Compare Eureka PowerSpeed Upright Vacuum Cleaner vs Dyson Ball Animal 3 Upright Vacuum

Accessories were useful but not uniformly premium: several reviewers liked the pet, fabric, and crevice tools, while one called the attachments only okay.

Included tools are useful when present, especially stair and combination tools, but the base package is limited and upgraded tool bundles were viewed as costly.

Aesthetic comments were positive, with reviewers liking the color match and sharp, modern look.

The finish and styling are praised as elegant or vibrant, although bulk affects where users may want to leave it out.

Area-rug handling benefits from height adjustment and was described as easy on low-pile rugs.

Area rug handling is mixed: it can glide when gates are opened, but other reviewers saw dragging, mat pull-up, or rug-transition trouble.

Setup was described as very easy, with assembly taking under a minute or pieces simply popping into place.

Setup is mixed: one review says it can be assembled quickly, while video and hands-on reviewers found weight or confusing assembly frustrating.

The dust bin was consistently praised for being large or easy to use, though one reviewer noted dirt can get stuck near the bin.

The bagless bin receives strong feedback for capacity and reduced emptying frequency, with reviewers also describing the canister as easy to manage.

Build feedback is mixed: one pet-focused review found the plastic less premium, while another praised the metal wand for the price.

Build quality feedback is mixed, with one reviewer calling parts flimsy and another crediting the heavy body with robustness.

High-pile evidence is cautiously positive for a budget vacuum, with above-average lab results but clear limits on shaggy rugs.

High-pile and general carpet pickup are powerful but uneven: some tests were excellent, while large debris on high pile caused trouble.

Low-pile carpet pickup is a consistent strength, with reviewers calling it solid, effective, and good for carpet dirt and hair.

Low-pile carpet pickup is generally strong for small and medium debris in objective tests.

One comparative carpet test found the Eureka slightly ahead of a compact Bissell, suggesting adequate but not leading medium-carpet pickup.

Medium-pile carpet deep cleaning scored very strongly in the Vacuum Wars sand-embedding test.

Clogging evidence is mixed: long hair can accumulate on the roller, but another reviewer found no dirt getting stuck in the brush area.

Clogging and debris prevention were strong in the Reviewed pet hair test, where dog hair caused no clogs or noticeable wrap.

In one budget upright comparison, the Eureka was not the clear winner, with the Shark Navigator performing best overall.

Comparative performance is mixed-positive overall: it ranks near the top in some tests, but some competitors beat it for hardwood, usability, or value.

Controls are mixed: foot controls and height adjustment were liked, but some reviewers disliked bending down or being unable to stop the brush bar.

Controls are generally simple and useful, especially brushroll and suction controls, but one hands-on reviewer found the switches unusual and less refined.

Cord length is mixed: two owners liked the long reach, while one said it would not cover an entire apartment without moving outlets.

Cord length is praised for giving long cleaning reach.

Cordless convenience is a weakness because a corded upright felt inconvenient compared with cordless habits.

Cord management feedback is positive but limited, with reviewers liking the hook and the way the cord stays in place.

Cord management is a clear annoyance in the TechRadar review, especially manual winding and unwinding.

Crevice pickup was weak in the comparative test, where the Eureka collected little sand from a deep crevice.

Crevice and groove pickup are strong, with reviewers citing successful crevice or crumb pickup.

Ease of use is positive in owner reviews, especially for simple operation and basic cleaning.

Ease of use is highly mixed: some reviewers find setup and controls simple, while others dislike the weight, cord, hose, and pushing effort.

Edge and baseboard performance is mixed: tests found mediocre wall pickup, while one owner liked using attachments for baseboards and harder-to-reach areas.

Edge and baseboard cleaning is consistently strong, with multiple reviewers reporting good cleanup along walls and edges.

Emptying is a strength, with repeated praise for easy release, large canisters, and simple dumping.

Emptying and mess control are repeatedly praised as simple or easy.

Filtration evidence is split: one lab found strong particle containment and owners saw little dust escaping, but other reviewers criticized the lack of HEPA or sealing.

Filtration and dust containment are generally praised, with sealed-system or strong filtration comments tied to allergen and pet-dander control.

Floorhead feedback is mixed: one review praised brush agitation, while lab testing found the cleaner head plowed material and hurt pickup.

The floorhead is both a strength and a weakness: adjustable gates improve suction control, but low gates can push larger debris.

The floorhead seal is useful when adjusted correctly, though an overly tight seal contributed to pushing debris in one test.

Hair-removal maintenance is strong because reviewers reported little need for cutting wrapped hair away.

Carpet hair pickup is positive overall, with pet-hair tools and tests showing good carpet hair collection when given enough passes.

Carpet hair pickup is consistently praised, especially for pet hair and fur.

Hard-floor hair evidence is limited but positive, with one long-term owner praising dust and pet-hair pickup on vinyl flooring.

Hard-floor hair pickup performed very well in the Just A Dad hands-on demonstrations.

Hair-wrap resistance is a weakness, with lab testing requiring cutting out long hair and another comparison noting more wrap than a competitor.

Hair-wrap resistance is one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers praising minimal tangles and automatic detangling.

Hard-floor fine debris results are divided: one lab criticized scattering, while owners reported strong dust pickup on vinyl or general floors.

Hard-floor fine-debris pickup is mostly strong in lab-style tests, though one reviewer saw flour streaks that needed extra attention.

