Dyson Big Ball Multi Floor Canister Vacuum

Dyson Big Ball Multi Floor Canister Vacuum Feature Scores

Explore all 46 feature scores for Dyson Big Ball Multi Floor Canister Vacuum, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

46 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    32 (70%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    6 (13%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    5 (11%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    3 (7%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.9
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Suction and Airflow: 4.9, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers consistently praise the vacuum’s strong suction, describing it as potent, extremely powerful, and able to pull dirt, dust, and even carpet upward.
  • 4.6
    8 reviews strong consensus
    Overall opinion: 4.6, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Overall opinion is strongly positive across most reviews, though the higher-level praise sits alongside repeated caveats about weight and large debris.
  • 4.6
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Ease of use: 4.6, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Ease of use is a broad strength across reviews, though it coexists with canister handling and weight caveats.
  • 4.8
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Versatility: 4.8, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Versatility is a clear strength, with reviewers praising all-floor use, attachment swaps, hose-and-tool cleaning, and broad household-surface coverage.
  • 4.9
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Emptying and Mess Control: 4.9, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Emptying is praised for pushing debris out, reducing mess, and allowing longer cleaning before trash-emptying becomes a concern.
  • 4.4
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Maneuverability and Handling: 4.4, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Handling is generally strong, with praise for gliding, turning, following, and flat head movement, but canister drag and small hallways create a learning curve.
  • 4.8
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup: 4.8, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Fine debris pickup on hard floors is consistently strong for sugar, kitty litter, flour, rice, and ordinary dust.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Comparative performance: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Comparative performance is very strong in the reviews, including better carpet dirt removal than typical vacuums and pet-hair performance comparable to top uprights.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Cord management: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Cord management is a strength, with reviewers liking the retractable cord and describing it as effortless or a favorite feature.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Storage footprint and upright-stand stability: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers like the self-righting and anti-topple behavior, and one owner also found the vacuum easy to fit into a small closet.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Tool-change simplicity: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Tool changes are repeatedly described as fast and simple, with parts snapping apart or into position with very little effort.
  • 4.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Maintenance requirements: 4.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Maintenance is generally light and straightforward, helped by washable filters and removable components.
  • 4.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Under-Furniture Pickup: 4.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Under-furniture cleaning is a strength thanks to the low-clearance head, articulating handle, and nearly flat cleaning position.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Accessories and Tools: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Included tools are seen as useful, especially for moving between messes, stairs, and specialty cleaning tasks, though the evidence is stronger for usefulness than variety.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Build quality and durability: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Build quality is strongly praised, with reviewers calling it top-notch and comparable to other well-built Dysons.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Low-pile carpet pickup is excellent in the scored reviews, with near-perfect test results and praise for easy pickup.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Cord length: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Cord length is praised because it supports multi-room cleaning and is called a favorite feature by one owner.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Hair Pickup — Carpets: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Carpet hair pickup is excellent, with one lab result above 98% and an owner saying it handled dog hair flawlessly.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Innovation compared to competitors: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Innovation evidence centers on the self-righting and hassle-reducing design, which reviewers frame as clever and efficient.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Ongoing ownership costs (bags, filters, batteries): 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Ownership-cost evidence is favorable because reviewers emphasize the washable lifetime filter and corded design that avoids battery replacement.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Pet-Ready Features: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Pet-related evidence is very positive: reviewers say it handles pet hair and broader pet messes well, with one review explicitly recommending it for pet owners.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Runtime: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Runtime is a non-issue in the positive evidence because reviewers treat the corded design as letting users clean as long as needed.
  • 4.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Bin and Bag: 4.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The dust bin is viewed positively for its debris-pushing design, larger usable capacity, and convenient 1.6L size.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Aesthetic design and finish: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Design impressions are positive, with reviewers calling it sleek enough for a modern home and one of the coolest vacuums they had seen.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Filtration / Dust Containment: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Filtration and dust containment receive positive but limited support through praise for the washable lifetime filter, hypoallergenic framing, and dirt-ejecting design.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors): 5.0, 1 review
    Crevice and corner pickup receives positive owner feedback, mainly because the vacuum’s power improved performance in corners and crevices.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Cyclone performance: 5.0, 1 review
    Cyclone performance is praised in one review for improving airflow and capturing fine dust very well.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Hose length: 5.0, 1 review
    Hose/reach feedback is positive but limited, with one lab review impressed by the reach of just over 33 feet.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Low-profile design: 5.0, 1 review
    Low-profile design is praised because the head can get under furniture more easily.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Noise level: 5.0, 1 review
    Noise feedback is limited but positive, with one reviewer surprised by how quiet the vacuum sounded during use.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Stair Cleaning: 5.0, 1 review
    Stair-cleaning evidence is limited but positive, centered on the stair tool being easy to attach and push along stair surfaces.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Upholstery / Above-Floor Pickup: 5.0, 1 review
    Above-floor cleaning is positive, with the extension arm praised for reaching vaulted ceilings and higher dust without difficulty.
  • 3.6
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Price and Value: 3.6, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Value is mixed-positive: reviewers often say performance justifies the price, while still repeatedly noting that Dyson pricing is high.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Overall durability/longevity: 4.5, 1 review
    Longevity evidence is limited to one owner connecting likely durability to an older Dyson that was still working after seven years.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Suitability for heavy-duty use: 4.5, 1 review
    Heavy-duty suitability is supported mainly by one reviewer saying the vacuum works well for large spaces and offices.
  • 3.5
    4 reviews low consensus
    Floorhead design: 3.5, 4 reviews, low consensus
    The floorhead earns praise for self-adjustment and roller-speed control, but several reviews say the main head struggles with larger debris.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Hair-removal channel issues: 4.0, 1 review
    Hair-removal channel evidence is limited but positive, with the owner describing excess hair removal as easy.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Surface safety with attachments: 4.0, 1 review
    Attachment surface safety is supported by one reviewer using distance and airflow to clean delicate fabric without pulling on it.

Cons

Sort
  • 1.9
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake: 1.9, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Large debris intake on hard floors is the clearest weakness, with cereal and other thick debris repeatedly pushed, missed, or requiring direct hose use.
  • 2.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Weight: 2.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Weight is a consistent drawback, with reviewers calling it heavy and potentially too much for children or older users to carry.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    Area Rug Handling: 2.0, 1 review
    Area rug handling is weak for thick small rugs, where suction can lift the rug and the release feature may not help enough.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    Controls and UI: 3.0, 1 review
    The handle trigger and suction controls help surface transitions, but one reviewer disliked needing to hold the trigger continuously.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors): 3.0, 1 review
    Edge and baseboard cleaning is only average to slightly above average, with one test noting it did not remove all edge debris.
  • 3.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Carpet — High-Pile Pickup: 3.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    High-pile carpet pickup is mostly good for smaller debris, but cereal remains a recurring limitation.
  • 3.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Clogging and debris prevention: 3.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Debris-prevention evidence is mixed: one lab review criticized larger debris pickup, while an owner said the vacuum rarely clogged.
  • 3.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Suitability for small spaces: 3.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Small-space suitability is split: articulation helps tight spaces, but a canister layout can be problematic in a narrow hallway.