Honeywell HPA5300

Honeywell HPA5300 Air Purifier Review

Brand: Honeywell
Released: May 11, 2021
Updated: 2 months ago
4.1
Overall review score
416
Review evidence points
53
Scored features
100
Customer reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the Honeywell HPA5300 for strong whole-room dust, smoke, odor, and allergy relief. Skip it if hums, rattles, bulky handling, or frequent filter costs would bother you.

Best for

Best for homes that need strong air cleaning for dust, pet-related allergens, wildfire smoke, cooking odors, litter boxes, or larger shared rooms. It also suits buyers who already use Honeywell HPA filters.

Not for

Not ideal for noise-sensitive bedrooms, shoppers wanting compact portability, or buyers expecting reliable smart-home power behavior. Skip it if filter expense or occasional hum/rattle risk is a dealbreaker.

Verdict

Customer evidence points to a powerful, mostly well-liked purifier that often makes rooms feel cleaner, reduces dust, helps allergies, and reacts impressively to odors or VOC events. Owners repeatedly praise smoke clearing, pet and litter odor control, HEPA filtration, and quiet low-speed operation. The tradeoff is consistency: a meaningful minority report rattles, hums, squeaks, bulky movement, costly filters, misleading filter or coverage expectations, and auto mode that reacts better to VOCs than to pollen, dust, or wildfire smoke. It is strongest for people who value proven airflow and filtration over compact design or smart behavior.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

53 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    21 (40%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    19 (36%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    8 (15%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    4 (8%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    1 (2%)

Pros

  • 4.4
    32 reviews low consensus
    air purification performance: 4.4, 32 reviews, low consensus
    Customer evidence for air purification performance was strongly positive across 32 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 5.0
    8 reviews strong consensus
    particle removal effectiveness: 5.0, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Customer evidence for particle removal effectiveness was strongly positive across 8 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 5.0
    8 reviews strong consensus
    smoke removal: 5.0, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Customer evidence for smoke removal was strongly positive across 8 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 4.6
    14 reviews low consensus
    dust removal: 4.6, 14 reviews, low consensus
    Customer evidence for dust removal was strongly positive across 14 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 4.6
    14 reviews moderate consensus
    odor reduction: 4.6, 14 reviews, moderate consensus
    Customer evidence for odor reduction was strongly positive across 14 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 4.7
    12 reviews low consensus
    allergen reduction: 4.7, 12 reviews, low consensus
    Customer evidence for allergen reduction was strongly positive across 12 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.

Cons

  • 2.0
    4 reviews low consensus
    smart features: 2.0, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Customer evidence for smart features was negative or cautionary across 4 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 1.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    listing accuracy: 1.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Customer evidence for listing accuracy was negative or cautionary across 2 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    child lock: 1.0, 1 review
    Customer evidence for child lock was negative or cautionary across 1 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    control placement: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Customer evidence for control placement was negative or cautionary across 2 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 2.5
    6 reviews low consensus
    portability: 2.5, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Customer evidence for portability was negative or cautionary across 6 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.
  • 2.7
    15 reviews low consensus
    filter replacement cost: 2.7, 15 reviews, low consensus
    Customer evidence for filter replacement cost was mixed across 15 review(s), based only on cited transcript evidence.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Air Purifiers, this product is above average in VOC sensor accuracy, customer support, scheduling options, near average in dust removal, overall satisfaction, below average in child lock, adjustable vents, portability.

Comparison summary

53 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    25 (47%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    15 (28%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    13 (25%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
child lock 1.0 3.7 -2.7
VOC sensor accuracy 5.0 2.9 +2.1
adjustable vents 2.0 3.9 -1.9
portability 2.5 4.2 -1.7
customer support 4.7 3.0 +1.7
control placement 2.0 3.5 -1.5
smart features 2.0 3.4 -1.4
size and footprint 2.9 3.9 -1.1

Consider This Instead

If you want better portability

Choose Shark HP102. It scores 4.9 vs 2.5 for portability, with a 4.1 overall score.

Compare

If you want better child lock

Choose Levoit EverestAir. It scores 4.7 vs 1.0 for child lock, with a 4.5 overall score.

Compare

If you want better build quality

Choose AirDoctor AD3000. It scores 4.8 vs 3.1 for build quality, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better overall satisfaction

Choose Levoit Core 200S. It scores 4.8 vs 4.1 for overall satisfaction, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

HPA300

  • Better: noise level The reviewer said the HPA5300 works but is noisier than the previous HPA300.
  • Upgrade: design The reviewer considered the HPA5300 design a downgrade from the HPA300.
  • Older model: specifications and redesign The reviewer viewed the HPA5300 as an improved replacement for the HPA300.

blue air

  • Better: reviews and reliability The reviewer returned the Honeywell and preferred Blueair for reliability and reviews.

Coway

  • Better: styling and low-speed quietness The reviewer preferred Coway for styling, quiet operation, and filter value.

FAQ

Does the Honeywell HPA5300 reduce dust?

Yes. Many owners reported less visible dust, dirt, or airborne particles, and several cited dirty filters as evidence it was catching material.

Is it quiet enough for bedrooms?

Sometimes. Many reviewers liked the low or auto setting for sleep, but others reported hums, rattles, squeaks, bright lights, or loud operation that made it poor for bedrooms.

Does auto mode work well?

It often reacts well to VOCs, odors, cooking, nail polish, and similar triggers. Several reviewers said it did not respond well to pollen, wildfire smoke, or dust.

Are replacement filters expensive?

Filter cost is a recurring concern. Some owners thought filters were affordable or long-lasting, but many called HEPA, carbon, or specialty filter replacement pricey.

Is it good for smoke and odors?

Most direct smoke and odor comments were positive, including wildfire smoke, cigarette smoke, cooking smells, litter box odor, and pet odors.

Is it easy to move?

Opinions are mixed. Some liked the handle or found it easy to move, while others called it bulky, heavy, or frustrating because of missing side handles.

Top Air Purifiers to Consider

#1 GoveeLife H7124
4.6

Choose the H7124 if you want a quiet smart purifier for odors, dust, pets, and app control. Skip it if you need foolproof Wi-Fi, wall-facing intake, UV light, or strong...

Pros: particle removal effectiveness, pollen removal

Cons: UV-C light effectiveness, air dryness

#2 PuroAir 240
4.6

Best for quiet, simple cleaning in bedrooms or apartments. Skip it if you need verified large-room CADR value, app control, or guaranteed neighbor-smoke removal.

Pros: particle removal effectiveness, dust removal

Cons: CADR rating, air changes per hour

#3 AirDoctor AD3500
4.6

Best for strong room cleaning, allergy relief, odor control, and simple operation. Skip it if high filter costs, a larger footprint, or possible nighttime fan noise would bother you.

Pros: particle removal effectiveness, HEPA filtration

Cons: customer support, warranty coverage

#4 Nuwave Forever, 47265
4.6

Choose this if you want strong odor, dust, smoke, and pet-air cleanup with washable filters. Skip it if turbo noise, Wi-Fi setup, or a high upfront price will bother you.

Pros: filter replacement cost, allergen reduction

Cons: Wi-Fi reliability