Compare Dyson Ball Animal 3 Extra Upright Vacuum vs Bissell CleanView Compact Upright Vacuum

Attachments are generally well regarded, especially the pet grooming, turbine, crevice, stair, and upholstery tools, though the Extra package value is debated elsewhere.

The included wand and small tools were praised for hard-to-reach spots, narrow places, and above-floor cleanup.

A WIRED review explicitly praises the vacuum’s styling while also noting broad floor-surface performance.

Blowback or scatter is a weakness on larger hard-floor debris, where debris moved to the sides.

Area rug handling is mixed: one review says it glides on a thick rug, while others warn it may be too strong or hard to move on carpet.

Area rug handling is positive in the buying-guide review, which said the suction covers carpets, area rugs, and hard floors.

Assembly is mixed: one comparison says the Dyson needs quite a bit of assembly, and another found setup slightly tricky.

Setup is very easy, with reviewers saying it comes mostly assembled or is very simple to put together.

The bin is viewed positively in the hands-on review, mainly because of its large capacity.

The bin is easy to remove and use, but the compact dust cup can require more frequent emptying.

Build quality evidence is positive for the wand, which a reviewer describes as high-quality plastic that does not tend to snap.

Build quality was framed as acceptable for the price, close to related Bissell models but not clearly premium.

High-pile and plush carpet evidence is positive, with reviewers praising thick-carpet deep cleaning and plush-carpet effectiveness.

Low-pile carpet pickup is usable but not effortless, with evidence of good results after extra passes.

Medium-pile carpet pickup scores very strongly in testing, including a perfect carpet deep-clean score and top sand pickup results.

Medium-carpet pickup is mixed: one test left sand behind, while another reviewer liked its basic carpet cleaning.

Clog prevention is a strength in pet-heavy use, with reviewers highlighting anti-clog design and debris containment in the bin.

Hair-debris flow was positive in the comparative test, where collected hair reached the canister without clogging.

Comparative evidence is favorable: reviewers say it impressed against other uprights, outshined competition on carpet, and felt like a worthy successor.

Comparative performance is mixed to weak: one roundup did not recommend under-$100 vacuums, and another preferred the turbo variant for varied floors.

Reviewers like the adjustable gates and suction controls because they improve control across surfaces and debris types.

Controls are a strength, with multiple reviewers praising the foot controls or simple power access.

Cord length is consistently praised, especially the 35-foot cord and long total cleaning range.

Cord length is mixed: one reviewer found the 23-foot cord easy to use, while another called the cord relatively short.

Cord management is praised in the unboxing review because the hook lets the user remove the whole cable in one go.

Cord management is positive, with one reviewer saying the cord wraps neatly around the back.

Crevice pickup is excellent in comparative testing, where the Dyson edges out the Shark Stratos in deep crevice sand pickup.

Crevice pickup is weak; the vacuum struggled to lift sand from a deep groove.

Cyclone performance is mixed: one review praises Radial Root Cyclone airflow, while another says the newer cyclone system dirties filters faster.

The dual-motor design is evaluated positively because the brush motor is described as not stealing power from the main motor.

Ease of use is mixed: one reviewer liked how the machine follows the hose, while another said several operations take getting used to.

Ease of use is strong thanks to the light body, simple controls, and easy everyday handling.

Edge and baseboard cleaning is mixed: one test found the Dyson missed rice near the center, while another called edge cleaning good but not best.

Edge and baseboard cleaning was reasonably good in the wall-rice test, though not flawless close to the wall.

Emptying and mess control are viewed positively, with reviewers calling the bin hygienic, easy to empty, and clean to handle.

Emptying is generally easy, with reviewers describing hassle-free bagless use and simple debris release.

Filtration and dust containment receive strong marks, with reviewers praising HEPA-level containment, allergen capture, and cleaner air while vacuuming.

Filtration is a limitation because one reviewer specifically noted the lack of HEPA filtration.

The cleaner head is repeatedly praised as a standout feature, with efficient design, a strong seal, and a fantastic updated head.

Floorhead design is mixed: reviewers criticized inefficiency and no brush shutoff, but one liked the raised agitator behavior when upright.

The floorhead seal is praised in comparative testing for forming a tight seal against the floor.

Hair-removal-channel evidence is mixed to negative: reviewers found balls trapped in the vanes and hair caught on comb teeth despite overall anti-tangle strengths.

Hair pickup on carpets is very strong, with lab and review evidence showing most hair picked up and long/pet hair efficiently removed.

Carpet hair pickup is a strength, with reviewers reporting most hair collected and one pet bedroom test filling the canister.

