Eufy Video Doorbell Dual Camera S330

Eufy Video Doorbell Dual Camera S330 Review

Brand: eufy
Released: February 2022
Updated: 2 weeks ago
4.1
Consolidated expert score
193
Review insights
46
Scored features
12
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the Eufy S330 if package monitoring, local storage, and no subscription matter most. Skip it if you need slim hardware, HomeKit, consistently fast live view, or stronger night vision.

Best for

Best for shoppers who receive frequent deliveries and want local storage without a monthly subscription. It also suits users who value AI package alerts, face recognition, and Alexa or Google support.

Not for

Not for buyers who need a slim, HomeKit-friendly doorbell or the fastest possible live view. It is also a weaker fit if strong long-distance night vision matters more than package monitoring.

Verdict

The Eufy Video Doorbell Dual Camera S330 stands out for its downward package camera, local storage, sharp daytime video, and generally useful AI alerts. Reviewers repeatedly liked that it avoids mandatory subscriptions while still saving clips and watching for deliveries. The tradeoff is that its premium feature set does not make every core doorbell task flawless: several reviewers reported laggy live view or delayed notifications, and night vision ranged from solid to notably poor. Installation was often described as easy, but one reviewer found setup frustrating, and multiple reviews called the unit large or bulky. Overall, the evidence points to a feature-rich, package-focused doorbell with excellent ownership economics, tempered by responsiveness, size, and low-light caveats.

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

Google Nest Doorbell

  • More expensive: long-term subscription cost ScienceFocus says Eufy could be cheaper in the long term than Google Nest Doorbell due to no subscription paywall.
  • Similar: resolution and facial recognition SafeHome says Eufy's 2K resolution and facial recognition reminded them of the Google Nest Doorbell.

ring doorbell

  • Worse: reliability and speed The reviewer contrasts Eufy's consistent, fast operation with the Ring doorbell experience.
  • More expensive: price and included kit The reviewer says the Eufy kit cost about the same or less than the Ring doorbell they bought.

Amazon Ring

  • More expensive: long-term subscription cost ScienceFocus says Eufy could be cheaper in the long term than Amazon Ring due to no subscription paywall.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

46 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0 43% 20 features
  • Positive 3.5-4.4 37% 17 features
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4 20% 9 features
  • Negative 1.5-2.4 0% 0 features
  • Very negative below 1.5 0% 0 features

