Amazon Basics Upright Vacuum

Amazon Basics Upright Vacuum Review

Brand: amazon
Released: January 8, 2023
Updated: 2 weeks ago
2.7
Consolidated expert score
84
Review insights
42
Scored features
7
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose it only for a very cheap, very light vacuum for low-pile carpet touchups. Skip it for hard floors, allergies, large debris, deep cleaning, or homes needing strong filtration.

Best for

Best for someone who needs the cheapest possible lightweight upright for quick low-pile carpet touchups and is not worried about filtration. It fits the evidence best in small, mostly carpeted spaces with light-duty messes.

Not for

Not for homes with lots of hard floors, allergy concerns, large debris, shag carpet, or expectations of strong whole-home cleaning. Reviewers repeatedly found better results from slightly more expensive alternatives.

Verdict

Review evidence points to a vacuum with a very narrow sweet spot. The Amazon Basics Upright is repeatedly praised for being extremely light, very cheap, and acceptable on low-pile or some carpet hair pickup. The tradeoff is substantial: multiple tests found weak hard-floor performance, poor large-debris handling, limited hose reach, weak or leaky filtration, and a basic fixed floorhead that struggles with sealing, height adjustment, and debris control. One owner-style review was much more positive about suction, controls, emptying, and tool storage, but the broader test evidence was harsher. Overall, it looks like a bare-minimum carpet touchup machine rather than a versatile whole-home upright.

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

Bissell PowerForce Helix 2112

  • Similar: shared design and platform The video review likewise described the Amazon Basics model as a clone of the Bissell PowerForce Helix 2112.
  • Similar: shared design and platform Vacuum Wars described the Amazon Basics upright as essentially a clone of the Bissell PowerForce Helix 2112.

Eureka Air Speed

  • Similar: licensed design similarity The reviewer said the Amazon vacuum appeared identical to the Eureka Air Speed.

Shark Navigator Swivel Pro Complete NV150

  • Better: overall performance and value Consumer Reports said the Shark Navigator Swivel Pro Complete NV150 delivered better performance than the Amazon Basics upright.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

42 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0 14% 6 features
  • Positive 3.5-4.4 21% 9 features
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4 19% 8 features
  • Negative 1.5-2.4 31% 13 features
  • Very negative below 1.5 14% 6 features

Pros

  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    Controls and UI: 5.0, based on 1 review
    The foot controls were strongly liked in the hands-on review.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    Onboard tool storage: 5.0, based on 1 review
    Onboard tool storage was praised in the owner review.
  • 4.6
    based on 6 reviews
    Weight: 4.6, based on 6 reviews
    Weight was the clearest strength, with nearly every source calling the vacuum very light or emphasizing its low 8-pound range.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Cord management: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Cord management was praised in one owner review because the onboard cord storage was easy to release.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Ease of use: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Ease of use was rated highly in the positive owner review, which called the vacuum easy to operate.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Tool-change simplicity: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Tool changes were praised in one hands-on review because the hose was easy to remove and attach.
  • 4.3
    based on 2 reviews
    Assembly and Setup: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
    Assembly was consistently easy, with one test noting it was nearly ready out of the box and another calling setup straightforward.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Aesthetic design and finish: 4.0, based on 1 review
    One reviewer liked the color, giving the design finish a modest positive note.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Packaging quality: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Packaging received a positive environmental note for mostly cardboard packing.
  • 3.8
    based on 2 reviews
    Hair Pickup — Carpets: 3.8, based on 2 reviews
    Hair pickup on carpet was generally decent to strong, though one review still saw some pet hair movement or sticking.
  • 3.8
    based on 2 reviews
    Pet-Ready Features: 3.8, based on 2 reviews
    Pet hair pickup was a relative bright spot, with reviewers saying it handled pet hair well, though filtration concerns limited its pet-readiness.
  • 3.5
    based on 3 reviews
    Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup: 3.5, based on 3 reviews
    Low-pile carpet pickup was one of the better areas, with reviewers calling fine-debris pickup decent or better than expected.
  • 3.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Upholstery / Above-Floor Pickup: 3.5, based on 2 reviews
    Above-floor pickup was mixed: one owner liked the suction through the tool setup, while another found the hose use inconvenient.
  • 3.5
    based on 1 review
    Stair Cleaning: 3.5, based on 1 review
    Stair cleaning was only moderately supported: the wand and light body made it possible, but not positioned as especially convenient.
  • 3.5
    based on 1 review
    Storage footprint and upright-stand stability: 3.5, based on 1 review
    Its small body was noted as a possible storage advantage, though the evidence supported compactness more than strong stand stability.