Hard-floor hair pickup is praised in Forbes’ evidence that suction lifts hair from both carpets and hard floors.

Hard-floor hair pickup was praised in the pet-hair buying-guide review as part of its multi-surface pet-hair cleaning.

Hair-wrap resistance is one of the clearest strengths, with multiple reviewers reporting virtually no tangles, clean vanes, and self-clearing brush behavior.

Hard-floor fine dust pickup is praised in testing, with the reviewer saying it handles the finest dust particles well.

Large debris intake is generally strong, but not perfect: some reviews praise larger debris pickup while others note popcorn or similar debris can spit forward.

Hard-floor large-debris intake is inconsistent, ranging from strong rice pickup in one test to poor results on big piles and hardwood.

The hose and wand range is praised for above-floor reach and easier high/low cleaning.

Hose length is only average; a comparison said the difference versus the turbo hose is not huge but still noticeable.

The new cleaner head and adjustable gates are seen as meaningful innovations versus previous Dyson uprights.

The low-profile aspect is modest but positive, with one reviewer noting a slim, short profile and limited under-bed reach.

Maintenance is viewed positively overall, with a reviewer explicitly calling it very easy.

Maintenance is a strength because reviewers liked the washable filters, easy cleaning access, and low-effort upkeep.

Maneuverability is mostly praised for the ball steering and tight turns, though one review says the ball-style steering takes some getting used to.

Maneuverability is adequate rather than exceptional; the lack of pivoting was said not to hurt handling too much.

Noise is a recurring drawback, with reviewers noting it is louder than some competitors and describing it as a very loud machine.

Noise is a consistent weakness; reviewers described it as loud or very noisy, even when they liked the cleaning power.

Ownership costs are viewed favorably because washable filters and reusable filtration reduce replacement needs.

Ownership costs look low because reviewers highlighted washable filters and bagless upkeep as money-saving.

Overall sentiment is very positive across reviews, with repeated top-choice language, high ratings, and strong owner satisfaction.

Overall opinion is positive for small-space, budget use, but reviewers consistently frame it as simple rather than premium.

Pet-related evidence is highly positive: reviewers praise fur pickup, pet-focused attachments, anti-tangle behavior, and usefulness in shedding-heavy homes.

Pet-readiness is mixed: reviewers saw useful pet-hair pickup in small spaces, but one comparison warned it is not ideal for households with lots of pets.

Value is mixed to negative: reviewers praise performance, but one calls it pricey and another doubts paying extra for bundled tools.

Value is strong overall, with reviewers calling it affordable, well positioned, and worth the budget price despite limitations.

Stair cleaning is a weakness in one review because the upright body and weight make stair use less ideal.

Its slim, short upright profile is praised for making the vacuum easy to tuck into a corner.

Storage is a strength; reviewers repeatedly described the vacuum as compact and easy to store in tight spaces.

Stuck resistance is favorable on thick carpet because the Ball Animal 3 glides where the earlier fixed-height model bogged down.

Reviewers consistently describe suction and airflow as a major strength, with lab results and user tests showing strong lift, deep cleaning, and upholstery power.

Suction drew mixed but mostly positive evidence: several reviewers praised power for routine cleaning, while one comparative test called it weak versus larger, premium uprights.

Reviewers frame it as a heavy-duty machine, citing powerful air speed, lift, and a Terminator-like readiness for demanding pet messes.

Heavy-duty suitability is weak because reviewers cautioned against large homes, huge messes, and homes with many pets.

For a full-size upright, one review finds the machine relatively compact and suitable for tucking into smaller spaces.

Small-space suitability is one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers pointing to apartments, dorm rooms, and compact storage.

The pet grooming attachment raises a surface-safety concern because a reviewer found the bristles stiff and would avoid using it on a pet.

Tool changes are mixed: one reviewer praised the easy teardown and quick-release wand, while another found getting the hose out awkward.

Under-furniture pickup is limited but possible, with one review noting it can reach under the bed a little.

Above-floor and upholstery pickup is strong, with reviewers praising turbine tools, couch and car-seat cleaning, and no suction loss with attachments.

Above-floor pickup was praised through the extension wand, especially for furniture and hard-to-reach areas.

Reviewers see it as versatile across mess sizes, surfaces, modes, and whole-apartment cleaning, especially with carpets, hard floors, and attachments.

Versatility is a strength for routine home use, with reviewers citing rugs, carpet, hard surfaces, and above-floor cleaning.

Weight is a consistent downside: reviewers describe it as the heaviest in a comparison, not lightweight, and tiring to lift.

Weight is a major strength; reviewers repeatedly called it light, portable, and easy to carry.