Pros

  • 5.0
    based on 8 reviews
    Subscription: 5.0, based on 8 reviews
    Reviewers strongly agreed that avoiding mandatory subscription fees is a major benefit of this doorbell.
  • 5.0
    based on 6 reviews
    Ongoing ownership costs: 5.0, based on 6 reviews
    Ongoing costs were one of the strongest positives because reviewers repeatedly valued no required monthly fee or subscription paywall.
  • 5.0
    based on 3 reviews
    AI features: 5.0, based on 3 reviews
    AI features were generally praised for identifying people, faces, packages, and reducing false alerts, though some sensitivity tuning remained necessary.
  • 5.0
    based on 3 reviews
    Peace of mind: 5.0, based on 3 reviews
    Peace-of-mind evidence centered on package protection, delivery confidence, and knowing what happened at the door.
  • 5.0
    based on 3 reviews
    Recording: 5.0, based on 3 reviews
    Recording earned positive evidence from pre-recording, long clip access, and package-approach footage.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    Pre-roll buffer: 5.0, based on 1 review
    Pre-roll evidence came from the wired review, where the reviewer valued capturing the start of motion events.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    System completeness: 5.0, based on 1 review
    System completeness had limited but positive evidence from one reviewer who called it a more complete kit.
  • 4.9
    based on 5 reviews
    Object and person detection: 4.9, based on 5 reviews
    Object, person, and package detection were generally strong, with reviewers praising accurate box detection, fewer false alerts, and useful AI filtering.
  • 4.9
    based on 4 reviews
    Reliability (general): 4.9, based on 4 reviews
    General reliability was praised in long-term and hands-on use, especially compared with prior solutions, though not every feature was flawless.
  • 4.8
    based on 7 reviews
    Storage: 4.8, based on 7 reviews
    Storage was a major strength, with reviewers praising local storage capacity, long clip retention, and no cloud requirement.
  • 4.8
    based on 2 reviews
    Complete kit in box: 4.8, based on 2 reviews
    Box contents and packaging received positive comments, with reviewers liking the included hardware and clear placement of needed parts.
  • 4.8
    based on 2 reviews
    Upgrade value vs previous model: 4.8, based on 2 reviews
    Upgrade evidence was positive from both Eufy and prior-doorbell perspectives, especially for pre-recording, video quality, and responsiveness.
  • 4.8
    based on 2 reviews
    Zones and activity areas: 4.8, based on 2 reviews
    Zones were useful for reducing unwanted alerts and tailoring detection around roads or specific camera areas.
  • 4.7
    based on 5 reviews
    Field of view and framing: 4.7, based on 5 reviews
    The dual-camera framing earned strong praise for seeing both visitors and doorstep packages, with reviewers noting generous coverage and fewer blind spots.
  • 4.7
    based on 10 reviews
    Delivery package monitoring: 4.7, based on 10 reviews
    Package monitoring was the product’s clearest strength, with reviewers praising the downward camera, delivery guard, and package detection despite occasional misses.
  • 4.6
    based on 10 reviews
    Video resolution and detail: 4.6, based on 10 reviews
    Reviewers usually praised video clarity, especially 2K daytime detail and color, though one CNET-style test found sharpness less impressive than expected in some clips.
  • 4.6
    based on 8 reviews
    App, software and firmware: 4.6, based on 8 reviews
    The app was often praised as smooth, clear, and easy to navigate, though one wired-version review called out firmware bugs.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Personalization options: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    Personalization was praised where reviewers could tune notifications, response behavior, and app behavior to fit different use cases.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Weather and temperature tolerance: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    Weather durability received positive evidence, with reviewers reporting normal operation through rain and noting resistance to inclement conditions.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Phone call integration: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Phone-call-style alerting worked well for one reviewer, who found the delay reasonable enough for visitors to still be waiting.
  • 4.4
    based on 6 reviews
    Chime: 4.4, based on 6 reviews
    The chime setup was a strength when using the included base station or compatible assistants, though one wired-version reviewer disliked losing the existing chime.
  • 4.4
    based on 9 reviews
    Recommendation for new buyers: 4.4, based on 9 reviews
    Most reviewers recommended or positively framed the doorbell, while still noting fit depends on package needs, budget, size, and lag tolerance.
  • 4.4
    based on 4 reviews
    Privacy: 4.4, based on 4 reviews
    Privacy was viewed positively because local storage reduced reliance on cloud footage, though policy language remained a caveat elsewhere.
  • 4.3
    based on 3 reviews
    Power Options and Compatibility: 4.3, based on 3 reviews
    Power flexibility was positive overall, with reviewers valuing battery and wired options plus useful power diagnostics.
  • 4.3
    based on 8 reviews
    Price and value: 4.3, based on 8 reviews
    Value was generally positive despite the high upfront price, because reviewers saw savings from local storage and a strong feature set.
  • 4.2
    based on 7 reviews
    Installation and Mounting: 4.2, based on 7 reviews
    Installation was often described as easy, but experiences varied because one review found setup long and frustrating and another disliked the bracket.
  • 4.2
    based on 5 reviews
    Face recognition: 4.2, based on 5 reviews
    Face recognition worked well in several reviews, but one reviewer found tagging faces unreliable without good lighting.
  • 4.2
    based on 3 reviews
    Base / Hub integration: 4.2, based on 3 reviews
    Hub integration was useful for storage and chimes, but setup and router requirements frustrated at least one reviewer.
  • 4.2
    based on 3 reviews
    Design aesthetics: 4.2, based on 3 reviews
    Design was mixed: reviewers liked the sleek, modern look but also called the device large, hefty, or intimidating.
  • 4.2
    based on 3 reviews
    Lens distortion handling: 4.2, based on 3 reviews
    Reviewers liked that the dual-feed approach can reduce fisheye warping, though TechRadar still noticed a slight fisheye effect from the main camera.
  • 4.1
    based on 5 reviews
    Audio: 4.1, based on 5 reviews
    Audio was generally understandable and clear, but some reviewers reported low phone volume, tinny playback, or lag during two-way conversations.
  • 4.0
    based on 9 reviews
    Notifications: 4.0, based on 9 reviews
    Notification performance varied widely, from instant or quick alerts in some reviews to slow or excessive alerts in others.
  • 4.0
    based on 3 reviews
    Quick-reply / pre-recorded message usefulness: 4.0, based on 3 reviews
    Quick replies and voice responses were useful for deliveries, but one reviewer found package-response behavior not fully reliable yet.
  • 3.7
    based on 6 reviews
    Motion detection: 3.7, based on 6 reviews
    Motion detection ranged from accurate and reliable in several tests to temperamental or overly active in busier locations.
  • 3.7
    based on 3 reviews
    Battery and Charging: 3.7, based on 3 reviews
    Battery impressions were mixed: reviewers liked better-than-expected battery life, but also disliked removal downtime during charging.
  • 3.5
    based on 4 reviews
    Theft and Tamper: 3.5, based on 4 reviews
    Tamper evidence was mixed: some tests found the doorbell hard to pull off, while others worried about a plastic bracket or footage loss if stolen.
  • 3.5
    based on 1 review
    Automation flexibility: 3.5, based on 1 review
    Automation evidence was limited and conditional, with one reviewer noting reactions depend on using other Eufy products.

