Compare Shark Rotator Powered Lift-Away Upright Vacuum, NV752 vs Simplicity Vacuums Allergy Upright Vacuum, S20EZM

Most reviews highlight a strong accessory bundle (crevice, upholstery tools, dusting variants, and often hard-floor and pet tools), plus the option of a caddy on some kits. Complaints focus on missing or downgraded accessories in some packages, limited included brushes, and frustration sourcing compatible add-ons.

Included tools are usually described as basic but useful (commonly crevice and a combo dusting/upholstery tool). Several reviewers want a wider or softer dusting tool, and some add aftermarket pet or specialty attachments.

Design feedback is generally positive, with some reviewers calling the finish modern and attractive. A few owners describe the look as dated or purely utilitarian, but aesthetics rarely impact overall satisfaction compared to performance factors.

A few comments call the vacuum simple, clean, or stylish, while others dislike cosmetic choices or mention broken trim/cover parts that are mostly aesthetic.

Airflow blowback or scatter is specifically mentioned on hard floors by some users, including reports of particles being thrown back toward feet during use.

Area rug handling is frequently described as challenging on smaller or lighter rugs due to strong suction, with reports of bunching, stalling, or difficulty pulling backward. Heavier rugs tend to fare better, and using the high-pile/area-rug setting improves usability but does not eliminate the issue.

Area rug handling depends heavily on height setting and rug type. Some owners say it works well when adjusted up; others say it can grab edges, chew bindings, or feel too aggressive on certain rugs.

Assembly is widely described as fast and straightforward, with parts clicking into place cleanly. Unboxing-style reviews often highlight that setup can be done in minutes without special tools.

Assembly is repeatedly described as simple and quick, typically sliding in the handle and attaching the hose, with minimal screws.

Several reviews describe protective shutoff behavior or clear warning indicators when the brush stops or a clog occurs, helping prevent belt damage or overheating. Users who encounter clogs often resolve them by clearing hair/string from the brush roll and obstructions from internal pathways.

The bag-full indicator is viewed as helpful when present, but at least one owner reports it failing to reset after changing bags.

The bagless dust cup is described as convenient, but capacity is debated: some call it large for longer sessions, while others say usable volume feels smaller than expected (especially in heavy pet homes). Many agree the shape helps collect a lot quickly, which can mean frequent emptying when tackling deep-clean jobs.

The bagged system is a major selling point: owners like cleaner disposal, consistent suction, and less dust exposure than bagless designs. Bag capacity is often praised, but replacement cost and bag consumption (especially with heavy shedding or wool rugs) are frequent notes.

Build quality sentiment is mixed: many describe solid plastics and secure connections (sometimes noting a metal wand), while others cite flimsy-feeling latches, hose cracking over time, or dust-cup component breakage. Overall impressions range from sturdy workhorse to cost-optimized in specific parts.

Build quality feedback is polarized: some praise sturdy materials (metal brush roll, aluminum wand, rubber bumpers), while others report cheap-feeling plastics, wobble, broken handles/covers, or hose issues over time.

High-pile carpet performance is generally rated strong when using the high-pile/area-rug setting, and many reviewers highlight effective pet hair removal. Some also report the lack of height adjustment and strong suction can cause rug grabbing, carpet seam lift, or long-term wear on certain rugs.

High-pile carpet performance is generally strong due to agitation and height settings, but some users find it hard to push or overly aggressive if set too low.

Low-pile carpet pickup is consistently strong, with many reviewers describing one-pass improvement and deep debris recovery compared to prior vacuums. The main drawback in low-pile settings is that strong suction can make backward pulls feel like a workout for some users.

Low-pile carpet results are typically positive, especially for everyday pickup and pet hair, though pushing effort can increase if suction is high and height is set low.

Medium-pile carpet performance is consistently strong in both subjective impressions and structured pickup tests, with many reviewers describing visibly revived carpets. Some note that the unit may require multiple passes for very heavy debris loads, but overall effectiveness remains a key selling point.

Medium-pile carpet cleaning is consistently praised, with multiple reports of lifting matted carpet and pulling embedded dirt and pet hair that previous vacuums missed.

