Compare Eureka PowerSpeed Upright Vacuum Cleaner vs Dyson Ball Animal 3 Extra Upright Vacuum

Accessories were useful but not uniformly premium: several reviewers liked the pet, fabric, and crevice tools, while one called the attachments only okay.

Attachments are generally well regarded, especially the pet grooming, turbine, crevice, stair, and upholstery tools, though the Extra package value is debated elsewhere.

Aesthetic comments were positive, with reviewers liking the color match and sharp, modern look.

A WIRED review explicitly praises the vacuum’s styling while also noting broad floor-surface performance.

Area-rug handling benefits from height adjustment and was described as easy on low-pile rugs.

Area rug handling is mixed: one review says it glides on a thick rug, while others warn it may be too strong or hard to move on carpet.

Setup was described as very easy, with assembly taking under a minute or pieces simply popping into place.

Assembly is mixed: one comparison says the Dyson needs quite a bit of assembly, and another found setup slightly tricky.

The dust bin was consistently praised for being large or easy to use, though one reviewer noted dirt can get stuck near the bin.

The bin is viewed positively in the hands-on review, mainly because of its large capacity.

Build feedback is mixed: one pet-focused review found the plastic less premium, while another praised the metal wand for the price.

Build quality evidence is positive for the wand, which a reviewer describes as high-quality plastic that does not tend to snap.

High-pile evidence is cautiously positive for a budget vacuum, with above-average lab results but clear limits on shaggy rugs.

High-pile and plush carpet evidence is positive, with reviewers praising thick-carpet deep cleaning and plush-carpet effectiveness.

Low-pile carpet pickup is a consistent strength, with reviewers calling it solid, effective, and good for carpet dirt and hair.

One comparative carpet test found the Eureka slightly ahead of a compact Bissell, suggesting adequate but not leading medium-carpet pickup.

Medium-pile carpet pickup scores very strongly in testing, including a perfect carpet deep-clean score and top sand pickup results.

Clogging evidence is mixed: long hair can accumulate on the roller, but another reviewer found no dirt getting stuck in the brush area.

Clog prevention is a strength in pet-heavy use, with reviewers highlighting anti-clog design and debris containment in the bin.

In one budget upright comparison, the Eureka was not the clear winner, with the Shark Navigator performing best overall.

Comparative evidence is favorable: reviewers say it impressed against other uprights, outshined competition on carpet, and felt like a worthy successor.

Controls are mixed: foot controls and height adjustment were liked, but some reviewers disliked bending down or being unable to stop the brush bar.

Reviewers like the adjustable gates and suction controls because they improve control across surfaces and debris types.

Cord length is mixed: two owners liked the long reach, while one said it would not cover an entire apartment without moving outlets.

Cord length is consistently praised, especially the 35-foot cord and long total cleaning range.

Cord management feedback is positive but limited, with reviewers liking the hook and the way the cord stays in place.

Cord management is praised in the unboxing review because the hook lets the user remove the whole cable in one go.

Crevice pickup was weak in the comparative test, where the Eureka collected little sand from a deep crevice.

Crevice pickup is excellent in comparative testing, where the Dyson edges out the Shark Stratos in deep crevice sand pickup.

Cyclone performance is mixed: one review praises Radial Root Cyclone airflow, while another says the newer cyclone system dirties filters faster.

The dual-motor design is evaluated positively because the brush motor is described as not stealing power from the main motor.

Ease of use is positive in owner reviews, especially for simple operation and basic cleaning.

Ease of use is mixed: one reviewer liked how the machine follows the hose, while another said several operations take getting used to.

Edge and baseboard performance is mixed: tests found mediocre wall pickup, while one owner liked using attachments for baseboards and harder-to-reach areas.

Edge and baseboard cleaning is mixed: one test found the Dyson missed rice near the center, while another called edge cleaning good but not best.

Emptying is a strength, with repeated praise for easy release, large canisters, and simple dumping.

Emptying and mess control are viewed positively, with reviewers calling the bin hygienic, easy to empty, and clean to handle.

Filtration evidence is split: one lab found strong particle containment and owners saw little dust escaping, but other reviewers criticized the lack of HEPA or sealing.

Filtration and dust containment receive strong marks, with reviewers praising HEPA-level containment, allergen capture, and cleaner air while vacuuming.

Floorhead feedback is mixed: one review praised brush agitation, while lab testing found the cleaner head plowed material and hurt pickup.

The cleaner head is repeatedly praised as a standout feature, with efficient design, a strong seal, and a fantastic updated head.

The floorhead seal is praised in comparative testing for forming a tight seal against the floor.

Hair-removal-channel evidence is mixed to negative: reviewers found balls trapped in the vanes and hair caught on comb teeth despite overall anti-tangle strengths.

Carpet hair pickup is positive overall, with pet-hair tools and tests showing good carpet hair collection when given enough passes.

Hair pickup on carpets is very strong, with lab and review evidence showing most hair picked up and long/pet hair efficiently removed.

Hard-floor hair evidence is limited but positive, with one long-term owner praising dust and pet-hair pickup on vinyl flooring.

Hard-floor hair pickup is praised in Forbes’ evidence that suction lifts hair from both carpets and hard floors.

Hair-wrap resistance is a weakness, with lab testing requiring cutting out long hair and another comparison noting more wrap than a competitor.

