Compare Shark Rotator Powered Lift-Away Upright Vacuum, NV752 vs Kenmore Featherlite Lift-Up Vacuum

Most reviews highlight a strong accessory bundle (crevice, upholstery tools, dusting variants, and often hard-floor and pet tools), plus the option of a caddy on some kits. Complaints focus on missing or downgraded accessories in some packages, limited included brushes, and frustration sourcing compatible add-ons.

It ships with a small but useful tool set (typically an upholstery tool and a multi-use 3-in-1/crevice-style tool). Reviewers generally describe the accessories as decent and sturdy rather than extensive.

Design feedback is generally positive, with some reviewers calling the finish modern and attractive. A few owners describe the look as dated or purely utilitarian, but aesthetics rarely impact overall satisfaction compared to performance factors.

Area rug handling is frequently described as challenging on smaller or lighter rugs due to strong suction, with reports of bunching, stalling, or difficulty pulling backward. Heavier rugs tend to fare better, and using the high-pile/area-rug setting improves usability but does not eliminate the issue.

It includes a suction adjustment intended for thicker rugs or high-pile carpet, which can help prevent the head from feeling stuck. Direct high-pile performance testing is limited in these reviews, but the feature is viewed as useful.

Assembly is widely described as fast and straightforward, with parts clicking into place cleanly. Unboxing-style reviews often highlight that setup can be done in minutes without special tools.

Assembly is consistently described as quick and simple, usually involving snapping the handle, hose, and wand into place. Packaging includes instructions, but many reviewers say it is self-explanatory.

Several reviews describe protective shutoff behavior or clear warning indicators when the brush stops or a clog occurs, helping prevent belt damage or overheating. Users who encounter clogs often resolve them by clearing hair/string from the brush roll and obstructions from internal pathways.

The bagless dust cup is described as convenient, but capacity is debated: some call it large for longer sessions, while others say usable volume feels smaller than expected (especially in heavy pet homes). Many agree the shape helps collect a lot quickly, which can mean frequent emptying when tackling deep-clean jobs.

Bagless dustbin design with washable filters is a consistent theme. Capacity is described as adequate but sometimes smaller than competitors, while removal and reattachment are generally easy.

Build quality sentiment is mixed: many describe solid plastics and secure connections (sometimes noting a metal wand), while others cite flimsy-feeling latches, hose cracking over time, or dust-cup component breakage. Overall impressions range from sturdy workhorse to cost-optimized in specific parts.

Several hands-on reviewers describe the plastics and overall build as solid for a budget vacuum. At the same time, long-term wear is not well documented, so durability confidence is good but not definitive.

High-pile carpet performance is generally rated strong when using the high-pile/area-rug setting, and many reviewers highlight effective pet hair removal. Some also report the lack of height adjustment and strong suction can cause rug grabbing, carpet seam lift, or long-term wear on certain rugs.

Low-pile carpet pickup is consistently strong, with many reviewers describing one-pass improvement and deep debris recovery compared to prior vacuums. The main drawback in low-pile settings is that strong suction can make backward pulls feel like a workout for some users.

Medium-pile carpet performance is consistently strong in both subjective impressions and structured pickup tests, with many reviewers describing visibly revived carpets. Some note that the unit may require multiple passes for very heavy debris loads, but overall effectiveness remains a key selling point.

Carpet deep-cleaning is a highlight in multiple tests, including perfect or near-top results when pulling embedded sand from medium-pile carpet. Even more critical reviewers still describe carpet performance as slightly above average rather than poor.

Clogging reports are mixed: several reviewers note it can power through messy tests and does not easily choke on typical carpet debris, but others report hair/dirt buildup in the floorhead and occasional clogs in pet tools. Users who maintain filters and clear hair from the brush roll report smoother ongoing performance.

Reviewers often note an open airflow path and dustbin layout that helps prevent clogs. Hair and debris generally make it into the bin without frequent blockage, even though the brushroll may wrap long strands.

Comparisons commonly position the NV752 as competitive with pricier Dyson uprights on carpet while offering more configuration flexibility. In head-to-head pet-hair testing, some competitors outperform it on anti-tangle and certain upholstery tool behavior, while the Shark often wins on filtration and hard-floor behavior versus kickback-prone designs.

In head-to-head discussions, it is often positioned as a direct competitor to Shark Navigator-style uprights and sometimes preferred for hard-floor pickup. Premium uprights still win on sealing, crevice work, and sometimes overall refinement, and one lab review preferred the Shark Navigator at a similar price.

Controls on the handle and a three-surface selector are frequently praised as convenient and intuitive. The most common control-related complaints are the lack of fine-grained suction/height adjustment and, in a few cases, a power button that feels finicky or hard to press.

