iRobot Roomba Combo i5 Robot Vacuum Feature Scores
Explore all 56 feature scores for iRobot Roomba Combo i5 Robot Vacuum, organized into pros and cons.
Scores by Feature
Summary
56 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.024 (43%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.422 (39%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.47 (13%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.43 (5%)
Pros
Sort
-
Overall opinion was broadly favorable, including top-list praise, high-rated robovac language, repeated recommendations, and a 4.4-star owner-style rating.
-
Mapping and path efficiency were standout strengths, with reviewers praising accurate mapping, room-by-room control, rows, and simultaneous mapping while vacuuming.
-
Overall cleaning convenience was praised for reducing effort, helping maintain the home, and making day-to-day life easier.
-
Value was repeatedly praised at its sale or category price, though one reviewer noted the non-plus model lacks self-emptying at the same general market tier.
-
Reviewers consistently rated vacuum pickup highly, citing strong suction, good vacuuming results, a 90/100 deep-cleaning score, and carpet suction that helped the rollers clean effectively.
-
Navigation and handling were praised across several reviews for methodical movement, accurate furniture navigation, and slowing down before obstacles.
-
Smart features and app control were widely praised for scheduling, room control, voice control, geofencing, and a simple app, but reviewers noted missing AI detection.
-
Pet-related feedback was mostly positive for pet hair and hair-tangle resistance, though one reviewer noted pet-waste avoidance is better on the j9 line.
-
Ease of use was very strong overall, from simple mapping and maintenance cleaning to quick room cleaning and few missed spots.
-
Hair-wrap resistance was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers praising painless roller hair removal and anti-tangling performance.
-
Setup was mostly easy or a breeze, with one unboxing reviewer adding that the initial setup was a little slow.
-
Hard-floor fine dust pickup was praised, including top bare-floor marks and visible fine dirt and dust in the bin.
-
Low-profile design was praised for being easy to hide and for fitting under tables, furniture, and beds.
-
Edge and baseboard cleaning was praised, including Consumer Reports-style edge performance and hands-on edge coverage.
-
Stuck resistance was strong in hands-on reports, especially around rug tassels and during longer whole-room jobs.
-
Tool and bin changes were described as simple, with the mop pad staying attached well and one reviewer saying the bin could be reinserted almost blindfolded.
-
Controls and UI were generally easy to use, though one reviewer found the feature set basic and another wanted more options.
-
Design impressions were positive, with reviewers calling the robot attractive, handsome, and sleek.
-
The bin was praised as easy to remove and empty, with reviewers noting a sizable container and one-handed emptying.
-
Under-furniture pickup was a strength, with reviewers praising table, entertainment-center, and low-profile under-bed access.
-
Versatility was a major strength, with reviewers praising mixed-floor suitability and the convenience of vacuuming and mopping at the same time.
-
Emptying and mess control was easy and low-friction, with one-handed emptying and simple lever-based bin removal.
-
Carpet hair pickup was rated positively through pet-hair performance and the cleaning system's carpet effectiveness.
-
Hard-floor hair pickup evidence was positive, especially around pet and human hair in mixed-floor homes.
-
Surface safety feedback was positive, with reviewers saying it was not damaging surfaces and varied carpet line directions to avoid harm.
-
Value-for-money was strong, with reviewers calling the value real and recommending the extra spend over cheaper models.
-
Storage footprint feedback was positive because reviewers liked the sleek base and the ability to keep the robot out of sight.
-
Build quality was praised directly as super solid, with a durable-looking body after use.
-
Docking reliability was praised by one long-use reviewer who said the robot finished jobs and returned to the dock.
-
Edge-following accuracy was praised through straight-line cleaning and careful route consistency.
-
Durability evidence was positive after use, with one reviewer noting the robot avoided beating itself up and still looked nearly new.
-
Reliability was praised by one long-use reviewer who said the robot consistently finished jobs and returned to the dock.
-
Maintenance was mixed: washable pads and hair-checking were manageable, but one reviewer stressed pre-run tidying and routine upkeep.
-
Child and pet lock was positively received as useful for homes with kids or pets bumping buttons.
-
Corner cleaning was supported by hands-on mopping/cleaning coverage where the robot avoided missing areas.
-
Kid-friendliness was supported by one reviewer who said it made life easier in a home with a toddler.
-
Large debris handling was positive, with a reviewer reporting that larger objects could be picked up alongside fine dust and dirt.
-
Surface safety with attachments was positive where reviewers said the robot's carpet-line pattern helped avoid harm.
-
Comparative performance was favorable against the 694 but less compelling as an upgrade over i3-class hardware.
-
Accessory feedback was limited but positive, with one reviewer appreciating the included extra replacement filter.
-
The dual-roller floorhead drew positive carpet feedback, especially for making carpet look clean and brushed.
-
Obstacle avoidance was mixed: some reviewers saw bumping, while another praised slowing before contact.
-
Charging behavior was positive because the robot can return home, recharge, and continue cleaning.
-
Software support was framed positively as a way the product could improve through updates without user effort.
-
Rug handling was mixed: it handled tassels and carpets well while vacuuming, but mopping lacks rug-aware avoidance.
-
Floor shine was described as a light-touch benefit when using water, but not as a deep-cleaning result.
Cons
Sort
-
Heavy-duty suitability was limited, with reviewers saying it should not be relied on for heavy messes or solid deep cleaning.
-
Cord management was criticized because the dock cord had no tidy routing.
-
Mop lifting was a weakness because one reviewer noted the i5 is not smart enough to avoid mopping rugs.
-
Liquid-system feedback was mixed: reviewers appreciated simple water or solution use, but one warned excess solution could leak onto floors.
-
Innovation feedback was mixed to negative because reviewers saw missing advanced features and little hardware upgrade versus related models.
-
Runtime was mixed to weak: one review found it below average and another said double-pass cleaning drained the battery quickly.
-
Streaking was noted as a mild mopping issue in one hands-on hard-floor test.
-
Water tank feedback was modest, with one reviewer saying the tank system was not huge.
-
Noise feedback was mixed: one review found it typical for a robovac and another valued shorter run time, but several users called it noisy or very loud on hard floors.
-
Mopping was mixed: convenient and useful for maintenance, but repeatedly described as basic, surface-level, or short of a deep mop.