Holmes HAP706-NU

Holmes HAP706-NU Air Purifier Review

Brand: Holmes
Released: October 2, 2009
Updated: 1 month ago
3.7
Overall review score
299
Review evidence points
39
Scored features
100
Customer reviews

Bottom Line

Choose it for low-cost small-room allergy, dust, smoke, and white-noise help. Skip it if you need strong airflow, quiet high-speed use, or proven long-term reliability.

Best for

Best for shoppers who want an inexpensive small-room purifier for allergies, dust, smoke odor, pet dander, or bedroom white noise. It suits people who can tolerate fan sound and are comfortable replacing filters.

Not for

Not ideal for large rooms, whole-home cleaning, very quiet bedrooms, or buyers who need strong airflow. Shoppers worried about early failure, burning smells, or ozone from the ionizer should look elsewhere.

Verdict

The Holmes HAP706-NU earns a mostly positive but cautious verdict from owners. Its best reviews describe cleaner-feeling air, easier breathing, reduced dust, better allergy control, and useful white noise in bedrooms, offices, nurseries, bathrooms, and other small spaces. True HEPA filtration and simple controls appeal to shoppers who do not want a complex smart purifier. The tradeoff is consistency: airflow is often weak, high speed can be loud, replacement filters can feel expensive, and a noticeable cluster of reviews report rattling, failed speeds, burned smells, or motors dying early. It looks like a good budget fit when the unit is healthy and the room is modest, but not a dependable pick for larger spaces or buyers sensitive to noise and durability risk.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

39 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    12 (31%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    14 (36%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    6 (15%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    6 (15%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    1 (3%)

Pros

  • 4.8
    22 reviews strong consensus
    allergen reduction: 4.8, 22 reviews, strong consensus
    Allergy relief is the strongest recurring theme. Many reviewers describe less sneezing, clearer breathing, fewer flare-ups, or easier nights after using it.
  • 4.9
    13 reviews strong consensus
    breathing relief: 4.9, 13 reviews, strong consensus
    Breathing relief is repeatedly praised, especially for asthma, sinus issues, wildfire smoke, and allergy-related stuffiness. Several buyers describe feeling a difference quickly.
  • 4.8
    10 reviews strong consensus
    sleep quality benefit: 4.8, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Sleep use is common and often positive. Many like the white noise and better breathing at night, although noisy or pitch-changing units can ruin bedroom use.
  • 4.5
    15 reviews low consensus
    value for money: 4.5, 15 reviews, low consensus
    Value is strong when the unit works: buyers like the low price, small-room performance, and white-noise benefits. The value falls apart for owners facing early failure or costly filters.
  • 4.6
    11 reviews strong consensus
    dust removal: 4.6, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Dust removal is a major strength in many bedrooms, offices, and small rooms. Reviewers often noticed less surface dust or visible debris gathering in the filter.
  • 4.2
    23 reviews low consensus
    air purification performance: 4.2, 23 reviews, low consensus
    Most owners say the purifier makes rooms feel fresher and noticeably cleaner, with several calling out quick improvements in stale or dusty spaces. A smaller group felt the weak fan limited how much air it could actually clean.

Cons

  • 1.2
    6 reviews strong consensus
    safety concerns: 1.2, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Safety concerns are serious despite being less common than positive reviews. Multiple owners mention smoke, sparks, burning smells, or fear of fire.
  • 1.8
    16 reviews low consensus
    reliability: 1.8, 16 reviews, low consensus
    Reliability is the biggest risk in the reviews. Positive long-term stories exist, but failures of fans, motors, speeds, rattling, and total shutdowns appear repeatedly.
  • 1.8
    4 reviews strong consensus
    ozone-free operation: 1.8, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Ionizer and ozone comfort is a concern for some owners. Several avoid the ionizer around asthma, pets, or babies because of ozone worries.
  • 1.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    condition on arrival: 1.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Condition on arrival is mixed, with a few reports of defective or possibly mishandled units right out of the box.
  • 2.2
    5 reviews low consensus
    air circulation: 2.2, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Airflow is one of the clearest tradeoffs. Some people liked the smoother breeze, but several complained that even the high setting moved very little air.
  • 2.3
    4 reviews low consensus
    initial chemical smell: 2.3, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Smell on startup or failure is a concern in a minority of reviews. Reports range from a mild new-unit smell to burning-plastic or electrical odors.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Air Purifiers, this product is above average in customer support, value for money, smoke removal, near average in allergen reduction, air purification performance, below average in ozone-free operation, air circulation, activated carbon filter.