Controls are straightforward: floor mode selection (hard floor vs carpet), brushroll on/off behavior, and in some reviews a suction adjustment for thicker rugs. A few reviewers note performance depends on having the correct setting selected.

Powered Lift-Away is repeatedly cited as the core differentiator: it enables cleaning under beds and furniture while keeping the powered head active, and it improves stair cleaning compared to standard uprights. The main downside is that the detached pod can feel heavy to carry during extended above-floor sessions.

The lift-up canister design is a major differentiator: multiple reviewers demonstrate detaching the canister for above-floor cleaning with the hose and tools. One lab review downplays the lift-away usefulness, so portability is helpful but not identical to premium lift-away systems.

Cord length is commonly described as usable but not class-leading, with some citing 30 ft and others noting newer units closer to 25 ft. Many owners explicitly wish for an extra 2 to 5 ft to reduce outlet switching.

Cord length is typically cited around 25 feet, which is usable but not class-leading. Some owners still find it longer than older vacuums and say it reduces outlet switching.

It is a corded upright, so it will not match the grab-and-go convenience of cordless sticks. One reviewer explicitly mentions returning to a cord as the main annoyance, though good cord management reduces the friction.

Cord management is generally manual wrap, and side routing can get in the way for some users. Multiple reviewers specifically wish for a retractable cord or better routing to reduce tangles during use.

Cord management gets positive notes thanks to a simple hook that keeps the cord out of your feet while vacuuming. It is not a cordless experience, but it reduces tangles and trip hazards.

The crevice tool and wand setup are repeatedly cited as effective for corners, baseboard gaps, vents, and furniture seams. Lighted wand configurations (when included) are viewed as especially helpful for seeing debris in tight crevices.

Crevice and tight-groove pickup is a consistent weak spot, with multiple tests showing below-average results when extracting sand or grit from cracks. If deep crevice detailing is a priority, this is the most repeated limitation.

Swivel steering and cornering are frequently praised, especially on carpet, and many users describe a smooth glide. The most common handling negatives are top-heaviness, wrist/back strain for some users, and a tendency to tip when pulling on the hose during above-floor cleaning.

A two-motor system is claimed in at least one comparison review and is presented as part of its deep-cleaning capability. Regardless of motor configuration, reviewers often report strong carpet results for the price.

Ease of use is generally rated high for standard upright floor cleaning due to swivel steering, strong pickup, and quick controls. Usability drops for some in lift-away and wand modes because of pod weight, tipping risk, and managing cord plus hose together.

Ease of use is praised heavily by some testers who call it one of the most ergonomic vacuums they have used. A lab review scored it below average for ease of use, suggesting the experience can vary, but most casual reviewers find it simple and comfortable.

Edge and baseboard cleaning is generally rated positively, with several reviewers noting it can run tight to baseboards. A few mention side-to-side asymmetry where one side cleans edges more effectively than the other, sometimes requiring extra passes.

Edge cleaning is described as a strength in at least one detailed comparison, where it performed near the top at picking debris close to walls. This is not a heavily discussed category elsewhere, but the available evidence is favorable.

Emptying is commonly described as quick and cleaner than many competitors, often via a bottom-drop mechanism and an additional top access point on some designs. While a few mention breakage or lid issues, the dominant theme is easy, low-mess dumping and less hair sticking inside.

Emptying is usually simple via a button release, and several reviewers say the bin design keeps mess and clogging manageable. Some note the bin is not huge, but day-to-day dumping is easy.

Filtration is consistently a standout: multiple test reviews emphasize sealed, HEPA-style filtration and strong containment, including smoke-test style demonstrations. Allergy-focused users frequently cite cleaner air and less dust blowback compared to alternatives.

Repeatedly highlighted as having sealed HEPA/anti-allergen filtration that helps keep fine dust and pet dander contained instead of blowing back into the room. This is considered a standout feature for the price tier.

The floorhead is widely viewed as strong on carpets and supported by helpful indicators and lighting in some reviews, but its low front lip and aggressive suction can create issues on hard floors and with large debris. A recurring complaint is the lack of true height adjustment, which can contribute to rug grabbing and, in some homes, wear on certain area rugs.

The floorhead uses relatively large intake gates and a compact/narrow head, which helps it swallow a wide range of debris sizes and reach tighter areas. The same design can reduce sealing pressure, which affects detail pickup.

Several reviews describe a decent hard-floor seal aided by a fabric squeegee, reducing scatter compared with some rivals. Still, the seal is not consistently tight across all surfaces, aligning with weaker crevice results and mixed hard-floor outcomes in some testing.

Carpet hair pickup is one of the strongest consensus positives, with multiple reviews describing major hair recovery even after other vacuums were used. This is frequently highlighted by multi-pet households and deep-clean comparisons against older machines.

