Dyson Ball Animal 3
- Better: overall functional value The review says the newer Animal 3 improves on Animal 2 in most functional areas while costing less.
Dyson Ball Animal 2 Upright Vacuum Cleaner Review
Bottom Line
Choose the Dyson Ball Animal 2 for very strong suction, pet hair, and tool reach. Skip it if you need a light, low-profile, budget-friendly vacuum for rugs, shag, or tight spaces.
Best for
Best for pet owners and larger homes that prioritize raw suction, carpet pickup, long reach, and easy-to-empty bagless cleaning over lightweight handling.
Not for
Not ideal for shoppers with tight storage, lots of shag or area rugs, frequent stair carrying, or a strict budget.
Verdict
The review evidence paints the Dyson Ball Animal 2 as a suction-first upright with standout pet-hair pickup, strong carpet cleaning, useful attachments, and straightforward bagless maintenance. Its best results come in homes that value deep cleaning power and long above-floor reach more than compact storage or featherweight handling. The main tradeoff is that the same force and bulky ball design that help cleaning can make high-pile carpets, area rugs, stairs, and under-furniture work harder than expected. Value also depends heavily on price: some reviewers call it worth the investment, while others say cheaper competitors perform better.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
Dyson V11
- Worse: suction power Animal 2 is described as having more suction than Dyson V11 on max mode.
Dyson’s Multi Floor 2
- Worse: suction power Animal 2 is presented as the stronger-suction model versus Multi Floor 2.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
55 reviewed features- Very positive 4.5-5.0 45% 25 features
- Positive 3.5-4.4 33% 18 features
- Neutral 2.5-3.4 13% 7 features
- Negative 1.5-2.4 9% 5 features
- Very negative below 1.5 0% 0 features
Pros
-
Suction was the strongest consensus attribute, repeatedly praised as exceptional, powerful, or among the strongest tested.
-
Cyclone performance was praised as central to the vacuum’s suction and constant cleaning power.
-
Edge and baseboard cleaning was praised in test evidence, including near-edge debris collection and edge-to-edge cleaner-head design.
-
Kid-friendliness evidence was positive, with one household reporting children enjoyed using the tools and another praising upright roller safety.
-
Support and reliability evidence was positive, driven by the five-year warranty and reviewer confidence in coverage.
-
Tool changes were generally described as easy, with attachments clicking on, staying secure, or being simple to use.
-
Hair pickup on carpets and pet hair tests was a major strength across lab and owner reviews.
-
Ease of use was generally positive, especially for routine movement and cleaning tasks, though weight-related handling complaints appear under other attributes.
-
Cord reach was consistently positive where mentioned, with reviewers appreciating the long cord or cable for larger cleaning areas.
-
One reviewer liked that the rollers stop in the upright position, framing it as a useful safety behavior around children.
-
Onboard tool storage was praised when mentioned, especially the integrated storage for upright accessories.
-
Low-pile and general carpet pickup drew strong praise, with several reviewers reporting excellent or near-record cleaning results.
-
The bagless bin was praised for large capacity and reduced interruptions, though most comments focused on capacity and disposal rather than aesthetics.
-
Assembly evidence was positive, with reviewers describing a simple setup and parts that clicked together easily.
-
Emptying and mess control were consistently praised, with several reviewers saying the bin empties easily and keeps hands away from debris.
-
Above-floor and upholstery cleaning was a strength because the wand, hose, and attachments were useful on sofas, stairs, furniture, and high areas.
-
Surface-safety evidence was positive where mentioned, especially the ability to stop the brush bar on hard floors or delicate rugs.
-
Controls were viewed favorably when mentioned, especially suction settings and brush controls that let users adjust spinning or suction behavior.
-
Ongoing ownership costs were favorable because the vacuum is bagless and uses washable or reusable filters.
-
Filtration and containment were strong overall thanks to HEPA or washable filtration, though one lab noted a partly weakened seal on an older unit.
-
Pet-ready performance was a strong point, with pet hair and upholstery hair pickup repeatedly praised, though one turbine-tool comment was critical.