Cons

  • 3.0
    based on 2 reviews
    Bin and Bag: 3.0, based on 2 reviews
    The bin was viewed positively by one reviewer for straightforward emptying, but another criticized the bagless design as inconvenient for apartments.
  • 3.0
    based on 1 review
    Suitability for small spaces: 3.0, based on 1 review
    Small-space suitability was limited to a very small, carpet-only apartment use case.
  • 2.9
    based on 6 reviews
    Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup: 2.9, based on 6 reviews
    Medium-carpet evidence was mixed: it could pick up some sand and felt clean in one review, but other reviewers called carpet cleaning lackluster or below average.
  • 2.8
    based on 2 reviews
    Emptying and Mess Control: 2.8, based on 2 reviews
    Emptying was polarizing: one owner called it very easy, while another warned the dust was hazardous and messy.
  • 2.7
    based on 3 reviews
    Versatility: 2.7, based on 3 reviews
    Versatility was mixed to poor: one owner liked using the wand for different tasks, while testing sources found the vacuum unsuitable across common surfaces.
  • 2.5
    based on 4 reviews
    Price and Value: 2.5, based on 4 reviews
    Price is the product’s core appeal, but reviewers repeatedly warned that the low price comes with major performance compromises.
  • 2.5
    based on 4 reviews
    Suction and Airflow: 2.5, based on 4 reviews
    Reviewers split sharply on suction: one found good suction in casual use, while multiple tests called hose suction, airflow, or measured vacuum strength weak for the category.
  • 2.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance: 2.5, based on 2 reviews
    Tangle resistance was mixed: the comparative test saw some wrap, and a later test reported longer hair tangling around the brush roll.
  • 2.3
    based on 5 reviews
    Overall opinion: 2.3, based on 5 reviews
    Overall opinion was mostly negative, with several reviewers calling it basic, a missed opportunity, or not recommended, while one owner liked it.
  • 2.0
    based on 2 reviews
    Hose length: 2.0, based on 2 reviews
    Hose length and reach were criticized by two reviewers as short or limited.
  • 2.0
    based on 1 review
    Carpet — High-Pile Pickup: 2.0, based on 1 review
    High-pile carpet suitability was weak; a reviewer suggested spending more if shag carpet is part of the home.
  • 2.0
    based on 1 review
    Clogging and debris prevention: 2.0, based on 1 review
    Debris prevention was weak in the technician review, where pet hair was observed sticking in the cyclone assembly.
  • 2.0
    based on 1 review
    Maintenance requirements: 2.0, based on 1 review
    Maintenance requirements were a drawback in the technician review because bagless use meant frequent upkeep.
  • 2.0
    based on 1 review
    Suitability for heavy-duty use: 2.0, based on 1 review
    Heavy-duty suitability was low because one reviewer framed it as a temporary, budget stopgap rather than a long-term workhorse.
  • 1.8
    based on 2 reviews
    Comparative performance: 1.8, based on 2 reviews
    Comparative performance was poor, with reviewers pointing to better options or slightly more expensive alternatives.
  • 1.8
    based on 2 reviews
    Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake: 1.8, based on 2 reviews
    Large debris intake was weak, especially on hard floors where rice was thrown around and bare-floor debris pickup was only passable.
  • 1.6
    based on 4 reviews
    Floorhead design: 1.6, based on 4 reviews
    Floorhead design was a recurring weakness, especially the fixed height, low gates, and limited design features.
  • 1.5
    based on 1 review
    Accessories and Tools: 1.5, based on 1 review
    Accessory support was criticized because the included tools were limited and nonstandard, making additional accessories difficult to find.
  • 1.5
    based on 1 review
    Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors): 1.5, based on 1 review
    Edge and wall pickup was weak in the comparative test, where rice remained near the wall.
  • 1.5
    based on 1 review
    Low-profile design: 1.5, based on 1 review
    Low-profile design was poor because the vacuum did not get very low.
  • 1.5
    based on 1 review
    Noise level: 1.5, based on 1 review
    Noise was a clear weakness in the comparative test, where the Amazon Basics was measured as nearly as loud as another noisy budget upright.
  • 1.0
    based on 4 reviews
    Filtration / Dust Containment: 1.0, based on 4 reviews
    Filtration was consistently judged poor, with reviewers reporting particle leakage, no HEPA-style containment, and smoke escaping from the body.
  • 1.0
    based on 3 reviews
    Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup: 1.0, based on 3 reviews
    Fine debris on hard floors was a major weakness, with reviewers describing sand or debris being scattered or kicked back.
  • 1.0
    based on 1 review
    Airflow blowback: 1.0, based on 1 review
    Airflow blowback was poor, with one reviewer describing sand being kicked back on hard floors.
  • 1.0
    based on 1 review
    Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors): 1.0, based on 1 review
    Crevice pickup was very poor in the comparative test, where the vacuum barely made progress lifting sand from a groove.
  • 1.0
    based on 1 review
    Floorhead Seal on Hard Floors: 1.0, based on 1 review
    The floorhead seal on hard floors was weak, with debris scattering instead of staying contained for pickup.
  • 1.0
    based on 1 review
    Under-Furniture Pickup: 1.0, based on 1 review
    Under-furniture pickup was poor because the machine did not get particularly low.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Upright Vacuums, this product is below average in Filtration / Dust Containment, Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup, Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors).

