Compare Bissell Cleanview XR Cordless Vacuum vs UWANT D100 Wet Dry Vacuum Cleaner

The accessory set is widely considered a key advantage, especially on the Pet package. Reviewers highlight the motorized pet tool, crevice tool, dusting brushes, and tool clips/wall storage as genuinely useful rather than filler.

Most reviewers highlight a generous box for the price: docking base, at least one spare roller, spare filter(s) (often HEPA), a cleaning brush/tool, and a bottle of cleaning fluid/solution.

Several reviewers like the sleek, modern look, but darker finishes can show dust and look dirty under bright LED lighting.

Multiple reviews call the D100 sleek/modern and compact-looking. The styling is generally viewed as functional and “nice looking,” rather than premium-luxury.

Smart mode uses sensors to adjust power/water based on detected dirt; reviewers see it ramp up on heavier messes. There’s no recurring mention of an app, but the automation itself is appreciated for day-to-day cleaning.

Debris blowback/scattering shows up in multiple hard-floor demos, where the roller head can push larger particles outward rather than pulling them in. Other users report minimal kickback on fine debris, so the issue appears most pronounced with larger chunks.

A recurring downside is blowback/scatter on very light debris (e.g., cat hair or some cereal) before pickup, especially at the start of a pass. Most reviewers still consider it manageable with technique/mode choice.

Rug and area-rug performance is generally positive, especially for routine dust, hair, and crumbs. Some reviewers still prefer keeping power in the middle setting to avoid the head feeling overly grabby at max suction.

On carpets/rugs the consensus is “limited”: it’s mainly for sealed hard floors, but a few reviewers say it can handle low-pile rugs or doormats in dry mode with modest results.

Assembly for the vacuum itself is typically quick (click together a couple parts), but wall-mount installation/setup can be more involved or confusing depending on the kit.

Setup is repeatedly described as quick and tool-free: attach the handle, assemble the two-piece base, plug in, and charge. Several note the battery often arrives partially charged.

At least one tester reports the unit detecting a clog and warning the user to check the roller/pipe, preventing continued operation until addressed.

One reviewer notes it won’t run unless the head is lowered into the cleaning position, which helps prevent accidental spinning while upright.

The removable battery is appreciated for easy charging and the option to buy spares, but charging can take a few hours. Some versions require removing the battery to charge, while others integrate charging into the wall mount.

Battery life is reported as “enough” for kitchens/entryways and smaller homes, but not long. Reported Smart runtimes range roughly from the low‑20 minutes to ~35 minutes; Turbo/Power mode is often ~16–18 minutes. Charging is widely criticized as slow in some tests (~6+ hours), though at least one reviewer reports closer to ~4 hours.

The dustbin is often described as small, filling quickly in pet-heavy homes. Several reviewers also point to an internal opening/pathway that seems restrictive for larger debris, contributing to clogs.

Build quality is generally described as solid for the price, with praise for the stable lay-flat mechanism and waterproof/washable chassis/motor design (IPX-style). Minor negatives include occasional leakage reports and a small learning curve with docking alignment.

High-pile carpet feedback is mixed: pet-hair tests show it can collect a meaningful amount, but lab scoring for overall carpet cleaning was poor when clogs occurred. In practice, many users still like it for carpet-heavy homes, but large-debris clogs remain a risk.

Low-pile carpet performance is usually described as a strength, with several reviewers praising strong pickup and pet-hair removal. One reviewer disagrees and would not recommend it for carpeted homes, indicating performance can vary by expectations and surfaces.

On medium-pile carpet, a dedicated deep-clean test reported above-average results, and multiple hands-on reviewers call it excellent on typical carpeting. Complaints here tend to be about clogging/emptying rather than carpet agitation.

Clogging is the most divisive theme. Multiple reviewers and lab tests report frequent clogs when trying to pick up cereal-sized debris, sometimes requiring very slow passes or manual de-clogging; smaller debris (rice/oatmeal/crumbs) is generally easier.

Normal household messes don’t appear to clog it often, but thick mixtures (like flour plus liquid) can clog the tube and require rinsing/cleanout. The included cleaning tool and washable design help recovery.

Comparisons are mixed: one reviewer claims it outperforms the Dyson V8 in suction metrics and beats certain Sharks in motor power, while other reviewers still prefer Dyson/Shark for more consistent hard-floor pickup and fewer issues with scattering or clogs.

