Honeywell HPA5300

Honeywell HPA5300 Review

Brand: Honeywell
Released: May 11, 2021
Updated: 35 minutes ago
3.9
Overall review score Customer score: 3.9
416
Review evidence points
53
Scored features
100
Customer reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the Honeywell HPA5300 for strong whole-room dust, smoke, odor, and allergy relief. Skip it if hums, rattles, bulky handling, or frequent filter costs would bother you.

Best for

Best for homes that need strong air cleaning for dust, pet-related allergens, wildfire smoke, cooking odors, litter boxes, or larger shared rooms. It also suits buyers who already use Honeywell HPA filters.

Not for

Not ideal for noise-sensitive bedrooms, shoppers wanting compact portability, or buyers expecting reliable smart-home power behavior. Skip it if filter expense or occasional hum/rattle risk is a dealbreaker.

Verdict

Customer evidence points to a powerful, mostly well-liked purifier that often makes rooms feel cleaner, reduces dust, helps allergies, and reacts impressively to odors or VOC events. Owners repeatedly praise smoke clearing, pet and litter odor control, HEPA filtration, and quiet low-speed operation. The tradeoff is consistency: a meaningful minority report rattles, hums, squeaks, bulky movement, costly filters, misleading filter or coverage expectations, and auto mode that reacts better to VOCs than to pollen, dust, or wildfire smoke. It is strongest for people who value proven airflow and filtration over compact design or smart behavior.

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

HPA300

  • Better: noise level The reviewer said the HPA5300 works but is noisier than the previous HPA300.
  • Upgrade: design The reviewer considered the HPA5300 design a downgrade from the HPA300.
  • Older model: specifications and redesign The reviewer viewed the HPA5300 as an improved replacement for the HPA300.

blue air

  • Better: reviews and reliability The reviewer returned the Honeywell and preferred Blueair for reliability and reviews.

Coway

  • Better: styling and low-speed quietness The reviewer preferred Coway for styling, quiet operation, and filter value.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

53 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0 40% 21 features
  • Positive 3.5-4.4 36% 19 features
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4 15% 8 features
  • Negative 1.5-2.4 8% 4 features
  • Very negative below 1.5 2% 1 feature

