Compare Shark PowerDetect Upright Vacuum vs Eureka PowerSpeed Upright Vacuum Cleaner

Included tools (crevice/duster, pet multi-tool, and a pet power brush) are repeatedly called useful for edges, upholstery, and tight spots. One review of the cordless ‘Clean and Empty’ variant said the attachment set felt minimal.

Reviews commonly mention multiple included tools (often including crevice, upholstery/dusting tools, and in some versions a pet/turbo brush), plus convenient onboard storage.

Reviewers generally like the premium look (notably the purple colorway and metallic accents) and the clear dustbin design. Overall impressions skew toward a modern, ‘flagship’ finish.

No summary yet.

The Detect system (floor type, dirt level, edge proximity, and direction sensing) is widely described as genuinely useful, automatically changing suction and brushroll behavior. There’s no app focus here—automation is built into the vacuum’s onboard sensors.

Debris scatter/blowback is generally low, and reviewers contrast it favorably against uprights that ‘shoot’ particles forward. Safety interlocks and DuoClean design help keep debris moving into the bin instead of back into the room.

Area rugs are handled well overall, but strong suction can tug on lightweight/thin rugs and may require extra passes for larger debris. Better results are reported on thicker or more stable rugs.

Assembly and setup are repeatedly described as fast and painless, typically taking only a few minutes. Most reviewers felt it was ready to use almost immediately.

Assembly is consistently described as quick and simple, with basic parts (handle, hose/cord hooks) snapping in and the unit ready in about a minute in some tests.

One review notes a safety interlock: the vacuum won’t run until the hose is fully connected, which helps prevent accidental blowback or messy operation. This is a minor but appreciated safety/robustness detail.

Only covered for the cordless variant: the detachable battery is convenient and supports long runtime on lower-power settings. High-power use shortens runtime substantially, as expected.

The bagless dustbin is described as large for an upright and easy to remove, with reported capacities varying by source (roughly 1.3–1.9 L / about 0.5 gal). The size reduces how often you need to empty it.

The 2.6 L bagless bin is repeatedly highlighted as large and easy to empty via a bottom-release design, reducing how often you have to stop mid-clean.

Build quality is described as robust and heavy-duty, with materials that feel durable and designed for serious cleaning. The sturdy build contributes to its heavier weight.

Build quality is commonly described as more plastic and basic (not premium), but generally acceptable for the price point.

High-pile/plush carpet performance is more mixed: some reviewers still found strong cleaning, while at least one lab test measured below-average pickup compared with other top uprights. Homes dominated by plush carpet may want to compare alternatives.

Performance on high-pile/shag is a common weak spot: reviewers cite reduced deep pickup and harder pushing, often requiring more passes and careful height selection.

Low-pile carpet pickup is consistently strong, including embedded debris and hair, with some tests nearing ‘perfect’ results. It’s widely considered a dependable performer on common low/short carpet.

On low-pile carpet it’s described as solid and competitive for the price, with multiple reviews noting good debris collection once height is set correctly.

Medium-pile carpet performance is generally strong, with some testing showing excellent deep-clean pickup. Most reviewers consider it effective on typical rugs and mid-pile carpet.

No summary yet.

Clogging resistance is generally good, but some testing noted debris clumping in the hose and fine sand accumulating on filters, which can reduce airflow until cleaned. A few mentions suggest keeping sensors/filters clean to avoid performance dips.

In comparisons, it’s often favored versus older Sharks and many uprights for its automation and overall pickup. A recurring nuance is that Shark’s Stratos can match or slightly beat it in certain sealed/crevice or plush-carpet scenarios, while PowerDetect wins on features.

Controls are described as straightforward, with clear mode buttons and helpful Detect-mode indicators that show when floors are clean/dirty. The cordless variant’s battery indicator is described as basic, but day-to-day operation is still simple.

The detachable pod (Lift-Away/Powered Lift-Away) is widely praised for turning the upright into a more flexible above-floor/under-furniture cleaner. This convertible design is a key differentiator versus basic uprights.

Corded versions are consistently listed around a 30‑ft cord, which most find sufficient. A few reviewers still wish it were longer for very large rooms.

Cord length is repeatedly praised as “long enough” for many rooms and general home use, though some users still need outlet changes in larger layouts.

Only discussed in a review of the cordless PowerDetect ‘Clean and Empty’ variant, where cordless operation and quick maneuvering are highlighted as major benefits. It’s not relevant to corded upright-only use.

Cord management is a recurring nit: the cord can get in the way and is not retractable. Storage solutions help, but it still requires a bit of attention while cleaning.

Cord hooks/wrap and storage are commonly mentioned as straightforward and practical for quick winding and organization.

Crevice and groove pickup is generally above average, but a few reviews say it’s not class-leading due to airflow/seal design that’s less concentrated than some competitors. It still performs well for typical cracks and edges.

No summary yet.

