Black+Decker Thermal Coffeemaker, 12-Cup CM2035B Feature Scores
Explore all 17 feature scores for Black+Decker Thermal Coffeemaker, 12-Cup CM2035B, organized into pros and cons.
Scores by Feature
Summary
17 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.06 (35%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.47 (41%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.42 (12%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.42 (12%)
Pros
Sort
-
The thermal pot function was the strongest point, with every relevant review saying the carafe kept coffee warm for hours or consistently hot.
-
Reviewers generally liked the compact footprint, readable controls, appearance, and counter-friendly design, though ergonomics were not uniformly perfect.
-
Value was a major strength, with multiple reviewers framing it as a budget-friendly brewer that outperforms its low price.
-
The overall experience was positive for everyday use, with intuitive controls and simple operation offset by a short learning curve in one lab review.
-
Capacity was a clear strength, with reviewers noting the full 12-cup output works well for larger households, offices, or frequent entertaining.
-
Carafe handling was mixed: most reviewers liked the pour quality and wide-mouth cleaning, but one found the press-to-pour lever hard for smaller hands.
-
Brew performance was mixed-positive: several reviewers liked the balanced extraction and flavor, while one lab review criticized below-ideal brew temperatures.
-
Automation features were useful rather than flashy: reviewers valued the freshness timer, auto-brew programming, and safety-minded auto shutoff.
-
Beverage quality was generally pleasant but not elite, ranging from smooth and drinkable in lab testing to very good in a user review.
-
Setup was described as quick and straightforward, with the home reviewer saying initial setup took only a few minutes.
-
Heating performance was inconsistent: some users measured or tasted very hot coffee, while the lab review found the water heated slowly and below ideal.
-
Home testing supported the core thermal-carafe claim, with the reviewer reporting coffee stayed warm for hours and remained enjoyable without reheating.
-
Build quality drew split reactions: reviewers liked the stainless or insulated carafe, but one home test found the plastic body flimsy and not built to last.
Cons
Sort
-
Design flaws centered on the press-to-pour carafe and a break-prone lid-lever warning, making the carafe less carefree than the rest of the machine.
-
The lack of a permanent filter was a drawback because it adds ongoing paper-filter costs and unnecessary waste.
-
Speed was acceptable but not a standout: one review called it standard, while others found it not the quickest or relatively long.
-
Maintenance was mixed: cleanup and dishwasher-safe parts were praised, but regular carafe cleaning, descaling time, and a fixed reservoir created hassles.