Compare Eureka PowerSpeed Upright Vacuum Cleaner vs Dyson Ball Animal 3 Upright Vacuum

Reviews commonly mention multiple included tools (often including crevice, upholstery/dusting tools, and in some versions a pet/turbo brush), plus convenient onboard storage.

Included accessories depend heavily on the package: multiple reviews note the base bundle often ships with only two tools, while higher tiers add many more. Several sources also point out that building a full tool set can add meaningful cost.

No summary yet.

Adjustable gates can help the vacuum transition and glide on thicker rugs compared with older fixed-height Dyson uprights. Still, some testers found the low-profile head can catch on rug edges or mats, requiring odd angles or gate changes to get over lips.

Assembly is consistently described as quick and simple, with basic parts (handle, hose/cord hooks) snapping in and the unit ready in about a minute in some tests.

Assembly feedback ranges from very quick and straightforward (a few click-in steps) to awkward, mainly because the vacuum and floorhead are heavy and some latches are not intuitive. A couple of reviewers also mention minimal or downloaded instructions, which can add to first-time friction.

The 2.6 L bagless bin is repeatedly highlighted as large and easy to empty via a bottom-release design, reducing how often you have to stop mid-clean.

It is a bagless vacuum with a relatively large bin for an upright in this class; some sources cite about 0.45 gal / 1.7 L and describe infrequent emptying. A few reviews also note the bin can feel smaller than certain prior Dyson variants, but overall capacity is a plus for whole-house cleans.

Build quality is commonly described as more plastic and basic (not premium), but generally acceptable for the price point.

Build-quality impressions are mixed. Some reviewers describe it as solidly built and durable-feeling, while at least one user review perceived parts as flimsy plastic with many moving mechanisms that raised long-term concerns.

Performance on high-pile/shag is a common weak spot: reviewers cite reduced deep pickup and harder pushing, often requiring more passes and careful height selection.

High-pile results are mixed: some reviews report excellent cleaning and better glide than older Dyson uprights when the gates are opened, while at least one lab test found below-average pickup of mixed debris on high pile. Expect strong suction, but plan to adjust gates and make extra passes for large, lightweight debris.

On low-pile carpet it’s described as solid and competitive for the price, with multiple reviews noting good debris collection once height is set correctly.

On low-pile carpet, most reviews report excellent pickup, including strong results on fine and medium debris. A few tests note small particles like sugar can remain without extra attention, but overall low-pile performance is a key strength.

No summary yet.

Medium-pile carpet deep-clean performance is repeatedly highlighted as a strength, including a perfect-style result in a sand-embedded deep-clean test. Even when reviewers criticize ease of pushing, they still credit it with strong embedded-dirt extraction.

In pet-hair and general cleaning discussions, reviewers report strong debris flow with no notable clogs during testing, including with clumps of fur. Most complaints are about plowing or scattering larger debris rather than true clogging inside the system.

Compared with other uprights, it is often ranked near the top for raw cleaning power and carpet results, and is positioned as a meaningful upgrade over the Ball Animal 2 for usability. However, some competitors are called out as better on hard floors, easier to maneuver, or stronger value depending on your mix of flooring and need for lift-away handling.

Controls are intentionally simple: a main power switch plus a brushroll on/off, with performance tuning handled via a slider or gates on the floorhead. The main drawback noted is that the suction/gate slider sits low on the head, requiring you to bend down to adjust between surfaces.

Cord length is repeatedly praised as “long enough” for many rooms and general home use, though some users still need outlet changes in larger layouts.

Cord length is consistently described as long, usually around 33 to 35 feet, supporting wide cleaning range without frequent outlet changes. The long cord is a reach advantage but also contributes to cord management hassle.

Cord hooks/wrap and storage are commonly mentioned as straightforward and practical for quick winding and organization.

Cord handling is manual, with no automatic rewind, and reviewers commonly describe winding and unwinding as tedious. The benefit is reach, but the tradeoff is time and a cord that can get in the way during cleaning.

No summary yet.

Crevice performance is repeatedly praised, with strong suction at the head and good results in crevice-style pickup tests. It is commonly described as effective for tight gaps and grooves when used with the right setting or tool.

Cyclone-style engineering is referenced as part of Dyson's lossless-suction approach, including mentions of radial root cyclone technology. In practice, reviewers attribute consistent suction and strong pickup to the overall airflow and head design rather than any single component.

Maneuverability is limited by the non-swivel floorhead; users often describe it as light but less agile around furniture than swiveling competitors.

