Black+Decker Dustbuster QuickClean

Black+Decker Dustbuster QuickClean Review

Brand: BLACK+DECKER
Released: November 1, 2018
Updated: 1 week ago
3.3
Consolidated expert score
95
Review insights
47
Scored features
8
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose it for quick crumbs, small wet spills, light handheld use, and tight storage. Skip it for long sessions, deep car cleanup, heavy pet hair, or low-noise needs.

Best for

Best for small homes, kitchens, car-seat crumbs, and quick wet or dry spot cleaning where light weight and compact storage matter more than deep-cleaning power.

Not for

Not for long sessions, whole-car cleanup, heavy pet hair, baseboard detail work, thick sauces, embedded carpet messes, or users who need quiet operation.

Verdict

The Black+Decker Dustbuster QuickClean comes across as a useful, low-cost spot cleaner rather than a full cleaning solution. Reviewers consistently liked its light weight, simple setup, compact storage, cordless convenience, and ability to grab crumbs, dry debris, and thin liquid spills quickly. The tradeoff is limited stamina and cleaning depth: battery life sits around ten minutes, recharge feedback is weak, and tougher jobs like pet hair, fuzzy car floors, baseboards, thick sauces, and embedded carpet messes expose its low suction and small-bin limitations. Its best evidence is for quick kitchen, car-seat, and small-home touchups; its weakest evidence is for extended, deep, or low-mess emptying tasks.

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

Beldray

  • Cheaper: price The QuickClean was described as a little more expensive than lower-priced rival handheld units.

BISSELL Pet Hair Eraser

  • Better: pet hair pickup The reviewer said the QuickClean was not comparable to the BISSELL Pet Hair Eraser for pet hair.

Black+Decker Furbuster AdvanceClean+

  • Better: battery life and recharge time The reviewer pointed to the Furbuster AdvanceClean+ as a better battery/recharge alternative.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

47 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0 19% 9 features
  • Positive 3.5-4.4 30% 14 features
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4 26% 12 features
  • Negative 1.5-2.4 26% 12 features
  • Very negative below 1.5 0% 0 features

Pros

  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    Assembly and Setup: 5.0, based on 1 review
    Setup is a clear strength, with assembly described as quick and simple.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    Cordless convenience: 5.0, based on 1 review
    Cordless use is strongly praised for grab-and-go cleaning without dragging a cord.
  • 4.8
    based on 2 reviews
    Storage footprint and upright-stand stability: 4.8, based on 2 reviews
    Storage is a strength thanks to the compact body and wall-hanger/charger setup.
  • 4.7
    based on 3 reviews
    Weight: 4.7, based on 3 reviews
    Weight is a clear strength, with reviewers repeatedly calling it light or not heavy.
  • 4.5
    based on 3 reviews
    Ease of use: 4.5, based on 3 reviews
    Ease of use is generally strong, with praise for intuitive setup, simple controls, and grab-and-go operation.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Fresh Liquid Pickup Speed: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Fresh liquid pickup is a strong point for thin spills, which it removed quickly and easily.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Suitability for small spaces: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Small-space suitability is good because reviewers found it compact and easy to store in smaller homes.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Tool-change simplicity: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Tool changes are easy, with accessories sliding in and out of the mouth without fuss.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Versatility: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Versatility is strong for small wet and dry messes around the home and car.
  • 4.4
    based on 5 reviews
    Overall opinion: 4.4, based on 5 reviews
    Overall opinion is polarized: short demos highly recommend it, while lab testing calls it limited and far from high-performing.
  • 4.3
    based on 2 reviews
    Maneuverability and Handling: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
    Handling is strong because the vacuum is light and comfortable, though tight-space performance is less consistent.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Build quality and durability: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Build quality is acceptable for the price, with one reviewer saying the plastic parts still felt sturdy.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Ongoing ownership costs (bags, filters, batteries): 4.0, based on 1 review
    Ownership costs look manageable because replacement filters or inserts can be bought cheaply.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Overall durability/longevity: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Durability impressions are positive for the plastic body, with one reviewer not expecting cracks or breaks from normal use.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Packaging quality: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Packaging drew a simple positive impression in one short unboxing review.
  • 3.9
    based on 4 reviews
    Battery and Charging: 3.9, based on 4 reviews
    Charging feedback is split between praise for the hanger/charger and criticism of weak battery/recharge performance.
  • 3.8
    based on 3 reviews
    Upholstery / Above-Floor Pickup: 3.8, based on 3 reviews
    Above-floor and upholstery pickup is useful for crumbs and car seats, though it is not flawless on couch debris or pet hair.
  • 3.8
    based on 4 reviews
    Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup: 3.8, based on 4 reviews
    Low-pile carpet pickup ranges from excellent for light messes to weak on embedded flour or final dust.
  • 3.8
    based on 2 reviews
    Aesthetic design and finish: 3.8, based on 2 reviews
    Design feedback favors a practical, portable, lightweight shape over premium styling.
  • 3.6
    based on 7 reviews
    Suction and Airflow: 3.6, based on 7 reviews
    Suction impressions are split: several demos and one review praise quick pickup, while lab-style testing criticizes low lift and weaker deep-cleaning.
  • 3.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Bin and Bag: 3.5, based on 2 reviews
    The bin is easy to inspect, but its small size limits capacity.
  • 3.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Clogging and debris prevention: 3.5, based on 2 reviews
    Debris prevention is mixed: one demo avoided clogging, while larger cereal pieces wedged in the intake in testing.
  • 3.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Price and Value: 3.5, based on 2 reviews
    Value is generally good for the price, though reviewers note the low price brings real performance compromises.

