Bissell CleanView Compact Upright Vacuum Feature Scores
Explore all 37 feature scores for Bissell CleanView Compact Upright Vacuum, organized into pros and cons.
Scores by Feature
Summary
37 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.014 (38%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.415 (41%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.44 (11%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.44 (11%)
Pros
Sort
-
Weight is a major strength; reviewers repeatedly called it light, portable, and easy to carry.
-
Controls are a strength, with multiple reviewers praising the foot controls or simple power access.
-
Overall opinion is positive for small-space, budget use, but reviewers consistently frame it as simple rather than premium.
-
The included wand and small tools were praised for hard-to-reach spots, narrow places, and above-floor cleanup.
-
Suction drew mixed but mostly positive evidence: several reviewers praised power for routine cleaning, while one comparative test called it weak versus larger, premium uprights.
-
Storage is a strength; reviewers repeatedly described the vacuum as compact and easy to store in tight spaces.
-
Carpet hair pickup is a strength, with reviewers reporting most hair collected and one pet bedroom test filling the canister.
-
Maintenance is a strength because reviewers liked the washable filters, easy cleaning access, and low-effort upkeep.
-
Setup is very easy, with reviewers saying it comes mostly assembled or is very simple to put together.
-
Ease of use is strong thanks to the light body, simple controls, and easy everyday handling.
-
Value is strong overall, with reviewers calling it affordable, well positioned, and worth the budget price despite limitations.
-
Small-space suitability is one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers pointing to apartments, dorm rooms, and compact storage.
-
Versatility is a strength for routine home use, with reviewers citing rugs, carpet, hard surfaces, and above-floor cleaning.
-
Pet-readiness is mixed: reviewers saw useful pet-hair pickup in small spaces, but one comparison warned it is not ideal for households with lots of pets.
-
Emptying is generally easy, with reviewers describing hassle-free bagless use and simple debris release.
-
Cord management is positive, with one reviewer saying the cord wraps neatly around the back.
-
Hard-floor hair pickup was praised in the pet-hair buying-guide review as part of its multi-surface pet-hair cleaning.
-
Ownership costs look low because reviewers highlighted washable filters and bagless upkeep as money-saving.
-
Above-floor pickup was praised through the extension wand, especially for furniture and hard-to-reach areas.
-
The bin is easy to remove and use, but the compact dust cup can require more frequent emptying.
-
Area rug handling is positive in the buying-guide review, which said the suction covers carpets, area rugs, and hard floors.
-
Hair-debris flow was positive in the comparative test, where collected hair reached the canister without clogging.
-
Edge and baseboard cleaning was reasonably good in the wall-rice test, though not flawless close to the wall.
-
Low-pile carpet pickup is usable but not effortless, with evidence of good results after extra passes.
-
Medium-carpet pickup is mixed: one test left sand behind, while another reviewer liked its basic carpet cleaning.
-
Cord length is mixed: one reviewer found the 23-foot cord easy to use, while another called the cord relatively short.
-
Build quality was framed as acceptable for the price, close to related Bissell models but not clearly premium.
-
Hose length is only average; a comparison said the difference versus the turbo hose is not huge but still noticeable.
-
Maneuverability is adequate rather than exceptional; the lack of pivoting was said not to hurt handling too much.
Cons
Sort
-
Noise is a consistent weakness; reviewers described it as loud or very noisy, even when they liked the cleaning power.
-
Heavy-duty suitability is weak because reviewers cautioned against large homes, huge messes, and homes with many pets.
-
Blowback or scatter is a weakness on larger hard-floor debris, where debris moved to the sides.
-
Crevice pickup is weak; the vacuum struggled to lift sand from a deep groove.
-
Comparative performance is mixed to weak: one roundup did not recommend under-$100 vacuums, and another preferred the turbo variant for varied floors.
-
Hard-floor large-debris intake is inconsistent, ranging from strong rice pickup in one test to poor results on big piles and hardwood.
-
Filtration is a limitation because one reviewer specifically noted the lack of HEPA filtration.
-
Floorhead design is mixed: reviewers criticized inefficiency and no brush shutoff, but one liked the raised agitator behavior when upright.