backward pulls feel like a workout for some users.

Low-pile carpet cleaning is widely described as excellent, with testing-focused sources reporting near-top collection results and strong single-pass pickup on typical debris.

Medium-pile carpet performance is consistently strong in both subjective impressions and structured pickup tests, with many reviewers describing visibly revived carpets. Some note that the unit may require multiple passes for very heavy debris loads, but overall effectiveness remains a key selling point.

Medium-pile carpet deep-clean performance is repeatedly called out as a strength, including embedded sand/debris test outcomes described as top-tier.

Clogging reports are mixed: several reviewers note it can power through messy tests and does not easily choke on typical carpet debris, but others report hair/dirt buildup in the floorhead and occasional clogs in pet tools. Users who maintain filters and clear hair from the brush roll report smoother ongoing performance.

Comparisons commonly position the NV752 as competitive with pricier Dyson uprights on carpet while offering more configuration flexibility. In head-to-head pet-hair testing, some competitors outperform it on anti-tangle and certain upholstery tool behavior, while the Shark often wins on filtration and hard-floor behavior versus kickback-prone designs.

Controls on the handle and a three-surface selector are frequently praised as convenient and intuitive. The most common control-related complaints are the lack of fine-grained suction/height adjustment and, in a few cases, a power button that feels finicky or hard to press.

Powered Lift-Away is repeatedly cited as the core differentiator: it enables cleaning under beds and furniture while keeping the powered head active, and it improves stair cleaning compared to standard uprights. The main downside is that the detached pod can feel heavy to carry during extended above-floor sessions.

Cord length is commonly described as usable but not class-leading, with some citing 30 ft and others noting newer units closer to 25 ft. Many owners explicitly wish for an extra 2 to 5 ft to reduce outlet switching.

Cord length is often listed as long (commonly cited as 30 ft), though at least one review suggests a shorter effective reach depending on how the cord is routed/managed. Overall, corded coverage is viewed as adequate to strong.

Cord management is generally manual wrap, and side routing can get in the way for some users. Multiple reviewers specifically wish for a retractable cord or better routing to reduce tangles during use.

Cord management gets mixed notes: some appreciate the overall reach, while others complain about hooks being stiff or the routing getting in the way of certain lift-off configurations.

The crevice tool and wand setup are repeatedly cited as effective for corners, baseboard gaps, vents, and furniture seams. Lighted wand configurations (when included) are viewed as especially helpful for seeing debris in tight crevices.

Crevice/groove pickup is frequently highlighted as a strength relative to some competitors, supported by test commentary and the usefulness of the integrated wand for hard-to-reach debris.

Swivel steering and cornering are frequently praised, especially on carpet, and many users describe a smooth glide. The most common handling negatives are top-heaviness, wrist/back strain for some users, and a tendency to tip when pulling on the hose during above-floor cleaning.

Maneuverability is often described as better than expected for its size, helped by swivel steering and a relatively light chassis. Still, some note it can feel dense/hefty in hand or less ideal in tight, low-clearance spaces.

Ease of use is generally rated high for standard upright floor cleaning due to swivel steering, strong pickup, and quick controls. Usability drops for some in lift-away and wand modes because of pod weight, tipping risk, and managing cord plus hose together.

Edge and baseboard cleaning is generally rated positively, with several reviewers noting it can run tight to baseboards. A few mention side-to-side asymmetry where one side cleans edges more effectively than the other, sometimes requiring extra passes.

Emptying is commonly described as quick and cleaner than many competitors, often via a bottom-drop mechanism and an additional top access point on some designs. While a few mention breakage or lid issues, the dominant theme is easy, low-mess dumping and less hair sticking inside.

No-touch / low-mess disposal is frequently cited as a major advantage. Several sources describe a bag release that reduces contact with dust and makes disposal quick and hygienic.

Filtration is consistently a standout: multiple test reviews emphasize sealed, HEPA-style filtration and strong containment, including smoke-test style demonstrations. Allergy-focused users frequently cite cleaner air and less dust blowback compared to alternatives.

Filtration and dust containment are repeatedly praised: sealed system language, HEPA-oriented bags/filters, and reduced dust exposure during disposal are common. This is positioned as a strong fit for allergy concerns.

The floorhead is widely viewed as strong on carpets and supported by helpful indicators and lighting in some reviews, but its low front lip and aggressive suction can create issues on hard floors and with large debris. A recurring complaint is the lack of true height adjustment, which can contribute to rug grabbing and, in some homes, wear on certain area rugs.