Ease of use is mixed: the machine is light and simple with foot controls, but frequent notes mention no swivel head and bending down for manual height adjustments.

Ease-of-use feedback splits by user expectations: some reviewers call it simple, intuitive, and highly usable, while others find it cumbersome due to weight, strong suction, cord drag, and a stiff hose. Most agree it rewards a short learning curve around head-gate settings and wand handling.

Edge/baseboard reach is repeatedly described as limited, often leaving a small strip near walls that may require a tool pass.

Edge cleaning is a consistent bright spot, with multiple tests showing strong pickup right along walls and baseboards and near edge-to-edge suction. One review notes a small gap from the front in a specific setup, but overall edge results are strong.

Emptying is generally described as hygienic and easy: detach the bin and press a button to drop debris into the trash. A couple of users caution that the release mechanism can be sensitive, so careful handling helps avoid accidental disassembly.

Filtration is described as decent-to-strong for the budget class in testing, but multiple reviews emphasize the lack of true HEPA and/or a fully sealed allergen system.

Most reviews describe strong dust containment with a sealed system and effective filtration, sometimes even labeled HEPA whole-machine filtration. One test notes it may not be a true HEPA filter but still performed excellently at keeping fine particles from escaping.

Floorhead design is frequently described as basic and non-swiveling, with behavior that can plow or scatter debris on hard floors depending on debris type and pass angle.

The Motorbar floorhead and its adjustable gates are widely cited as the key design upgrade, improving versatility and helping the vacuum handle different debris types. Critiques focus on the head being relatively narrow and, with gates set low, sometimes pushing larger debris instead of riding over it.

Reviews repeatedly describe the head seal as both the superpower and the pain point: a tight seal boosts deep cleaning but can make the vacuum hard to push and can shove larger debris. Opening the gates or moving the slider increases airflow and clearance, improving debris intake and reducing sticking.

Hair pickup on carpets is generally described as good for pet hair, with performance often improving with extra passes.

Hair pickup on carpets is a standout, with multiple tests showing strong removal of pet fur and long human hair from rugs. Reviewers often recommend it for carpet-heavy homes where hair is a constant problem.

Long hair tangling is a recurring theme: several reviews report wrap on the brush roll, sometimes requiring cutting/clearing, especially because the roller is often described as non-removable.

The anti-tangle system is repeatedly called out as a major upgrade, with many tests showing little to no hair wrap. In some cases hair can briefly wrap, but reviewers note it can self-clear with continued run time, reducing the need for cutting hair off the brushroll.

Fine debris on hard floors can be frustrating in some tests because the brush roll can scatter/spray particles, leading to extra cleanup passes.

Fine dust performance on hard floors is generally strong in controlled tests, but real-world feedback is more mixed, including reports of flour streaks or needing extra passes. Turning the brushroll off and adjusting the head gates are commonly suggested to improve hard-floor results.

Larger debris on hard floors is helped by having height adjustment, but scatter can still occur depending on the debris type and technique.

Large, lightweight debris like cereal or oats can be a weak spot when the head gates are set low, with several reviews describing pinging or plowing. Adjusting the gates, turning off the brushroll on hard floors, or using a hand tool can improve pickup but may add extra passes.

Some versions are noted to include headlights, improving visibility during cleaning, but this appears variant-dependent rather than universal.

Hose length feedback is mixed; some mention decent above-floor reach (sometimes cited as ~7 ft in certain versions) while others describe the hose as short for the category.

Reach is a strong point, with reviewers citing hoses and wands in the 13 to 15 foot range or multi-meter extension. Multiple users also report the stretch hose can feel stiff and pull back, so the usable reach can be less pleasant than the spec suggests.

No summary yet.

Maintenance is mostly routine (washable filters, bin emptying), but brush-roll hair wrap and occasional odor/filter cleaning are common upkeep points.

Routine upkeep is simple but frequent: empty the bin and wash the filters on a recurring schedule, with some reviewers citing monthly cleaning and a 24-hour dry time. Brushroll access is generally good, though at least one review found the secondary filter harder to remove.

The ball steering helps it corner and pivot, and some reviewers find it easy to make tight turns. That said, the combination of weight, cord drag, and strong suction at the head often makes it feel bulky or tiring, and it can feel stiff on certain carpets.

Noise is repeatedly noted as on the louder side for the class, especially at higher settings, though some owners describe it as not excessively loud for the price.

