Compare Shark PowerDetect Upright Vacuum vs Kenmore Intuition Bagged Upright Vacuum

Included tools (crevice/duster, pet multi-tool, and a pet power brush) are repeatedly called useful for edges, upholstery, and tight spots. One review of the cordless ‘Clean and Empty’ variant said the attachment set felt minimal.

Accessories vary by model/package: multiple reviews highlight useful upholstery/pet tools and, in some versions, turbo tools. Value is higher when the kit includes more tools and extra bags, but quality/fit of tools is debated in at least one review.

Reviewers generally like the premium look (notably the purple colorway and metallic accents) and the clear dustbin design. Overall impressions skew toward a modern, ‘flagship’ finish.

Design/finish gets some positive mentions (e.g., sleek styling, chrome/rose-gold accents on certain versions). At least one reviewer considers it more utilitarian/old-school or bulky in practice.

The Detect system (floor type, dirt level, edge proximity, and direction sensing) is widely described as genuinely useful, automatically changing suction and brushroll behavior. There’s no app focus here—automation is built into the vacuum’s onboard sensors.

Debris scatter/blowback is generally low, and reviewers contrast it favorably against uprights that ‘shoot’ particles forward. Safety interlocks and DuoClean design help keep debris moving into the bin instead of back into the room.

Area rugs are handled well overall, but strong suction can tug on lightweight/thin rugs and may require extra passes for larger debris. Better results are reported on thicker or more stable rugs.

Assembly and setup are repeatedly described as fast and painless, typically taking only a few minutes. Most reviewers felt it was ready to use almost immediately.

Assembly is typically described as quick and easy, with straightforward snap-in steps and minimal setup time reported by at least one hands-on review.

One review notes a safety interlock: the vacuum won’t run until the hose is fully connected, which helps prevent accidental blowback or messy operation. This is a minor but appreciated safety/robustness detail.

A bag-full/level indicator is mentioned as a helpful convenience feature that reduces guesswork and prompts timely bag replacement to keep performance steady.

Only covered for the cordless variant: the detachable battery is convenient and supports long runtime on lower-power settings. High-power use shortens runtime substantially, as expected.

The bagless dustbin is described as large for an upright and easy to remove, with reported capacities varying by source (roughly 1.3–1.9 L / about 0.5 gal). The size reduces how often you need to empty it.

Bagged operation is a defining feature. Many reviewers like the cleaner disposal and note synthetic bags can maintain suction reasonably well, but bag capacity and sealing details are debated, and you must keep bags stocked.

Build quality is described as robust and heavy-duty, with materials that feel durable and designed for serious cleaning. The sturdy build contributes to its heavier weight.

Build quality feedback is split. Some reviews describe a well-designed, feature-rich product for the price, while a technician-style review calls materials and mechanisms cheap/chintzy and not up to older Kenmore expectations.

High-pile/plush carpet performance is more mixed: some reviewers still found strong cleaning, while at least one lab test measured below-average pickup compared with other top uprights. Homes dominated by plush carpet may want to compare alternatives.

High-pile/shag performance is described as strong by at least one test source, while other reviewers caution that very thick carpet can be harder to push due to no height adjustment and strong suction (mitigated by a suction release valve on some variants).

Low-pile carpet pickup is consistently strong, including embedded debris and hair, with some tests nearing ‘perfect’ results. It’s widely considered a dependable performer on common low/short carpet.

Low-pile carpet cleaning is widely described as excellent, with testing-focused sources reporting near-top collection results and strong single-pass pickup on typical debris.

Medium-pile carpet performance is generally strong, with some testing showing excellent deep-clean pickup. Most reviewers consider it effective on typical rugs and mid-pile carpet.

Medium-pile carpet deep-clean performance is repeatedly called out as a strength, including embedded sand/debris test outcomes described as top-tier.

Clogging resistance is generally good, but some testing noted debris clumping in the hose and fine sand accumulating on filters, which can reduce airflow until cleaned. A few mentions suggest keeping sensors/filters clean to avoid performance dips.