In comparisons, the D100 is framed as a value leader rather than the absolute “best regardless of price.” Reviewers often contrast it with premium brands, noting it offers many flagship-style features for less money.

Controls are generally straightforward, with multiple power modes and a battery-level display (LEDs or a small screen). A recurring nit is that the wall-charging setup can make indicators harder to see or feel less intuitive.

Controls are typically simple (power + mode) with a clear display and voice prompts. Users like having water-output and volume controls, but at least one tester couldn’t fully mute voice prompts and others mention a small learning curve for self-cleaning workflows.

Conversion to handheld is repeatedly described as quick and easy, turning the unit into a dustbuster-style cleaner for spot messes, stairs, and vehicles.

Cordless convenience is a major reason people reach for this model: the lightweight, grab-and-go design makes quick daily cleanups and room-to-room moves easy. Removable batteries further support cordless flexibility, though runtime limits can still require planning for larger homes.

Cordless operation is a consistent quality-of-life win—no dragging a cord while mopping. The push-in dock/parking style also supports quick grab-and-go use.

Crevice/groove cleaning is a bright spot. One test reports a perfect crevice-pickup score, and multiple reviewers note the crevice tool works well for tight areas and car interiors.

Dried coffee/ketchup style tests suggest it can lift set-in stains, but may require repeated passes—performance is better on fresh spills than on fully dried, sticky stains.

Ease of use is boosted by the press-on/press-off trigger style, readable battery/mode indicators, and comfortable handling. Usability drops when users encounter frequent clogs or messy emptying, which can overshadow the otherwise friendly design.

Day-to-day use is mostly praised (roll off the dock, press power, clean). Pain points include a tight, suction-y tank lid for some users (especially with hand strength/arthritis) and occasional learning curve around docking/self-cleaning steps.

Edge results are mixed: head-on edge pickup can be strong in some tests, but along-the-wall pickup can drop off, leading reviewers to recommend using the crevice tool for close-to-baseboard cleaning.

Edge cleaning is a major strength: multiple reviewers call it edge-to-edge/dual-edge and show it cleaning close to baseboards. One measured the real gap at ~5–6 mm from the wall (still better than many, but not as tight as some marketing claims).

Emptying is polarizing: some describe a simple twist-and-dump, while others describe multi-step emptying and hair sticking to the filter that may require manual removal. This is one of the biggest day-to-day tradeoffs for pet owners.

Emptying is usually straightforward and some reviews highlight solid/liquid separation that makes disposal cleaner (dump solids first, then pour liquid). The main mess risk comes from soggy mixed debris when doing wet + dry together.

Filtration is generally viewed as good for a budget cordless, with mentions of allergen trapping and solid particle containment in testing. It is also repeatedly described as less sealed or less refined than premium competitors, so allergy-focused buyers may want higher-end options.

HEPA/air filtration is referenced in multiple reviews, with filters catching noticeable pet hair and fine debris. Users emphasize keeping the filter clean/dry for best performance.

Multiple reviewers note it leaves only light moisture and floors dry quickly after a pass; water-output adjustment helps balance cleaning strength versus dry time.

The floorhead gets both praise and criticism: some testing highlights a well-sealed head with multiple gates/squeegees and strong carpet pickup, while others call out a narrow debris pathway that can clog or scatter larger items on hard floors.

At least one detailed test credits the perimeter felt/squeegees for creating a good seal on hard floors and carpets. However, other reviewers still report hard-floor snowplowing or scattering with larger debris, suggesting sealing alone does not guarantee smooth intake.

Fresh spills (water, coffee, milk) are often shown being removed in one or two passes in demos/tests, with the unit automatically increasing effort in Smart mode on wetter areas.

Carpet hair pickup is repeatedly praised, especially for cat/dog hair. Reviewers often describe the XR as a standout in its price tier for keeping carpets and rugs looking clean.

Pet hair pickup on hard floors is frequently praised (dog/cat homes). Hair is often visible in the tank/filter after a pass, suggesting strong real-world performance.

The brushroll is often marketed and described as tangle-free, with fins/combs helping manage long hair. Still, a few reviewers report hair ending up wrapped around the filter/bin area during emptying, so anti-tangle is better on the floor than in the bin.