-
Maintenance was considered straightforward, especially because filters can be washed and routine cleaning tasks are easy to access.
-
Reviewers who commented on looks described the Dyson as cool, futuristic, or one-of-a-kind, with no major finish complaints in the evidence.
-
Durability and longevity evidence was positive, with reviewers citing long-term use, flagship status, or confidence from warranty/build quality.
-
Reviewers consistently liked the included tools and attachments, especially when they made hair, upholstery, and detailed cleaning easier.
-
Stair cleaning was generally strong because of long hose and wand reach, though one review cited moving the heavy unit as cumbersome.
-
Versatility was strong for tool-based cleaning, although one professional review noted it was less versatile than some uprights.
-
Hose and wand reach were praised for stairs and above-floor cleaning, though one owner disliked a stiff non-bending section.
-
Overall opinion was mixed-to-positive: many reviewers loved the cleaning power, but some rejected it over price, weight, or handling.
-
Medium or thicker-carpet suitability was supported by reviewers who described the wider brush bar and flooring range as appropriate for thicker or medium pile.
-
Comparative performance was strong overall, but not unanimous: some reviews ranked it among the best, while others found cheaper models performed better.
-
Innovation evidence centered on Dyson’s ball and self-adjusting systems, which reviewers called distinctive or inventive, but sometimes with practical tradeoffs.
-
Build quality evidence was mixed-positive: some reviewers called the plastics robust and durable, while one disliked a cheap-feeling hose handle.
-
Heavy-duty suitability was mixed: reviewers admired its power for busy homes, but some found it impractical for varied carpets or prolonged whole-house use.
-
Hard-floor fine-dust pickup was strong in some tests but weaker in floor cracks and gaps.
-
The self-adjusting head earned praise for adapting across floors, but multiple tests found that the same tight seal could hinder large debris or rugs.
-
Maneuverability was polarizing: the ball design helped turning, but weight and suction made some users work harder.
-
Floorhead design was a tradeoff: reviewers liked the wide, self-adjusting head, but some found it poor with larger debris.
-
Crevice and groove pickup was split: one test praised deep crevice pickup, while hard-floor gap and larger-debris tests exposed limitations.
-
Value was the main split: some reviewers said the power justified the price, while others called it too expensive or best only on sale.
-
Hair-wrap evidence was mixed: pet-hair tools resisted tangling, but one lab measured substantial long-hair wrap on the brush roll.
-
Floorhead sealing was mixed-positive, with suction-loss control praised but active-baseplate behavior linked to large-debris problems.
-
Noise opinions varied sharply, from quiet and acceptable in some reviews to loud or noisy in others.
Cons
-
Hard-floor large-debris intake was mixed, ranging from strong cereal pickup to complaints that the head pushed larger debris.
-
Clogging evidence was limited but negative, with reviewers noting occasional dog-hair bin sticking and a narrow tube that could clog on larger items.
-
High-pile carpet was the clearest cleaning limitation, especially with cereal, rugs, shag, or strong suction pulling the head down.
-
Area-rug results were mixed: one owner cleaned small rugs quickly with tools, while testers found strong suction could make rugs unworkable or sticky.
-
Weight was one of the most repeated drawbacks, with reviewers calling it heavy or difficult to lug, despite some tool-based workarounds.
-
Under-furniture pickup was mixed-to-negative; wand/tools helped some users, but the bulky ball limited precision and low-clearance reach.
-
Upright-stand stability and storage were weak spots, with multiple reviewers describing bulk or difficulty getting the vacuum to stay upright.
-
Low-profile cleaning was a repeated weakness because the ball and bulk limited reach under furniture and tight areas.
-
Stuck resistance evidence was negative, focused on area rugs and mats that strong suction could grab or lift.
-
Small-space suitability was poor because the large ball and bulky body made tight spaces and storage harder.
-
Handheld conversion was a weakness because a reviewer noted it cannot become a lightweight handheld unit like some alternatives.
-
The lack of LEDs on the floorhead was a clear drawback in the only opinionated evidence for this attribute.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Upright Vacuums, this product is above average in Surface safety with attachments, Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors), Support and Reliability, below average in Convertible handheld design, Headlight and LED lights, Suitability for small spaces.
