Bissell Featherweight Stick Vacuum

Bissell Featherweight Stick Vacuum Review

Brand: Bissell
Released: April 14, 2017
Updated: 1 week ago
4.0
Consolidated expert score
154
Review insights
50
Scored features
10
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose it for cheap, lightweight hard-floor touchups, tight spaces, and simple handheld jobs. Skip it for whole-house carpet deep cleaning, large debris, premium filtration, or long uninterrupted cord reach.

Best for

Best for small homes, apartments, dorms, RVs, and users who want a cheap, light corded vacuum for hard floors, tight spaces, and quick surface cleanups.

Not for

Not for users who need deep carpet cleaning, strong filtration, large-debris intake, premium pet tools, or a long cord for uninterrupted whole-house cleaning.

Verdict

The Bissell Featherweight earns its best feedback as a low-cost, very light hard-floor vacuum for apartments, dorms, tight spaces, and quick cleanups. Reviewers consistently like its suction for fine debris, crevice pickup, simple assembly, compact storage, and handheld conversion. The tradeoff is that the same simple no-brush design limits deeper carpet cleaning, larger debris intake, and premium above-floor jobs. Several reviewers also criticize the short cord, basic filtration, and bin/filter cleanup. It performs well when judged as a small, inexpensive corded stick vacuum, but it is not a full replacement for a stronger upright or a specialized pet, carpet, or HEPA-focused machine.

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Worse: airflow on lower power settings The cheap stick vacuums, including the Bissell, were described as having more airflow than the Dyson v10 on low and medium.

Eureka Blaze

  • Better: maneuverability The reviewer said the Bissell was worse than the Eureka Blaze in that comparison.
  • Better: large debris pickup The Bissell struggled with larger hard-floor debris while the eureka blaze did better.

eureka blaze stick vacuum

  • Similar: general performance The reviewer said the Bissell and eureka blaze stick vacuum had similar performance.
  • Better: overall pickup and ease of use The reviewer picked the Eureka blaze stick vacuum over the Bissell overall.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

50 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0 44% 22 features
  • Positive 3.5-4.4 34% 17 features
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4 14% 7 features
  • Negative 1.5-2.4 8% 4 features
  • Very negative below 1.5 0% 0 features