Anti-tangle design and scrapers/comb features generally keep long hair from wrapping tightly. Stress tests show hair may stick temporarily, but it’s usually easy to remove and often ends up trapped in the tank filter instead.

For fine dust and small crumbs on hard floors, feedback is generally better, including successful pickups of baking soda and everyday dust. A lab test, however, still scored hardwood performance very low due to repeated clogs during mixed-debris trials.

Fine debris like dust and small particles is generally collected well, but one reviewer warns that very large amounts of powder (e.g., flour) mixed with liquid can form paste and cause issues.

Large-debris pickup on hard floors is inconsistent. Several reviewers show Cheerios/Froot Loops-sized pieces getting pushed around, blown outward, or clogging the intake, and some recommend switching to a wider-opening crevice tool or pre-sweeping big chunks.

It handles larger debris and mixed messes (cereal, sauce, even spaghetti in one demo) better than many expect. However, very light pieces can scatter, and at least one reviewer saw eggshell not picked up in a specific mode/test.

The LED headlights are repeatedly praised as genuinely useful, helping reveal debris in dark corners and under furniture. At least one hands-on reviewer calls them among the best in the category rather than a gimmick.

Noted innovations versus peers include push-in docking, a fully washable/waterproof motor/chassis, electrolyzed-water cleaning claims, a combined dual-compartment tank, and an adjustable/swiveling handle.

The ultra-thin/flat form factor (often cited around 13.5 cm) is a standout design point and is frequently compared favorably to bulkier competitors.

Routine maintenance is usually considered straightforward (washable filter, removable brush roll), but owners who experience clogs or hair buildup report more frequent cleaning and occasional mess when clearing the bin/filter area.

The self-clean routine reduces hands-on scrubbing, but ownership still involves emptying/ rinsing tanks, cleaning filters, and occasionally clearing thicker debris. Reviewers mention mixed wet+dry sludge can be unpleasant to dump, and long drying beeps (in some units) add annoyance to the maintenance loop.

Maneuverability is commonly rated above average, with reviewers praising swivel response, stable straight-line tracking, and easy navigation around furniture. Max suction can feel a bit too grabby for some users, making medium power the sweet spot.

Handling is generally described as smooth and nimble, helped by the light weight and a flexible/swiveling handle. One reviewer notes the forward “thrust” can feel tiring over long sessions and that backward passes can smear more than some competitors.

Mopping results are consistently positive for everyday grime, muddy footprints, and mixed wet messes. Tough, dried-on spills can take multiple passes, but most reviewers still report a clean finish.

Noise is often described as quieter than similar cordless sticks, making it easier to use for quick daily cleanups without feeling disruptive.

Operating noise varies by mode—Turbo is described as noticeably louder. Several measure/describe the drying airflow as relatively quiet (low‑40 dB in one test), but repeated beeps during drying and voice prompts can be more annoying than the fan noise itself.

Odor prevention is repeatedly credited to the deodorizing rod plus heated drying; one reviewer left dirty water in the tank for ~24 hours and reported no bad smell. Heated drying is also cited as reducing mildew/mold risk.

Onboard or nearby storage is a plus when using the tool clip or wall mount, keeping common tools within reach. Storage capacity is limited (some mounts hold only a couple tools), so not every accessory may live on the dock at once.

Overall sentiment is strongly positive: most reviewers recommend it, especially for hard-floor homes wanting a one-pass vacuum+mop workflow and minimal roller-touching cleanup.

Packaging impressions are mostly positive, including sturdy cardboard organization and reduced mess from foam. Some dislike the amount of plastic wrapping used to protect parts.

Most reviews position this as a pet-friendly vacuum: pet-focused attachments (turbo tool/fur brush) and strong hair pickup are common positives. A couple reviewers also mention allergen trapping benefits and the brand’s pet-oriented messaging.

Pet households specifically like the combination of strong hair pickup, anti-tangle brush design, and odor mitigation (deodorizer + heated drying). Several reviewers explicitly recommend it for homes with shedding pets.

Value is a core selling point in many reviews, especially when priced around the low $200s or on sale. Conversely, reviewers who experienced frequent clogs or weak hard-floor performance say it is not worth the money even at a budget price.

Value is the dominant theme: many call it the best value-for-money wet/dry vacuum in its segment, often citing prices around ~$289–$320 (or sales near ~$299) while offering features found on pricier competitors.

