Explore all 27 feature scores for Breville The Grind Control Coffee Maker, organized into pros and cons.
Scores by Feature
Summary
27 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.07 (26%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.414 (52%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.45 (19%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.41 (4%)
Pros
Sort
-
Overall user experience is strongly positive once the machine is dialed in, with reviewers calling it convenient, satisfying, easy to use, and a very nice coffee maker.
-
The grinder and hopper system are central strengths, praised for burr quality, customization, efficiency, and grind consistency, but several reviews warn about chute cleaning or beans getting stuck.
-
Beverage quality is a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly describing the coffee as rich, robust, strong, tasty, or better than expected, though one single-cup test was muddy.
-
Design and ergonomics are usually praised for stainless styling, readable displays, user-friendly controls, and manageable under-cabinet height, despite some smudging and bulk.
-
Brewing performance is mostly praised for strong, hot, flavorful coffee, though one review needed calibration before reaching the best batch.
-
Reviewers like the programmable auto-start, countdown/timer information, and morning automation that grinds and brews fresh coffee.
-
Capacity is a strength, with praise for the large water tank, 12-cup output, and bean/reservoir capacity that reduces refills.
-
Heating performance is viewed positively, with reviewers describing hot coffee, improved temperature control, and measured temperatures that support a hot cup.
-
Value is mixed: reviewers say the brew and all-in-one grinder justify the price, but others flag the cost if durability problems appear.
-
Setup is generally manageable, with one review calling it extremely simple, but others emphasize reading instructions, calibration, or an initial chemical smell.
-
Popularity/reception is favorable, including a best-overall guide mention and comments about strong online and expert reception.
-
Filter options are praised for flexibility, with paper filters producing cleaner extraction and reducing mess while the included filter supports a fuller cup.
-
Carafe performance is sharply mixed: reviewers praise heat retention and some pouring experiences, but multiple reviews complain about dripping or awkward pouring.
-
Speed evidence is positive, with one lab review saying it brewed quickly and another video calling the brew time not too long.
-
Shipping evidence is limited but positive, with one reviewer saying the retailer shipped quickly with free shipping.
-
Carafe/pot mode performs well in the available evidence, with reviewers favoring carafe mode or finding quality consistent across modes.
-
Recognition is favorable, with Good Housekeeping describing it as a Lab favorite for hot, full-bodied coffee.
-
One hands-on review says the machine delivers on the promise of a great cup of coffee.
-
One video frames the non-capsule approach as a benefit because it avoids disposable plastic cups and lowers cost per cup.
-
Travel-mug friendliness is positive in the one direct evaluation, thanks to removable drip-tray clearance for taller mugs.
-
Durability sentiment is split: one long-term owner says it outperforms other machines after years, while another warns complex parts may fail sooner.
Cons
Sort
-
Common design flaws center on the carafe lip, grinder chute clogging risk, oily-bean clogging, and messy maintenance.
-
Packaging sustainability receives one negative mention because the product arrived with styrofoam and lots of plastic.
-
Accessories receive little direct evaluation; one reviewer specifically downplays the included cleaning brush as small.
-
Warranty sentiment is modest to negative because the one-year warranty is considered standard and short for a potentially failure-prone appliance.
-
Mess control is mixed to negative: some uses avoid overflow, but several reviewers report loose grounds, stuck chute residue, or messy cleanup.
-
Water and maintenance evidence is mixed: filling can be easy, but regular descaling and chute cleaning are repeated requirements.