Clogging reports are mixed: several reviewers note it can power through messy tests and does not easily choke on typical carpet debris, but others report hair/dirt buildup in the floorhead and occasional clogs in pet tools. Users who maintain filters and clear hair from the brush roll report smoother ongoing performance.

Some owners mention clogs or brush/belt issues that require disassembly, while others highlight visible clog indicators and easy access to the roller area for checks.

Comparisons commonly position the NV752 as competitive with pricier Dyson uprights on carpet while offering more configuration flexibility. In head-to-head pet-hair testing, some competitors outperform it on anti-tangle and certain upholstery tool behavior, while the Shark often wins on filtration and hard-floor behavior versus kickback-prone designs.

Comparisons are common: many say it out-cleans certain Sharks/Dysons on carpet and pet hair, while at least one comparison favors a premium canister for ease and deep extraction despite higher upkeep.

Controls on the handle and a three-surface selector are frequently praised as convenient and intuitive. The most common control-related complaints are the lack of fine-grained suction/height adjustment and, in a few cases, a power button that feels finicky or hard to press.

Controls are usually described as straightforward, with height adjustment settings that are easy to use. The foot pedal placement is occasionally criticized for accidental shutoffs when bumping furniture.

Powered Lift-Away is repeatedly cited as the core differentiator: it enables cleaning under beds and furniture while keeping the powered head active, and it improves stair cleaning compared to standard uprights. The main downside is that the detached pod can feel heavy to carry during extended above-floor sessions.

Cord length is commonly described as usable but not class-leading, with some citing 30 ft and others noting newer units closer to 25 ft. Many owners explicitly wish for an extra 2 to 5 ft to reduce outlet switching.

Cord length perception varies: several reviewers call it long enough (often cited as 30 ft), while others say it is shorter than expected and requires frequent outlet changes in larger spaces.

Cord management is generally manual wrap, and side routing can get in the way for some users. Multiple reviewers specifically wish for a retractable cord or better routing to reduce tangles during use.

Cord wrap is often praised as neat and practical, but multiple users wish for a retractable cord for convenience and to reduce cord management hassles.

The crevice tool and wand setup are repeatedly cited as effective for corners, baseboard gaps, vents, and furniture seams. Lighted wand configurations (when included) are viewed as especially helpful for seeing debris in tight crevices.

Swivel steering and cornering are frequently praised, especially on carpet, and many users describe a smooth glide. The most common handling negatives are top-heaviness, wrist/back strain for some users, and a tendency to tip when pulling on the hose during above-floor cleaning.

Ease of use is generally rated high for standard upright floor cleaning due to swivel steering, strong pickup, and quick controls. Usability drops for some in lift-away and wand modes because of pod weight, tipping risk, and managing cord plus hose together.

Day-to-day use is often described as simple and satisfying on carpet, but usability drops for some due to weight when carrying, strong pull on thick carpet, short hose frustrations, or brush roll behavior during hose use.

Edge and baseboard cleaning is generally rated positively, with several reviewers noting it can run tight to baseboards. A few mention side-to-side asymmetry where one side cleans edges more effectively than the other, sometimes requiring extra passes.

Edge and baseboard cleaning is highlighted positively by some owners, while others still avoid edges on delicate rugs due to brush aggression.

Emptying is commonly described as quick and cleaner than many competitors, often via a bottom-drop mechanism and an additional top access point on some designs. While a few mention breakage or lid issues, the dominant theme is easy, low-mess dumping and less hair sticking inside.

Filtration is consistently a standout: multiple test reviews emphasize sealed, HEPA-style filtration and strong containment, including smoke-test style demonstrations. Allergy-focused users frequently cite cleaner air and less dust blowback compared to alternatives.

Filtration is a standout: multiple reviews highlight HEPA-style bags and filters, strong dust containment, and noticeable allergy relief versus bagless vacuums.

The floorhead is widely viewed as strong on carpets and supported by helpful indicators and lighting in some reviews, but its low front lip and aggressive suction can create issues on hard floors and with large debris. A recurring complaint is the lack of true height adjustment, which can contribute to rug grabbing and, in some homes, wear on certain area rugs.

The floorhead/brush system is powerful but divisive. Many emphasize strong agitation and carpet grooming; many also complain the brush roll runs continuously and can be too aggressive on hard floors and some rugs.

