Compare Dyson Ball Animal 3 Extra Upright Vacuum vs Bissell CleanView Swivel Vacuum

The Extra bundle's pet-focused tools (pet groom and turbine tool) and core tools (crevice/brush, stair) are widely viewed as useful. Value depends on how often you will use the specialized pet attachments.

Reviews consistently note a useful tool set for the price, often including a crevice tool, dusting brush, extension/wand, and a pet-focused turbo tool.

At least one long-form review explicitly calls the vacuum stylish, and the design is generally treated as premium-looking. Color and trim differences are also noted between package variants.

Aesthetics are described as typical for the category: a modern, pet-themed look with bright accents rather than a premium finish.

A recurring minor complaint is blowback or scattering with certain large debris, including spitting kernels or pushing round objects. Changing the head setting or vacuuming path is often described as reducing the issue.

Some scattering or blowback is reported on hard floors or with certain debris, especially when height is set too high or the brush action outpaces suction.

Strong suction can make small/thin rugs harder to vacuum and may drag them around, but the adjustable gates/air-bleed settings help. Homes with heavier rugs or more carpet generally report smoother handling.

Assembly is generally described as tool-free and quick, with parts snapping into place. One reviewer found setup slightly tricky because the manual relied on photos, but still completed it in about 12 minutes.

Multiple reviewers found setup straightforward, typically just attaching the handle and snapping or screwing a few parts in before cleaning.

A visible fill line or indicator on the bin is appreciated as a helpful cue for when to empty, especially for a budget model.

The bagless bin is repeatedly described as large (about 0.5 gallons / 1.7 liters in reviews) and easy to monitor as it fills. Capacity helps longer cleaning sessions between empties.

The bagless bin is easy to remove and empty with a bottom-release door; some users note the fill line can feel conservative, leading to more frequent emptying.

Reviews characterize the vacuum as dense and premium-feeling, with sturdy components and a removable brush roll design. The same build contributes to the heavier carry weight.

Build quality is often described as mostly plastic and budget-grade; it feels lighter but may not inspire long-term confidence compared with pricier uprights.

Reviewers say the head design and gate/vent settings help it work on thick or deep-pile carpet without stalling. It can still feel grabby in deeper-clean modes because of the high suction.

High-pile performance ranges from very good on hair and smaller debris to weaker on larger pieces when head clearance becomes an issue.

Low-pile carpet pickup is generally strong, though large debris can still require extra passes in some lab-style testing.

In controlled sand tests on medium-pile carpet, the vacuum scored at or near the top, indicating excellent embedded-dirt pickup. Reviewers also note it avoids bogging on thicker carpet when the head gates are opened.

Medium-pile carpet performance is repeatedly strong, including at least one deep-clean test reporting excellent sand pickup.

Most reviews emphasize strong clog resistance and fewer mid-clean stoppages, even with heavy pet fur. However, very large or round debris can sometimes lodge in the head until cleared.

Clogging prevention is a mix: some like the suction blockage indicator, while others warn hair and debris can build up and require frequent cleaning to avoid performance drop.

Across comparative reviews, the Ball Animal 3 Extra is portrayed as outperforming cheaper uprights in deep-clean tests and improving on earlier Dyson uprights for hard floors and hair tangles. Some comparisons still highlight tradeoffs like weight, noise, and occasional large-debris scattering.

In comparisons, it is treated as a capable budget option, but it does not match premium uprights for power, refinement, or filtration.

Controls include multiple cleaning modes, brush-roll control, and head gate/air-bleed adjustments that help tune performance by surface. Reviewers sometimes mention a short learning curve in figuring out the best setting.

Controls are serviceable but not premium: common notes include foot-based buttons and a height dial that may require bending, plus occasional complaints about button placement.

Multiple reviews cite an extra-long 35-foot cord, giving a large room-to-room cleaning radius. Cord length is consistently positioned as a strength.

Cord length is commonly reported around 27 feet, which is usable for most rooms but a bit shorter than some uprights with longer cords.

Cord hooks and rear storage are mentioned as straightforward for wrapping and quickly releasing the cord. No one highlights a rewind feature, but basic cord handling is described as manageable.

Cord management is a strong convenience point on rewind variants, while non-rewind versions still offer clips/hooks that help keep the cord out of the way.

Crevice testing and reviewer feedback indicate excellent groove pickup, with the Dyson scoring at or near the top for lifting sand from a deep crevice. This aligns with its high sealed suction.

Crevice and groove pickup is described as decent but not class-leading; results vary by test material and technique.