Cons

  • 3.4
    based on 5 reviews
    Emptying and Mess Control: 3.4, based on 5 reviews
    Emptying and mess control are inconsistent: some demos are clean, while other reviews report mess, leaks, or spill-back.
  • 3.3
    based on 3 reviews
    Accessories and Tools: 3.3, based on 3 reviews
    The built-in crevice tool is appreciated, but accessory reach and included extras are limited.
  • 3.3
    based on 3 reviews
    Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors): 3.3, based on 3 reviews
    Crevice and groove pickup is mixed, with strong sand/kennel cleanup but weak sealing on narrow uneven tracks.
  • 3.3
    based on 2 reviews
    Comparative performance: 3.3, based on 2 reviews
    Comparative performance is mixed: it underperforms stronger models in lab testing but does well against budget peers on pet hair.
  • 3.0
    based on 2 reviews
    Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup: 3.0, based on 2 reviews
    Fine-dust pickup is mixed: it lifts some dry debris cleanly but can leave a flour film.
  • 3.0
    based on 2 reviews
    Support and Reliability: 3.0, based on 2 reviews
    Reliability evidence is mixed, from robust at-home performance to broader concerns about convenience and consistency.
  • 2.8
    based on 2 reviews
    Controls and UI: 2.8, based on 2 reviews
    Controls are mixed: the trigger does not bother every reviewer, but another found it a convenience problem.
  • 2.7
    based on 3 reviews
    Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake: 2.7, based on 3 reviews
    Large-debris intake is inconsistent, handling some larger pieces but struggling with oversized or awkward debris.
  • 2.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Hair Pickup — Carpets: 2.5, based on 2 reviews
    Pet hair pickup is only fair, especially on fuzzy car surfaces and stranded hairs.
  • 2.5
    based on 1 review
    Filtration / Dust Containment: 2.5, based on 1 review
    Dust containment and filtration need upkeep, with the sponge insert getting grimy quickly.
  • 2.5
    based on 1 review
    Floorhead design: 2.5, based on 1 review
    The inlet/nozzle design can hold back pickup, with one comparative test linking the large inlet to weak suction on a mat.
  • 2.5
    based on 1 review
    Streaking / Residue: 2.5, based on 1 review
    Residue control is limited on thicker wet messes, which can smear rather than fully suction away.
  • 2.3
    based on 3 reviews
    Maintenance requirements: 2.3, based on 3 reviews
    Maintenance is a recurring caveat because filters need cleaning and the manual/filter guidance is confusing.
  • 2.0
    based on 3 reviews
    Suitability for heavy-duty use: 2.0, based on 3 reviews
    Heavy-duty suitability is poor because reviewers say it should not replace a regular vacuum or clean large areas.
  • 2.0
    based on 2 reviews
    Runtime: 2.0, based on 2 reviews
    Runtime is a consistent limitation at roughly ten to eleven minutes.
  • 2.0
    based on 1 review
    Floorhead Seal on Hard Floors: 2.0, based on 1 review
    Seal quality is weak on narrow or uneven hard surfaces, where the nozzle failed to seal well.
  • 2.0
    based on 1 review
    Hair-removal channel issues: 2.0, based on 1 review
    Hair removal is inconvenient because snagged hair has to be pulled from bristles manually.
  • 2.0
    based on 1 review
    Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance: 2.0, based on 1 review
    Hair tangle resistance is weak because hair wrapped into the brush bristles.
  • 2.0
    based on 1 review
    Low-profile design: 2.0, based on 1 review
    Low-clearance access is limited because the stout body and short crevice tool restrict reach.
  • 2.0
    based on 1 review
    Noise level: 2.0, based on 1 review
    Noise is a downside, with one review calling it loud enough to make normal conversation difficult.
  • 2.0
    based on 1 review
    Onboard tool storage: 2.0, based on 1 review
    Onboard storage is weak because loose tools have nowhere to live on the vacuum body.
  • 2.0
    based on 1 review
    Pet-Ready Features: 2.0, based on 1 review
    Pet readiness is limited because the vacuum lacks a roller brush and struggles to remove pet hair from upholstery.
  • 1.5
    based on 1 review
    Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors): 1.5, based on 1 review
    Baseboard cleaning is weak, with one test leaving enough debris that a broom seemed better.
  • 1.5
    based on 1 review
    Under-Furniture Pickup: 1.5, based on 1 review
    Under-furniture reach is poor because the short crevice tool and stout body limit access.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Handheld Vacuums, this product is below average in Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors), Low-profile design, Pet-Ready Features.

