Compare Bissell CleanView Compact Upright Vacuum vs Shark PowerDetect Upright Vacuum

Tooling is basic but useful: reviews mention a small set of attachments (often a crevice tool and a brush/dusting tool) plus a removable handle/wand used for above-floor tasks. Some comparisons note that more specialized pet tools appear on other variants, not the base compact.

Included tools (crevice/duster, pet multi-tool, and a pet power brush) are repeatedly called useful for edges, upholstery, and tight spots. One review of the cordless ‘Clean and Empty’ variant said the attachment set felt minimal.

Reviewers generally like the premium look (notably the purple colorway and metallic accents) and the clear dustbin design. Overall impressions skew toward a modern, ‘flagship’ finish.

The Detect system (floor type, dirt level, edge proximity, and direction sensing) is widely described as genuinely useful, automatically changing suction and brushroll behavior. There’s no app focus here—automation is built into the vacuum’s onboard sensors.

Blowback/scatter is a recurring complaint on hard floors, with reviewers describing debris being kicked or spit backward and larger piles spreading to the sides rather than being captured cleanly in one pass.

Debris scatter/blowback is generally low, and reviewers contrast it favorably against uprights that ‘shoot’ particles forward. Safety interlocks and DuoClean design help keep debris moving into the bin instead of back into the room.

Area rug handling is generally reported as solid for everyday cleaning, though large piles of mixed debris can require extra passes and may scatter to the sides depending on rug type and pile.

Area rugs are handled well overall, but strong suction can tug on lightweight/thin rugs and may require extra passes for larger debris. Better results are reported on thicker or more stable rugs.

Setup is commonly described as simple and close to ready out of the box, typically involving snapping in the handle/wand and placing or attaching basic parts and tools.

Assembly and setup are repeatedly described as fast and painless, typically taking only a few minutes. Most reviewers felt it was ready to use almost immediately.

One review notes a safety interlock: the vacuum won’t run until the hose is fully connected, which helps prevent accidental blowback or messy operation. This is a minor but appreciated safety/robustness detail.

Only covered for the cordless variant: the detachable battery is convenient and supports long runtime on lower-power settings. High-power use shortens runtime substantially, as expected.

The dust cup is described as compact and may need frequent emptying, especially with pets. Some reviews emphasize the convenience of bagless use, but capacity is a common limitation.

The bagless dustbin is described as large for an upright and easy to remove, with reported capacities varying by source (roughly 1.3–1.9 L / about 0.5 gal). The size reduces how often you need to empty it.

Build quality is often characterized as plasticky and basic, consistent with the budget category. Comparisons suggest it does not feel premium, though it remains lightweight and practical.

Build quality is described as robust and heavy-duty, with materials that feel durable and designed for serious cleaning. The sturdy build contributes to its heavier weight.

High-pile/plush carpet performance is more mixed: some reviewers still found strong cleaning, while at least one lab test measured below-average pickup compared with other top uprights. Homes dominated by plush carpet may want to compare alternatives.

On low-pile carpet, reviewers report it can clean effectively but may take more passes and can push some particles around compared with variants that offer adjustable height control.

Low-pile carpet pickup is consistently strong, including embedded debris and hair, with some tests nearing ‘perfect’ results. It’s widely considered a dependable performer on common low/short carpet.

On typical carpet scenarios, performance is described as decent for a budget compact upright, with one test showing moderate sand pickup and others reporting good day-to-day results on bedroom and small-area carpet.

Medium-pile carpet performance is generally strong, with some testing showing excellent deep-clean pickup. Most reviewers consider it effective on typical rugs and mid-pile carpet.

Clogging prevention is acceptable in tests and demos, with hair and debris generally reaching the bin without immediate clogs; some reviews also point out accessible paths for cleaning and clearing buildup.

Clogging resistance is generally good, but some testing noted debris clumping in the hose and fine sand accumulating on filters, which can reduce airflow until cleaned. A few mentions suggest keeping sensors/filters clean to avoid performance dips.

Comparisons often place it as a good small-space option but behind larger or more adjustable uprights on mixed-floor performance, edge precision, and overall refinement, especially on hard floors and bigger debris loads.

