Breville The Grind Control Coffee Maker

Breville The Grind Control Coffee Maker Feature Scores

Explore all 27 feature scores for Breville The Grind Control Coffee Maker, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

27 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    7 (26%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    14 (52%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    5 (19%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    1 (4%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.6
    11 reviews strong consensus
    Overall user experience: 4.6, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Overall user experience is strongly positive once the machine is dialed in, with reviewers calling it convenient, satisfying, easy to use, and a very nice coffee maker.
  • 4.4
    11 reviews strong consensus
    Grinder, hopper and dosing system: 4.4, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    The grinder and hopper system are central strengths, praised for burr quality, customization, efficiency, and grind consistency, but several reviews warn about chute cleaning or beans getting stuck.
  • 4.5
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Espresso and beverage quality: 4.5, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Beverage quality is a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly describing the coffee as rich, robust, strong, tasty, or better than expected, though one single-cup test was muddy.
  • 4.5
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Design, ergonomics and footprint: 4.5, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Design and ergonomics are usually praised for stainless styling, readable displays, user-friendly controls, and manageable under-cabinet height, despite some smudging and bulk.
  • 4.4
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Brewing performance and consistency: 4.4, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Brewing performance is mostly praised for strong, hot, flavorful coffee, though one review needed calibration before reaching the best batch.
  • 4.7
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Automation and sensors: 4.7, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers like the programmable auto-start, countdown/timer information, and morning automation that grinds and brews fresh coffee.
  • 4.6
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Capacity: 4.6, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Capacity is a strength, with praise for the large water tank, 12-cup output, and bean/reservoir capacity that reduces refills.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Heating-element power: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Heating performance is viewed positively, with reviewers describing hot coffee, improved temperature control, and measured temperatures that support a hot cup.
  • 3.9
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    Value and Price: 3.9, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    Value is mixed: reviewers say the brew and all-in-one grinder justify the price, but others flag the cost if durability problems appear.
  • 3.9
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    Assembly and Setup: 3.9, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Setup is generally manageable, with one review calling it extremely simple, but others emphasize reading instructions, calibration, or an initial chemical smell.
  • 4.4
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Popularity: 4.4, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Popularity/reception is favorable, including a best-overall guide mention and comments about strong online and expert reception.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Filter: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Filter options are praised for flexibility, with paper filters producing cleaner extraction and reducing mess while the included filter supports a fuller cup.
  • 3.6
    8 reviews low consensus
    Cup, tray and carafe handling: 3.6, 8 reviews, low consensus
    Carafe performance is sharply mixed: reviewers praise heat retention and some pouring experiences, but multiple reviews complain about dripping or awkward pouring.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Speed and time-to-cup: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Speed evidence is positive, with one lab review saying it brewed quickly and another video calling the brew time not too long.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Shipping policy: 5.0, 1 review
    Shipping evidence is limited but positive, with one reviewer saying the retailer shipped quickly with free shipping.
  • 4.1
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Pot function: 4.1, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Carafe/pot mode performs well in the available evidence, with reviewers favoring carafe mode or finding quality consistent across modes.
  • 4.6
    1 review
    Recognition and certifications: 4.6, 1 review
    Recognition is favorable, with Good Housekeeping describing it as a Lab favorite for hot, full-bodied coffee.
  • 4.3
    1 review
    Accuracy of marketing claims: 4.3, 1 review
    One hands-on review says the machine delivers on the promise of a great cup of coffee.
  • 4.3
    1 review
    Capsules, pods and consumables: 4.3, 1 review
    One video frames the non-capsule approach as a benefit because it avoids disposable plastic cups and lowers cost per cup.
  • 4.2
    1 review
    Portability and travel-friendliness: 4.2, 1 review
    Travel-mug friendliness is positive in the one direct evaluation, thanks to removable drip-tray clearance for taller mugs.
  • 3.7
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Build quality and durability: 3.7, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Durability sentiment is split: one long-term owner says it outperforms other machines after years, while another warns complex parts may fail sooner.

Cons

Sort
  • 2.6
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Design flaws: 2.6, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Common design flaws center on the carafe lip, grinder chute clogging risk, oily-bean clogging, and messy maintenance.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    Environmental packaging sustainability: 2.0, 1 review
    Packaging sustainability receives one negative mention because the product arrived with styrofoam and lots of plastic.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    Accessories: 2.5, 1 review
    Accessories receive little direct evaluation; one reviewer specifically downplays the included cleaning brush as small.
  • 2.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Warranty and Customer support: 2.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Warranty sentiment is modest to negative because the one-year warranty is considered standard and short for a potentially failure-prone appliance.
  • 3.0
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    Mess-free used-puck disposal: 3.0, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Mess control is mixed to negative: some uses avoid overflow, but several reviewers report loose grounds, stuck chute residue, or messy cleanup.
  • 3.4
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Water system, maintenance and descaling: 3.4, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Water and maintenance evidence is mixed: filling can be easy, but regular descaling and chute cleaning are repeated requirements.