BISSELL Big Green Professional Carpet Cleaner

BISSELL Big Green Professional Carpet Cleaner Feature Scores

Explore all 39 feature scores for BISSELL Big Green Professional Carpet Cleaner, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

39 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    23 (59%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    11 (28%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    2 (5%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    3 (8%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.8
    9 reviews strong consensus
    Overall opinion: 4.8, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Overall opinion was strongly positive across most reviews, with repeated best-in-class or highly recommended conclusions, plus one mixed consumer-review outlier.
  • 5.0
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Dried-On Stain Removal: 5.0, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Stain-removal performance was the strongest recurring theme, with reviewers praising dried-on, tough, vomit, tomato sauce, and other stain results.
  • 5.0
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Suitability for heavy-duty use: 5.0, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Heavy-duty suitability was a standout theme: reviewers repeatedly framed the machine as a workhorse for large areas and deep cleaning.
  • 5.0
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Water tank: 5.0, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Water-tank performance was repeatedly praised for large capacity, removable/refill-friendly design, and long coverage between refills.
  • 4.9
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Solution / Liquid system: 4.9, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The liquid system stood out for efficient water use, removable/refillable tanks, visible solution status, and strong area coverage before refilling.
  • 4.7
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Suction and Airflow: 4.7, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers consistently praised suction at the floor head/nozzle, with repeated test evidence of class-leading extraction; the main caveat was weaker sealed suction at the hose in one test.
  • 4.9
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Build quality and durability: 4.9, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Build quality was one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers citing rental-fleet toughness, long-lasting construction, and tank-like durability.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Comparative performance: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Comparative performance was strong, with reviewers saying it beat named rental-style competitors and lower-priced options for key cleaning tasks.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Ease of use: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Ease of use was strong where reviewers discussed push/pull cleaning, maneuverability, tank installation, and large-area coverage before refill stops.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Fresh Liquid Pickup Speed: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Fresh or wet stain pickup was praised in several tests, including fast grape-juice cleanup and strong wet-stain results.
  • 4.4
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Price and Value: 4.4, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers generally considered it worth the higher price because of performance, durability, and warranty support, while still repeatedly noting it is expensive.
  • 4.6
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Upholstery / Above-Floor Pickup: 4.6, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Above-floor and upholstery cleaning were considered useful and at least slightly above average, helped by the hose and tough stain/stair tool.
  • 4.8
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Floor Drying Time: 4.8, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Drying performance was repeatedly praised, with reviewers saying it left carpets drier than competitors or helped carpets dry faster.
  • 4.5
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Versatility: 4.5, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Versatility was praised for hose, attachments, above-floor uses, and multi-surface capability, though spot cleaning was only slightly above average in one test.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Stair Cleaning: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The hose and tough stain tool were repeatedly praised for making stair cleaning more practical.
  • 4.3
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Floorhead design: 4.3, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Floorhead feedback was mostly positive thanks to the large/aggressive brush and spring-loaded nozzle, but the 9-inch path was narrower than some competitors.
  • 4.5
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    Overall durability/longevity: 4.5, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Durability was a major strength in most reviews, especially rental-fleet build and tank-like construction, but one review cited leaking complaints.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Hose length: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Hose length was praised by Vacuum Wars as Bissell’s longest hose, increasing reach for stairs, upholstery, and other above-floor tasks.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Pet-Ready Features: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Pet-related cleanup evidence was strong, with one review highlighting urine-stain cleanup and another noting pickup of pet hair and stains from carpet.
  • 4.3
    4 reviews low consensus
    Accessories and Tools: 4.3, 4 reviews, low consensus
    The included hose and tough stain/upholstery tools were usually viewed as useful, though one reviewer strongly disliked the included shampoo bottles.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Support and Reliability: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Warranty confidence and widely available parts supported reliability confidence in the reviews that discussed ownership support.
  • 4.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Maintenance requirements: 4.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Maintenance was generally manageable, with easy tank and underbody cleanup, but brushroll removal requiring a screwdriver and interior wiping were drawbacks.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Controls and UI: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Controls were viewed as simple and easy to operate, with one review noting the minimal on/off and trigger setup.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Maneuverability and Handling: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Handling feedback was mixed: one review called it easy to maneuver, while another said its heavy body was still felt during use.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Emptying and Mess Control: 5.0, 1 review
    The dirty-water tank earned strong marks in one test because it was easy to empty and clean through the large opening.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Filtration / Dust Containment: 5.0, 1 review
    One review of the Big Green 7700 praised its filtration approach for containing dust and helping clean the air while cleaning floors.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Tool-change simplicity: 5.0, 1 review
    The hose/accessory changeover was described as clearly marked and simple, requiring only a quarter-turn connection process.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Hair Pickup — Carpets: 4.5, 1 review
    One owner observed carpet pet-hair pickup during deep cleaning, tying hair removal to the brushroll and extraction performance.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Heating element: 4.5, 1 review
    The 7700 review described the heating element as useful for improving cleaning by raising hot tap-water temperature.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Adaptive chassis lift: 4.0, 1 review
    One technician highlighted the spring-loaded/free-floating lower design as a rare design intended to accommodate higher-pile carpet.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Mopping performance: 4.0, 1 review
    Mopping or hard-floor washing support came from one 7700 review, which said the hard-floor tool did a good job on sealed surfaces.
  • 3.5
    1 review
    Area Rug Handling: 3.5, 1 review
    Area-rug handling was supported only by one 7700 review, which said best results seemed limited to small areas, bare floors, and area rugs.
  • 3.5
    1 review
    Packaging quality: 3.5, 1 review
    Packaging received only light opinionated coverage, with one reviewer describing a colorful retail-style box full of advertising.
  • 3.5
    1 review
    Steam Cleaning: 3.5, 1 review
    Steam-cleaning feedback came from the 7700 review and was mixed: results ranged from adequate to very good, but slow operation was a caveat.

Cons

Sort
  • 2.0
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Weight: 2.0, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Weight was the clearest repeated drawback: reviewers consistently called the machine heavy, large, or difficult for stairs and some users.
  • 2.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Suitability for small spaces: 2.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Small-space suitability was weak because reviewers emphasized the need for storage space and cautioned against the machine for users who struggle with its size and weight.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    Innovation compared to competitors: 2.0, 1 review
    Innovation was a weak spot in one review, which said the machine’s only unusual trait was being larger and heavier than most competitors.
  • 3.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Noise level: 3.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Noise feedback was mixed: one technician found it very loud and advised earplugs for heavy use, while another owner considered it relatively quiet for its size.
  • 3.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Storage footprint and upright-stand stability: 3.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Storage feedback was split: the fold-down handle helped storage, but the machine’s large body made it inconvenient for some users to store or use often.