Logitech G413 SE

Logitech G413 SE Feature Scores

Explore all 48 feature scores for Logitech G413 SE, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

48 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    7 (15%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    11 (23%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    12 (25%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    11 (23%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    7 (15%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.4
    13 reviews strong consensus
    design aesthetics: 4.4, 13 reviews, strong consensus
    Design aesthetics are a strong point, with reviewers repeatedly praising the clean, black, professional, compact, or sexy appearance.
  • 4.5
    9 reviews strong consensus
    build quality: 4.5, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Build quality is consistently strong, with reviewers repeatedly praising the sturdy aluminum-topped construction and premium feel for the price.
  • 4.6
    6 reviews strong consensus
    frame rigidity: 4.6, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Frame rigidity is a clear strength, with reviewers repeatedly noting little to no flex and solid construction.
  • 4.3
    11 reviews strong consensus
    keycap quality: 4.3, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Keycap quality is one of the strongest areas, with repeated praise for PBT texture and durability, although some reviewers dislike the legends or lack of double-shot clarity.
  • 4.3
    9 reviews strong consensus
    size and form factor: 4.3, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Size and form factor are broadly praised, with reviewers emphasizing compactness, low wasted space, and lightweight designs.
  • 4.7
    4 reviews strong consensus
    desk space efficiency: 4.7, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Desk space efficiency is a strength, especially for TKL users and reviewers who praised the extra mouse room or no-waste footprint.
  • 4.3
    5 reviews strong consensus
    key responsiveness: 4.3, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Responsiveness is generally a bright spot, with reviewers saying the board kept up, felt nippy, gave quick feedback, or registered inputs accurately.
  • 4.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    backlight brightness: 4.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Backlight brightness is praised where discussed, with reviewers calling it bright, useful in the dark, or easy to see even in a sunlit room.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    sound dampening: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Sound dampening receives positive limited evidence from reviewers who note little reverberation or no echoing from the chassis.
  • 3.9
    3 reviews strong consensus
    ergonomics: 3.9, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Ergonomics are mixed to positive, with some praise for comfort and adjustable angles but lingering concern about wrist support.
  • 4.1
    2 reviews limited evidence
    latency: 4.1, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Latency-related evidence is positive but limited, with reviewers describing the keyboard as keeping up and parsing commands quickly.
  • 3.8
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    portability: 3.8, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    Portability is mixed: reviewers like the compact, light TKL body, but one reviewer dislikes the attached cable for packing.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    built-in calculator: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The built-in calculator shortcut receives limited positive evidence as part of the useful Fn-layer shortcuts.
  • 4.7
    1 review
    durability: 4.7, 1 review
    Durability evidence is strongly positive but concentrated in one review that emphasizes heat and wear resistance over time.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    key spacing: 4.5, 1 review
    Key spacing receives limited positive evidence from one reviewer who found it comfortable for both typing and precision gameplay.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    reliability: 4.5, 1 review
    Reliability has limited positive evidence from one reviewer who says the new keys avoid the double-typing issue.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    key stability: 4.0, 1 review
    Key stability receives limited positive evidence from one reviewer who found only slight wobble and did not consider it worrying.
  • 3.5
    1 review
    volume control: 3.5, 1 review
    Volume control is mildly positive where mentioned, because reviewers note Fn-layer volume controls, but not dedicated hardware controls.