In comparisons, it’s often favored versus older Sharks and many uprights for its automation and overall pickup. A recurring nuance is that Shark’s Stratos can match or slightly beat it in certain sealed/crevice or plush-carpet scenarios, while PowerDetect wins on features.

Controls are described as straightforward, with clear mode buttons and helpful Detect-mode indicators that show when floors are clean/dirty. The cordless variant’s battery indicator is described as basic, but day-to-day operation is still simple.

The detachable pod (Lift-Away/Powered Lift-Away) is widely praised for turning the upright into a more flexible above-floor/under-furniture cleaner. This convertible design is a key differentiator versus basic uprights.

Corded versions are consistently listed around a 30‑ft cord, which most find sufficient. A few reviewers still wish it were longer for very large rooms.

Cord length is often listed as long (commonly cited as 30 ft), though at least one review suggests a shorter effective reach depending on how the cord is routed/managed. Overall, corded coverage is viewed as adequate to strong.

Only discussed in a review of the cordless PowerDetect ‘Clean and Empty’ variant, where cordless operation and quick maneuvering are highlighted as major benefits. It’s not relevant to corded upright-only use.

Cord management is a recurring nit: the cord can get in the way and is not retractable. Storage solutions help, but it still requires a bit of attention while cleaning.

Cord management gets mixed notes: some appreciate the overall reach, while others complain about hooks being stiff or the routing getting in the way of certain lift-off configurations.

Crevice and groove pickup is generally above average, but a few reviews say it’s not class-leading due to airflow/seal design that’s less concentrated than some competitors. It still performs well for typical cracks and edges.

Crevice/groove pickup is frequently highlighted as a strength relative to some competitors, supported by test commentary and the usefulness of the integrated wand for hard-to-reach debris.

Only discussed for the cordless Clean & Empty variant, where the auto-empty dock and large bagless container are highlighted as a major convenience. No long-term reliability issues are described in the review text.

Handling is frequently praised for responsive swivel steering and a balanced feel that helps it not ‘feel’ as heavy while pushing. Downsides include a bulky head, strong suction that can tug on thin rugs, and occasional threshold hiccups.

Maneuverability is often described as better than expected for its size, helped by swivel steering and a relatively light chassis. Still, some note it can feel dense/hefty in hand or less ideal in tight, low-clearance spaces.

Ease of use is generally high thanks to automation, clear controls, and a large bin. The main usability drawbacks are heft, bulky floorhead size in tight areas, and occasional hassle when changing configurations.

Edge cleaning is repeatedly called excellent; Edge Detect boosts suction at baseboards and corners, and one test rated edge pickup as perfect. This is one of the most consistently praised strengths.

Most reviewers find the bin easy to empty, but bottom-release designs can be messier than top-release systems and may put hands closer to debris. Auto-empty convenience is mentioned only for the cordless ‘Clean and Empty’ variant.

No-touch / low-mess disposal is frequently cited as a major advantage. Several sources describe a bag release that reduces contact with dust and makes disposal quick and hygienic.

Filtration and dust containment are a strong point, with a sealed system and HEPA filtration performing well in fog/particle tests. Reviewers often cite it as a good option for allergy-conscious homes.

Filtration and dust containment are repeatedly praised: sealed system language, HEPA-oriented bags/filters, and reduced dust exposure during disposal are common. This is positioned as a strong fit for allergy concerns.

The DuoClean dual-roller floorhead (soft roller + bristle/fin roller) and integrated sensors are praised for mixed-floor effectiveness and reduced scatter. Multiple reviewers also call the head bulky, which can limit tight-space access.

Several reviews suggest the seal/airflow isn’t as concentrated when fully sealed to the floor, which can slightly reduce deep-clean or crevice performance versus top competitors. The cordless variant also notes a squeegee design that can affect sealing.

Hair pickup on carpets is generally very good, particularly for pet hair on rugs. A few notes suggest extremely long hair can still wrap or require occasional roller checks.

Hair pickup on carpets is good overall, but multiple reviews note that hair can remain on or wrap around the brushroll, reducing the 'clean it and forget it' experience for heavy-shedding homes.

