- Compared: price, runtime, dust illumination, attachments, and weight The Dyson model is compared as a much higher-priced wet-cleaning alternative with longer runtime and more attachments.
Bissell CrossWave OmniFind Cordless Vacuum Review
Bottom Line
Choose the Bissell CrossWave OmniFind if you need an easy cordless vacuum mop for pet hair, hard floors, rugs, spills, and kid messes. Skip it if you need dry-only vacuuming, stair cleaning, deep scrubbing, or mostly carpet cleaning.
Best for
Best for busy homes with pets, kids, hard floors, rugs, spills, and frequent light cleaning. Reviewers valued the cordless vacuum-and-mop convenience, easy maintenance, and strong pet-hair handling.
Not for
Not for mostly carpeted homes, stair cleaning, dry-only vacuuming, tight corners, or heavy-duty scrubbing. Reviewers repeatedly noted damp carpets, missed edges, and limited deep-cleaning ability.
Verdict
Review evidence is strongly positive for everyday mixed messes: the OmniFind repeatedly earned praise for lifting pet hair, wet spills, dry debris, and visible grime while staying easy to maneuver and maintain. The main tradeoff is convenience versus depth. It vacuums and mops at once, has useful self-cleaning, and reviewers liked the cordless handling, lights, and two-tank system. However, it is not a true deep scrubber, cannot be used as a dry-only vacuum, misses corners and edges, and is awkward for stairs. Carpet performance is useful for rugs and refreshes, but dampness makes it a weaker fit for mostly carpeted homes.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
Bissell CrossWave Edge All-in-One
- Compared: price, corded design, and edge reach The review describes the CrossWave Edge All-in-One as a cheaper, corded, similar model that claims edge reach.
previous Cross Wave
- Older model: drying performance The reviewer says the OmniFind improves on the previous Cross Wave, especially by drying better.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
49 reviewed features- Very positive 4.5-5.0 47% 23 features
- Positive 3.5-4.4 31% 15 features
- Neutral 2.5-3.4 16% 8 features
- Negative 1.5-2.4 4% 2 features
- Very negative below 1.5 2% 1 feature
Pros
-
Setup was consistently easy, with reviewers saying assembly was straightforward and instructions were clear.
-
Pet hair pickup was one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers repeatedly praising its ability to lift hair and debris.
-
One reviewer found it much better than a previous Cross Wave, especially for drying.
-
The floorhead design was praised for its large brush roll and seal, which the reviewer linked to better drying.
-
The hard-floor seal was praised as part of why the machine dried floors well.
-
The vacuum mop was viewed as useful for kid-related mealtime messes.
-
Overall sentiment was strongly positive, with every reviewer recommending or praising the OmniFind despite caveats.
-
Ease of use was one of the strongest themes, with reviewers calling it intuitive, effortless, and life-easing.
-
Hair-wrap resistance was a clear strength, with reviewers praising minimal hair wrap and easier detangling.
-
Weight was praised, with reviewers calling it lightweight and easy to carry or use.
-
Cordless operation was a recurring advantage, making the machine easier to move around rooms without being tethered.
-
Mopping performance was repeatedly praised for making floors visibly cleaner and handling everyday wet and dry messes.
-
Area rug performance was positive, with reviewers saying rugs cleaned well and did not feel overly wet.
-
Fresh liquid pickup was strong, with reviewers reporting fast pickup of spills and wet messes.
-
Maintenance was considered easier than similar machines, though users still need to empty, rinse, and dry parts.
-
Noise was viewed positively during normal cleaning, with one reviewer saying it was quiet enough for nighttime use.
-
The self-cleaning cycle was praised for simplifying cleanup and clearing hair, debris, and dirty water.
-
The dirty-water collection design earned praise because the built-in strainer made disposal cleaner and easier.
-
Carpet hair pickup was positive, with a reviewer saying it collected pet hair and crumbs well on carpets.
-
Packaging was praised as minimal, recyclable, and still protective.
-
Rug handling included a positive note that the machine did not get stuck at rug corners.
-
Small-space suitability was positive thanks to a compact body and neat charging base.
-
Reviewers valued the two-in-one vacuum-and-mop design, especially for everyday messes.
-
Debris illumination was mostly praised for revealing fur and messes, though one reviewer was underwhelmed.
-
LED/headlight feedback was mostly positive, but one reviewer found the feature less impressive than on other power mops.
-
Maneuverability was praised across reviews, with reviewers saying it glides, swerves around furniture, and feels easy to move.
-
Runtime was generally enough for full-home or hard-floor cleaning, though the water tank could empty before the battery.
-
Build quality was viewed positively, with reviewers describing the unit as sturdy, high-quality, and well-made.
-
Emptying and mess control were positive thanks to easy decanting, straining, and cleaner debris separation.
-
Battery feedback was mostly positive because it covered whole-home or hard-floor cleaning, though it was not class-leading.
-
Controls were generally simple and intuitive, but mid-body button placement and upright shutoff were drawbacks.
-
Large debris pickup was generally good, though cereal sometimes needed extra passes and could scatter.
-
Drying feedback was mixed by surface: one reviewer found hard floors dried fast, while another found floors wetter than a mop.
-
Reviewers considered it worth considering for the price because of its two-in-one cleaning role and overall usefulness.
-
Storage was mostly positive thanks to compact docking, though one reviewer found outlet placement frustrating.
-
Reviewers generally found the suction effective for dirt and hair, though one noted there are limits to what it can pick up.
-
The dirty-water indicator was useful because it clearly prompted the user when the tank needed attention.
-
Dried-on mess performance was mixed: some stubborn dirt came up well, but stuck-on food or tougher spots needed more scrubbing.