Cons

Sort
  • 1.3
    8 reviews strong consensus
    macro customization: 1.3, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Macro customization is consistently weak because reviewers repeatedly mention the lack of macros, programming, or built-in macro controls.
  • 1.6
    12 reviews strong consensus
    software quality: 1.6, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    Software quality is a repeated weakness because the board lacks G Hub support or meaningful software-based customization.
  • 1.7
    7 reviews strong consensus
    customization options: 1.7, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Customization options are broadly weak, with reviewers repeatedly saying there is little or nothing to customize beyond basic shortcuts or lighting presets.
  • 1.3
    4 reviews strong consensus
    compatibility: 1.3, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Compatibility is scored narrowly around G Hub support, where multiple reviewers call out the keyboard as incompatible or unsupported.
  • 1.6
    5 reviews strong consensus
    passthrough features: 1.6, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Passthrough features are a repeated omission, with several reviewers criticizing the loss or lack of USB passthrough.
  • 2.0
    9 reviews low consensus
    extra gaming features: 2.0, 9 reviews, low consensus
    Extra gaming features are one of the weakest areas, with repeated criticism of missing bells and whistles, although one review liked the anti-ghosting basics.
  • 1.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    hot-swappable switches: 1.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Hot-swappable switch support is weak because reviewers point out the switches are not hot-swappable or cannot be swapped.
  • 1.6
    4 reviews strong consensus
    RGB customization: 1.6, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    RGB customization is weak overall because reviewers repeatedly note the lack of RGB, configurable colors, or programmable lighting.
  • 1.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    ease of switch replacement: 1.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Ease of switch replacement is poor because reviewers say replacing switches requires tools, is not supported, or is a drawback.
  • 1.7
    4 reviews strong consensus
    wrist rest quality: 1.7, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Wrist rest quality scores low because reviewers repeatedly describe the missing wrist rest as disappointing or uncomfortable.
  • 1.9
    5 reviews strong consensus
    cable quality: 1.9, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Cable quality is generally weak, with reviewers criticizing the standard rubber, non-detachable, non-braided, or dangling cable.
  • 1.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    connectivity: 1.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Connectivity is limited by the hard-wired, non-detachable cable, which reviewers disliked for desk setup flexibility.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    onboard memory: 1.0, 1 review
    Onboard memory is criticized by one reviewer because lighting settings reset without built-in memory.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    switch options: 1.0, 1 review
    Switch options are very limited, with one reviewer criticizing the board for effectively offering only brown-style switches.
  • 1.3
    1 review
    per-key lighting control: 1.3, 1 review
    Per-key lighting control is criticized because one review specifically says players cannot color important keys such as WASD.
  • 2.3
    3 reviews low consensus
    acoustics: 2.3, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Acoustics are inconsistent: some reviewers dislike the dull thud or unpleasant sound, while another says the keyboard avoids annoying echo.
  • 2.5
    6 reviews strong consensus
    noise level: 2.5, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Noise level trends negative to mixed: several reviewers say the board is loud or clicky enough to disturb others, though one says it is not very loud.
  • 1.5
    1 review
    profile management: 1.5, 1 review
    Profile management receives negative evidence from one reviewer who says there is no way to create profiles.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    actuation consistency: 2.0, 1 review
    Actuation consistency is a concern in the Trusted Reviews transcript, which notes different keys feeling uneven in bump strength.
  • 2.8
    11 reviews low consensus
    switch feel: 2.8, 11 reviews, low consensus
    Switch feel is the most divisive core trait: several reviewers called the switches stiff, clunky, mushy, or terrible, while a smaller set found them smooth, tactile, or enjoyable.
  • 2.7
    6 reviews low consensus
    media controls: 2.7, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Media controls are mixed: some reviewers appreciate function-layer controls, while others criticize the lack of dedicated media keys.
  • 2.7
    5 reviews low consensus
    typing feel: 2.7, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Typing feel is mixed: positive reviews describe a satisfying, responsive feel, but several reviewers describe mushiness, friction, or dull feedback.
  • 2.6
    3 reviews low consensus
    legend visibility: 2.6, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Legend visibility is split: one reviewer found the legends nearly invisible without lighting, while others liked the clean font or noted dark-room limitations for secondary functions.
  • 2.6
    2 reviews limited evidence
    stabilizer quality: 2.6, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Stabilizer quality is split, with one reviewer complaining about ticking stabilizers and another saying the spacebar had no wobble.
  • 2.9
    14 reviews low consensus
    value for money: 2.9, 14 reviews, low consensus
    Value for money is sharply split but leans negative overall: several reviewers say it is overpriced or hard to recommend, while others call it reasonable or affordable.
  • 3.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    materials quality: 3.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Materials quality is mixed: one review praises PBT and aluminum, while another criticizes cheap-feeling materials despite those components.
  • 3.4
    2 reviews limited evidence
    layout options: 3.4, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Layout options are mixed: one reviewer criticizes the TKL layout omissions, while another praises the choice between full-size and TKL versions.
  • 3.2
    7 reviews low consensus
    typing comfort: 3.2, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Typing comfort is highly split: some reviewers find the keyboard satisfying or comfortable, while others report fatigue, stiffness, or poor typing comfort.
  • 3.2
    9 reviews moderate consensus
    RGB lighting quality: 3.2, 9 reviews, moderate consensus
    Lighting quality is mixed: reviewers often like the clean white lighting, but several criticize limited white-only modes, distracting patterns, or lack of richer lighting behavior.
  • 3.4
    12 reviews low consensus
    gaming performance: 3.4, 12 reviews, low consensus
    Gaming performance is mixed to moderately positive: some reviewers say it keeps up and registers inputs well, while others criticize basic rollover and missing gaming features.