Cyclone performance is generally credited for maintaining strong suction and helping prevent clogs. One reviewer felt the newer cyclone setup lets filters get dirty faster than older Dyson designs, suggesting more frequent checks.

Multi-cyclonic design is credited with maintaining suction reasonably well during typical cleaning, though it does not fully solve large-debris limitations.

Dyson's ball steering is frequently praised for tight turns and easier navigation around furniture. A few reviewers say it takes getting used to, but most find it maneuverable once familiar.

Ease of use is boosted by strong cleaning performance, ball steering, and versatile attachments. The main usability negatives are the heavy body, occasional hard-to-push feel on carpet, and loud operation.

Edge cleaning is generally good on the sides, but multiple tests note weaker pickup at the front edge or centerline near walls, sometimes needing an extra angle or pass. It is solid but not the strongest point.

No summary yet.

Hygienic, no-touch emptying is a consistent positive, with reviewers noting you can eject debris without handling dust or fur. This is frequently paired with praise for the large bin.

Emptying is generally clean and simple thanks to the bottom-drop design, though clumped hair can sometimes stick and require manual removal.

Whole-machine HEPA filtration and sealed dust containment are frequently praised, especially by pet owners and allergy-focused reviewers. Washable filters are seen as a plus for long-term ownership.

Filtration is the biggest downside across sources: it lacks a sealed HEPA system and some testing reports significant particle release, making it a weak fit for allergy-sensitive homes.

The redesigned floorhead with adjustable gates is frequently credited for better large-debris pickup and improved thick-carpet glide compared to older Dyson uprights. Tradeoffs mentioned include occasional spitting/pushing of bigger pieces and less effective reach at the very front edge for some debris.

The floorhead design is budget-focused: it can clean well when settings are right, but low clearance and brush behavior can contribute to plowing on certain debris.

A sealing flap or squeegee-like feature is cited as helping hard-floor pickup and reducing scatter when the height setting is dialed in.

A few reviewers report that hair or round debris can snag in the hair-removal comb/vanes and may require pulling it off or opening the head. It is not constant, but it is the main tangle-related annoyance mentioned.

Hair pickup on carpet is repeatedly described as excellent, with pet owners reporting noticeably better results than prior vacuums. Lab-style tests show near-complete hair collection in a few passes.

Pet hair pickup on carpet is a frequent strength, with multiple reviews calling it strong for the price, though effectiveness can drop as hair accumulates.

Detangling features (hair-removal vanes/active combing) are a standout, with multiple tests showing virtually no brush-roll wrap even with long hair. Some reviewers still mention occasional hair catching at the comb area.

Hair can wrap around the brush and cleaning it can be tedious; higher-end competitors manage tangles better in several comparisons.

Reviews describe strong fine-dust pickup on hard floors, helped by high suction and floorhead details intended to capture small particles. It is commonly positioned as one of the better Dyson uprights for hard floors.

No summary yet.

Adjustable gates help it take in larger debris on hard floors and carpet, and many reviewers see strong pickup overall. Some tests still show it can initially spit or push items like popcorn kernels or plastic balls until the setting or approach is adjusted.

Large debris on hard floors is mixed: small debris is fine, but bigger pieces can be pushed, plowed, or scattered depending on height and brush behavior.

Several comparisons note the absence of headlights or floor illumination on the CleanView models discussed, unlike some higher-end uprights.

A long hose and wand (15 feet cited in reviews) enables above-floor cleaning and helps reach stairs and furniture. Reviewers often highlight this reach as a practical advantage versus typical uprights.

Above-floor reach is mixed: some variants have a useful hose length for stairs and upholstery, while others describe the hose as short for high shelves or tall furniture.

Maintenance is often described as easy thanks to washable filters, removable brush roll, and accessible inspection points. Some users still report periodic cleaning around the comb/mesh and more frequent filter attention than expected.

Maintenance is a real requirement: regular bin emptying, filter washing, and brush/belt checks are repeatedly mentioned to keep performance and reliability stable.

Swivel steering is repeatedly highlighted as a usability win, making it easier to navigate around furniture, though some users find the swivel can make straight-line tracking a bit less precise.

Noise is a common complaint, with descriptions ranging from loud to screaming if powered on while upright. Measured sound levels in one test place it on the louder side of comparable uprights.

Noise is a recurring compromise: one test measured very loud levels, while other reviews call it slightly louder than average for an upright.