Pros

  • 5.0
    based on 4 reviews
    Suitability for small spaces: 5.0, based on 4 reviews
    Small-space suitability is a clear strength, with praise for tight spaces, apartments, dorms, RVs, and compact storage.
  • 5.0
    based on 2 reviews
    Assembly and Setup: 5.0, based on 2 reviews
    Assembly is consistently described as easy, with few parts and a handle that goes on quickly.
  • 5.0
    based on 2 reviews
    Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors): 5.0, based on 2 reviews
    Crevice pickup on hard floors is excellent in tests, including one-pass and near-perfect results.
  • 5.0
    based on 2 reviews
    Runtime: 5.0, based on 2 reviews
    Runtime is treated as a strength because the corded design does not run out of battery during cleaning.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    Airflow blowback: 5.0, based on 1 review
    Airflow blowback evidence is positive in one test because debris was not blown or flung around during hard-floor cleanup.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    Battery and Charging: 5.0, based on 1 review
    Battery and charging sentiment is positive only because the corded design avoids charging waits entirely.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    Controls and UI: 5.0, based on 1 review
    Controls are very simple; one reviewer highlighted the basic on/off switch as easy to operate.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    Floorhead Seal on Hard Floors: 5.0, based on 1 review
    The hard-floor seal is a standout in one lab-style review, producing a near-perfect crevice result.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    Hair Pickup — Hard Floors: 5.0, based on 1 review
    Hard-floor hair pickup is a strength in testing, including pet and long human hair.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance: 5.0, based on 1 review
    Hair-wrap resistance is excellent because the no-brush design leaves no brush roll for hair to wrap around.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    Ongoing ownership costs (bags, filters, batteries): 5.0, based on 1 review
    Recurring cost evidence is positive but limited, with one review noting virtually no recurring repair costs.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    Support and Reliability: 5.0, based on 1 review
    Reliability evidence is limited but strong from a long-term owner who said the vacuum delivers on reliability.
  • 4.8
    based on 5 reviews
    Price and Value: 4.8, based on 5 reviews
    Value is one of the strongest themes, with reviewers repeatedly praising the low price and calling the corded model an exceptional bargain.
  • 4.8
    based on 7 reviews
    Weight: 4.8, based on 7 reviews
    Weight is one of the strongest advantages, with multiple reviewers calling it extremely light and easy to carry or push.
  • 4.8
    based on 4 reviews
    Ease of use: 4.8, based on 4 reviews
    Ease of use is a major strength, driven by light weight, simple controls, easy pushing, and quick assembly.
  • 4.6
    based on 4 reviews
    Versatility: 4.6, based on 4 reviews
    Versatility is a major positive: reviewers praise its stick, handheld, stair, and compact-use configurations.
  • 4.5
    based on 4 reviews
    Convertible handheld design: 4.5, based on 4 reviews
    The handheld conversion is a major benefit for tight spaces and quick above-floor tasks, though one test called handheld performance only okay.
  • 4.5
    based on 3 reviews
    Storage footprint and upright-stand stability: 4.5, based on 3 reviews
    Storage is a strength for apartments and closets, helped by the slim body and partial self-standing ability, with some handle limitations.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Overall durability/longevity: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    Long-term owner evidence is positive, with one reviewer saying it kept working for years, though another source mixes that with cheap-feeling build comments.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Stair Cleaning: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    Stair cleaning is viewed positively, especially when configured as a handheld or stair vacuum.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Area Rug Handling: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Area-rug handling is supported by one positive long-term review saying it works well on hard floors and mid-pile rugs.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Cord management: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Cord management evidence is limited but positive, with one review calling the cord easy to wrap for storage.
  • 4.3
    based on 3 reviews
    Noise level: 4.3, based on 3 reviews
    Noise feedback is favorable overall: reviewers called it not too loud, and it even won one noise comparison against a premium vacuum.
  • 4.3
    based on 8 reviews
    Overall opinion: 4.3, based on 8 reviews
    Overall sentiment is mostly positive for the price and intended use, though one premium comparison review was sharply negative.
  • 4.3
    based on 4 reviews
    Tool-change simplicity: 4.3, based on 4 reviews
    Tool changes are generally considered easy, but one reviewer noted the floor piece needed firm pulling because it was wedged in.
  • 4.2
    based on 5 reviews
    Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup: 4.2, based on 5 reviews
    Fine dust and small hard-floor debris pickup is consistently good, though powdery messes may require repeat passes in one review.
  • 4.1
    based on 7 reviews
    Suction and Airflow: 4.1, based on 7 reviews
    Reviewers usually found suction strong for the size and price, especially on hard floors, but one comparison test measured much weaker suction than a premium upright.
  • 4.0
    based on 5 reviews
    Maintenance requirements: 4.0, based on 5 reviews
    Maintenance is mixed: several owners describe quick cleaning, while lab-style reviews criticize dirty filters and harder bin cleanup.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Aesthetic design and finish: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Color and finish evidence is limited but positive, with one reviewer noting multiple hues that make buying more than one tempting.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Hair Pickup — Carpets: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Carpet hair pickup is positive at the surface level in the cheap-stick-vacuum comparison.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Kid-friendliness: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Kid-related evidence is limited to quick toddler-meal cleanup, where the vacuum was considered useful.
  • 3.9
    based on 6 reviews
    Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup: 3.9, based on 6 reviews
    Low-pile carpet pickup is acceptable for surface debris, but reviewers repeatedly frame it as surface-level rather than deep cleaning.
  • 3.8
    based on 2 reviews
    Build quality and durability: 3.8, based on 2 reviews
    Build feedback is mixed: one long-term owner called it sturdy, while another source said the plastic body felt cheap in places.
  • 3.8
    based on 2 reviews
    Pet-Ready Features: 3.8, based on 2 reviews
    Pet-hair evidence is mostly positive for pickup, though couch/pet use was described as dependent on suction rather than specialized pet tools.
  • 3.7
    based on 7 reviews
    Accessories and Tools: 3.7, based on 7 reviews
    The crevice tool is repeatedly praised for cracks, corners, and hard-to-reach areas, while several reviewers note the accessory set is very limited.
  • 3.7
    based on 3 reviews
    Floorhead design: 3.7, based on 3 reviews
    The floorhead design helps contain debris and suits hard floors, but the lack of a roller limits carpet depth and some pickup.
  • 3.7
    based on 3 reviews
    Under-Furniture Pickup: 3.7, based on 3 reviews
    Under-furniture pickup is mixed: handheld use reaches some low spaces, but the main floorhead struggled under a bed in one test.
  • 3.7
    based on 3 reviews
    Upholstery / Above-Floor Pickup: 3.7, based on 3 reviews
    Above-floor performance is useful for simple tasks and upholstery, but reviewers find it limited for tougher handheld or car cleaning.
  • 3.6
    based on 6 reviews
    Emptying and Mess Control: 3.6, based on 6 reviews
    Emptying feedback is split: some users find it straightforward, while others call it messy, tricky, or hard to clean.

