Compare Shark PowerDetect Upright Vacuum vs Bissell MultiClean Vacuum

Edge and baseboard cleaning was repeatedly praised, including perfect-rating language and strong single-pass results.

Edge cleaning was a weakness in lab and user testing, especially along walls or wood edges where it failed to collect or glide smoothly.

Small-space suitability was weak because the bulky floorhead struggled to fit into tight spaces.

The Slim version received positive small-space feedback because its narrower head was easier to maneuver in tight areas.

Suction and airflow were a core strength, repeatedly described as above average, superb, or able to handle almost any debris.

Reviews split on suction: some users praised strong real-world pickup, while lab reviews found below-average sealed suction, hose airflow, and crevice results.

Hose length was a recurring limitation for high or far-away above-floor cleaning.

The hose earned positive comments for stretch and reach, including a clear stretch hose and a useful long-reach handle setup.

Under-furniture cleaning improved greatly with Powered Lift-Away, though the standard upright body could block access.

Under-furniture cleaning was mixed: the body could get fairly flat, but Lift-Off mode could not use the powered floorhead for easier reach.

Hard-floor crevice pickup had mixed evidence: the vacuum was strong overall, but sealed-airflow changes reduced concentrated performance in related tests.

Crevice and groove pickup was a consistent weakness in formal tests, tied to lower suction and large front gates.

Stair suitability was limited by weight, despite Lift-Away making lifted use more manageable.

Stair cleaning benefited from the Lift-Off canister and attachments, although the inability to use the wider powered head in canister mode limited coverage.

The DuoClean floorhead was widely praised as a central reason for its strong multi-surface pickup.

The floorhead's large front gates helped debris intake, but the design could also trap material or make pushing harder depending on surface.

Durability evidence was limited but positive, centered on the heavy-duty material impression.

Long-term confidence was limited by concern over how well the automatic cord rewind would hold up.

Fine-dust and small-debris hard-floor pickup was excellent, with single-pass and nearly perfect pickup language across reviews.

Fine hard-floor pickup was sharply split: Vacuum Wars praised broad debris pickup, while TechGearLab found sand left behind on hardwood.

Hair-removal evidence was mostly positive, with easy brushroll access and fewer tangles, but occasional roller checks were still advised.

Hair-removal maintenance was frustrating in one lab review because the roller could not be removed from the head.

Ease of use was generally strong thanks to automated modes and Lift-Away flexibility, tempered by bulk and some awkward configurations.

Ease of use varied, with users praising light rolling and simple handling while lab testing found harder pushing and floor transitions.

Weight was the most repeated ergonomic drawback, even when some reviewers said handling partly offset the heft.

Weight impressions were mostly manageable, described as lightweight by one user and medium-weight by another first-look reviewer.

High-pile performance was the clearest carpet weakness: one lab found the brushroll lacked enough agitation for long, thick fibers.

High-pile and shag results were mixed: Vacuum Wars supported thick-rug use, while TechGearLab found deep debris remained in shag fibers.

Noise was acceptable to mixed: some found the sound pleasant or moderate, while others called it noisy or noted changing mode volume.

Noise impressions were generally favorable, with reviewers describing it as not very loud, not screaming, and more pleasant than some alternatives.

Large-debris intake was excellent in several tests, but oats and extra-large clusters occasionally needed another pass.

Large hard-floor debris pickup was generally strong in Vacuum Wars and user tests, but TechGearLab found overall hardwood pickup below average.

The cord was a repeated convenience drawback because it can get in the way, tangle, and does not retract.

Cord management was convenient with automatic rewind, but the same reviewer questioned long-term reliability.

Heavy-duty suitability was strong for deep cleaning and whole-home needs, especially where reviewers emphasized power and large-home use.

In a user test with a large carpet mess, the vacuum was judged to do a very good job, though heavier-duty limits appeared in lab suction and hard-floor findings.

Low-pile carpet pickup was consistently strong, from rare perfect-score language to impressive mixed-material cleanup.

Low-pile carpet pickup ranged from decent to very good, with some reviewers praising carpet results and one noting inefficient reverse passes.

Above-floor and upholstery cleaning was strong when using the powered pet brush and detail tools, limited mainly by hose reach.

Above-floor and upholstery cleaning were usable, with Lift-Off flexibility and tools, but lab upholstery pickup was only about average.

Overall opinion was strongly favorable, with multiple reviewers recommending it or calling it a top upright despite tradeoffs.

Overall opinion was mixed-to-positive: multiple reviewers strongly recommended it, while one lab review rated it only average and limited by suction and hard-floor results.

Cord length was viewed as reasonably generous at 30 feet, though not exceptional.

Cord length was a mild drawback on the Slim model, repeatedly described as a little below average.

Compared with other uprights, reviewers often ranked the PowerDetect at or near the top, while noting Stratos remained competitive in some measures.

Comparative performance depended on the outlet: Vacuum Wars found it competitive with pricier vacuums, while TechGearLab found several similarly priced alternatives stronger.

Controls were considered clear and modern, with handle buttons and a colorful display supporting manual modes and Detect mode.

Controls were useful, including brushroll on/off and floor-transition settings, but they were not as seamless as automatic systems.

Tool changes and configuration changes were usually easy, with quick release and detail-tool use praised.

Tool changes were mostly straightforward, especially where no tools were needed, but the fixed handle-and-wand setup limited convenience in some versions.

Versatility was repeatedly praised across hard floors, carpets, Lift-Away use, and multi-surface configurations.

Versatility was a major pro across positive reviews because of Lift-Off use, attachments, pet features, and hard-floor/carpet adaptability.