Summary
8 compared features- Above average 0.4+ pts higher 63% 5 features
- Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
- Below average 0.4+ pts lower 38% 3 features
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Convertible handheld design | 2.0 | 4.3 | -2.3 |
| Headlight and LED lights | 2.0 | 4.0 | -2.0 |
| Suitability for small spaces | 2.1 | 3.9 | -1.8 |
| Surface safety with attachments | 4.6 | 3.1 | +1.5 |
| Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors) | 4.9 | 3.6 | +1.2 |
| Support and Reliability | 4.8 | 3.6 | +1.2 |
| Overall durability/longevity | 4.5 | 3.3 | +1.1 |
| Kid-friendliness | 4.8 | 3.6 | +1.2 |
FAQ
Is the Dyson Ball Animal 2 good for pet hair?
Yes. Multiple reviews praised pet-hair pickup, with one lab reporting 98.2% hair collection and owners liking the hair tools for couches and upholstery.
Does it work well on carpet?
It is very strong on low-pile and general carpet, but high-pile carpet and cereal-sized debris were recurring trouble spots in several tests.
Is it easy to maneuver?
The ball design helps it turn tightly, but reviewers split on handling because the vacuum is heavy and strong suction can make it harder to push or pull.
How is it on hard floors?
Reviews praised fine dust and some large-debris pickup on hard floors, but a few tests found debris could remain in cracks or get pushed by the head.
Is it worth the price?
Value is mixed. Some reviewers called the suction worth the investment, while others said similarly priced or cheaper vacuums performed better overall.
Is it good for stairs and upholstery?
Mostly yes. Reviewers liked the long reach, hose, wand, and attachments for stairs, upholstery, and above-floor cleaning, though carrying the heavy unit can be cumbersome.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - Youtube
- Review score
- 4.4/5
YouTube - Youtube
- Review score
- 4.6/5
YouTube - Youtube
- Review score
- 4.5/5
Article Reviews
Consider This Instead
If you want better Low-profile design
Choose Shark Stratos Upright Vacuum. It scores 5.0 vs 2.3 for Low-profile design, with a 4.3 overall score.
If you want better Storage footprint and upright-stand stability
Choose Bissell CleanView Compact Upright Vacuum. It scores 5.0 vs 2.5 for Storage footprint and upright-stand stability, with a 3.8 overall score.
If you want better Convertible handheld design
Choose Kenmore Bagless Upright Vacuum Lift. It scores 4.6 vs 2.0 for Convertible handheld design, with a 3.8 overall score.
If you want better Under-Furniture Pickup
Choose Bissell ProHeat 2X Revolution Upright Carpet Cleaner. It scores 5.0 vs 2.6 for Under-Furniture Pickup, with a 3.9 overall score.
Overall Top Upright Vacuums Alternatives
Choose the Shark Stratos for powerful upright cleaning, sealed HEPA filtration, Lift-Away versatility, and strong hard-floor or low-pile carpet pickup. Skip it if you need a lightweight vacuum or mainly...
Pros: Packaging quality, Low-profile design
Cons: Storage footprint and upright-stand stability, Hair-removal channel issues
Choose the Eureka OmniVerse for strong value, versatile floor and above-floor cleaning, pet pickup, and under-furniture reach. Skip it if you want premium-feeling tool changes, a larger bin, or the...
Pros: Suitability for heavy-duty use, Surface safety with attachments
Cons: Onboard tool storage, Cord management
Choose the Kenmore FeatherLite Lift-Up for a light, easy, budget upright with strong pickup, HEPA filtration, and useful lift-up cleaning. Skip it if long-hair tangles, crevice pickup, or top-tier hard-floor/carpet...
Pros: Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors), Pet-Ready Features
Cons: Hose length, Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors)
Choose the Dreame H14 Pro if you want a premium wet-dry vacuum mop that cleans hard floors fast, reaches under furniture, and self-cleans. Skip it if price, floor drying time,...
Pros: Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors), Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake
Cons: Sanitizing performance, Clogging and debris prevention