Hoover Smartwash Automatic Carpet Cleaner Machine Feature Scores
Explore all 38 feature scores for Hoover Smartwash Automatic Carpet Cleaner Machine, organized into pros and cons.
Scores by Feature
Summary
38 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.020 (53%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.412 (32%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.43 (8%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.42 (5%)
-
Very negative below 1.51 (3%)
Pros
Sort
-
Above-floor and spot cleaning were consistently praised, especially the hose, handheld/pet tools, and spot-cleaning performance.
-
Maintenance was a major strength: reviewers repeatedly praised removable brushes, removable covers, easy tank cleaning, and easy cleanup.
-
Ease of use was one of the broadest positives, with repeated praise for simple tanks, automatic operation, easy cleaning, and light handling.
-
Accessories were a clear strength, with repeated praise for the hose, pet tool, Spot Chaser, and attachment usefulness.
-
Drying was one of the strongest themes, with many reviewers praising dry-only mode, HeatForce, or fast usable carpets, despite one regular-cleaning caveat.
-
Pet-focused reviewers liked the pet tools, Spot Chaser, and real-world cleaning on pet-heavy carpets and rugs.
-
Versatility was a recurring strength, especially for spot cleaning, manual tool use, attachments, and doing more than basic carpet passes.
-
Weight feedback was positive overall, with several reviewers calling it relatively lightweight, easy to push, or lighter than rentals.
-
Hose length was praised by two reviewers as really long and useful for furniture or car cleaning.
-
Emptying and mess control were mostly positive, with reviewers finding the dirty tank easy to remove, empty, and clean.
-
Value was mixed-to-positive: owners often called it worth the money, while test reviewers noted cheaper alternatives or a premium price caveat.
-
Overall opinion was polarized: many owners highly recommended or loved it, but two testing/defective-unit reviews did not recommend it.
-
Tank feedback was generally positive for capacity, coverage, and clean/dirty separation, though one review warned the one-gallon tank is small for whole-house jobs.
-
Innovation evidence was positive, with reviewers framing it as newer, easier carpet-cleaner technology compared with older/rental-style machines.
-
Handling was usually praised, with reviewers describing the machine as lightweight, easy to push, or lighter than rented cleaners.
-
Fresh liquid-like stains were handled well in testing, with urine, grape juice, and worked-in liquid stains clearing quickly.
-
Comparative performance was mixed: some tests ranked SmartWash well for drying and features, while others preferred Power Scrub or the pet variant.
-
Area-rug handling was praised in a pet-home review where rug color and cleanliness bounced back strongly.
-
Setup was praised as very easy, with the handle snapping into place during assembly.
-
Kid-friendliness was supported by one owner who said even kids could use it because the controls were not confusing.
-
Tool changes were praised in the pet comparison because the Spot Chaser handle releases easily.
-
Reviewers split on suction: one comparative test found poor sealed-box suction, while another measured above-average suction and an owner described strong power.
-
Stain-removal evidence was sharply mixed: some reviewers saw strong results, while controlled tests found weak upright stain performance on tougher stains.
-
Heavy-duty suitability was context-dependent: it impressed in a pet-and-kids home, but one reviewer said the tank is small for big whole-house jobs.
-
Automation was praised when it worked because it reduced guesswork in mixing, spraying, washing, and drying.
-
A medium-pile carpet test was positive, with the reviewer calling the stain performance far better than average.
-
Cord length received one positive owner mention, calling the more-than-20-foot cable great.
-
The two-brush floorhead design was praised as one of the best carpet-cleaner brush systems overall.
-
Carpet hair pickup was praised in a pet-home review that still pulled substantial Golden Retriever hair after thorough vacuuming.
-
Hair-wrap and tangle resistance scored well in the pet version because the handheld scrubber was described as making a real difference.
-
Airflow blowback evidence was positive in a comparative drying explanation, where upward airflow toward the brushes helped drying performance.
-
Ownership cost evidence was limited to one pet-version comparison noting that extra Spot Chaser solution has to be purchased.
Cons
Sort
-
Reliability concerns centered on two reviews from the same reviewer where the automatic sensor failed and the unit had to be sent back.
-
Durability evidence was negative in one used-unit review where the automatic wash/dry sensing failed badly enough to return it.
-
Residue/streaking evidence was negative in controlled testing, where multiple stains and residue remained after repeated passes.
-
Controls were mixed: reviewers liked the simple automatic concept, but two reviews reported the wash/dry sensing failing or misreading direction.
-
Heating-related evidence was mixed: some reviewers praised faster drying, while others warned there is no true heater and described HeatForce as hot exhaust air.
-
The liquid system divided reviewers: automatic mixing and dispensing were praised for simplicity, but sensor and speed-threshold issues hurt performance in some tests.