Only discussed for the cordless Clean & Empty variant, where the auto-empty dock and large bagless container are highlighted as a major convenience. No long-term reliability issues are described in the review text.

Handling is frequently praised for responsive swivel steering and a balanced feel that helps it not ‘feel’ as heavy while pushing. Downsides include a bulky head, strong suction that can tug on thin rugs, and occasional threshold hiccups.

Maneuverability is limited by the non-swivel floorhead; users often describe it as light but less agile around furniture than swiveling competitors.

Ease of use is generally high thanks to automation, clear controls, and a large bin. The main usability drawbacks are heft, bulky floorhead size in tight areas, and occasional hassle when changing configurations.

Ease of use is mixed: the machine is light and simple with foot controls, but frequent notes mention no swivel head and bending down for manual height adjustments.

Edge cleaning is repeatedly called excellent; Edge Detect boosts suction at baseboards and corners, and one test rated edge pickup as perfect. This is one of the most consistently praised strengths.

Edge/baseboard reach is repeatedly described as limited, often leaving a small strip near walls that may require a tool pass.

Most reviewers find the bin easy to empty, but bottom-release designs can be messier than top-release systems and may put hands closer to debris. Auto-empty convenience is mentioned only for the cordless ‘Clean and Empty’ variant.

Filtration and dust containment are a strong point, with a sealed system and HEPA filtration performing well in fog/particle tests. Reviewers often cite it as a good option for allergy-conscious homes.

Filtration is described as decent-to-strong for the budget class in testing, but multiple reviews emphasize the lack of true HEPA and/or a fully sealed allergen system.

The DuoClean dual-roller floorhead (soft roller + bristle/fin roller) and integrated sensors are praised for mixed-floor effectiveness and reduced scatter. Multiple reviewers also call the head bulky, which can limit tight-space access.

Floorhead design is frequently described as basic and non-swiveling, with behavior that can plow or scatter debris on hard floors depending on debris type and pass angle.

Several reviews suggest the seal/airflow isn’t as concentrated when fully sealed to the floor, which can slightly reduce deep-clean or crevice performance versus top competitors. The cordless variant also notes a squeegee design that can affect sealing.

Hair pickup on carpets is generally very good, particularly for pet hair on rugs. A few notes suggest extremely long hair can still wrap or require occasional roller checks.

Hair pickup on carpets is generally described as good for pet hair, with performance often improving with extra passes.

Hard-floor hair pickup is widely praised, with the soft roller helping lift hair without scattering. Reviewers regularly mention clean results with minimal push-around.

Anti-tangle performance is frequently highlighted as best-in-class, and many reviewers report little to no hair wrap. One test still saw some long hair wrapping, so it’s strong but not always 100% hands-off.

Long hair tangling is a recurring theme: several reviews report wrap on the brush roll, sometimes requiring cutting/clearing, especially because the roller is often described as non-removable.

Fine-dust pickup on hard floors is consistently very strong, often near-perfect in tests. A nuance: fine sand can end up on filters in some scenarios, increasing cleanup/maintenance.

Fine debris on hard floors can be frustrating in some tests because the brush roll can scatter/spray particles, leading to extra cleanup passes.

Large-debris pickup on hard floors is generally excellent and tends to avoid scattering, helped by the soft front roller. One review found very large clusters sometimes need a second pass.

Larger debris on hard floors is helped by having height adjustment, but scatter can still occur depending on the debris type and technique.

Headlights and Detect-mode lighting are frequently praised for improving visibility and giving feedback while cleaning. Lighting is considered a meaningful usability feature rather than just cosmetic.

Some versions are noted to include headlights, improving visibility during cleaning, but this appears variant-dependent rather than universal.

Hose reach is repeatedly criticized as short, limiting high-reach tasks (stairs, ceilings, tall shelving). It works for quick spot jobs, but it’s not an ideal ‘whole-house above-floor’ setup.

Hose length feedback is mixed; some mention decent above-floor reach (sometimes cited as ~7 ft in certain versions) while others describe the hose as short for the category.

Reviewers often describe it as one of the most innovative, feature-rich uprights, driven by sensor-based automation and upgraded hair management. The smart behaviors are frequently cited as more than gimmicks.

No summary yet.

Some reviewers note it can get low to the floor and reach under furniture better than many traditional uprights, especially when reconfigured into Lift-Away modes. This supports better access in low-clearance areas.

Routine maintenance is mostly straightforward (empty bin, wash filters, wipe sensors), but at least one test found fine sand builds up on a foam filter and increases cleaning frequency. Odor cartridges are optional and removable.

Maintenance is mostly routine (washable filters, bin emptying), but brush-roll hair wrap and occasional odor/filter cleaning are common upkeep points.

Noise is typically “upright-vac loud” rather than quiet, with measured levels ranging from the mid/upper‑60s into the 70s dB depending on mode. Detect/boost behavior can change the pitch and volume during use.