In comparisons, it’s often favored versus older Sharks and many uprights for its automation and overall pickup. A recurring nuance is that Shark’s Stratos can match or slightly beat it in certain sealed/crevice or plush-carpet scenarios, while PowerDetect wins on features.

Controls are straightforward and generally well-liked, especially foot-operated power and handle release controls that keep operation simple during quick cleanups.

Controls are described as straightforward, with clear mode buttons and helpful Detect-mode indicators that show when floors are clean/dirty. The cordless variant’s battery indicator is described as basic, but day-to-day operation is still simple.

The detachable pod (Lift-Away/Powered Lift-Away) is widely praised for turning the upright into a more flexible above-floor/under-furniture cleaner. This convertible design is a key differentiator versus basic uprights.

Cord length is reported around the low-to-mid 20 ft range depending on review context, which is workable for small rooms but may feel short for larger spaces and can require more outlet changes.

Corded versions are consistently listed around a 30‑ft cord, which most find sufficient. A few reviewers still wish it were longer for very large rooms.

Only discussed in a review of the cordless PowerDetect ‘Clean and Empty’ variant, where cordless operation and quick maneuvering are highlighted as major benefits. It’s not relevant to corded upright-only use.

Cord wrap and quick-release features are highlighted positively in hands-on demos, making it easier to store and deploy for quick cleanups without wrestling the cord.

Cord management is a recurring nit: the cord can get in the way and is not retractable. Storage solutions help, but it still requires a bit of attention while cleaning.

Crevice pickup on hard floors is a weak spot in one measured test, where the vacuum struggled to lift sand from a deeper groove and made limited progress after a few passes.

Crevice and groove pickup is generally above average, but a few reviews say it’s not class-leading due to airflow/seal design that’s less concentrated than some competitors. It still performs well for typical cracks and edges.

Only discussed for the cordless Clean & Empty variant, where the auto-empty dock and large bagless container are highlighted as a major convenience. No long-term reliability issues are described in the review text.

Handling is helped by low weight, but maneuverability is limited by design choices noted in comparisons (no swivel/pivot on some variants), which can require more repositioning and extra passes around furniture.

Handling is frequently praised for responsive swivel steering and a balanced feel that helps it not ‘feel’ as heavy while pushing. Downsides include a bulky head, strong suction that can tug on thin rugs, and occasional threshold hiccups.

Ease of use is generally high thanks to automation, clear controls, and a large bin. The main usability drawbacks are heft, bulky floorhead size in tight areas, and occasional hassle when changing configurations.

Edge and baseboard cleaning is viewed as workable: some tests show it can pick up much of the debris near walls, though small amounts right at the wall line can remain without multiple passes or attachment use.

Edge cleaning is repeatedly called excellent; Edge Detect boosts suction at baseboards and corners, and one test rated edge pickup as perfect. This is one of the most consistently praised strengths.

Emptying is generally easy and straightforward via a button release over the trash, with reviewers calling the process simple and low-fuss for routine maintenance.

Most reviewers find the bin easy to empty, but bottom-release designs can be messier than top-release systems and may put hands closer to debris. Auto-empty convenience is mentioned only for the cordless ‘Clean and Empty’ variant.

Filtration is a tradeoff: reviews mention washable filters but repeatedly note the lack of a true HEPA filter, making it less ideal for allergy-focused households seeking maximum dust containment.

Filtration and dust containment are a strong point, with a sealed system and HEPA filtration performing well in fog/particle tests. Reviewers often cite it as a good option for allergy-conscious homes.

Floorhead design is a mixed point. Multiple reviews mention no height adjustment on the base compact and an always-on brush roll behavior; this can work fine on carpet but can increase scatter and passes needed on certain hard-floor and debris scenarios.

The DuoClean dual-roller floorhead (soft roller + bristle/fin roller) and integrated sensors are praised for mixed-floor effectiveness and reduced scatter. Multiple reviewers also call the head bulky, which can limit tight-space access.

Several reviews suggest the seal/airflow isn’t as concentrated when fully sealed to the floor, which can slightly reduce deep-clean or crevice performance versus top competitors. The cordless variant also notes a squeegee design that can affect sealing.