Reviewers saw the PowerDetect as unusually innovative for an upright because of its multiple new Detect features.

Reviewers treated some features as uncommon for the category, especially the tangle-free brushroll and sealed filtration system.

Reviewers liked the practical attachment set, especially dual-purpose tools and pet-focused accessories, though hose reach shaped how useful they felt.

Attachment feedback was mixed-to-positive: reviewers liked the included turbo/crevice/dusting tools, but one lab review found the motorized brush underpowered.

Onboard tool storage was praised for keeping attachments housed on the vacuum and harder to lose.

Onboard tool storage was explicitly liked in the cord-rewind review.

Anti-tangle performance was usually excellent, with several reviewers saying hair did not wrap; one stress test found some long-hair buildup.

Hair-wrap resistance was mostly positive, especially in Vacuum Wars testing, though TechGearLab still found some long hair wrapped around the brushroll.

The dustbin drew praise for its larger capacity versus many cordless vacuums and for reducing emptying frequency.

The bagless bin was easy to clean and empty, though bin size was called a little below average in Slim-model testing.

Area-rug results were mixed: transitions were smooth on low-profile rugs, but thin rugs and large clusters sometimes required extra effort.

Area-rug handling was mixed, helped by suction adjustment and strong pickup in some tests but hurt by mat-climbing difficulty in another.

Filtration was a standout in lab-style reviews, with fog or particle testing indicating excellent dust containment.

Filtration was one of the clearest strengths, with fog and air-quality testing showing no meaningful leakage or particle spikes.

Hair pickup on carpets and rugs was very strong overall, though one lab saw long hair wrap during stress testing.

Carpet hair pickup was a relative strength, with reviewers reporting clean low-pile results and easy pet-hair pickup.

Maintenance was usually straightforward, but TechGearLab found sand collecting at the foam filter and adding upkeep.

Maintenance feedback was split: tangle-free design reduced hair work in positive reviews, but one lab review found roller hair removal frustrating.

Pet-readiness was a major strength due to hair pickup, anti-tangle behavior, odor control, HEPA filtration, and pet tools.

Pet usefulness was a recurring strength, driven by pet-hair pickup, HEPA filtration, tangle resistance, and pet-focused attachments, though tougher pet messes had stronger competitors.

Setup was described as quick and easy, with straightforward assembly from the boxed components.

Assembly and setup were easy in the first-look review, with no tools required and the unboxing described as straightforward.

Build was described as robust and heavy-duty, with durable-feeling materials despite the mostly plastic construction.

Build feedback was sparse but positive where mentioned, especially around the sealed HEPA filter's rubber-sealed design.

Packaging was positively described as well-packed and protective.

Packaging was rated positively in the first-look review, with the box arriving undamaged and the product wrapped well.

The detachable pod and powered Lift-Away design added flexibility, though moving around in broken-down mode could be awkward.

The Lift-Off canister design improved above-floor flexibility, though it could not attach to the wide floor head in one review's testing.

Headlights and debris illumination were useful for seeing hidden dust and cleaning darker corners.

Debris illumination was praised because the LED bank helped visibility more than expected.

Medium-pile and general carpet/rug results were strong, with reviewers calling it one of the best for carpet and better tuned than Stratos in one comparison.

Medium-pile/rug pickup was strong in the comparison review, where the Lift-Off picked up large debris in a solid pass.

Low-profile reach was mixed: Lift-Away helped under furniture, but the full upright dustbin and bulky head blocked some tight spaces.

Low-profile usefulness was limited in one review because the canister mode could not connect to the powered floorhead for under-furniture cleaning.

Floorhead seal and concentrated airflow were a tradeoff: wider channels helped some features but reduced sealed-floor test strength.

The hard-floor seal was a tradeoff: the larger front gates helped large debris but let in more air and reduced seal strength.

Handling was mostly good thanks to swivel steering, but bulk and tight-area navigation were common caveats.

Maneuverability varied by reviewer: some found it light and easy to turn, while lab testing found turning and mat transitions harder.

Emptying was usually easy, but one reviewer wanted a top-release design to keep hands farther from debris.

Emptying was easy in user reviews, with debris dropping from the bagless canister and minimal complication.

LED lighting was considered helpful and more pronounced than older Shark lighting in comparative discussion.

LED headlights were praised as useful and a nice touch rather than just a spec-sheet feature.

Value was mixed to positive: reviewers praised performance for the cost but repeatedly noted premium pricing.

Value was polarized: Vacuum Wars saw strong performance for the price, while TechGearLab considered it expensive for its performance tier.

Design impressions were positive overall: reviewers noted a cleaner finish, smart packaging of features, and a distinctive purple colorway.

The smart Detect system was one of the strongest themes, with reviewers praising automatic floor, dirt, edge, and direction adjustments.

Clogging and debris-prevention evidence was mixed because one lab found material clumped in the hose despite strong pickup.

Hard-floor hair pickup was strongly praised, especially the front roller acting like a magnet for hair.

Odor control split reviewers, with some liking fresher floors while TechGearLab found the scent cheap and overpowering.

Ongoing odor-cartridge cost appeared manageable in the one review that evaluated replacement cost.

Reverse cleaning was praised where tested, with Direction Detect helping backward pulls and reverse oat pickup.

The strong suction created a self-propelled feel that some found helpful after adjustment, but it could also feel odd.

Storage and footprint evidence leaned bulky, with reviewers noting a large head or hefty upright form rather than compactness.

Stuck resistance was a weak point in one lab review, where the vacuum struggled to climb onto a bamboo test mat.

Attachment surface safety was a caveat because the dusting brush bristles were described as stiff and unsuitable for delicate surfaces.