Compare Shark PowerDetect Upright Vacuum vs Bissell CleanView Swivel Vacuum

Included tools (crevice/duster, pet multi-tool, and a pet power brush) are repeatedly called useful for edges, upholstery, and tight spots. One review of the cordless ‘Clean and Empty’ variant said the attachment set felt minimal.

Reviews consistently note a useful tool set for the price, often including a crevice tool, dusting brush, extension/wand, and a pet-focused turbo tool.

Reviewers generally like the premium look (notably the purple colorway and metallic accents) and the clear dustbin design. Overall impressions skew toward a modern, ‘flagship’ finish.

Aesthetics are described as typical for the category: a modern, pet-themed look with bright accents rather than a premium finish.

The Detect system (floor type, dirt level, edge proximity, and direction sensing) is widely described as genuinely useful, automatically changing suction and brushroll behavior. There’s no app focus here—automation is built into the vacuum’s onboard sensors.

Debris scatter/blowback is generally low, and reviewers contrast it favorably against uprights that ‘shoot’ particles forward. Safety interlocks and DuoClean design help keep debris moving into the bin instead of back into the room.

Some scattering or blowback is reported on hard floors or with certain debris, especially when height is set too high or the brush action outpaces suction.

Area rugs are handled well overall, but strong suction can tug on lightweight/thin rugs and may require extra passes for larger debris. Better results are reported on thicker or more stable rugs.

Assembly and setup are repeatedly described as fast and painless, typically taking only a few minutes. Most reviewers felt it was ready to use almost immediately.

Multiple reviewers found setup straightforward, typically just attaching the handle and snapping or screwing a few parts in before cleaning.

One review notes a safety interlock: the vacuum won’t run until the hose is fully connected, which helps prevent accidental blowback or messy operation. This is a minor but appreciated safety/robustness detail.

A visible fill line or indicator on the bin is appreciated as a helpful cue for when to empty, especially for a budget model.

Only covered for the cordless variant: the detachable battery is convenient and supports long runtime on lower-power settings. High-power use shortens runtime substantially, as expected.

The bagless dustbin is described as large for an upright and easy to remove, with reported capacities varying by source (roughly 1.3–1.9 L / about 0.5 gal). The size reduces how often you need to empty it.

The bagless bin is easy to remove and empty with a bottom-release door; some users note the fill line can feel conservative, leading to more frequent emptying.

Build quality is described as robust and heavy-duty, with materials that feel durable and designed for serious cleaning. The sturdy build contributes to its heavier weight.

Build quality is often described as mostly plastic and budget-grade; it feels lighter but may not inspire long-term confidence compared with pricier uprights.

High-pile/plush carpet performance is more mixed: some reviewers still found strong cleaning, while at least one lab test measured below-average pickup compared with other top uprights. Homes dominated by plush carpet may want to compare alternatives.

High-pile performance ranges from very good on hair and smaller debris to weaker on larger pieces when head clearance becomes an issue.

Low-pile carpet pickup is consistently strong, including embedded debris and hair, with some tests nearing ‘perfect’ results. It’s widely considered a dependable performer on common low/short carpet.

Low-pile carpet pickup is generally strong, though large debris can still require extra passes in some lab-style testing.

Medium-pile carpet performance is generally strong, with some testing showing excellent deep-clean pickup. Most reviewers consider it effective on typical rugs and mid-pile carpet.

Medium-pile carpet performance is repeatedly strong, including at least one deep-clean test reporting excellent sand pickup.

Clogging resistance is generally good, but some testing noted debris clumping in the hose and fine sand accumulating on filters, which can reduce airflow until cleaned. A few mentions suggest keeping sensors/filters clean to avoid performance dips.

Clogging prevention is a mix: some like the suction blockage indicator, while others warn hair and debris can build up and require frequent cleaning to avoid performance drop.

In comparisons, it’s often favored versus older Sharks and many uprights for its automation and overall pickup. A recurring nuance is that Shark’s Stratos can match or slightly beat it in certain sealed/crevice or plush-carpet scenarios, while PowerDetect wins on features.