Hair pickup on carpets is generally strong for the size and price, with tests and demos showing substantial pet hair capture and good overall results in bedrooms and small carpeted areas.

Hair pickup on carpets is generally very good, particularly for pet hair on rugs. A few notes suggest extremely long hair can still wrap or require occasional roller checks.

Hair pickup on hard floors is described as effective for everyday use in general recommendations, but can be impacted by scatter behavior on larger piles and by the always-on brush roll.

Hard-floor hair pickup is widely praised, with the soft roller helping lift hair without scattering. Reviewers regularly mention clean results with minimal push-around.

Hair-wrap resistance is average: one test reports noticeable but not extreme hair wrap, and comparisons highlight that dedicated self-cleaning systems are typically found on higher-end or different models rather than this compact base design.

Anti-tangle performance is frequently highlighted as best-in-class, and many reviewers report little to no hair wrap. One test still saw some long hair wrapping, so it’s strong but not always 100% hands-off.

Fine-dust pickup on hard floors is consistently very strong, often near-perfect in tests. A nuance: fine sand can end up on filters in some scenarios, increasing cleanup/maintenance.

Hard-floor large debris pickup is inconsistent: some tests show it can collect common debris, but multiple reviewers note scatter and the need for extra passes on bigger piles, partly due to the always-on brush roll and compact head behavior.

Large-debris pickup on hard floors is generally excellent and tends to avoid scattering, helped by the soft front roller. One review found very large clusters sometimes need a second pass.

Headlights and Detect-mode lighting are frequently praised for improving visibility and giving feedback while cleaning. Lighting is considered a meaningful usability feature rather than just cosmetic.

Hose reach is adequate for quick above-floor tasks but not long; one comparison notes a shorter hose on the compact versus a slightly longer hose on a related variant, which can matter for stairs and higher reach.

Hose reach is repeatedly criticized as short, limiting high-reach tasks (stairs, ceilings, tall shelving). It works for quick spot jobs, but it’s not an ideal ‘whole-house above-floor’ setup.

Reviewers often describe it as one of the most innovative, feature-rich uprights, driven by sensor-based automation and upgraded hair management. The smart behaviors are frequently cited as more than gimmicks.

Some reviewers note it can get low to the floor and reach under furniture better than many traditional uprights, especially when reconfigured into Lift-Away modes. This supports better access in low-clearance areas.

Maintenance is regular but manageable: washable filters and accessible components are frequently mentioned, with some reviews noting simple access for cleaning parts and clearing debris as needed.

Routine maintenance is mostly straightforward (empty bin, wash filters, wipe sensors), but at least one test found fine sand builds up on a foam filter and increases cleaning frequency. Odor cartridges are optional and removable.

Noise is a repeated drawback: reviewers call it loud for its size, with one test placing it in the low 90 dB range. Buyers should expect a noticeably noisy cleaning experience relative to many midrange uprights.

Noise is typically “upright-vac loud” rather than quiet, with measured levels ranging from the mid/upper‑60s into the 70s dB depending on mode. Detect/boost behavior can change the pitch and volume during use.

The odor-neutralizer cartridge can leave a fresher scent, and some reviewers liked the effect. Others disliked the fragrance (described as overpowering) and removed the cartridge, so preferences vary.

Onboard tool storage is mentioned as a convenience feature, keeping key tools attached to the vacuum for quick swaps. This helps day-to-day usability.

Ongoing costs are generally low because it’s bagless; routine expenses are mainly filters and optional odor-neutralizer cartridges. One reviewer noted the odor cartridge lasts months and is inexpensive to replace.

Overall sentiment trends positive when the goal is an inexpensive, lightweight vacuum for routine carpet and small-area maintenance, with clear caveats around noise, filtration, and hard-floor scatter control.

Overall sentiment is strongly positive across sources, with Vacuum Wars naming it a top pick and several outlets calling it a standout upright. The most consistent criticisms are weight/bulk, short hose reach, and a few maintenance quirks (like sand on filters).

Packaging is reported as well-protected, with sturdy inserts that keep parts secure in transit. Reviewers who mentioned it were happy with the condition on arrival.