Hard-floor hair pickup is widely praised, with the soft roller helping lift hair without scattering. Reviewers regularly mention clean results with minimal push-around.

Anti-tangle performance is frequently highlighted as best-in-class, and many reviewers report little to no hair wrap. One test still saw some long hair wrapping, so it’s strong but not always 100% hands-off.

Hair-wrap/tangle resistance is a consistent weak spot across several sources. Even when hair-focused branding is mentioned, reviewers still report wrap and that brushroll cleaning can be tedious.

Fine-dust pickup on hard floors is consistently very strong, often near-perfect in tests. A nuance: fine sand can end up on filters in some scenarios, increasing cleanup/maintenance.

Fine dust pickup on hard floors is described as decent but not class-leading; some sources report improved results with additional passes or technique, and a minority note dragging/pushing behavior in certain situations.

Large-debris pickup on hard floors is generally excellent and tends to avoid scattering, helped by the soft front roller. One review found very large clusters sometimes need a second pass.

Large debris intake on hard floors is generally good for the class, with some mention of larger debris handling aided by the floorhead/gate design. A few reviewers note occasional snowplow/drag or a couple pieces left behind on hard floors.

Headlights and Detect-mode lighting are frequently praised for improving visibility and giving feedback while cleaning. Lighting is considered a meaningful usability feature rather than just cosmetic.

Headlights/LEDs are consistently noted as a helpful usability feature for spotting debris in dim areas, and reviewers generally treat them as a meaningful perk at this price level.

Hose reach is repeatedly criticized as short, limiting high-reach tasks (stairs, ceilings, tall shelving). It works for quick spot jobs, but it’s not an ideal ‘whole-house above-floor’ setup.

Hose length/behavior is inconsistent across sources. Some mention long reach, while a technician-style review calls the hose short, stiff, and prone to tipping/pulling the unit, which can hurt real-world above-floor ergonomics.

Reviewers often describe it as one of the most innovative, feature-rich uprights, driven by sensor-based automation and upgraded hair management. The smart behaviors are frequently cited as more than gimmicks.

Some reviewers note it can get low to the floor and reach under furniture better than many traditional uprights, especially when reconfigured into Lift-Away modes. This supports better access in low-clearance areas.

Low-profile reach is a common limitation. Multiple sources note it can be tricky under low furniture, and the overall body shape/positioning can restrict access compared with more under-furniture-focused designs.

Routine maintenance is mostly straightforward (empty bin, wash filters, wipe sensors), but at least one test found fine sand builds up on a foam filter and increases cleaning frequency. Odor cartridges are optional and removable.

Maintenance is shaped by the bagged system (cleaner disposal) but complicated by brushroll hair wrap and, for some, finicky small mechanisms. Several reviewers flag brushroll cleaning as annoying or difficult.

Noise is typically “upright-vac loud” rather than quiet, with measured levels ranging from the mid/upper‑60s into the 70s dB depending on mode. Detect/boost behavior can change the pitch and volume during use.

Noise impressions vary. Some sources call it quieter than certain competitors or surprisingly reasonable for performance, while at least one review describes it as loud during testing. Overall it lands around mid-pack rather than ultra-quiet.

The odor-neutralizer cartridge can leave a fresher scent, and some reviewers liked the effect. Others disliked the fragrance (described as overpowering) and removed the cartridge, so preferences vary.

Onboard tool storage is mentioned as a convenience feature, keeping key tools attached to the vacuum for quick swaps. This helps day-to-day usability.

Onboard tool storage is mentioned positively by some as convenient, but criticized by at least one reviewer who reports tools not locking well and being easy to knock off, implying variability by model and expectations.

Ongoing costs are generally low because it’s bagless; routine expenses are mainly filters and optional odor-neutralizer cartridges. One reviewer noted the odor cartridge lasts months and is inexpensive to replace.

Ongoing costs are a recurring tradeoff: bags (and some filters) add ownership expense over time. Multiple sources frame this as the main downside versus bagless convenience, even if disposal is cleaner.