Cons

  • 3.1
    based on 4 reviews
    Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup: 3.1, based on 4 reviews
    Medium-pile and thicker carpet performance is mixed; it can work on rugs, but deeper or thicker carpet debris remains a limitation.
  • 3.0
    based on 5 reviews
    Comparative performance: 3.0, based on 5 reviews
    Comparative results are mixed: it can compare surprisingly well in some categories but loses badly to better-equipped models in others.
  • 3.0
    based on 3 reviews
    Bin and Bag: 3.0, based on 3 reviews
    The dust bin is adequate for small jobs, but reviews criticize the bin/filter system as small, dirty, and needing frequent emptying.
  • 2.9
    based on 4 reviews
    Suitability for heavy-duty use: 2.9, based on 4 reviews
    Heavy-duty suitability is mixed: one long-term owner praised years of heavy jobs, while testing shows it struggles with deep dirt and big messes.
  • 2.8
    based on 6 reviews
    Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake: 2.8, based on 6 reviews
    Large-debris intake is mixed to weak: several tests found it struggled with cereal-sized debris, while one chip test was positive.
  • 2.8
    based on 5 reviews
    Cord length: 2.8, based on 5 reviews
    Cord length is one of the most repeated limitations, though one small-apartment owner found the 15-foot cord workable.
  • 2.5
    based on 4 reviews
    Maneuverability and Handling: 2.5, based on 4 reviews
    Handling is mixed to weak because the corded head lacks swivel, though one reviewer still found it easy to turn on hard floors.
  • 2.0
    based on 1 review
    Carpet — High-Pile Pickup: 2.0, based on 1 review
    High-pile carpet evidence is negative, with one review calling it the vacuum’s lowest-performing surface.
  • 2.0
    based on 1 review
    Clogging and debris prevention: 2.0, based on 1 review
    Clogging evidence is negative in one big-mess handheld test where the Bissell repeatedly clogged.
  • 1.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Filtration / Dust Containment: 1.5, based on 2 reviews
    Filtration is a clear weak point; reviewers criticized smoke/dust containment and warned that filtration-sensitive users should look elsewhere.
  • 1.5
    based on 1 review
    Low-profile design: 1.5, based on 1 review
    Low-profile design is weak in one test because the head would not lie flat under a bed.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Stick Vacuums & Electric Brooms, this product is above average in Airflow blowback, Support and Reliability, Ongoing ownership costs (bags, filters, batteries), below average in Low-profile design, Filtration / Dust Containment, Maneuverability and Handling.

Summary

8 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher 38% 3 features
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower 63% 5 features
Attribute This product Category average Difference
Low-profile design 1.5 4.3 -2.8
Filtration / Dust Containment 1.5 4.0 -2.5
Airflow blowback 5.0 2.8 +2.2
Maneuverability and Handling 2.5 4.3 -1.8
Support and Reliability 5.0 3.5 +1.5
Ongoing ownership costs (bags, filters, batteries) 5.0 3.6 +1.4
Carpet — High-Pile Pickup 2.0 3.4 -1.4
Clogging and debris prevention 2.0 3.4 -1.4

FAQ

Is the Bissell Featherweight good on hard floors?

Yes. Reviewers most consistently praise it for fine debris, small messes, crevice pickup, and quick hard-floor cleaning.

Does it work on carpet?

It works best for low-pile surface debris. Reviews repeatedly say it is not ideal for deep carpet cleaning because it lacks a spinning brush roll.

Is it good for large debris?

Large-debris results are mixed to weak. Several tests found cereal-sized debris hard to pick up without lifting or hovering the vacuum.

How portable is it?

Very portable. Multiple reviewers praise the extremely light body, easy pushing, and compact size for apartments, dorms, RVs, and tight spaces.

Is the cord a problem?

Often, yes. Reviewers repeatedly call the roughly 15-foot cord short, especially for whole-room or whole-house cleaning.

How is the filtration?

Filtration is a weakness. Reviewers describe it as basic and not suitable for users who need strong dust containment or HEPA-level filtration.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Consider This Instead

Overall Top Stick Vacuums & Electric Brooms Alternatives

#1 Dyson V8 Animal Cordless Vacuum
4.5

Choose the Dyson V8 Animal for a lightweight cordless vacuum that reviewers say handles pet hair, dust, stairs, cars, and small homes easily. Skip it for whole-house deep cleans, big...

Pros: Suction and Airflow, Noise level

Cons: Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake, Suitability for heavy-duty use

#2 Tineco Pure ONE S12 Cordless Stick Vacuum Cleaner
4.4

Choose the Tineco Pure ONE S12 for smart suction, strong carpet and pet-hair pickup, and lots of tools. Skip it if you need a large bin, simple storage, low price,...

Pros: Support and Reliability, Stair Cleaning

Cons: Airflow blowback, Bin and Bag

#3 DREAME R10 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner
4.4

Choose the Dreame R10 if you want strong suction, LED-lit cleaning, easy handling, and good value for everyday floors and pet hair. Skip it if you need quiet turbo cleaning,...

Pros: Pet-Ready Features, Assembly and Setup

Cons: AI, Smart

#4 Narwal S20 Pro Cordless Vacuum Mop with Self-Cleaning
4.4

Choose the Narwal S20 Pro for hard-floor homes that need strong one-pass pickup, edge cleaning, quiet self-drying, and light handling. Skip it if reverse cleaning, LED headlights, rug cleaning, or...

Pros: Pet-Ready Features, Noise level

Cons: Reverse cleaning performance, Suitability for heavy-duty use