Alen BreatheSmart 45i

Alen BreatheSmart 45i Air Purifier Review

Brand: Alen
Released: January 21, 2022
Updated: 2 months ago
3.9
Overall review score Expert score: 4.3 Customer score: 3.4
175
Review evidence points
48
Scored features
11
Total reviews
6 expert / 5 customer

Bottom Line

Choose the Alen BreatheSmart 45i for quiet, efficient medium-room cleaning with strong filters and simple controls. Skip it if you need the lowest price, very large-room coverage, or guaranteed app-first control.

Best for

Best for medium-room owners who want strong particle cleaning, quiet lower speeds, straightforward onboard controls, and long-term filter support. It especially fits people who care about dust, allergens, and a smoother fan sound.

Not for

Not ideal for shoppers chasing the lowest CADR-per-dollar, very large spaces, or app-first smart control. Buyers focused on odors, smoke, or VOCs should avoid the base Pure filter and budget for upgraded carbon filters.

Verdict

The Alen BreatheSmart 45i earns broad approval for air-cleaning performance, low-speed quietness, energy efficiency, and approachable controls. Lab-style reviews show strong particle reduction and reassuring ozone results, while customer reviews often praise fresher air, less dust, and allergy relief. Its best case is a medium room where smooth fan sound, filter choice, and build quality matter. The tradeoff is value: several reviewers say cheaper competitors offer more raw CADR, and app/Wi-Fi support is inconsistent or modest. Odor, VOC, and smoke performance also depends on buying upgraded carbon filters rather than the base Pure filter.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

48 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    23 (48%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    22 (46%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    1 (2%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    1 (2%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    1 (2%)

Pros

  • 4.6
    7 reviews strong consensus
    noise level: 4.6, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Noise is a major strength at low and quiet speeds, although higher settings are more audible.
  • 4.7
    5 reviews strong consensus
    ease of use: 4.7, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Setup, controls, and filter access are repeatedly described as easy and intuitive.
  • 4.9
    4 reviews strong consensus
    real-time air quality monitoring: 4.9, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Real-time monitoring is repeatedly praised for clear feedback and quick detection.
  • 4.6
    5 reviews strong consensus
    auto mode performance: 4.6, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Auto mode is consistently described as responsive, handy, and useful for hands-off operation.
  • 4.5
    6 reviews strong consensus
    activated carbon filter: 4.5, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Upgraded carbon options are repeatedly praised for odors, VOCs, and smoke, but the base Pure filter lacks carbon.
  • 4.6
    5 reviews strong consensus
    design and appearance: 4.6, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers like the discreet, customizable design and swappable front panels.

Cons

  • 1.0
    1 review
    condition on arrival: 1.0, 1 review
    The only condition evidence is a strongly negative customer report of receiving a used, scuffed unit.
  • 2.3
    1 review
    remote control: 2.3, 1 review
    Remote control is mixed because the base model lacks it, while app-enabled units can be controlled remotely.
  • 3.4
    3 reviews strong consensus
    pre-filter quality: 3.4, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Pre-filter evidence is mixed: it catches larger particles but can be harder to clean than a separate pre-filter.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Air Purifiers, this product is above average in filter availability, handle design, air quality sensor accuracy, near average in air purification performance, overall satisfaction, below average in condition on arrival, odor reduction, pre-filter quality.

Comparison summary

48 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    25 (52%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    18 (38%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    5 (10%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
condition on arrival 1.0 2.8 -1.8
filter availability 4.8 3.5 +1.3
handle design 4.5 3.3 +1.2
air quality sensor accuracy 4.9 3.7 +1.2
reliability 4.2 3.0 +1.2
durability 4.5 3.3 +1.2
smart features 4.4 3.3 +1.1
real-time air quality monitoring 4.9 3.9 +1.0

Consider This Instead

If you want better condition on arrival

Choose Alen BreatheSmart Flex. It scores 4.8 vs 1.0 for condition on arrival, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

If you want better size and footprint

Choose Shark HP102. It scores 4.9 vs 3.5 for size and footprint, with a 4.1 overall score.

Compare

If you want better CADR rating

Choose Coway Airmega 250. It scores 5.0 vs 4.1 for CADR rating, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

If you want better pre-filter quality

Choose AirDoctor AD3500. It scores 4.8 vs 3.4 for pre-filter quality, with a 4.6 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

AirDoctor 3000

  • Alternative: purification performance AirDoctor 3000 is named as a performance-focused alternative if Wi-Fi is not important.

Alen Breathesmart 75i

  • Older model: room coverage The 75i is presented as the larger model in the same series for bigger coverage needs.

Breeze smart 75i

  • Upgrade: size and coverage The 45i is described as the smaller, lighter version of the BreezeSmart 75i.

FAQ

Is the Alen BreatheSmart 45i good for medium rooms?

Yes. Reviews repeatedly place it in the medium-room range, with strong results around 300 to 400 square feet and some claims up to 800 square feet.

Is it quiet?

Mostly yes, especially at low and quiet fan speeds. Higher settings are audible, but reviewers often describe the sound as smooth or less intrusive.

Does it reduce dust and allergies?

Most evidence is positive, with customers reporting less dust and allergy relief. One customer in a desert home with pets said it did not reduce dust.

Does the base filter remove odors and VOCs?

Only partly. Reviewers say the base Pure filter is weak for odors, smoke, and VOCs, while upgraded carbon filters are the better choice for those problems.

Does it have app support?

Some versions support the Alen app, but reviews are mixed. One reviewer found app support hidden, another could not connect their unit, and Modern Castle tested a non-Wi-Fi base model.

Is the warranty good?

The lifetime warranty is viewed as valuable, but reviewers stress that it depends on registration and using OEM filters or a filter subscription.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Air Purifiers to Consider

#1 GoveeLife H7124
4.6

Choose the H7124 if you want a quiet smart purifier for odors, dust, pets, and app control. Skip it if you need foolproof Wi-Fi, wall-facing intake, UV light, or strong...

Pros: particle removal effectiveness, pollen removal

Cons: UV-C light effectiveness, air dryness

#2 PuroAir 240
4.6

Best for quiet, simple cleaning in bedrooms or apartments. Skip it if you need verified large-room CADR value, app control, or guaranteed neighbor-smoke removal.

Pros: particle removal effectiveness, dust removal

Cons: CADR rating, air changes per hour

#3 AirDoctor AD3500
4.6

Best for strong room cleaning, allergy relief, odor control, and simple operation. Skip it if high filter costs, a larger footprint, or possible nighttime fan noise would bother you.

Pros: particle removal effectiveness, HEPA filtration

Cons: customer support, warranty coverage

#4 Nuwave Forever, 47265
4.6

Choose this if you want strong odor, dust, smoke, and pet-air cleanup with washable filters. Skip it if turbo noise, Wi-Fi setup, or a high upfront price will bother you.

Pros: filter replacement cost, allergen reduction

Cons: Wi-Fi reliability