Marathon Feature Scores
Explore all 85 feature scores for Marathon, organized into pros and cons.
Scores by Feature
Summary
85 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.022 (26%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.438 (45%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.413 (15%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.412 (14%)
Pros
Sort
-
The game is highly enjoyable once it clicks, with gunplay and extraction highs repeatedly pulling players back. It is not instantly fun for everyone, and some players never get past the early friction.
-
Bungie-style gunplay is the clearest strength: weapons feel punchy, precise, and satisfying, and team fights can be exhilarating. The very short time-to-kill can also make some deaths feel abrupt or frustrating.
-
Sound design is a major strength, with footsteps, weapons, abilities, environmental hazards, and distant fights providing both atmosphere and tactical information. Good headphones materially improve situational awareness.
-
The loud retro-futurist art direction is one of the game’s defining traits. It is often gorgeous, vibrant, and refreshingly distinctive, though the color and visual density can be overwhelming.
-
The best runs create a powerful one-more-match pull, with several players staying hooked for dozens or even hundreds of hours. Long-term replayability depends on whether fresh content can keep repetition from overtaking the core loop.
-
Corporate factions, environmental storytelling, and sci-fi lore give Tau Ceti IV a strong sense of place. The world-building is often praised as unusually rich for a multiplayer extraction game.
-
Marathon feels most original in its audiovisual identity, corporate sci-fi setting, and the way it reshapes extraction-shooter conventions. Some class and genre elements are familiar enough to keep it from feeling wholly new.
-
The drop-loot-extract loop produces tense, memorable runs and a strong one-more-match pull. Repetition can creep in when contracts stall or the available content starts feeling familiar.
-
Map design improves noticeably as the game opens up, with Outpost and Cryo Archive earning especially strong praise for verticality, secrets, and combat flow. The earliest maps are more divisive and can feel flat or repetitive.
-
Loot creates the stakes that make extraction exciting, and modular gear can produce genuinely valuable finds. Losing a prized kit is thrilling when the system clicks and deeply frustrating when deaths or inventory friction feel unfair.
-
The core shooter feels highly polished, from weapon handling to map presentation and audiovisual feedback. UI and onboarding roughness keep that polish from feeling equally strong outside matches.
-
Tau Ceti IV has a distinctive uneasy atmosphere, mixing bright retro-futurism with abandoned spaces, corporate menace, and creeping dread. The contrast makes the world memorable even before combat starts.
-
Cryo Archive is the standout endgame attraction, combining tougher AI, puzzles, high-value gear, bosses, and heavy PvP pressure. Its weekend-only access is repeatedly questioned despite the activity itself earning strong praise.
-
Exploration is rewarding when maps reveal vents, tunnels, locked rooms, hidden loot, and secrets. Some early areas become familiar too quickly, reducing the sense of discovery over time.
-
Frame rates are consistently described as stable, including solid 60fps console performance and smooth higher-end PC results. Dropped-frame complaints are rare in the scored material.
-
The six main Runner shells plus Rook support noticeably different playstyles through movement, stealth, healing, defense, and utility. Their identities are useful and varied even when some archetypes feel familiar.
-
Graphics are widely praised for sharp detail, bold color, and strong presentation across platforms. The visual identity is a major draw even for players who are unsure about the extraction-shooter format.
-
The underlying story and mystery are compelling, but Marathon tells them indirectly through factions, lore entries, briefings, and environmental clues. That approach fascinates lore-minded players and leaves others wishing for a more direct campaign-style narrative.
-
Marathon is at its best with a coordinated group that communicates and combines shell abilities. Friends make risky gear choices and intense fights more manageable, while silent random squads can quickly unravel.
-
Tension is one of Marathon’s best tools: quiet looting can turn into a lethal encounter in seconds, and solo Rook runs can feel like survival horror. For some players that pressure becomes frustration rather than excitement.
-
Major bugs appear uncommon during play. Serious issues are rare, with only a minor one-off NPC problem standing out among otherwise clean technical reports.
-
The reboot carries meaningful connections to Bungie’s older Marathon games through lore, aesthetics, locations, and endgame references. Fans of the original universe get more continuity than the genre shift initially suggests.
-
Connections are generally stable, with few disconnect-style problems surfacing during long sessions. Online reliability is much less troublesome than the game’s UI or balance.
-
Voice work is a presentation strength, especially in faction scenes and debriefs. The cast and performances add personality to material that could otherwise feel like dry lore delivery.
-
Multiplayer is aggressively PvP-focused, with trios, solo play, and emerging duo options producing very different experiences. Squad play can be excellent, while solo and mismatched team sizes expose some of the game’s harshest tradeoffs.
-
The soundtrack ranges from understated and atmospheric to haunting and memorable. Music reinforces the uneasy sci-fi mood without overpowering the important positional audio.