Carpet hair pickup is one of the strongest consensus positives, with multiple reviews describing major hair recovery even after other vacuums were used. This is frequently highlighted by multi-pet households and deep-clean comparisons against older machines.

Hair pickup on carpets is good overall, but multiple reviews note that hair can remain on or wrap around the brushroll, reducing the 'clean it and forget it' experience for heavy-shedding homes.

Hair pickup on hard floors varies widely. Some reviewers note it struggles to pull hair in with the main head on bare floors, while others report good results when using the dedicated hard-floor tool or adjusting settings appropriately.

Tangle resistance is inconsistent and highly hair-length dependent. Some reviewers describe acceptable real-world performance, while multiple others report long pet and human hair wrapping the brush roll and requiring scissors or manual cleaning, including a head-to-head test where it performed poorly on detangling.

Hair-wrap/tangle resistance is a consistent weak spot across several sources. Even when hair-focused branding is mentioned, reviewers still report wrap and that brushroll cleaning can be tedious.

Fine dust pickup on hard floors is often reported as good, with sand and powder-like debris generally handled well in tests. Some owners with grouted tile or tricky surfaces report needing multiple passes, indicating results can depend on floor texture and the chosen mode/tool.

Fine dust pickup on hard floors is described as decent but not class-leading; some sources report improved results with additional passes or technique, and a minority note dragging/pushing behavior in certain situations.

Large debris intake on hard floors is the most polarized performance area: some reviewers report no snowplowing and easy pickup of cereal and crumbs, while others (including a pro review) say it can push larger particles unless the dedicated hard-floor tool is used. Expect best results when using the correct attachment and surface setting.

Large debris intake on hard floors is generally good for the class, with some mention of larger debris handling aided by the floorhead/gate design. A few reviewers note occasional snowplow/drag or a couple pieces left behind on hard floors.

LED lighting is one of the most consistently praised features, with reviewers highlighting bright lights on the floorhead and, in many configurations, on the wand/handle for attachment use. Lights are frequently credited with revealing dirt that would otherwise be missed.

Headlights/LEDs are consistently noted as a helpful usability feature for spotting debris in dim areas, and reviewers generally treat them as a meaningful perk at this price level.

Hose length is a frequent complaint: multiple reviewers describe it as short and not very extendable, making high-reach cleaning harder without moving the base. The lift-away pod helps compensate but shifts the burden to carrying the pod during above-floor cleaning.

Hose length/behavior is inconsistent across sources. Some mention long reach, while a technician-style review calls the hose short, stiff, and prone to tipping/pulling the unit, which can hurt real-world above-floor ergonomics.

Low-profile reach is a common limitation. Multiple sources note it can be tricky under low furniture, and the overall body shape/positioning can restrict access compared with more under-furniture-focused designs.

Routine maintenance is generally considered manageable, with washable filters and accessible components emphasized in multiple reviews. The biggest maintenance pain point is brush-roll hair removal, which can range from occasional to frequent depending on hair length and pet load.

Maintenance is shaped by the bagged system (cleaner disposal) but complicated by brushroll hair wrap and, for some, finicky small mechanisms. Several reviewers flag brushroll cleaning as annoying or difficult.

Noise impressions skew positive for an upright: several reviews call it quieter than some competing uprights and certain Dyson models. It is still commonly acknowledged as not truly quiet, especially under high-suction carpet modes.

Noise impressions vary. Some sources call it quieter than certain competitors or surprisingly reasonable for performance, while at least one review describes it as loud during testing. Overall it lands around mid-pack rather than ultra-quiet.

Onboard storage is often described as limited, commonly holding only a couple of tools on the body. Several reviewers mention tools falling off or needing a separate bag/caddy for the remaining accessories.

Onboard tool storage is mentioned positively by some as convenient, but criticized by at least one reviewer who reports tools not locking well and being easy to knock off, implying variability by model and expectations.

Ongoing costs are a recurring tradeoff: bags (and some filters) add ownership expense over time. Multiple sources frame this as the main downside versus bagless convenience, even if disposal is cleaner.

Longevity reports are mixed: many owners claim multi-year service (often 5 to 10+ years) and repeat purchases, while others report earlier failures such as hose splitting, dust cup/lid breakage, or brush-motor issues. Overall durability seems highly dependent on usage intensity and hair load.