In comparisons, it is treated as a capable budget option, but it does not match premium uprights for power, refinement, or filtration.

Controls are described as straightforward, with clear mode buttons and helpful Detect-mode indicators that show when floors are clean/dirty. The cordless variant’s battery indicator is described as basic, but day-to-day operation is still simple.

Controls are serviceable but not premium: common notes include foot-based buttons and a height dial that may require bending, plus occasional complaints about button placement.

The detachable pod (Lift-Away/Powered Lift-Away) is widely praised for turning the upright into a more flexible above-floor/under-furniture cleaner. This convertible design is a key differentiator versus basic uprights.

Corded versions are consistently listed around a 30‑ft cord, which most find sufficient. A few reviewers still wish it were longer for very large rooms.

Cord length is commonly reported around 27 feet, which is usable for most rooms but a bit shorter than some uprights with longer cords.

Only discussed in a review of the cordless PowerDetect ‘Clean and Empty’ variant, where cordless operation and quick maneuvering are highlighted as major benefits. It’s not relevant to corded upright-only use.

Cord management is a recurring nit: the cord can get in the way and is not retractable. Storage solutions help, but it still requires a bit of attention while cleaning.

Cord management is a strong convenience point on rewind variants, while non-rewind versions still offer clips/hooks that help keep the cord out of the way.

Crevice and groove pickup is generally above average, but a few reviews say it’s not class-leading due to airflow/seal design that’s less concentrated than some competitors. It still performs well for typical cracks and edges.

Crevice and groove pickup is described as decent but not class-leading; results vary by test material and technique.

Multi-cyclonic design is credited with maintaining suction reasonably well during typical cleaning, though it does not fully solve large-debris limitations.

Only discussed for the cordless Clean & Empty variant, where the auto-empty dock and large bagless container are highlighted as a major convenience. No long-term reliability issues are described in the review text.

Handling is frequently praised for responsive swivel steering and a balanced feel that helps it not ‘feel’ as heavy while pushing. Downsides include a bulky head, strong suction that can tug on thin rugs, and occasional threshold hiccups.

Ease of use is generally high thanks to automation, clear controls, and a large bin. The main usability drawbacks are heft, bulky floorhead size in tight areas, and occasional hassle when changing configurations.

Edge cleaning is repeatedly called excellent; Edge Detect boosts suction at baseboards and corners, and one test rated edge pickup as perfect. This is one of the most consistently praised strengths.

No summary yet.

Most reviewers find the bin easy to empty, but bottom-release designs can be messier than top-release systems and may put hands closer to debris. Auto-empty convenience is mentioned only for the cordless ‘Clean and Empty’ variant.

Emptying is generally clean and simple thanks to the bottom-drop design, though clumped hair can sometimes stick and require manual removal.

Filtration and dust containment are a strong point, with a sealed system and HEPA filtration performing well in fog/particle tests. Reviewers often cite it as a good option for allergy-conscious homes.

Filtration is the biggest downside across sources: it lacks a sealed HEPA system and some testing reports significant particle release, making it a weak fit for allergy-sensitive homes.

The DuoClean dual-roller floorhead (soft roller + bristle/fin roller) and integrated sensors are praised for mixed-floor effectiveness and reduced scatter. Multiple reviewers also call the head bulky, which can limit tight-space access.

The floorhead design is budget-focused: it can clean well when settings are right, but low clearance and brush behavior can contribute to plowing on certain debris.

Several reviews suggest the seal/airflow isn’t as concentrated when fully sealed to the floor, which can slightly reduce deep-clean or crevice performance versus top competitors. The cordless variant also notes a squeegee design that can affect sealing.

A sealing flap or squeegee-like feature is cited as helping hard-floor pickup and reducing scatter when the height setting is dialed in.

Hair pickup on carpets is generally very good, particularly for pet hair on rugs. A few notes suggest extremely long hair can still wrap or require occasional roller checks.