Hair-wrap resistance is one of the clearest strengths, with multiple reviewers reporting virtually no tangles, clean vanes, and self-clearing brush behavior.

Hard-floor fine debris results are divided: one lab criticized scattering, while owners reported strong dust pickup on vinyl or general floors.

Hard-floor fine dust pickup is praised in testing, with the reviewer saying it handles the finest dust particles well.

Large-debris hard-floor pickup is mixed: some reviewers saw good rice, popcorn, or cereal pickup, while others reported scattering and merely decent results.

Large debris intake is generally strong, but not perfect: some reviews praise larger debris pickup while others note popcorn or similar debris can spit forward.

One review praised the built-in headlights for improved visibility.

Hose length is mixed: some reviewers liked the reach with wand/hose use, while one called the hose really short.

The hose and wand range is praised for above-floor reach and easier high/low cleaning.

The new cleaner head and adjustable gates are seen as meaningful innovations versus previous Dyson uprights.

Kid-friendliness was praised by one owner because the vacuum was light enough for children to use.

The low-profile aspect is modest but positive, with one reviewer noting a slim, short profile and limited under-bed reach.

Maintenance is mixed: washable filters and easy cleaning help, but the non-removable brush roller and wrapped hair can be troublesome.

Maintenance is viewed positively overall, with a reviewer explicitly calling it very easy.

Handling is mixed: reviewers liked the light weight and easy rolling, but several criticized the basic non-swivel head around furniture or corners.

Maneuverability is mostly praised for the ball steering and tight turns, though one review says the ball-style steering takes some getting used to.

Noise feedback is mixed: one test called it still noisy and another pet list noted louder operation, while one owner said it was not super loud.

Noise is a recurring drawback, with reviewers noting it is louder than some competitors and describing it as a very loud machine.

Onboard tool storage was praised as convenient and easy to access.

Washable filters were viewed as reducing replacement and maintenance costs.

Ownership costs are viewed favorably because washable filters and reusable filtration reduce replacement needs.

One long-term owner reported no issues after about a year and a half of frequent family use.

Overall opinion is positive for budget and basic cleaning needs, but the strongest critical review framed it as basic and best for modest expectations.

Overall sentiment is very positive across reviews, with repeated top-choice language, high ratings, and strong owner satisfaction.

Pet-oriented evidence is positive overall: reviewers praised pet tools, pet hair pickup, and usefulness in homes with pets, though hair wrap remains a limitation.

Pet-related evidence is highly positive: reviewers praise fur pickup, pet-focused attachments, anti-tangle behavior, and usefulness in shedding-heavy homes.

Value is a major strength, with multiple reviewers calling it a strong buy or unusually capable for a low price.

Value is mixed to negative: reviewers praise performance, but one calls it pricey and another doubts paying extra for bundled tools.

Stair-cleaning evidence is limited to attachment use, where a reviewer thought the tools would work well on stairs.

Stair cleaning is a weakness in one review because the upright body and weight make stair use less ideal.

Its slim, short upright profile is praised for making the vacuum easy to tuck into a corner.

Residue or scatter evidence is negative in one budget comparison, where the group of simple uprights kicked sand behind them.

Stuck resistance is favorable on thick carpet because the Ball Animal 3 glides where the earlier fixed-height model bogged down.

Reviewers generally found suction strong for the price, with some tests showing good airflow, while one lab review still called suction relatively low next to better models.

Reviewers consistently describe suction and airflow as a major strength, with lab results and user tests showing strong lift, deep cleaning, and upholstery power.

Heavy-duty suitability is mixed: some reviewers liked it for frequent family and pet use, while lab testing warned against big messes or deeper cleaning demands.

Reviewers frame it as a heavy-duty machine, citing powerful air speed, lift, and a Terminator-like readiness for demanding pet messes.

One lab review positioned it as suitable for small spaces with simple debris challenges.

For a full-size upright, one review finds the machine relatively compact and suitable for tucking into smaller spaces.

Reliability evidence is limited but positive, based on one owner reporting no issues after extended use.

Attachment surface safety evidence is limited but positive, with one reviewer praising a dusting tool for surfaces that should not be scratched.

The pet grooming attachment raises a surface-safety concern because a reviewer found the bristles stiff and would avoid using it on a pet.

Tool changes were usually described as simple, with removable handles, hoses, and twist-lock attachments that were easy to remove or connect.

Tool changes are mixed: one reviewer praised the easy teardown and quick-release wand, while another found getting the hose out awkward.

Under-furniture pickup is limited but possible, with one review noting it can reach under the bed a little.

Above-floor and upholstery cleaning is generally useful with included tools, but lab testing found it less thorough than a mini motorized brush.

Above-floor and upholstery pickup is strong, with reviewers praising turbine tools, couch and car-seat cleaning, and no suction loss with attachments.

Versatility was praised through height settings, hose use, and multiple tools, although it remains a basic upright rather than a premium convertible system.

Reviewers see it as versatile across mess sizes, surfaces, modes, and whole-apartment cleaning, especially with carpets, hard floors, and attachments.

Weight is one of the clearest strengths, repeatedly described as very light or easy to lift.

Weight is a consistent downside: reviewers describe it as the heaviest in a comparison, not lightweight, and tiring to lift.