Cons
-
The liquid system earned praise for separating clean and dirty water, but reviewers disliked the lack of dry-only or water-off control.
-
Odor feedback was mixed: cleaned floors could smell fresh, but the dirty tank can stink if it is not emptied.
-
Water tank feedback was mixed: the tank could run out quickly, but another reviewer used very little water during testing.
-
Dock cleaning noise was a small drawback because the clean-out cycle was described as a little loud.
-
Innovation was viewed as limited; one reviewer said it was not the most advanced or fancy floor cleaner.
-
Automatic standby behavior was a drawback because the machine can power off when it stands too upright.
-
Streaking and residue can occur if the cleaning-solution ratio is wrong.
-
Heavy-duty suitability is limited because reviewers framed it as a surface-cleaning tool rather than a deep scrubber.
-
Edges and corners were a repeated limitation, with reviewers saying it could not reach concealed crumbs or tight corners well.
-
Stair cleaning was a clear weakness because the machine is too large and does not convert to a handheld vacuum.
-
The lack of handheld conversion limits above-floor and stair use.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Vacuums, this product is above average in Area Rug Handling, Noise level, Floorhead design, below average in Convertible handheld design, Stair Cleaning, Streaking / Residue.
Summary
8 compared features- Above average 0.4+ pts higher 38% 3 features
- Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
- Below average 0.4+ pts lower 63% 5 features
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Convertible handheld design | 1.0 | 3.6 | -2.6 |
| Stair Cleaning | 1.5 | 3.6 | -2.1 |
| Streaking / Residue | 2.5 | 4.4 | -1.9 |
| Area Rug Handling | 4.5 | 2.8 | +1.7 |
| Noise level | 4.5 | 2.9 | +1.6 |
| Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors) | 2.3 | 3.8 | -1.5 |
| Floorhead design | 5.0 | 3.7 | +1.3 |
| Suitability for heavy-duty use | 2.5 | 3.8 | -1.3 |
FAQ
Is the Bissell CrossWave OmniFind good for pet hair?
Yes. Reviewers repeatedly praised its pet-hair pickup, hair-wrap resistance, and ability to collect fur from everyday floor messes.
Can it replace a regular vacuum?
Not completely. It works well as a vacuum mop for hard floors, rugs, spills, and daily debris, but reviewers noted there is no dry-only mode, no handheld conversion, and poor stair suitability.
How does it perform on carpets and rugs?
Reviewers liked it on rugs and said it collected crumbs and pet hair well, but one found carpets too damp for regular use. It is better as a rug refresher than a primary carpet cleaner.
How long does the battery last?
Reviewers generally found the runtime enough for whole-home or hard-floor cleaning, with several referencing the 25-minute runtime. One noted the clean-water tank emptied before the battery did.
Is it easy to clean after use?
Yes, compared with similar machines. Reviewers praised the self-cleaning cycle, easy tank emptying, and removable parts, though the dirty tank must be emptied to avoid odors.
Does it clean edges and corners well?
No. Edge and corner reach was one of the most repeated limitations, with reviewers saying the wide head missed tight corners and concealed crumbs.
Does it handle dried-on messes?
It is mixed. Some reviewers saw good results on stubborn dirt and dried messes, but others said stuck-on food or tougher residue still needed heavier scrubbing.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - Vacuum Reviews & Deals
- Review score
- 4.8/5
Article Reviews
tomsguide.com
- Review score
- 3.7/5
Consider This Instead
If you want better Stair Cleaning
Choose Bissell CrossWave Vacuum Cleaner. It scores 4.3 vs 1.5 for Stair Cleaning, with a 3.7 overall score.
If you want better Streaking / Residue
Choose Dreame H13 Pro Wet Dry Vacuum Cleaner. It scores 5.0 vs 2.5 for Streaking / Residue, with a 3.9 overall score.
If you want better Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors)
Choose Dreame H12 Pro Wet Dry Vacuum Cleaner. It scores 4.6 vs 2.3 for Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors), with a 3.8 overall score.
If you want better Innovation compared to competitors
Choose Tineco Floor ONE S6 Cordless Wet Dry Vacuum. It scores 4.8 vs 3.0 for Innovation compared to competitors, with a 4.0 overall score.
Overall Top Vacuums Alternatives
Choose the Dyson V15 Detect for elite suction, laser-guided hard-floor cleaning, and strong pet-hair tools. Skip it if price, full-power noise, trigger fatigue, high-pile carpets, or long whole-home runtime matter...
Pros: Overall durability/longevity, Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors)
Cons: Storage footprint and upright-stand stability, Carpet — High-Pile Pickup
#2
Current product
Bissell CrossWave OmniFind Cordless Vacuum
Choose the Bissell CrossWave OmniFind if you need an easy cordless vacuum mop for pet hair, hard floors, rugs, spills, and kid messes. Skip it if you need dry-only vacuuming,...
Pros: Pet-Ready Features, Assembly and Setup
Cons: Convertible handheld design, Stair Cleaning
Choose the Tineco Floor One S6 for easy hard-floor mopping, lay-flat reach, and self-cleaning convenience. Skip it if you need quiet dock drying, deep carpet suction, or the lowest price.
Pros: Innovation compared to competitors, Low-profile design
Cons: Dock noise, Noise level
Choose the Dreame H13 Pro for powerful hard-floor mopping, fast brush drying, LEDs and easier powered rolling. Skip it if price, loud drying, app controls, or cleaning under low furniture...
Pros: Accessories and Tools, Streaking / Residue
Cons: Convertible handheld design, Clogging and debris prevention