Carpet hair pickup is one of the strongest consensus positives, with multiple reviews describing major hair recovery even after other vacuums were used. This is frequently highlighted by multi-pet households and deep-clean comparisons against older machines.

Hair pickup on hard floors varies widely. Some reviewers note it struggles to pull hair in with the main head on bare floors, while others report good results when using the dedicated hard-floor tool or adjusting settings appropriately.

Tangle resistance is inconsistent and highly hair-length dependent. Some reviewers describe acceptable real-world performance, while multiple others report long pet and human hair wrapping the brush roll and requiring scissors or manual cleaning, including a head-to-head test where it performed poorly on detangling.

Fine dust pickup on hard floors is often reported as good, with sand and powder-like debris generally handled well in tests. Some owners with grouted tile or tricky surfaces report needing multiple passes, indicating results can depend on floor texture and the chosen mode/tool.

Hard-floor fine dust pickup is inconsistent: some users report very clean results, while others say the brush roll and airflow can scatter particles or require switching to other vacuums for hard floors.

Large debris intake on hard floors is the most polarized performance area: some reviewers report no snowplowing and easy pickup of cereal and crumbs, while others (including a pro review) say it can push larger particles unless the dedicated hard-floor tool is used. Expect best results when using the correct attachment and surface setting.

Large debris intake on hard floors gets mixed feedback, including complaints about litter or particles being thrown back during use in some homes.

LED lighting is one of the most consistently praised features, with reviewers highlighting bright lights on the floorhead and, in many configurations, on the wand/handle for attachment use. Lights are frequently credited with revealing dirt that would otherwise be missed.

The headlight is frequently mentioned as useful for spotting debris, though at least one owner questions bulb longevity and whether the lights are true LEDs.

Hose length is a frequent complaint: multiple reviewers describe it as short and not very extendable, making high-reach cleaning harder without moving the base. The lift-away pod helps compensate but shifts the burden to carrying the pod during above-floor cleaning.

Reach is a frequent theme: some are happy with the wand/hose extension for corners and drapes, while others say the permanently attached hose feels too short and can tug the vacuum toward them.

Routine maintenance is generally considered manageable, with washable filters and accessible components emphasized in multiple reviews. The biggest maintenance pain point is brush-roll hair removal, which can range from occasional to frequent depending on hair length and pet load.

Maintenance expectations are higher than some modern uprights: multiple owners mention periodic belt changes and watching filters/bags, and a few report recurring belt or brush issues.

Handling is mixed: some call it easy to maneuver with good wheel roll and a small footprint, while others find it awkward to lift onto steps, hard to push on thick carpet, or unstable/wobbly when parked.

Noise impressions skew positive for an upright: several reviews call it quieter than some competing uprights and certain Dyson models. It is still commonly acknowledged as not truly quiet, especially under high-suction carpet modes.

Noise is a common downside. Many describe it as loud, though a few say the tone is acceptable or less irritating than other vacuums.

Onboard storage is often described as limited, commonly holding only a couple of tools on the body. Several reviewers mention tools falling off or needing a separate bag/caddy for the remaining accessories.

Onboard tool storage is commonly praised as convenient and secure, helping reduce lost tools and making quick transitions easier.

Ongoing costs are mostly about bags and periodic belts/filters. Many accept the trade for cleaner disposal and better dust control, but some find OEM bags or add-on tools expensive.

Longevity reports are mixed: many owners claim multi-year service (often 5 to 10+ years) and repeat purchases, while others report earlier failures such as hose splitting, dust cup/lid breakage, or brush-motor issues. Overall durability seems highly dependent on usage intensity and hair load.

Longevity reports are split: some claim many years across prior Simplicity units and expect long service due to replaceable parts, while others report failures around 1 to 2 years, frequent belt breaks, or brush/motor issues.

Packaging is usually described as adequate to good, especially when double-boxed, but there are notable complaints about missing parts in used or open-box purchases. When fully complete, kits often include bags or caddies that help keep accessories organized.

Most reviewers frame the NV752 as a strong pet-home upright thanks to deep carpet cleaning, a pet-focused tool set, and sealed filtration. The main drawbacks for pet owners are brush-roll hair wrap on long hair and mixed performance from some air-powered pet tools depending on the included version.