Pet hair pickup on carpet is a frequent strength, with multiple reviews calling it strong for the price, though effectiveness can drop as hair accumulates.

Hard-floor hair pickup is widely praised, with the soft roller helping lift hair without scattering. Reviewers regularly mention clean results with minimal push-around.

Anti-tangle performance is frequently highlighted as best-in-class, and many reviewers report little to no hair wrap. One test still saw some long hair wrapping, so it’s strong but not always 100% hands-off.

Hair can wrap around the brush and cleaning it can be tedious; higher-end competitors manage tangles better in several comparisons.

Fine-dust pickup on hard floors is consistently very strong, often near-perfect in tests. A nuance: fine sand can end up on filters in some scenarios, increasing cleanup/maintenance.

No summary yet.

Large-debris pickup on hard floors is generally excellent and tends to avoid scattering, helped by the soft front roller. One review found very large clusters sometimes need a second pass.

Large debris on hard floors is mixed: small debris is fine, but bigger pieces can be pushed, plowed, or scattered depending on height and brush behavior.

Headlights and Detect-mode lighting are frequently praised for improving visibility and giving feedback while cleaning. Lighting is considered a meaningful usability feature rather than just cosmetic.

Several comparisons note the absence of headlights or floor illumination on the CleanView models discussed, unlike some higher-end uprights.

Hose reach is repeatedly criticized as short, limiting high-reach tasks (stairs, ceilings, tall shelving). It works for quick spot jobs, but it’s not an ideal ‘whole-house above-floor’ setup.

Above-floor reach is mixed: some variants have a useful hose length for stairs and upholstery, while others describe the hose as short for high shelves or tall furniture.

Reviewers often describe it as one of the most innovative, feature-rich uprights, driven by sensor-based automation and upgraded hair management. The smart behaviors are frequently cited as more than gimmicks.

Some reviewers note it can get low to the floor and reach under furniture better than many traditional uprights, especially when reconfigured into Lift-Away modes. This supports better access in low-clearance areas.

Routine maintenance is mostly straightforward (empty bin, wash filters, wipe sensors), but at least one test found fine sand builds up on a foam filter and increases cleaning frequency. Odor cartridges are optional and removable.

Maintenance is a real requirement: regular bin emptying, filter washing, and brush/belt checks are repeatedly mentioned to keep performance and reliability stable.

Swivel steering is repeatedly highlighted as a usability win, making it easier to navigate around furniture, though some users find the swivel can make straight-line tracking a bit less precise.

Noise is typically “upright-vac loud” rather than quiet, with measured levels ranging from the mid/upper‑60s into the 70s dB depending on mode. Detect/boost behavior can change the pitch and volume during use.

Noise is a recurring compromise: one test measured very loud levels, while other reviews call it slightly louder than average for an upright.

The odor-neutralizer cartridge can leave a fresher scent, and some reviewers liked the effect. Others disliked the fragrance (described as overpowering) and removed the cartridge, so preferences vary.

Onboard tool storage is mentioned as a convenience feature, keeping key tools attached to the vacuum for quick swaps. This helps day-to-day usability.

Onboard storage is commonly noted on pet-focused variants, keeping core tools attached and accessible, though not every accessory has a perfect home.

Ongoing costs are generally low because it’s bagless; routine expenses are mainly filters and optional odor-neutralizer cartridges. One reviewer noted the odor cartridge lasts months and is inexpensive to replace.

Ongoing costs are described as manageable, with washable filters and routine maintenance rather than expensive consumables being the main ownership burden.

Longevity feedback is mixed: some owners are happy, while others cite concerns about early failure and recommend keeping up with maintenance.

Overall sentiment is strongly positive across sources, with Vacuum Wars naming it a top pick and several outlets calling it a standout upright. The most consistent criticisms are weight/bulk, short hose reach, and a few maintenance quirks (like sand on filters).

Overall sentiment skews positive for budget shoppers, but more critical reviews recommend alternatives if you need better filtration or more consistent hard-floor pickup.