Core tools like the crevice/brush and stair tool are stored on the vacuum, which reviewers find convenient. Some pet accessories are not stored onboard and may need separate storage.

Onboard storage is commonly noted on pet-focused variants, keeping core tools attached and accessible, though not every accessory has a perfect home.

Ongoing costs are described as manageable, with washable filters and routine maintenance rather than expensive consumables being the main ownership burden.

Longevity feedback is mixed: some owners are happy, while others cite concerns about early failure and recommend keeping up with maintenance.

Overall sentiment is strongly positive, with multiple reviews rating it around 9/10 or calling it a top Dyson upright, especially for pets and carpets. The recurring negatives are price, weight, and noise.

Overall sentiment skews positive for budget shoppers, but more critical reviews recommend alternatives if you need better filtration or more consistent hard-floor pickup.

Pet-focused performance is a highlight: strong hair pickup, detangling design, and HEPA filtration are repeatedly called out for reducing fur and dander. The pet grooming tool is polarizing, with one reviewer disliking the stiff bristles and others finding it intriguing or useful.

Pet-focused features are a core draw, including a turbo tool and brush roll designed to lift pet hair, with performance best on carpet and upholstery touch-ups.

Multiple sources call it expensive, and one comparison suggests the Extra bundle is not always worth the full premium versus the base model. Reviewers who prioritize pet hair and deep cleaning are more likely to view the cost as justified, especially on sale.

Value is a primary reason reviewers recommend it: strong cleaning and features for the money, with tradeoffs mainly in filtration and refinement.

The long hose/wand helps with stair reach, and it can clean stairs effectively with the right attachment. However, several reviewers caution that the heavy upright body can make stair cleaning awkward, especially for limited mobility or narrow stairs.

Despite being a full-size corded upright, reviewers describe it as relatively slim/short and easy to tuck into a corner. One note: turning it on while still upright can be jarringly loud.

Storage is reasonable for an upright and remains stable when parked, but some designs have a higher head profile that can limit where it fits.

Repeated testing and reviews describe extremely strong suction and airflow, including top crevice and embedded-dirt results. The upside is deep cleaning; the downside is that the power can make it harder to push and may tug on thin rugs.

Performance is generally described as solid for a budget upright: capable pickup on carpet and smaller debris, but not a top-tier powerhouse versus premium uprights.

Reviewers describe it as a heavy-duty, industrial-strength option for shedding pets and embedded dirt, suited to larger or carpet-heavy homes. The heavy weight and loudness are the main heavy-duty tradeoffs.

A narrower cleaning path and tight turning help it maneuver in tighter rooms compared with bulkier uprights. The heavy body remains a consideration for small-space storage and carrying.

Support is referenced via a 5-year warranty and mentions of Dyson customer support. No review flags major reliability failures, though long-term durability claims are mostly implied rather than proven.

Reliability is a concern in at least one user report citing many complaints about early failures; routine belt and clog checks are advised.

Surface safety is generally fine, with reviewers noting it avoids scratching, but the always-on brushroll on some variants can be a concern on delicate floors if you are not careful.

Tool changes are generally described as simple, using quick-release buttons to swap between wand, hose, and attachments. Reviewers note a short learning curve, but day-to-day changes are straightforward.

Tool changes are generally simple, but the always-on brushroll during above-floor tool use can make the workflow feel less polished.

One review notes it can reach under a bed a little and handle awkward angles thanks to ball steering. It still will not replace a low-profile design for deep under-furniture cleaning.

Under-furniture cleaning can be limited by head height and how the handle tilts; several reviews note it does not reach as easily as some competitors.

Above-floor cleaning is repeatedly praised, with turbine and upholstery tools pulling hair from couches, car seats, and pet beds. One review notes suction remains strong even when using attachments.

The included motorized or turbo hand tool can help on upholstery and stairs, though some users find the turbo tool loses effectiveness when pressed into fabric.

Versatility is frequently emphasized: multiple head settings, strong hard-floor and carpet performance, and long-reach above-floor tools support whole-home cleaning. Its limitations show up most on stairs, thin rugs, and edge-front pickup.

Versatility is good for a basic upright: it can handle mixed floors and switch to above-floor tools for stairs and upholstery, but it lacks higher-end conveniences like sealed HEPA filtration or advanced power controls.

Weight is consistently flagged as a drawback at roughly 17 pounds, affecting carrying and stair use. The heft is often framed as the tradeoff for strong power and a dense build.

Several reviews describe the vacuum as easy to push and relatively light-feeling, though some tested variants are heavier than the lightest budget uprights.