Bose SoundLink Micro 2

Bose SoundLink Micro 2 Feature Scores

Explore all 44 feature scores for Bose SoundLink Micro 2, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

44 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    7 (16%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    16 (36%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    11 (25%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    10 (23%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.4
    10 reviews strong consensus
    Water resistance rating: 4.4, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Water resistance receives strong praise, including real-world rinse or shower testing and comments that it can handle rain or outdoor use.
  • 4.4
    8 reviews strong consensus
    Drop resistance durability: 4.4, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Durability is strongly praised, with reviewers calling it rugged, drop-resistant, premium-built, and able to survive rough handling.
  • 4.2
    13 reviews strong consensus
    Handle or strap quality: 4.2, 13 reviews, strong consensus
    The strap is one of the best-liked hardware changes, praised for attachability, replaceability, and flexibility, though a few found parts of it mixed or too small.
  • 4.3
    8 reviews strong consensus
    Voice clarity: 4.3, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Voice reproduction is consistently praised, with reviewers calling vocals full-bodied, clean, clear, or well served by the midrange.
  • 4.2
    10 reviews strong consensus
    Design and aesthetics: 4.2, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Design is strongly praised for compact shape, premium feel, color choices, stand-up ability, and stylish practicality.
  • 4.1
    13 reviews moderate consensus
    Frequency response balance: 4.1, 13 reviews, moderate consensus
    Sound balance is the strongest recurring theme, with most reviewers praising clear, punchy, size-defying sound, though some noted thinness, limited bass depth, or average performance.
  • 4.3
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Multipoint connectivity: 4.3, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Multipoint is consistently treated as useful, letting two devices connect and switch music duties smoothly.
  • 4.3
    6 reviews strong consensus
    USB-C charging: 4.3, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    USB-C charging is consistently treated as a welcome modernization over micro USB.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Everyday usability: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Everyday usability is praised for grab-and-go use, desk listening, shower use, biking, backpacking, and high portability.
  • 4.4
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Weight convenience: 4.4, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Weight and size convenience are praised, with reviewers emphasizing compactness, lightness, pocketability, and portability.
  • 4.2
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Bluetooth codec support: 4.2, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Codec support is generally praised for SBC, AAC, and aptX Adaptive or Snapdragon support, though some reviewers downplay its importance on a tiny mono speaker.
  • 4.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Dust resistance rating: 4.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Dust resistance is praised where mentioned, mainly through favorable reactions to the IP67/IP68 rugged protection.
  • 4.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Setup simplicity: 4.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Setup is consistently easy, with reviewers describing pairing or initial setup as quick and simple.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Bluetooth connection stability: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Connection stability is praised in the two reviews that assessed it, with no connectivity issues and seamless pairing.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Control button responsiveness: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Button feel is praised in the reviews that assessed it, with tactile, responsive controls and pleasant clicks.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Latency with TV (lip sync): 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Video latency was viewed positively in the YouTube reviews that tested phone video use, with both saying latency was not an issue.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Bluetooth connectivity: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Bluetooth connectivity is viewed positively where assessed, with no issues and acceptable Bluetooth 5.4 operation.
  • 3.6
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    App reliability: 3.6, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    App impressions are mixed: reviewers liked navigation or convenience in some cases, but criticized the app and EQ as basic or barebones.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Bluetooth range: 4.5, 1 review
    Bluetooth range tested well in one review, which confirmed Bose's claimed detection range.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Charging time: 4.0, 1 review
    Charging time is viewed positively in one review, which found the second generation recharges faster than the old model.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Low-volume performance: 4.0, 1 review
    Low- and mid-volume playback is a strength in the review that assessed it, with clean, distortion-free sound at moderate levels.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    On-device controls: 4.0, 1 review
    On-device controls are praised in one review, which says Bose improved the physical button interface.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Status indicators: 4.0, 1 review
    The battery/status readout was appreciated in one review as a convenience added through the Bose app.