Noise is repeatedly noted as on the louder side for the class, especially at higher settings, though some owners describe it as not excessively loud for the price.

The odor-neutralizer cartridge can leave a fresher scent, and some reviewers liked the effect. Others disliked the fragrance (described as overpowering) and removed the cartridge, so preferences vary.

Onboard tool storage is mentioned as a convenience feature, keeping key tools attached to the vacuum for quick swaps. This helps day-to-day usability.

Onboard tool storage is frequently called out as convenient, keeping common attachments accessible without hunting for them.

Ongoing costs are generally low because it’s bagless; routine expenses are mainly filters and optional odor-neutralizer cartridges. One reviewer noted the odor cartridge lasts months and is inexpensive to replace.

Longer-term ownership feedback includes reports of holding up well over a year-plus of regular family/pet use in at least one update-style review, though it remains an entry-level design.

Overall sentiment is strongly positive across sources, with Vacuum Wars naming it a top pick and several outlets calling it a standout upright. The most consistent criticisms are weight/bulk, short hose reach, and a few maintenance quirks (like sand on filters).

Overall sentiment trends positive for budget, carpet-first needs: praised for suction, bin size, and simplicity, with the most common complaints being hard-floor scatter, agility limits, and hair wrap maintenance.

Packaging is reported as well-protected, with sturdy inserts that keep parts secure in transit. Reviewers who mentioned it were happy with the condition on arrival.

Multiple reviews highlight pet-focused features: strong pet-hair pickup, anti-tangle brushroll performance, and included pet tools. Overall it’s positioned as a pet-friendly upright.

Pet-focused value is a consistent theme: reviewers highlight strong pet hair pickup for the price and versions that include a pet/turbo tool for upholstery and stairs.

Most sources position it as a premium-priced flagship that feels worth it if you want top-tier performance and automation. Price-sensitive shoppers may find better value elsewhere unless it’s on sale.

Value is consistently rated high: many reviews frame it as one of the better budget uprights if you prioritize carpet and can accept tradeoffs on hard floors and premium filtration.

Only mentioned for the cordless variant: reviewers estimate roughly 30–40 minutes in typical auto use and up to about an hour-plus on lower settings. Actual runtime varies with floor type and how often boost triggers. Only mentioned for the cordless variant: max/boost runtime is relatively short (around the low teens in minutes). It’s best treated as a spot-boost mode rather than a whole-home setting.

Lift-Away makes stair cleaning more practical than with a fixed-body upright, especially paired with the pet brush/crevice tool. That said, the unit’s overall weight is still a drawback if you carry it up and down frequently.

Reviews consistently describe suction as very strong and effective across surfaces, including embedded debris. A few note it can need an extra pass on certain large clusters, and sealed airflow is slightly less concentrated than some rivals.

Reviewers frequently describe strong suction/airflow for a budget upright, with test-style content showing respectable airflow and lift relative to similarly priced competitors.

Reviews frame it as a ‘powerhouse’ that can handle heavy-duty messes, mixed debris, and frequent pet hair. It’s well-suited to larger homes or demanding cleaning routines.

Multiple sources describe the vacuum as bulky, making it less ideal for very tight rooms or cramped layouts. It’s better suited to medium-to-large spaces where the head can maneuver freely.

Several reviews cite a long warranty (often 5 years) and don’t report common reliability failures in their testing windows. Overall sentiment suggests solid support coverage for a flagship upright.

Reliability signals are generally positive in owner updates (no issues reported over extended use in at least one case), but support experiences are not deeply covered across the set.

Switching between upright and Lift-Away modes is generally quick with dedicated release buttons, and attachments click in easily. Some reviewers note the multi-configuration approach can feel a bit fiddly until you get used to it.

Tool changes are generally described as simple: pop off the hose/handle and attach tools directly or via the handle extension for extra reach.

Under-furniture cleaning is a standout thanks to Lift-Away/Powered Lift-Away configurations that let the head reach farther under beds and couches. In standard mode, the pod can reduce clearance, but reviewers like the workaround.

Above-floor cleaning is strong with the included tools, especially the pet power brush for upholstery. The limiting factor called out in multiple reviews is short hose reach for high areas.

Above-floor and upholstery cleaning is considered helpful with included tools, especially for quick pickups, though some reviews note it’s not as thorough as a mini motorized brush unless you use a turbo tool.

Versatility is a major theme: multiple floor modes, smart sensing, Lift-Away configurations, and a strong set of tools cover a wide range of cleaning tasks. The main tradeoff is that reconfiguring for certain scenarios can take a bit more effort.

No summary yet.

Weight is a common complaint, with most sources describing it as heavy (around 17–18 lb) and bulky. Several reviewers add that good balance and swivel steering help it feel lighter while pushing than the number suggests.

Multiple sources call it lightweight for an upright (often around 10–12 lb depending on variant), making it easier to carry and use for quick cleanups.