Pet hair on carpet is one of the strongest categories, with one lab test measuring roughly mid-90 percent removal and other reviewers describing near-perfect results. This is a key reason it is recommended for pet homes.

Hair pickup on hard floors varies widely. Some reviewers note it struggles to pull hair in with the main head on bare floors, while others report good results when using the dedicated hard-floor tool or adjusting settings appropriately.

Hard-floor hair pickup is generally reported as strong, especially when the brushroll is allowed to run to grab strands. Some users choose to keep the carpet setting on hard floors specifically to improve hair pickup.

Tangle resistance is inconsistent and highly hair-length dependent. Some reviewers describe acceptable real-world performance, while multiple others report long pet and human hair wrapping the brush roll and requiring scissors or manual cleaning, including a head-to-head test where it performed poorly on detangling.

Most reviewers report that long human hair can wrap around the brushroll and requires manual removal, making anti-tangle performance below average. A minority opinion claims it handles tangles well, but the dominant theme is that hair wrap is a regular maintenance task.

Fine dust pickup on hard floors is often reported as good, with sand and powder-like debris generally handled well in tests. Some owners with grouted tile or tricky surfaces report needing multiple passes, indicating results can depend on floor texture and the chosen mode/tool.

Large debris intake on hard floors is the most polarized performance area: some reviewers report no snowplowing and easy pickup of cereal and crumbs, while others (including a pro review) say it can push larger particles unless the dedicated hard-floor tool is used. Expect best results when using the correct attachment and surface setting.

Hard-floor large-debris pickup is polarizing: multiple reviewers report excellent pickup with minimal snowplowing, while one lab review found it pushed cereal and scored poorly. Using the correct floor setting and the specific debris type being tested seem to drive the difference.

LED lighting is one of the most consistently praised features, with reviewers highlighting bright lights on the floorhead and, in many configurations, on the wand/handle for attachment use. Lights are frequently credited with revealing dirt that would otherwise be missed.

The floorhead LED is widely appreciated for spotting debris in dark rooms, under furniture, and at night. It is consistently treated as a practical, high-value feature.

Hose length is a frequent complaint: multiple reviewers describe it as short and not very extendable, making high-reach cleaning harder without moving the base. The lift-away pod helps compensate but shifts the burden to carrying the pod during above-floor cleaning.

Hose reach is a common complaint in at least one lab review, and specs cited elsewhere put it around the mid-single-digit feet range. It works for stairs and upholstery, but tall ceiling corners may feel limiting.

Routine maintenance is generally considered manageable, with washable filters and accessible components emphasized in multiple reviews. The biggest maintenance pain point is brush-roll hair removal, which can range from occasional to frequent depending on hair length and pet load.

Routine upkeep is manageable with washable filters and an easy-to-clean bin, but brushroll hair wrap can add regular maintenance. Expect periodic filter care plus occasional brushroll cutting for long hair.

Swivel steering, light carry weight, and balanced handling are repeatedly praised, especially for weaving around furniture. A lab reviewer still rated handling strong but felt it was less maneuverable than the very best premium uprights.

Noise impressions skew positive for an upright: several reviews call it quieter than some competing uprights and certain Dyson models. It is still commonly acknowledged as not truly quiet, especially under high-suction carpet modes.

Noise impressions are mixed: one comparison test measured it as relatively quiet around the low-80 dB range, while another measured it slightly louder than average. Overall it is moderate and rarely described as painfully loud.

Onboard storage is often described as limited, commonly holding only a couple of tools on the body. Several reviewers mention tools falling off or needing a separate bag/caddy for the remaining accessories.

Onboard tool storage is convenient, with accessories kept on the vacuum for quick access. This supports quick transitions between floor cleaning and above-floor detailing.

Because it is bagless and uses washable filters, owners can avoid recurring bag purchases and reduce routine costs. You will still have periodic filter replacement and brushroll cleaning as part of ownership.

Longevity reports are mixed: many owners claim multi-year service (often 5 to 10+ years) and repeat purchases, while others report earlier failures such as hose splitting, dust cup/lid breakage, or brush-motor issues. Overall durability seems highly dependent on usage intensity and hair load.

Overall sentiment is mostly enthusiastic, with several reviewers calling it a top budget upright and recommending it for everyday cleaning. The outlier is a lab-style review that does not recommend it due to average cleaning and hard-floor performance.

Packaging is usually described as adequate to good, especially when double-boxed, but there are notable complaints about missing parts in used or open-box purchases. When fully complete, kits often include bags or caddies that help keep accessories organized.

Packaging feedback is positive where mentioned, with parts arriving intact and well organized. No repeated complaints about broken pieces in transit appear in these reviews.