No summary yet.

Packaging is usually described as adequate to good, especially when double-boxed, but there are notable complaints about missing parts in used or open-box purchases. When fully complete, kits often include bags or caddies that help keep accessories organized.

Most reviewers frame the NV752 as a strong pet-home upright thanks to deep carpet cleaning, a pet-focused tool set, and sealed filtration. The main drawbacks for pet owners are brush-roll hair wrap on long hair and mixed performance from some air-powered pet tools depending on the included version.

Value is commonly rated high: many compare it favorably to more expensive Dysons, citing similar cleaning results at a lower price. Detractors argue that missing accessories, short hose/cord, and hair-wrap maintenance reduce the value proposition for their specific homes.

Value is generally described as strong for a bagged upright with these features, especially when priced under typical premium uprights. However, some reviewers argue the value depends heavily on sale pricing and expectations around build/tool refinement.

The self-propelled or drive-assist feel is widely mentioned as making carpet cleaning faster and easier. Some users love it, while others find it overly aggressive, describing the vacuum as pulling forward or being difficult to control in tight spaces.

Stair cleaning is frequently called out as easier than typical uprights because Lift-Away lets users bring suction and tools to the stairs without moving the full base. The main limitation is the weight of the pod during longer stair sessions.

Stair cleaning benefits from the lift-off/lift-up pod concept, and several reviewers like the idea for above-floor work. A technician-style review warns the short/stiff hose and stability can make stairs feel awkward in practice.

Storage footprint is often described as reasonable for a full-size upright, but stability is inconsistent: several users call it top-heavy and prone to tipping when using the hose or lift-away in certain configurations. Some mitigate this by using the caddy or carrying the pod during above-floor cleaning.

Across reviews and test-style videos, the NV752 is repeatedly described as very high suction with strong airflow (often measured in the low-to-mid 20 kPa range). A recurring theme is that suction can feel almost too strong on small rugs and some attachment use-cases.

Strong suction is a recurring theme, including measured airflow/suction reporting and subjective comments about a solid carpet seal and strong pickup. Some sources note strong head performance versus similarly priced uprights, though a few mention limits on hard floors or thick carpet push resistance tied to high suction.

Multiple reviews (including professional cleaners and heavy pet households) describe it as a capable workhorse for deep cleaning and high hair load. The main heavy-duty downsides are frequent bin emptying in extreme pet homes and brush-roll hair maintenance.

Support experiences vary widely. Some reviewers report helpful troubleshooting and reasonable parts discounts, while others describe warranty gaps (especially around brush-head components) and a frustrating parts/coverage process.

Tool swaps and mode changes are generally described as button-driven and quick, with the wand and pod detaching cleanly. A minority of users find handling awkward when they must carry the pod while using attachments, which can reduce the perceived simplicity.

Tool-change is generally described as straightforward (quick-release wand/tools), though a few sources mention a learning curve for reseating the wand/bag mechanism or frustration with attachment retention.

Under-furniture pickup is repeatedly praised as a core benefit of the Powered Lift-Away design, enabling flatter reach under beds and many couches without losing powered-head performance. A few users still report limitations under very low-clearance furniture, but overall sentiment is strongly positive.

Above-floor cleaning is often praised when using the wand and upholstery tools, especially for couches, pet beds, and car interiors. Performance varies by included pet tool version: motorized tools are usually applauded, while air-powered tools sometimes stall or collect hair on their rollers.

Above-floor and upholstery cleaning is generally described as a strong use case thanks to included tools (e.g., upholstery brushes/turbo tools/pet tools on some kits) and the detachable pod, though tool fit/retention quality is disputed by at least one reviewer.

Versatility is a major strength: reviews repeatedly emphasize moving between upright cleaning, lift-away pod use, and wand/attachment work for stairs, upholstery, ceilings, and under-furniture cleaning. The tradeoff is that full versatility sometimes requires carrying the pod and managing cord and hose together.

No summary yet.

Most reviews place weight around 15 to 16 lb and call it heavy or top-heavy, particularly for users with back or wrist sensitivity. Many also note the self-propelled feel helps offset pushing effort during carpet cleaning.

Weight is commonly reported around the mid-teens (about 14 lb) in some reviews, but other sources describe it as heavier/dense or cite higher numbers for certain variants. Perceived carrying comfort can vary, especially on stairs.