Noise impressions vary: one lab-style review measured it around 59 dB and called it surprisingly quiet, while another home test recorded about 81 dB and found it loud. Expect a noticeable, power-forward sound profile that depends on test method and environment.

Onboard tool storage is frequently called out as convenient, keeping common attachments accessible without hunting for them.

Some accessories can be stored directly on the vacuum so they are close at hand, and this is viewed as convenient during room-to-room cleaning. A few comments note the storage positions are not always the easiest to access in the moment.

Ongoing costs are generally viewed as low because it is bagless and the filters are washable/rinsable. The main recurring burden is time and downtime: filter washing is recommended regularly and requires a long air-dry period, so some owners may prefer spare filters.

Longer-term ownership feedback includes reports of holding up well over a year-plus of regular family/pet use in at least one update-style review, though it remains an entry-level design.

Overall sentiment trends positive for budget, carpet-first needs: praised for suction, bin size, and simplicity, with the most common complaints being hard-floor scatter, agility limits, and hair wrap maintenance.

Packaging is praised in at least one review for secure, eco-minded materials such as recyclable cardboard rather than excessive plastic. Other reviews do not strongly dispute this, but they also do not focus on packaging.

Pet-focused value is a consistent theme: reviewers highlight strong pet hair pickup for the price and versions that include a pet/turbo tool for upholstery and stairs.

Reviewers frequently recommend it for pet owners thanks to strong fur pickup, brushroll de-tangling behavior, and filtration aimed at keeping dander contained. Upholstery tools (when included) are also highlighted as particularly effective on pet hair.

Value is consistently rated high: many reviews frame it as one of the better budget uprights if you prioritize carpet and can accept tradeoffs on hard floors and premium filtration.

Value is debated: some reviewers call it hard to beat for sheer cleaning performance and note it can be a relatively affordable way into a Dyson upright, especially on sale. Others feel it is expensive versus strong competitors, and the limited base tool set (or paid upgrades) can make the overall value proposition weaker.

The stair tool can help on carpeted steps, but multiple reviewers emphasize the bigger issue is carrying the unit. At roughly 17 lb and with an awkward carry approach, it is commonly described as a pain for multi-level or stair-heavy homes.

The vacuum stands upright but has a tall, bulky profile that some reviewers would rather store in a utility space than leave out. Stability is generally not flagged as an issue, but footprint and visual presence are.

Reviewers frequently describe strong suction/airflow for a budget upright, with test-style content showing respectable airflow and lift relative to similarly priced competitors.

Across reviews and lab-style tests, the Animal 3 is consistently described as extremely powerful, often cited around 290 air watts. That strength shows up as strong deep cleaning, but it can also make the vacuum harder to push and more likely to plow larger, lightweight debris unless the head gates are adjusted.

A narrower cleaning path can help in tighter spaces and gives more maneuvering options around furniture legs and corners. However, the overall upright body is still bulky and corded, so it is not universally praised for small or cluttered homes.

Reliability signals are generally positive in owner updates (no issues reported over extended use in at least one case), but support experiences are not deeply covered across the set.

Warranty and support details vary by reviewer and region: several sources cite a 5-year manufacturer warranty, while another lists a 1-year warranty. Practical support experience is not deeply covered, so expectations should be set by the retailer and your local Dyson terms.

Tool changes are generally described as simple: pop off the hose/handle and attach tools directly or via the handle extension for extra reach.

Tool swapping is generally straightforward once you learn the wand and hose release points, with attachments snapping into place. Several reviewers still found the wand/hose handling awkward or stiff at first, especially when switching frequently during a clean.

Multiple reviewers note the ball design and bulky body limit how far the vacuum can reach under low furniture. For frequent under-sofa or under-bed cleaning, the Animal 3 is often described as less practical than lower-profile or cordless alternatives.

Above-floor and upholstery cleaning is considered helpful with included tools, especially for quick pickups, though some reviews note it’s not as thorough as a mini motorized brush unless you use a turbo tool.

Above-floor cleaning benefits from the long hose/wand reach and strong suction, and pet-oriented upholstery tools get high marks when included. Still, several reviewers found the hose stiff or retracting, which can make above-floor work more of a workout than expected.

No summary yet.

Multiple sources call it lightweight for an upright (often around 10–12 lb depending on variant), making it easier to carry and use for quick cleanups.

Most sources place the weight around 17 to 17.4 lb, and it is frequently described as heavy for everyday lifting. Some users still find it manageable on flat floors, but the weight shows up in fatigue and portability complaints.