For pet homes, reviews indicate it can pick up hair effectively for routine maintenance, but limitations include louder operation, smaller bin capacity, and fewer specialized pet-focused tools compared with pet-specific models.

Multiple reviews highlight pet-focused features: strong pet-hair pickup, anti-tangle brushroll performance, and included pet tools. Overall it’s positioned as a pet-friendly upright.

Value is a key reason it is recommended in small-space contexts, with multiple reviews pointing to strong utility for the price. Some testing-based commentary suggests that many sub-$100 uprights still have performance compromises versus step-up models.

Most sources position it as a premium-priced flagship that feels worth it if you want top-tier performance and automation. Price-sensitive shoppers may find better value elsewhere unless it’s on sale.

Only mentioned for the cordless variant: reviewers estimate roughly 30–40 minutes in typical auto use and up to about an hour-plus on lower settings. Actual runtime varies with floor type and how often boost triggers. Only mentioned for the cordless variant: max/boost runtime is relatively short (around the low teens in minutes). It’s best treated as a spot-boost mode rather than a whole-home setting.

Stair cleaning is supported via the hose/handle wand approach and attachments, and reviewers describe it as usable for stairs and tight areas, though reach is limited by the compact hose length.

Lift-Away makes stair cleaning more practical than with a fixed-body upright, especially paired with the pet brush/crevice tool. That said, the unit’s overall weight is still a drawback if you carry it up and down frequently.

Storage footprint is frequently praised, with reviewers calling it space-saving and easy to keep upright and tucked away; compact dimensions are highlighted as a key reason to choose it for limited storage.

Reviews generally describe strong cleaning power for a compact, budget upright, with measured suction/airflow in one test and user reports of solid everyday performance on carpets and routine messes. It is not positioned as a powerhouse versus higher-end uprights and may require extra passes on tougher scenarios.

Reviews consistently describe suction as very strong and effective across surfaces, including embedded debris. A few note it can need an extra pass on certain large clusters, and sealed airflow is slightly less concentrated than some rivals.

Reviews frame it as a ‘powerhouse’ that can handle heavy-duty messes, mixed debris, and frequent pet hair. It’s well-suited to larger homes or demanding cleaning routines.

Consistently framed as ideal for small spaces such as dorms, studios, and apartments because it is compact, light, and easy to stash in closets or tight storage areas.

Multiple sources describe the vacuum as bulky, making it less ideal for very tight rooms or cramped layouts. It’s better suited to medium-to-large spaces where the head can maneuver freely.

Several reviews cite a long warranty (often 5 years) and don’t report common reliability failures in their testing windows. Overall sentiment suggests solid support coverage for a flagship upright.

Tool changes are typically described as easy, using friction-fit or simple twist/lock connections for the hose-to-handle and attachment swaps.

Switching between upright and Lift-Away modes is generally quick with dedicated release buttons, and attachments click in easily. Some reviewers note the multi-configuration approach can feel a bit fiddly until you get used to it.

Under-furniture cleaning is a standout thanks to Lift-Away/Powered Lift-Away configurations that let the head reach farther under beds and couches. In standard mode, the pod can reduce clearance, but reviewers like the workaround.

Above-floor pickup is a practical use case: reviewers show cleaning cat trees, dog beds, and edges using the wand and attachments, positioning it as a flexible small-space cleaner.

Above-floor cleaning is strong with the included tools, especially the pet power brush for upholstery. The limiting factor called out in multiple reviews is short hose reach for high areas.

Versatility is a strength for a compact upright thanks to the removable handle/wand, hose use, and basic attachments, enabling quick transitions between floors, edges, and above-floor touchups.

Versatility is a major theme: multiple floor modes, smart sensing, Lift-Away configurations, and a strong set of tools cover a wide range of cleaning tasks. The main tradeoff is that reconfiguring for certain scenarios can take a bit more effort.

Weight is a standout strength. Multiple reviews cite roughly 8 lb and emphasize easy carrying, quick room-to-room use, and simple storage handling.

Weight is a common complaint, with most sources describing it as heavy (around 17–18 lb) and bulky. Several reviewers add that good balance and swivel steering help it feel lighter while pushing than the number suggests.