Overall sentiment is strongly positive across sources, with Vacuum Wars naming it a top pick and several outlets calling it a standout upright. The most consistent criticisms are weight/bulk, short hose reach, and a few maintenance quirks (like sand on filters).

No summary yet.

Packaging is reported as well-protected, with sturdy inserts that keep parts secure in transit. Reviewers who mentioned it were happy with the condition on arrival.

Multiple reviews highlight pet-focused features: strong pet-hair pickup, anti-tangle brushroll performance, and included pet tools. Overall it’s positioned as a pet-friendly upright.

Most sources position it as a premium-priced flagship that feels worth it if you want top-tier performance and automation. Price-sensitive shoppers may find better value elsewhere unless it’s on sale.

Value is generally described as strong for a bagged upright with these features, especially when priced under typical premium uprights. However, some reviewers argue the value depends heavily on sale pricing and expectations around build/tool refinement.

Only mentioned for the cordless variant: reviewers estimate roughly 30–40 minutes in typical auto use and up to about an hour-plus on lower settings. Actual runtime varies with floor type and how often boost triggers. Only mentioned for the cordless variant: max/boost runtime is relatively short (around the low teens in minutes). It’s best treated as a spot-boost mode rather than a whole-home setting.

Lift-Away makes stair cleaning more practical than with a fixed-body upright, especially paired with the pet brush/crevice tool. That said, the unit’s overall weight is still a drawback if you carry it up and down frequently.

Stair cleaning benefits from the lift-off/lift-up pod concept, and several reviewers like the idea for above-floor work. A technician-style review warns the short/stiff hose and stability can make stairs feel awkward in practice.

Reviews consistently describe suction as very strong and effective across surfaces, including embedded debris. A few note it can need an extra pass on certain large clusters, and sealed airflow is slightly less concentrated than some rivals.

Strong suction is a recurring theme, including measured airflow/suction reporting and subjective comments about a solid carpet seal and strong pickup. Some sources note strong head performance versus similarly priced uprights, though a few mention limits on hard floors or thick carpet push resistance tied to high suction.

Reviews frame it as a ‘powerhouse’ that can handle heavy-duty messes, mixed debris, and frequent pet hair. It’s well-suited to larger homes or demanding cleaning routines.

Multiple sources describe the vacuum as bulky, making it less ideal for very tight rooms or cramped layouts. It’s better suited to medium-to-large spaces where the head can maneuver freely.

Several reviews cite a long warranty (often 5 years) and don’t report common reliability failures in their testing windows. Overall sentiment suggests solid support coverage for a flagship upright.

Switching between upright and Lift-Away modes is generally quick with dedicated release buttons, and attachments click in easily. Some reviewers note the multi-configuration approach can feel a bit fiddly until you get used to it.

Tool-change is generally described as straightforward (quick-release wand/tools), though a few sources mention a learning curve for reseating the wand/bag mechanism or frustration with attachment retention.

Under-furniture cleaning is a standout thanks to Lift-Away/Powered Lift-Away configurations that let the head reach farther under beds and couches. In standard mode, the pod can reduce clearance, but reviewers like the workaround.

Above-floor cleaning is strong with the included tools, especially the pet power brush for upholstery. The limiting factor called out in multiple reviews is short hose reach for high areas.

Above-floor and upholstery cleaning is generally described as a strong use case thanks to included tools (e.g., upholstery brushes/turbo tools/pet tools on some kits) and the detachable pod, though tool fit/retention quality is disputed by at least one reviewer.

Versatility is a major theme: multiple floor modes, smart sensing, Lift-Away configurations, and a strong set of tools cover a wide range of cleaning tasks. The main tradeoff is that reconfiguring for certain scenarios can take a bit more effort.

No summary yet.

Weight is a common complaint, with most sources describing it as heavy (around 17–18 lb) and bulky. Several reviewers add that good balance and swivel steering help it feel lighter while pushing than the number suggests.

Weight is commonly reported around the mid-teens (about 14 lb) in some reviews, but other sources describe it as heavier/dense or cite higher numbers for certain variants. Perceived carrying comfort can vary, especially on stairs.