Pet owners frequently praise strong pickup on carpet and reduced lingering hair. A few reports note limitations for long hair on upholstery or brush/belt strain in heavy pet homes.

Value is commonly rated high: many compare it favorably to more expensive Dysons, citing similar cleaning results at a lower price. Detractors argue that missing accessories, short hose/cord, and hair-wrap maintenance reduce the value proposition for their specific homes.

Value is usually rated positively for a bagged HEPA-style upright, with several reviewers calling it worth the money. Some disagree when durability or repair frequency becomes an issue.

The self-propelled or drive-assist feel is widely mentioned as making carpet cleaning faster and easier. Some users love it, while others find it overly aggressive, describing the vacuum as pulling forward or being difficult to control in tight spaces.

Some users describe a powered-assist or self-propel-like feel, while others explicitly wish it were self-propelled, especially as they age or when cleaning thick carpet.

Stair cleaning is frequently called out as easier than typical uprights because Lift-Away lets users bring suction and tools to the stairs without moving the full base. The main limitation is the weight of the pod during longer stair sessions.

Stair cleaning is supported via hose/tools and at least one stair-focused attachment mention, but carrying weight and hose tug can make stair work more demanding for some users.

Storage footprint is often described as reasonable for a full-size upright, but stability is inconsistent: several users call it top-heavy and prone to tipping when using the hose or lift-away in certain configurations. Some mitigate this by using the caddy or carrying the pod during above-floor cleaning.

Several reviewers like the compact footprint and storage friendliness, especially for apartments and tight spaces. Upright stability is occasionally criticized due to wobble or center-of-gravity comments.

Across reviews and test-style videos, the NV752 is repeatedly described as very high suction with strong airflow (often measured in the low-to-mid 20 kPa range). A recurring theme is that suction can feel almost too strong on small rugs and some attachment use-cases.

Suction is consistently described as strong, often the primary reason people keep the vacuum. A minority say it is good but not on par with their best prior vacuum, or that strong suction can increase push effort.

Multiple reviews (including professional cleaners and heavy pet households) describe it as a capable workhorse for deep cleaning and high hair load. The main heavy-duty downsides are frequent bin emptying in extreme pet homes and brush-roll hair maintenance.

Support experiences vary widely. Some reviewers report helpful troubleshooting and reasonable parts discounts, while others describe warranty gaps (especially around brush-head components) and a frustrating parts/coverage process.

Support experiences are mixed but lean positive in key stories, including at least one report of a quick refund after failure. Others report difficulty reaching customer service or post-warranty parts frustration.

Tool swaps and mode changes are generally described as button-driven and quick, with the wand and pod detaching cleanly. A minority of users find handling awkward when they must carry the pod while using attachments, which can reduce the perceived simplicity.

Tool changes are usually straightforward, especially with the telescoping wand. Compatibility with older hoses or certain attachments is a reported pain point for some owners.

Under-furniture pickup is repeatedly praised as a core benefit of the Powered Lift-Away design, enabling flatter reach under beds and many couches without losing powered-head performance. A few users still report limitations under very low-clearance furniture, but overall sentiment is strongly positive.

Above-floor cleaning is often praised when using the wand and upholstery tools, especially for couches, pet beds, and car interiors. Performance varies by included pet tool version: motorized tools are usually applauded, while air-powered tools sometimes stall or collect hair on their rollers.

Above-floor cleaning is generally strong with the wand and crevice tool, but upholstery performance is mixed, including complaints about long pet hair on couches and limited included fabric tools.

Versatility is a major strength: reviews repeatedly emphasize moving between upright cleaning, lift-away pod use, and wand/attachment work for stairs, upholstery, ceilings, and under-furniture cleaning. The tradeoff is that full versatility sometimes requires carrying the pod and managing cord and hose together.

Most reviews place weight around 15 to 16 lb and call it heavy or top-heavy, particularly for users with back or wrist sensitivity. Many also note the self-propelled feel helps offset pushing effort during carpet cleaning.

Weight impressions vary but cluster around sturdy and somewhat heavy. Many say it feels fine while pushing, but heavier when carrying up stairs or doing repeated back-and-forth on thick carpet.

Wool and delicate rug compatibility is a concern in the reviews: some users report damage to a rug or needing to avoid edges, and others note wool rugs fill bags quickly even when they like the cleaning result.