Packaging is reported as well-protected, with sturdy inserts that keep parts secure in transit. Reviewers who mentioned it were happy with the condition on arrival.

Multiple reviews highlight pet-focused features: strong pet-hair pickup, anti-tangle brushroll performance, and included pet tools. Overall it’s positioned as a pet-friendly upright.

Pet-focused features are a core draw, including a turbo tool and brush roll designed to lift pet hair, with performance best on carpet and upholstery touch-ups.

Most sources position it as a premium-priced flagship that feels worth it if you want top-tier performance and automation. Price-sensitive shoppers may find better value elsewhere unless it’s on sale.

Value is a primary reason reviewers recommend it: strong cleaning and features for the money, with tradeoffs mainly in filtration and refinement.

Only mentioned for the cordless variant: reviewers estimate roughly 30–40 minutes in typical auto use and up to about an hour-plus on lower settings. Actual runtime varies with floor type and how often boost triggers. Only mentioned for the cordless variant: max/boost runtime is relatively short (around the low teens in minutes). It’s best treated as a spot-boost mode rather than a whole-home setting.

Lift-Away makes stair cleaning more practical than with a fixed-body upright, especially paired with the pet brush/crevice tool. That said, the unit’s overall weight is still a drawback if you carry it up and down frequently.

Storage is reasonable for an upright and remains stable when parked, but some designs have a higher head profile that can limit where it fits.

Reviews consistently describe suction as very strong and effective across surfaces, including embedded debris. A few note it can need an extra pass on certain large clusters, and sealed airflow is slightly less concentrated than some rivals.

Performance is generally described as solid for a budget upright: capable pickup on carpet and smaller debris, but not a top-tier powerhouse versus premium uprights.

Reviews frame it as a ‘powerhouse’ that can handle heavy-duty messes, mixed debris, and frequent pet hair. It’s well-suited to larger homes or demanding cleaning routines.

Multiple sources describe the vacuum as bulky, making it less ideal for very tight rooms or cramped layouts. It’s better suited to medium-to-large spaces where the head can maneuver freely.

Several reviews cite a long warranty (often 5 years) and don’t report common reliability failures in their testing windows. Overall sentiment suggests solid support coverage for a flagship upright.

Reliability is a concern in at least one user report citing many complaints about early failures; routine belt and clog checks are advised.

Surface safety is generally fine, with reviewers noting it avoids scratching, but the always-on brushroll on some variants can be a concern on delicate floors if you are not careful.

Switching between upright and Lift-Away modes is generally quick with dedicated release buttons, and attachments click in easily. Some reviewers note the multi-configuration approach can feel a bit fiddly until you get used to it.

Tool changes are generally simple, but the always-on brushroll during above-floor tool use can make the workflow feel less polished.

Under-furniture cleaning is a standout thanks to Lift-Away/Powered Lift-Away configurations that let the head reach farther under beds and couches. In standard mode, the pod can reduce clearance, but reviewers like the workaround.

Under-furniture cleaning can be limited by head height and how the handle tilts; several reviews note it does not reach as easily as some competitors.

Above-floor cleaning is strong with the included tools, especially the pet power brush for upholstery. The limiting factor called out in multiple reviews is short hose reach for high areas.

The included motorized or turbo hand tool can help on upholstery and stairs, though some users find the turbo tool loses effectiveness when pressed into fabric.

Versatility is a major theme: multiple floor modes, smart sensing, Lift-Away configurations, and a strong set of tools cover a wide range of cleaning tasks. The main tradeoff is that reconfiguring for certain scenarios can take a bit more effort.

Versatility is good for a basic upright: it can handle mixed floors and switch to above-floor tools for stairs and upholstery, but it lacks higher-end conveniences like sealed HEPA filtration or advanced power controls.

Weight is a common complaint, with most sources describing it as heavy (around 17–18 lb) and bulky. Several reviewers add that good balance and swivel steering help it feel lighter while pushing than the number suggests.

Several reviews describe the vacuum as easy to push and relatively light-feeling, though some tested variants are heavier than the lightest budget uprights.