Comparison summary

39 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    8 (21%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    19 (49%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    12 (31%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
ozone-free operation 1.8 4.4 -2.6
air circulation 2.2 4.0 -1.8
activated carbon filter 2.0 3.8 -1.8
reliability 1.8 3.0 -1.2
noise level 3.1 4.0 -0.9
build quality 2.8 4.0 -1.2
fan speed options 2.9 4.1 -1.1
customer support 4.3 3.0 +1.3

Consider This Instead

If you want better condition on arrival

Choose VOOPNU DH-JH12. It scores 4.7 vs 1.7 for condition on arrival, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

If you want better activated carbon filter

Choose Honeywell HPA3100. It scores 5.0 vs 2.0 for activated carbon filter, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

If you want better ozone-free operation

Choose Purivortex PX500. It scores 5.0 vs 1.8 for ozone-free operation, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

If you want better filter replacement cost

Choose Honeywell HFD-120-Q. It scores 4.8 vs 3.2 for filter replacement cost, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

Hamilton Beach 04383 True Air Allergen-Reducing Cleaner

  • Better: air movement The Hamilton Beach cleaner was preferred because it moved air better.

Holmes HAP9412B-U Small Room HEPA-type Air Purifier

  • Better: airflow The reviewer found the other Holmes HEPA-type purifier moved air more effectively than this True HEPA model.

Honeywell HPA100

  • Better: noise and satisfaction The reviewer said a Honeywell HPA100 was quieter and would leave buyers happier than this unit.

FAQ

Does it help with allergies?

Yes, many reviewers say it reduced sneezing, stuffiness, asthma flare-ups, sinus symptoms, or general allergy discomfort, especially in bedrooms and offices.

Is it quiet enough for sleeping?

Often on low or medium, where many owners describe it as soft white noise. High speed, rattles, and some defective units are much louder.

How well does it handle smoke and odors?

Smoke and everyday odors often improved, including apartment smoke, bathroom smells, pet rooms, and stale rooms. Odor control is not perfect, and one reviewer said it did not remove cooking odor.

What room size is it best for?

Reviews point to small rooms: bedrooms, offices, bathrooms, nurseries, and desk areas. Some larger rooms improved, but buyers repeatedly warn it is not a whole-house purifier.

Are replacement filters a problem?

They can be. Some owners found filters reasonable or used generics, while others said authentic filters were pricey, needed frequent replacement, or were hard to find.

Does it seem durable?

Durability is split. Older or good units sometimes lasted years, but many newer reviews mention fan noise, failed speeds, stopped motors, or units dying within months.

Top Air Purifiers to Consider

#1 GoveeLife H7124
4.6

Choose the H7124 if you want a quiet smart purifier for odors, dust, pets, and app control. Skip it if you need foolproof Wi-Fi, wall-facing intake, UV light, or strong...

Pros: particle removal effectiveness, pollen removal

Cons: UV-C light effectiveness, air dryness

#2 PuroAir 240
4.6

Best for quiet, simple cleaning in bedrooms or apartments. Skip it if you need verified large-room CADR value, app control, or guaranteed neighbor-smoke removal.

Pros: particle removal effectiveness, dust removal

Cons: CADR rating, air changes per hour

#3 AirDoctor AD3500
4.6

Best for strong room cleaning, allergy relief, odor control, and simple operation. Skip it if high filter costs, a larger footprint, or possible nighttime fan noise would bother you.

Pros: particle removal effectiveness, HEPA filtration

Cons: customer support, warranty coverage

#4 Nuwave Forever, 47265
4.6

Choose this if you want strong odor, dust, smoke, and pet-air cleanup with washable filters. Skip it if turbo noise, Wi-Fi setup, or a high upfront price will bother you.

Pros: filter replacement cost, allergen reduction

Cons: Wi-Fi reliability