Standard/low runtime is typically reported around 30–40 minutes, which works for quick whole-room sessions and spot cleaning. Lab measurement around the low 30-minute range suggests it may not cover a large multi-room home in one go. Max/turbo runtime is short across reviews, commonly around 8–11 minutes. Many reviewers treat turbo as a spot-cleaning boost rather than a mode you can run for an entire cleaning session.

Sanitizing claims come from electrolyzed-water/“sterilization” language and heated drying. Some reviewers run informal bacteria comparisons that look promising, but most acknowledge true disinfection levels aren’t lab-verified in these reviews.

The rinse + hot/warm-air dry routine is a headline feature and widely praised for reducing manual roller washing. Reported drying is often ~1 hour at ~60°C, leaving the roller mostly dry (sometimes not 100%). A major complaint is persistent beeping during the drying phase in at least one long-term test.

Several reviewers describe it as self-propelled or at least strongly assisted by brush traction, which reduces pushing effort. A minority find that same pull can feel a bit too forceful over long cleans.

Reviewers like the adjustable water-output options and the ability to use cleaning solution; some highlight electrolyzed-water operation as a differentiator. A common request is easier filling, and there’s no consistent mention of automatic solution dosing.

Stair cleaning gets positive callouts due to the light weight and the ability to use the main head or a handheld tool on steps. Users who vacuum lots of stairs often describe the XR as much less of a hassle than full-size uprights.

Storage is convenient with the wall mount/charging station, but there are complaints that the mount can stick out and that some versions do not stand upright on their own. Many owners still like the organized, grab-and-go footprint.

The push-in base makes parking easier than lift-on docks and reviewers like the compact footprint. Some note it’s happiest when docked against a wall and that occasional alignment/positioning habits help.

Some users report an even, streak-free finish and visibly shinier floors, while another notes that backward movement can smear more than with some competing wet/dry vacs (consistent with many floor washers being optimized for forward passes).

Reviews frequently describe strong suction for the price, with one test citing very high sealed suction versus a pricier Dyson. That said, several reviewers argue real-world pickup can be limited by clogs or snowplowing on hard floors, so power is not always the bottleneck.

Pickup power is repeatedly described as strong, especially for a budget wet/dry unit. Reviews show it handling liquids and common household debris well, though very light debris can sometimes get pushed ahead before being captured.

Its compact body, flexibility, and lay-flat reach make it easy to store and to use in tighter rooms (kitchens, entryways, around furniture legs).

Only a small number of reviews mention after-purchase support details; one cites a 2‑year warranty and a 30‑day return policy. Broader reliability feedback is limited beyond short-term use.

Tool changes are generally described as simple, using quick-release buttons and straightforward clicks. The learning curve tends to be more about the bin-emptying sequence or wall-mount setup than swapping attachments.

Roller removal and routine access are often tool-free and quick. The main exception is the dirty-tank lid/fit, which can require a firm pull/wiggle and may be difficult for users with limited hand strength.

Lay-flat/180° cleaning is one of the most praised features, letting the head reach under tables, chairs, and some low furniture. Extremely low clearances can still be limiting, but it’s more capable than many alternatives.

Above-floor cleaning is generally good with the motorized pet tool and crevice attachments, with many calling it great for furniture and cars. One lab-style upholstery test notes it can leave some debris behind and may require extra passes.

Versatility is a consistent strength: reviewers mention stick mode, handheld mode, and extended reach, plus the ability to swap tools for upholstery, corners, and high spots.

Versatility is strong for hard-floor households thanks to Smart/Turbo/Dry (suction-only) modes and adjustable water output. Most reviewers caution it’s not meant to be a primary carpet cleaner, though low-pile rugs/mats can work in a pinch.

The D100’s water system is often described as a dual-compartment or “two-in-one” tank that keeps clean and dirty water separated. Capacity is cited anywhere from ~650 ml fresh/~700 ml dirty to about ~1 liter total. Tanks are generally easy to remove, but filling access and the tight lid/fit draw some complaints.

Weight is a standout: multiple reviews cite roughly 5.9 lb and emphasize how easy it is to carry, maneuver, and use one-handed in handheld mode.

Across reviews the D100 is repeatedly called lightweight and easy to lift/steer, with reported weights around ~4.1–4.3 kg.