Summary

8 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher 0% 0 features
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower 100% 8 features
Attribute This product Category average Difference
Filtration / Dust Containment 1.0 4.2 -3.2
Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup 1.0 3.9 -2.9
Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors) 1.0 3.7 -2.7
Floorhead Seal on Hard Floors 1.0 3.6 -2.6
Accessories and Tools 1.5 4.0 -2.5
Under-Furniture Pickup 1.0 3.5 -2.5
Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors) 1.5 3.8 -2.3
Comparative performance 1.8 3.9 -2.2

FAQ

Is the Amazon Basics Upright Vacuum good on carpet?

It can be decent on low-pile carpet and hair pickup, but reviews were mixed. Several tests found it weak with medium-sized debris and below average for broader carpet cleaning.

Does it work well on hard floors?

No. Multiple reviewers said it scatters or kicks back debris on hard floors, and one comparative test found it threw rice around rather than collecting it cleanly.

Is the vacuum lightweight?

Yes. Weight was the clearest strength, with reviewers repeatedly emphasizing that it is extremely light for an upright vacuum.

Is filtration a concern?

Yes. Several reviewers criticized its filtration, including reports of particle leakage, no HEPA-style containment, and smoke escaping during a containment test.

Is it a good value?

Only in a narrow budget sense. Reviewers acknowledged the low price, but several warned that slightly more expensive vacuums performed better or were easier to recommend.

Does it handle pet hair?

Pet hair pickup was one of the better areas, with multiple reviewers saying it performed well or decently. Longer hair and filtration concerns still limit how pet-ready it is.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Consider This Instead

Overall Top Upright Vacuums Alternatives

#1 Shark Stratos Upright Vacuum
4.3

Choose the Shark Stratos for powerful upright cleaning, sealed HEPA filtration, Lift-Away versatility, and strong hard-floor or low-pile carpet pickup. Skip it if you need a lightweight vacuum or mainly...

Pros: Packaging quality, Low-profile design

Cons: Storage footprint and upright-stand stability, Hair-removal channel issues

#2 Eureka Omniverse Upright Vacuum
4.3

Choose the Eureka OmniVerse for strong value, versatile floor and above-floor cleaning, pet pickup, and under-furniture reach. Skip it if you want premium-feeling tool changes, a larger bin, or the...

Pros: Suitability for heavy-duty use, Surface safety with attachments

Cons: Onboard tool storage, Cord management

#3 Kenmore Featherlite Lift-Up Vacuum
4.3

Choose the Kenmore FeatherLite Lift-Up for a light, easy, budget upright with strong pickup, HEPA filtration, and useful lift-up cleaning. Skip it if long-hair tangles, crevice pickup, or top-tier hard-floor/carpet...

Pros: Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors), Pet-Ready Features

Cons: Hose length, Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors)

#4 DREAME H14 Pro Wet Dry Vacuum Cleaner
4.2

Choose the Dreame H14 Pro if you want a premium wet-dry vacuum mop that cleans hard floors fast, reaches under furniture, and self-cleans. Skip it if price, floor drying time,...

Pros: Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors), Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake

Cons: Sanitizing performance, Clogging and debris prevention