Cons

  • 3.3
    based on 6 reviews
    Smart-home integration (Alexa, Google, Siri, HomeKit, Matter, Thread): 3.3, based on 6 reviews
    Alexa and Google support were useful, especially for chimes and live view, but reviewers repeatedly noted missing HomeKit or IFTTT support.
  • 3.0
    based on 1 review
    Controls and indicators: 3.0, based on 1 review
    Controls had one usability caveat: a reviewer found that visitors sometimes pressed the lens instead of the doorbell button.
  • 2.9
    based on 4 reviews
    Size and form factor: 2.9, based on 4 reviews
    Size and form factor were recurring drawbacks, with multiple reviewers describing the doorbell as large, bulky, or not especially compact.
  • 2.8
    based on 6 reviews
    lag): 2.8, based on 6 reviews
    Lag was a repeated caveat, especially for live view, audio conversations, and intervening during fast porch-piracy scenarios.
  • 2.8
    based on 5 reviews
    Low-light and Night vision: 2.8, based on 5 reviews
    Night vision was the clearest split: some reviewers found usable or strong night footage, while others called it weak, especially beyond close range.
  • 2.5
    based on 1 review
    Law enforcement policy transparency: 2.5, based on 1 review
    One reviewer criticized law-enforcement policy language as vague, even while seeing local storage as a privacy improvement.
  • 2.5
    based on 1 review
    Light adjustability: 2.5, based on 1 review
    Light adjustability evidence was limited to one criticism that the bottom LEDs could not be turned off.
  • 2.5
    based on 1 review
    Security ecosystem integration: 2.5, based on 1 review
    Security ecosystem integration was a weak spot for one reviewer, who disliked managing a hodgepodge of home-security apps.
  • 2.5
    based on 1 review
    Wi-Fi range and stability: 2.5, based on 1 review
    Wi-Fi evidence was limited but negative, with one roundup warning that the doorbell stops working if Wi-Fi cuts out.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Video Doorbells, this product is above average in Subscription, Pre-roll buffer, Recording, below average in Security ecosystem integration.

Summary

8 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher 88% 7 features
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower 13% 1 feature
Attribute This product Category average Difference
Security ecosystem integration 2.5 4.1 -1.6
Subscription 5.0 3.6 +1.4
Pre-roll buffer 5.0 3.4 +1.6
Recording 5.0 3.5 +1.5
Ongoing ownership costs 5.0 3.6 +1.4
Delivery package monitoring 4.7 3.4 +1.2
Storage 4.8 3.6 +1.2
Face recognition 4.2 3.1 +1.1

FAQ

Does the Eufy S330 require a subscription?

No reviewer treated a subscription as mandatory. Multiple reviews praised local storage and no monthly fees, while noting cloud storage can be added if desired.

Is the second package camera useful?

Yes, most reviewers found it useful for seeing packages close to the door and reducing blind spots. A few noted it is not essential or can miss the occasional parcel.

How good is the video quality?

Reviewers generally praised the 2K main camera for sharp, colorful detail in daylight. Night performance was more mixed, with some finding it usable and others calling it weak.

Are notifications fast?

They can be fast, especially in some wired or later tests, but evidence is mixed. Several reviewers reported slow live view, delayed motion alerts, or too many alerts in busy locations.

Does it work with Alexa, Google, or HomeKit?

Reviewers reported Alexa and Google Assistant support, including useful chime or live-view options. They repeatedly noted that HomeKit support is missing.

Who is this doorbell best suited for?

It fits buyers who receive packages often, want local storage, and prefer avoiding monthly fees. It is less ideal for users who need a small doorbell, HomeKit, or consistently strong night vision.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Consider This Instead

If you want better Security ecosystem integration

Choose Eufy 2K Video Doorbell S220. It scores 5.0 vs 2.5 for Security ecosystem integration, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

If you want better Wi-Fi range and stability

Choose eufy Video Doorbell C31. It scores 5.0 vs 2.5 for Wi-Fi range and stability, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

Overall Top Video Doorbells Alternatives

#1 Eufy 2K Video Doorbell S220
4.3

Good if you want sharp video, local storage and no required subscription. Skip it if you need 24/7 recording, flawless AI alerts, broad smart-home support or true six-month battery life.

Pros: Ongoing ownership costs, Privacy

Cons: Controls and indicators, Smart-home integration (Alexa

#2 eufy Video Doorbell C31
4.2

Good if you want an easy, no-fee doorbell with wired/battery power, local storage, and solid 2K coverage. Skip it if you need premium video bitrates, effortless chime coexistence, or built-in...

Pros: Wi-Fi range and stability, Ongoing ownership costs

Cons: Smart-home integration (Alexa, Google

#3 Eufy Video Doorbell Kit, C210
4.2

Choose the Eufy C210 if you want a no-fee, battery-friendly doorbell with local storage and good 1080p video. Skip it if you need hardwired charging, HomeKit, or consistently instant motion...

Pros: Ongoing ownership costs, Subscription

Cons: Wi-Fi range and stability, Chime

#4 Nest Doorbell Wired, 2nd Gen
4.2

Choose it if you want sharp HDR video, excellent smart alerts, Google Home integration and flexible zones. Skip it if subscription costs, a narrow horizontal view, wiring work or weaker...

Pros: Motion detection, Object and person detection

Cons: Storage, Field of view and framing