Pros

  • 5.0
    based on 8 reviews
    particle removal effectiveness: 5.0, based on 8 reviews
    Customer evidence for particle removal effectiveness was strongly positive across 8 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 5.0
    based on 8 reviews
    smoke removal: 5.0, based on 8 reviews
    Customer evidence for smoke removal was strongly positive across 8 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 5.0
    based on 4 reviews
    scheduling options: 5.0, based on 4 reviews
    Customer evidence for scheduling options was strongly positive across 4 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 5.0
    based on 4 reviews
    VOC sensor accuracy: 5.0, based on 4 reviews
    Customer evidence for VOC sensor accuracy was strongly positive across 4 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 5.0
    based on 2 reviews
    ozone-free operation: 5.0, based on 2 reviews
    Customer evidence for ozone-free operation was strongly positive across 2 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 5.0
    based on 2 reviews
    pollen removal: 5.0, based on 2 reviews
    Customer evidence for pollen removal was strongly positive across 2 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    pet dander removal: 5.0, based on 1 review
    Customer evidence for pet dander removal was strongly positive across 1 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    true HEPA filter: 5.0, based on 1 review
    Customer evidence for true HEPA filter was strongly positive across 1 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 4.8
    based on 5 reviews
    maintenance ease: 4.8, based on 5 reviews
    Customer evidence for maintenance ease was strongly positive across 5 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 4.7
    based on 7 reviews
    air circulation: 4.7, based on 7 reviews
    Customer evidence for air circulation was strongly positive across 7 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 4.7
    based on 12 reviews
    allergen reduction: 4.7, based on 12 reviews
    Customer evidence for allergen reduction was strongly positive across 12 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 4.7
    based on 3 reviews
    activated carbon filter: 4.7, based on 3 reviews
    Customer evidence for activated carbon filter was strongly positive across 3 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 4.7
    based on 3 reviews
    customer support: 4.7, based on 3 reviews
    Customer evidence for customer support was strongly positive across 3 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 4.6
    based on 14 reviews
    dust removal: 4.6, based on 14 reviews
    Customer evidence for dust removal was strongly positive across 14 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 4.6
    based on 14 reviews
    odor reduction: 4.6, based on 14 reviews
    Customer evidence for odor reduction was strongly positive across 14 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 4.6
    based on 8 reviews
    fan speed options: 4.6, based on 8 reviews
    Customer evidence for fan speed options was strongly positive across 8 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 4.6
    based on 7 reviews
    HEPA filtration: 4.6, based on 7 reviews
    Customer evidence for HEPA filtration was strongly positive across 7 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 4.6
    based on 9 reviews
    room coverage: 4.6, based on 9 reviews
    Customer evidence for room coverage was strongly positive across 9 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 4.5
    based on 15 reviews
    value for money: 4.5, based on 15 reviews
    Customer evidence for value for money was strongly positive across 15 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 4.5
    based on 8 reviews
    pre-filter quality: 4.5, based on 8 reviews
    Customer evidence for pre-filter quality was strongly positive across 8 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 4.5
    based on 4 reviews
    real-time air quality monitoring: 4.5, based on 4 reviews
    Customer evidence for real-time air quality monitoring was strongly positive across 4 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 4.4
    based on 32 reviews
    air purification performance: 4.4, based on 32 reviews
    Customer evidence for air purification performance was strongly positive across 32 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 4.4
    based on 19 reviews
    auto mode performance: 4.4, based on 19 reviews
    Customer evidence for auto mode performance was strongly positive across 19 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 4.2
    based on 9 reviews
    filter availability: 4.2, based on 9 reviews
    Customer evidence for filter availability was mostly positive across 9 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 4.2
    based on 5 reviews
    filter life: 4.2, based on 5 reviews
    Customer evidence for filter life was mostly positive across 5 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 4.2
    based on 12 reviews
    design and appearance: 4.2, based on 12 reviews
    Customer evidence for design and appearance was mostly positive across 12 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 4.2
    based on 6 reviews
    durability: 4.2, based on 6 reviews
    Customer evidence for durability was mostly positive across 6 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 4.1
    based on 7 reviews
    ease of use: 4.1, based on 7 reviews
    Customer evidence for ease of use was mostly positive across 7 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 4.1
    based on 32 reviews
    overall satisfaction: 4.1, based on 32 reviews
    Customer evidence for overall satisfaction was mostly positive across 34 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 4.0
    based on 3 reviews
    filter stages: 4.0, based on 3 reviews
    Customer evidence for filter stages was mostly positive across 3 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    energy efficiency: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Customer evidence for energy efficiency was mostly positive across 1 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    washable pre-filter: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Customer evidence for washable pre-filter was mostly positive across 1 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 3.9
    based on 11 reviews
    sleep mode: 3.9, based on 11 reviews
    Customer evidence for sleep mode was mostly positive across 11 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 3.8
    based on 5 reviews
    display readability: 3.8, based on 5 reviews
    Customer evidence for display readability was mostly positive across 5 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 3.8
    based on 4 reviews
    indicator lights: 3.8, based on 4 reviews
    Customer evidence for indicator lights was mostly positive across 4 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 3.7
    based on 3 reviews
    handle design: 3.7, based on 3 reviews
    Customer evidence for handle design was mostly positive across 3 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 3.7
    based on 3 reviews
    replacement experience: 3.7, based on 3 reviews
    Customer evidence for replacement experience was mostly positive across 3 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 3.7
    based on 3 reviews
    VOC reduction: 3.7, based on 3 reviews
    Customer evidence for VOC reduction was mostly positive across 3 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 3.7
    based on 50 reviews
    noise level: 3.7, based on 50 reviews
    Customer evidence for noise level was mostly positive across 50 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 3.5
    based on 2 reviews
    documentation quality: 3.5, based on 2 reviews
    Customer evidence for documentation quality was mixed across 2 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.