Large-debris hard-floor pickup is mixed: some reviewers saw good rice, popcorn, or cereal pickup, while others reported scattering and merely decent results.

Hard-floor large-debris intake is mixed to weak: adjustable gates can help, but several reviewers saw cereal or oats pushed around.

One review praised the built-in headlights for improved visibility.

Hose length is mixed: some reviewers liked the reach with wand/hose use, while one called the hose really short.

The hose offers long reach, but reviewers often criticize it for stiffness, retraction pull, or awkward use.

Innovation feedback is negative in one review because the manual suction slider felt behind vacuums with automatic adjustment.

Kid-friendliness was praised by one owner because the vacuum was light enough for children to use.

Low-profile performance is weak because the ball design prevents easy access under furniture.

Maintenance is mixed: washable filters and easy cleaning help, but the non-removable brush roller and wrapped hair can be troublesome.

Maintenance is mixed-positive: routine bin and filter care is simple, but monthly filter washing and drying can feel tedious.

Handling is mixed: reviewers liked the light weight and easy rolling, but several criticized the basic non-swivel head around furniture or corners.

Handling is the most divided usability area: some reviewers praise the ball steering, while several others find it heavy, stiff, or tiring.

Noise feedback is mixed: one test called it still noisy and another pet list noted louder operation, while one owner said it was not super loud.

Noise feedback is mixed: one lab found it surprisingly quiet for a high-performance upright, while another reviewer found it loud enough to be frustrating.

Onboard tool storage was praised as convenient and easy to access.

Onboard tool storage was criticized because clipped-on attachments were not easy to remove.

Washable filters were viewed as reducing replacement and maintenance costs.

Ongoing costs are viewed favorably because washable filters and the bagless sealed design reduce replacement needs.

One long-term owner reported no issues after about a year and a half of frequent family use.

Durability impressions are mixed: one reviewer worried about plastic and moving parts, while another felt the heavy build gave robustness.

Overall opinion is positive for budget and basic cleaning needs, but the strongest critical review framed it as basic and best for modest expectations.

Overall opinion is positive but not unanimous: reviewers praise deep cleaning and pet performance, while the heaviest critiques focus on weight, corded use, and awkward handling.

Packaging was positively described as secure and recyclable in the TechRadar hands-on review.

Pet-oriented evidence is positive overall: reviewers praised pet tools, pet hair pickup, and usefulness in homes with pets, though hair wrap remains a limitation.

Pet-focused performance is one of the strongest themes: reviewers praise pet hair pickup, anti-tangle behavior, and filtration for homes with shedding animals.

Value is a major strength, with multiple reviewers calling it a strong buy or unusually capable for a low price.

Value is divided: some reviewers see strong Dyson power for the money, while others point to high accessory costs, high price, or better-value competitors.

Self-propel feel is lightly positive in Reviewed's test because the motor helped the vacuum move forward.

Stair-cleaning evidence is limited to attachment use, where a reviewer thought the tools would work well on stairs.

Stair feedback is split by tool versus machine: the stair tool is useful, but carrying the full vacuum up stairs is repeatedly criticized.

Storage and upright stability are mixed: it stayed stable during hose use, but its large, bold body was criticized as hard to store discreetly.

Residue or scatter evidence is negative in one budget comparison, where the group of simple uprights kicked sand behind them.

Hard-floor residue is a weakness in the TechRadar flour test, which left visible streaking.

Stuck resistance is mixed: it improves over earlier Dyson uprights on thick carpet, but strong suction can still pull into carpets or mats.

Reviewers generally found suction strong for the price, with some tests showing good airflow, while one lab review still called suction relatively low next to better models.

Reviewers consistently describe the vacuum as extremely powerful, with class-leading suction; the main tradeoff is that the suction can make carpets harder to push across.

Heavy-duty suitability is mixed: some reviewers liked it for frequent family and pet use, while lab testing warned against big messes or deeper cleaning demands.

The vacuum is well suited to deep or whole-house cleaning because reviewers repeatedly highlight strong suction and deep carpet performance.

One lab review positioned it as suitable for small spaces with simple debris challenges.

Small-space suitability is limited by bulk, under-furniture reach, and a preference for more open floor plans.

Reliability evidence is limited but positive, based on one owner reporting no issues after extended use.

Warranty support is praised in the review that discusses it, specifically for the lengthy parts-and-labor coverage.

Attachment surface safety evidence is limited but positive, with one reviewer praising a dusting tool for surfaces that should not be scratched.

Tool changes were usually described as simple, with removable handles, hoses, and twist-lock attachments that were easy to remove or connect.

Tool changes are usable but not seamless; reviewers repeatedly describe the wand or hose connection process as tricky or awkward.

Under-furniture pickup is a repeated weakness because the ball and body height limit reach.

Above-floor and upholstery cleaning is generally useful with included tools, but lab testing found it less thorough than a mini motorized brush.

Above-floor and upholstery cleaning are strong when the tools are used, especially on sofas and cushions.

Versatility was praised through height settings, hose use, and multiple tools, although it remains a basic upright rather than a premium convertible system.

Versatility is praised where the adjustable cleaner head helps the vacuum handle multiple floor and debris types.

Weight is one of the clearest strengths, repeatedly described as very light or easy to lift.

Weight is a repeated concern across reviews, especially for carrying, stairs, and extended use.