Summary

8 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher 0% 0 features
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower 100% 8 features
Attribute This product Category average Difference
Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors) 1.5 4.3 -2.8
Low-profile design 2.0 4.4 -2.4
Pet-Ready Features 2.0 4.2 -2.2
Under-Furniture Pickup 1.5 3.7 -2.2
Onboard tool storage 2.0 4.1 -2.1
Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance 2.0 3.9 -1.9
Maintenance requirements 2.3 3.9 -1.5
Runtime 2.0 3.6 -1.6

FAQ

Is the Black+Decker Dustbuster QuickClean good for quick crumbs?

Yes. Reviewers repeatedly found it handy for toast crumbs, small dry debris, car-seat crumbs, and other small spot-cleaning jobs.

Can it pick up wet spills?

It performs well on thin liquid spills, including water and milk-style messes. Thick sauces are less successful because they can smear or collect in the squeegee head.

How long does the battery last?

The review evidence points to roughly ten to eleven minutes of useful runtime. That is enough for small jobs but not for extended cleaning.

Is it good for pet hair?

Only in limited situations. It can pull up some clumps and did well for a budget model in one test, but reviewers criticized the lack of a roller brush, leftover hairs, and hair caught in bristles.

Is it easy to empty?

Opinions are mixed. Some demos found emptying simple, while other reviews said debris can spill back, collect around the mouth, or require unpleasant filter handling.

Is it loud?

Yes, noise is a drawback in the review evidence. One review measured it as pretty loud and warned users not to expect normal conversation while it is running.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Consider This Instead

If you want better Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors)

Choose Dyson Car + Boat Handheld Vacuum. It scores 5.0 vs 1.5 for Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors), with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

Overall Top Handheld Vacuums Alternatives

#1 Bissell AeroSlim Cordless Handheld Vacuum
4.5

Choose the AeroSlim for fast spot-cleaning in cars, kitchens, desks, dorms, and small homes. Skip it if you need a whole-house vacuum, long runtime, or a large debris cup.

Pros: Kid-friendliness, Surface safety with attachments

Cons: Bin and Bag, Suitability for heavy-duty use

#2 Bissell Pet Hair Eraser Cordless Hand Vacuum
4.4

Best for quick pet-hair cleanup on upholstery, stairs, cars, and tight spots. Skip it for long sessions, large areas, or shoppers who need replaceable batteries and stronger upright-level suction.

Pros: Controls and UI, Stair Cleaning

Cons: Airflow blowback, Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake

#3 Saker Car Vacuum Portable Cordless 3 in 1 Handheld Car Vacuum
4.3

Best for quick car, keyboard, craft-room, and small-space cleanups with strong suction and blower versatility. Skip it for full-size SUV deep cleans, shop-vac jobs, or users who dislike short battery...

Pros: Build quality and durability, Ongoing ownership costs (bags

Cons: Battery and Charging, Noise level

#4 Dyson Car + Boat Handheld Vacuum
4.2

Choose the Dyson Car+Boat if you want premium handheld suction for cars, boats, upholstery, pet hair, and quick messes. Skip it if price, trigger fatigue, wet cleanup, or whole-home versatility...

Pros: Build quality and durability, Assembly and Setup

Cons: Onboard tool storage, Controls and UI