Cons

  • 3.3
    based on 4 reviews
    air quality sensor accuracy: 3.3, based on 4 reviews
    Customer evidence for air quality sensor accuracy was mixed across 4 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 3.3
    based on 4 reviews
    condition on arrival: 3.3, based on 4 reviews
    Customer evidence for condition on arrival was mixed across 4 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 3.1
    based on 10 reviews
    build quality: 3.1, based on 10 reviews
    Customer evidence for build quality was mixed across 10 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 3.0
    based on 1 review
    power consumption: 3.0, based on 1 review
    Customer evidence for power consumption was mixed across 1 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 2.9
    based on 8 reviews
    size and footprint: 2.9, based on 8 reviews
    Customer evidence for size and footprint was mixed across 8 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 2.8
    based on 11 reviews
    reliability: 2.8, based on 11 reviews
    Customer evidence for reliability was mixed across 11 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 2.7
    based on 15 reviews
    filter replacement cost: 2.7, based on 15 reviews
    Customer evidence for filter replacement cost was mixed across 15 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 2.5
    based on 6 reviews
    portability: 2.5, based on 6 reviews
    Customer evidence for portability was negative or cautionary across 6 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 2.0
    based on 4 reviews
    smart features: 2.0, based on 4 reviews
    Customer evidence for smart features was negative or cautionary across 4 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 2.0
    based on 2 reviews
    control placement: 2.0, based on 2 reviews
    Customer evidence for control placement was negative or cautionary across 2 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 2.0
    based on 1 review
    adjustable vents: 2.0, based on 1 review
    Customer evidence for adjustable vents was negative or cautionary across 1 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 1.5
    based on 2 reviews
    listing accuracy: 1.5, based on 2 reviews
    Customer evidence for listing accuracy was negative or cautionary across 2 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 1.0
    based on 1 review
    child lock: 1.0, based on 1 review
    Customer evidence for child lock was negative or cautionary across 1 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Air Purifiers, this product is above average in VOC sensor accuracy, customer support, condition on arrival, below average in child lock, portability, smart features.

Summary

8 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher 50% 4 features
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower 50% 4 features
Attribute This product Category average Difference
child lock 1.0 3.6 -2.6
VOC sensor accuracy 5.0 3.0 +2.0
customer support 4.7 2.8 +1.9
portability 2.5 4.1 -1.6
smart features 2.0 3.5 -1.5
adjustable vents 2.0 3.5 -1.5
condition on arrival 3.3 2.0 +1.3
scheduling options 5.0 3.8 +1.2

FAQ

Does the Honeywell HPA5300 reduce dust?

Yes. Many owners reported less visible dust, dirt, or airborne particles, and several cited dirty filters as evidence it was catching material.

Is it quiet enough for bedrooms?

Sometimes. Many reviewers liked the low or auto setting for sleep, but others reported hums, rattles, squeaks, bright lights, or loud operation that made it poor for bedrooms.

Does auto mode work well?

It often reacts well to VOCs, odors, cooking, nail polish, and similar triggers. Several reviewers said it did not respond well to pollen, wildfire smoke, or dust.

Are replacement filters expensive?

Filter cost is a recurring concern. Some owners thought filters were affordable or long-lasting, but many called HEPA, carbon, or specialty filter replacement pricey.

Is it good for smoke and odors?

Most direct smoke and odor comments were positive, including wildfire smoke, cigarette smoke, cooking smells, litter box odor, and pet odors.

Is it easy to move?

Opinions are mixed. Some liked the handle or found it easy to move, while others called it bulky, heavy, or frustrating because of missing side handles.

Consider This Instead

If you want better child lock

Choose Levoit EverestAir. It scores 4.7 vs 1.0 for child lock, with a 4.4 overall score.

Compare

If you want better portability

Choose Shark MAX HP202. It scores 5.0 vs 2.5 for portability, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

Overall Top Air Purifiers Alternatives

#1 Levoit EverestAir
4.4

Best for quiet, smart large-room cleaning and strong odor control. Skip it if $99 filters, true-HEPA wording, or occasional sensor/fan reliability complaints are dealbreakers.

Pros: air purification performance, allergen reduction

Cons: reliability, filter replacement cost

#2 Levoit Vital 100S
4.4

Best for compact rooms, strong particle removal, quiet sleep use, and useful app controls. Skip it for large spaces, heavy odors, or exact PM2.5 readings.

Pros: Wi-Fi reliability, filter stages

Cons: PM2.5 detection

#3 Levoit Vital 200S
4.3

Best for fast particle removal, quiet smart bedroom use, pet-friendly pre-filtering, and strong value. Skip it for medical HEPA certainty, serious VOC/odor problems, premium design, or very large spaces needing...

Pros: allergen reduction, safety certifications

Cons: PM2.5 detection, true HEPA filter

#4 Blueair Blue Pure 511i Max
4.3

Best for quiet, efficient bedroom air cleaning, strong app controls, and low upkeep costs. Skip it for large open spaces, pet-heavy homes, or buyers needing fast, highly accurate sensors.

Pros: energy efficiency, power consumption

Cons: handle design, air quality sensor accuracy