-
Movement is generally fluid and expressive, with sprinting, sliding, grapples, jumps, and shell abilities creating tactical routes. Heat limits, fall damage, and occasional mantling friction can make it feel less free-flowing than it first appears.
-
Successful extractions and close fights can produce unusually physical reactions—shaking hands, pounding hearts, relief, and triumph. The risk of losing gear gives victories and defeats more emotional weight than a routine shooter match.
-
Lore is unusually deep for a competitive shooter, with factions, AIs, codex entries, and ties to the original games creating a dense mystery. Players willing to read and connect clues get much more from the world than those who ignore it.
-
Build-crafting through mods and gear is flexible and satisfying, and the lack of extra crafting chores keeps the loop moving. The main tradeoff is that very short firefights can make some carefully built bonuses feel less important.
-
Stealth is a real playstyle rather than a novelty, especially with Rook and Assassin abilities. Sneaking, invisibility, noise control, and alternate routes can let careful players avoid or set up fights.
-
The underlying systems are layered and often rewarding, especially once builds, faction goals, and extraction risks start working together. Some mechanics can clash with the very short time-to-kill.
-
Faction introductions and story moments benefit from sharp, personality-driven writing. The strongest dialogue and briefings make the corporations and AIs feel distinctive rather than like generic quest dispensers.
-
Cryo Archive’s vaults and endgame spaces add meaningful puzzle-solving to the extraction formula. The puzzle-heavy design is praised for depth, though some random elements can undermine a clean solution.
-
The pace swings between careful, slow movement and explosive, very short firefights. That contrast can create terrific tension, but it also makes the game feel abrupt or uneven for players expecting a faster run-and-gun shooter.
-
Aiming benefits from Bungie’s familiar precision and strong weapon feedback, making accurate shooting feel satisfying. Some ADS-focused build effects matter less when fights end almost instantly.
-
Cryo Archive gives boss encounters real endgame weight, with difficult fights and a final encounter that can feel worth the preparation. Bosses are most effective when combined with the map’s PvP and puzzle pressure.
-
Friends, proximity chat, and coordinated squads can produce some of the game’s best moments. Solo-focused players also point out that finding a dependable group is harder than it should be.
-
Maps reward close attention with environmental details that support both atmosphere and storytelling. The strongest spaces feel deliberately built rather than like generic combat arenas.
-
Small animation details, including reload and movement touches, reinforce the snappy feel of play. The wider presentation also gives shells and weapons distinct animation work.
-
Early support looks responsive, with balance patches, fixes, and community feedback moving quickly. Long-term confidence still depends on Bungie maintaining that pace and expanding the game enough to sustain its audience.
-
Faction progression is one of the strongest long-term hooks, with reputation, upgrades, materials, and rewards giving failed runs some forward momentum. Seasonal resets and slow early progress are the main reservations.
-
Performance is generally strong across consoles and a range of PCs, including older hardware. Most reports describe smooth play with few major technical problems, though isolated issues remain.
-
Faction dialogue helps sell the mystery and corporate personalities, with interactions described as meaningful, unnerving, and worth following. It works best for players already interested in the setting.
-
The game can become deeply immersive once its lore, sound cues, world design, and tense extraction rhythm click together. Its unusual presentation helps players inhabit the role of a Runner rather than simply chase kills.
-
Progression ideas, Cryo Archive, and the interaction between PvP and extraction systems show real cleverness. Still, the broader extraction-shooter direction can feel more trend-following than groundbreaking.
-
Materials and faction economies give players useful goals beyond simple kills, while barter rewards make salvage feel valuable. The better implementations keep resources circulating without completely removing the consequences of losing gear.
-
Proximity chat and lightweight communication can create memorable truces or help clear up intentions, but the wider culture remains heavily shoot-on-sight. Social cooperation is possible rather than encouraged.
-
DualSense haptics noticeably strengthen weapon feel on PS5. The implementation is singled out as stellar rather than merely present.
-
The strongest spaces are more than scenery: windows, doors, vertical routes, and interactive areas can change how a fight or infiltration plays out. Environmental choices have real tactical value.
-
Shell skins and weapon cosmetics give players ways to personalize their look, but the reward quality is inconsistent. Recolors, repeated items, and paid cosmetics reduce the appeal of customization for some players.
-
Shooting and movement controls are often described as crisp and responsive, but inventory swapping and a few control choices can feel cumbersome. Some players needed tweaking before the controls felt right.
-
PS5-specific features are used well, especially the strong DualSense haptics and PS5 Pro image treatment. These additions reinforce the already strong presentation rather than changing the core game.
-
Players can often choose how much danger to accept, from quietly looting and extracting to chasing tougher events or fights. That flexibility is a major part of the appeal for players who dislike being forced into constant combat.
-
Season 1’s early content is described as a fun addition, with extra rewards and activities fitting naturally into normal play. The longer-term seasonal cadence still has more to prove.
-
Shield breaks and explosive hits provide satisfying visual feedback during combat. Those effects help gunfights feel punchy without needing elaborate spectacle.