Cons

Sort
  • 2.4
    8 reviews strong consensus
    Microphone: 2.4, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    The removed microphone is a recurring caveat: several reviewers missed speakerphone or assistant use, while a few said it was not a dealbreaker.
  • 1.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Multi-speaker pairing reliability: 1.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Multi-speaker pairing is viewed as limited by reviewers who criticized the need for exact matching for stereo and the two-speaker wireless cap.
  • 1.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Power bank function: 1.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Power bank function is a weakness because reviewers note the Bose cannot charge other devices, especially compared with rivals.
  • 2.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Omnidirectional sound: 2.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Omnidirectional performance is limited because reviewers describe the front-firing design as directional or poor off-axis.
  • 1.5
    1 review
    LED lighting effects: 1.5, 1 review
    Lighting is a negative in the comparison review because Bose lacks the useful safety light feature praised on a rival.
  • 1.5
    1 review
    Lighting effects: 1.5, 1 review
    Lighting effects are a weakness only in comparative evidence, where the Bose lacks a rival's useful night-safety light feature.
  • 2.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Wired input: 2.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Wired input is a weakness because reviewers noted the lack of wired playback, with one calling the limitation unacceptable for the price.
  • 2.8
    12 reviews low consensus
    Price / value for money: 2.8, 12 reviews, low consensus
    Price and value are the most divisive area: Bose fans and portability-focused reviewers accept the premium, while several others call it hard to justify.
  • 2.6
    4 reviews low consensus
    Distortion at high volume: 2.6, 4 reviews, low consensus
    High-volume behavior is mixed to weak: one reviewer heard less distortion than before, but others reported compression, shrill treble, or muddy overdriven sound when pushed.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    Float capability: 2.0, 1 review
    Float capability is a weakness where mentioned, with one reviewer finding it odd that the waterproof silicone speaker does not float.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    Smart features: 2.0, 1 review
    Smart features are weak in comparative evidence because one reviewer says rivals offer useful extras Bose lacks.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    Speakerphone quality: 2.0, 1 review
    Speakerphone usefulness is hurt by the removed microphone, with one reviewer saying it would have been nice to keep the feature.
  • 2.8
    9 reviews moderate consensus
    EQ customization: 2.8, 9 reviews, moderate consensus
    EQ customization is mixed to weak: reviewers appreciate having EQ, but many call it basic, barebones, or ineffective.
  • 2.9
    11 reviews low consensus
    Value for money: 2.9, 11 reviews, low consensus
    Value for money is mixed to negative overall: some reviewers say the premium is worthwhile for the form factor, but many think rivals offer better bang for the buck.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    Audio format support: 2.5, 1 review
    Audio format support is limited in one review, which criticizes the lack of high-resolution audio support.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    Stereo imaging accuracy: 2.5, 1 review
    The mono design limits stereo separation, with one reviewer saying instruments layer together and are hard to distinguish.
  • 3.2
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Cohesive presentation: 3.2, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Cohesion is mixed: vocals and harmonies can work neatly, but complex tracks or mono layering can sound hollowed out or hard to separate.
  • 3.1
    11 reviews moderate consensus
    Battery life (if portable): 3.1, 11 reviews, moderate consensus
    Battery life is divided: reviewers appreciated the upgrade from the original, but several measured or warned of much shorter runtime at loud volume.
  • 3.3
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    Detail retrieval: 3.3, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    Detail retrieval is mixed: reviewers praised nuance and synth-line detail, but others heard lost nuance, limited clarity, or less top-tier detailing.
  • 3.3
    6 reviews low consensus
    Inter-speaker connectivity: 3.3, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Inter-speaker connectivity is mixed: reviewers like stereo or party linking, but criticize exact-model requirements and limited pairing options.
  • 3.2
    12 reviews low consensus
    Loudness / maximum volume: 3.2, 12 reviews, low consensus
    Reviewers split on volume: several praised room-filling or louder-than-expected output for the size, while others said it falls short at max volume and against rivals.