Most reviewers frame the NV752 as a strong pet-home upright thanks to deep carpet cleaning, a pet-focused tool set, and sealed filtration. The main drawbacks for pet owners are brush-roll hair wrap on long hair and mixed performance from some air-powered pet tools depending on the included version.

Multiple reviewers call it a strong budget pick for pet households thanks to sealed HEPA filtration and strong pet-hair pickup. The common pet-focused drawback is brushroll hair wrap when long hair is present.

Value is commonly rated high: many compare it favorably to more expensive Dysons, citing similar cleaning results at a lower price. Detractors argue that missing accessories, short hose/cord, and hair-wrap maintenance reduce the value proposition for their specific homes.

Most reviewers frame it as a high-value upright in the roughly 100 to 200 dollar range and a frequent budget-category winner. One lab-style review felt similarly priced competitors delivered better overall results, so value depends on your floor types and priorities.

The self-propelled or drive-assist feel is widely mentioned as making carpet cleaning faster and easier. Some users love it, while others find it overly aggressive, describing the vacuum as pulling forward or being difficult to control in tight spaces.

Stair cleaning is frequently called out as easier than typical uprights because Lift-Away lets users bring suction and tools to the stairs without moving the full base. The main limitation is the weight of the pod during longer stair sessions.

Lift-up style use can make stairs easier because the canister can be carried while using the hose and tools. However, one reviewer argues it is not a true lift-away experience, so expect some compromise compared with premium lift-away designs.

Storage footprint is often described as reasonable for a full-size upright, but stability is inconsistent: several users call it top-heavy and prone to tipping when using the hose or lift-away in certain configurations. Some mitigate this by using the caddy or carrying the pod during above-floor cleaning.

Across reviews and test-style videos, the NV752 is repeatedly described as very high suction with strong airflow (often measured in the low-to-mid 20 kPa range). A recurring theme is that suction can feel almost too strong on small rugs and some attachment use-cases.

Power is strong for the price in several independent tests, with above-average sealed suction reported, but airflow and unsealed suction can be merely average because the floorhead does not always form a tight seal.

Multiple reviews (including professional cleaners and heavy pet households) describe it as a capable workhorse for deep cleaning and high hair load. The main heavy-duty downsides are frequent bin emptying in extreme pet homes and brush-roll hair maintenance.

Support experiences vary widely. Some reviewers report helpful troubleshooting and reasonable parts discounts, while others describe warranty gaps (especially around brush-head components) and a frustrating parts/coverage process.

The biggest reliability note is that it is a relatively new model in the market, so long-term durability is less proven than long-running competitors. Reviewers who handled it often say it feels well made, but they still flag uncertainty about years-long ownership.

Hardwood-friendly operation is noted: the brushroll can stop or be turned off on hard floors to reduce scratching risk. This makes it safer for delicate surfaces when you use the correct mode.

Tool swaps and mode changes are generally described as button-driven and quick, with the wand and pod detaching cleanly. A minority of users find handling awkward when they must carry the pod while using attachments, which can reduce the perceived simplicity.

Under-furniture pickup is repeatedly praised as a core benefit of the Powered Lift-Away design, enabling flatter reach under beds and many couches without losing powered-head performance. A few users still report limitations under very low-clearance furniture, but overall sentiment is strongly positive.

The LED headlight and relatively low-profile reach are repeatedly cited as helpful for cleaning under furniture and in dim areas. This improves real-world usability even when overall pickup varies by surface.

Above-floor cleaning is often praised when using the wand and upholstery tools, especially for couches, pet beds, and car interiors. Performance varies by included pet tool version: motorized tools are usually applauded, while air-powered tools sometimes stall or collect hair on their rollers.

Above-floor cleaning is a strong use case thanks to the lift-up canister and included upholstery/crevice-style tools. Reviewers commonly use it for couches, corners, fans, and other hard-to-reach spots with good results.

Versatility is a major strength: reviews repeatedly emphasize moving between upright cleaning, lift-away pod use, and wand/attachment work for stairs, upholstery, ceilings, and under-furniture cleaning. The tradeoff is that full versatility sometimes requires carrying the pod and managing cord and hose together.

Most reviews emphasize versatility: it can switch between hard floors and carpets, detach for above-floor tasks, and use multiple tools. It is commonly positioned as a do-it-all budget upright rather than a single-purpose machine.

Most reviews place weight around 15 to 16 lb and call it heavy or top-heavy, particularly for users with back or wrist sensitivity. Many also note the self-propelled feel helps offset pushing effort during carpet cleaning.

Weight is a standout: reviewers repeatedly measure or cite roughly 11.6 to 12 pounds. This featherlight feel improves carry comfort, stair moves, and general maneuvering.