-
Paid extras are mostly cosmetic and do not appear to create a serious pay-to-win problem. The bigger concern is the quality and pricing of the store and rewards pass rather than direct gameplay power.
-
Monetization earns mixed-to-negative reactions: expensive cosmetics and a weak rewards track draw criticism, but the lack of meaningful pay-to-win advantages is a clear positive. The base game is not gated by paid maps or abilities.
-
Servers held up well during play, with no major reliability problems standing out. The bigger uncertainty is long-term population and support rather than immediate server stability.
-
The $39.99 entry price is considered reasonable by some players given the production quality, though the premium pass and live-service model complicate the value proposition. It is easier to justify for committed extraction-shooter fans than casual players.
Cons
Sort
-
Menu navigation is often slower and more confusing than the shooting itself. The layout can become familiar with time, but familiarity does not fully solve the clutter and extra steps.
-
The interface is the most consistent criticism. Menus, inventory icons, loot management, and information density are stylish but frequently described as cluttered, confusing, or unnecessarily hard to use.
-
The learning curve is steep and sometimes brutal, but many players say the game becomes far more rewarding once its systems click. That delayed payoff is a strength for committed players and a major obstacle for casual ones.
-
Onboarding is one of the biggest barriers. Dense menus, limited guidance, unclear objectives, and unfamiliar extraction systems can make the first several hours feel much harder than the later game.
-
HUD readability has clear weaknesses, including very small text and objective markers that can be hard to spot. Those problems are especially costly when the game is already asking players to make quick decisions.
-
Objectives are not always well signposted, and several maps can become hard to navigate under pressure. The problem ranges from tiny markers to layouts that make players lose time simply finding the next interaction point.
-
Competitive balance is most satisfying when teams and gear are evenly matched. Skill gaps, gear gaps, and uneven squad sizes can create lopsided fights that feel decided before tactics have a chance to matter.
-
Shell balance needs tuning. Assassin can feel overpowered, while Recon can lag behind stronger defensive and offensive options.
-
The available maps have distinct personalities, but the overall amount of launch content is a recurring concern. More maps and modes would help the strong individual spaces feel less limited over time.
-
Jumping and climbing can feel smooth when the geometry cooperates, but mantling is inconsistent enough to cause failures at bad moments. Ledge grabs are the clearest point of frustration.
-
The first battle or rewards pass is a weak point, with recolors, duplicate items, and underwhelming cosmetics drawing criticism. Its non-expiring, low-pressure structure is one of the few positives.
-
The grind is substantial and central to Marathon’s identity. Some players enjoy faction progression and long-term goals, while others find repetitive quests and time demands exhausting.
-
Matchmaking quality depends heavily on who fills the squad. Coordinated friends are preferred, while random teammates can make runs miserable even when the technical act of matchmaking works reliably.
-
Marathon is intentionally demanding, with lethal PvP, dangerous AI, and a steep skill curve. Hardcore players often admire that commitment, while casual and new players repeatedly find the difficulty intimidating or punishing.
-
Mission variety is a weak spot, especially early on. Repetitive fetch-style objectives can make the grind feel artificial even when later contracts become more interesting.
-
Accessibility is mixed: customizable subtitles and color options help, but there is no dedicated accessibility hub and audio-heavy play lacks strong visual sound-direction support. Hard-of-hearing players may be especially underserved.
-
The arsenal is broadly viable, but not perfectly tuned. Sniper rifles in particular are described as slightly overtuned even while the overall weapon pool remains varied and useful.
-
The faction trees create useful goals, but their structure is not always clear. Some players like having upgrades to chase, while others find the paths too loosely organized to make build decisions feel exciting.
-
The tutorial covers the basic extraction loop, but it often leaves deeper systems to text prompts and trial-and-error. Its basic introduction works, yet the lack of guidance quickly becomes frustrating.
-
Enemy variety is serviceable rather than a standout. Some players find enough variety to keep encounters from going stale, while others specifically call the bot roster limited.
-
Crash behavior is mostly manageable but not flawless. A few mid-match crashes can occur, although rejoining softens the impact and some long sessions run without crashing at all.
-
Enemy AI is dangerous, aggressive, and often smart enough to flank, pressure, or expose players to rival squads. Balance has shifted through patches, and some players still find the bots either too punishing or less threatening than they should be.
-
Questing gives the extraction loop direction and steady progression, yet the structure can be restrictive and grindy. Fetch-style objectives, poor signposting, and one-at-a-time progression are common pain points.
-
Contracts give each run a concrete purpose and feed faction progression, but several missions are vague, repetitive, or frustrating. The one-active-contract restriction is a frequent complaint because it can make failed runs feel wasted.
-
Weapon mods, faction upgrades, cores, and implants can meaningfully reshape a loadout and keep progression interesting. The depth is rewarding once understood, though the surrounding menus can make upgrades harder to parse than necessary.