myQ Secure View 3-in-1 Smart Lock Feature Scores
Explore all 26 feature scores for myQ Secure View 3-in-1 Smart Lock, organized into pros and cons.
Scores by Feature
Summary
26 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.014 (54%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.410 (38%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.42 (8%)
Pros
Sort
-
Facial recognition drew some of the strongest praise, with reviewers calling it cool, incredible, and very fast.
-
Hands-on reviewers generally found installation approachable, praising complete hardware, easy installation, clear directions, and a smooth process, with one longer install still going fairly smoothly.
-
Camera and doorbell evidence was positive, with praise for clear visitor video, a wide-angle view, and the integrated 2K camera-doorbell design.
-
Speed was a standout: one article cited two-second unlock latency, while a hands-on reviewer found face recognition extremely fast.
-
Reviewers praised the physical construction, describing the lock as a great quality product and super well built.
-
The lock’s integrated design was praised for reducing separate-device clutter and for looking slick and well designed.
-
The hidden key backup was viewed positively, and another reviewer liked that the lock still had multiple fallback options.
-
Keypad evidence was mixed: one reviewer preferred physical buttons, while another confirmed the pin code worked.
-
Fingerprint access performed well in hands-on testing, with the reviewer saying the biometrics worked completely.
-
The interior locking action received strong praise from a reviewer who described it as super smooth.
-
Security handling for face scans was praised because the reviewer said scans stay on the device rather than going to the cloud.
-
Battery impressions were mixed: reviewers liked the rechargeable pack, but one noted a long initial charge time.
-
The app setup experience was praised as simple, with phone control presented as easy to use.
-
Guest access was praised for service or pet-care scenarios where the owner could let someone in without sharing a key.
-
A hands-on reviewer tested multiple unlock methods and found them working successfully.
-
Remote access was praised for letting someone enter without needing a physical key handoff.
-
Weather protection was praised through the exterior gasket, which a reviewer said sealed well to keep moisture out.
-
Notification evidence was mixed: one review praised context-aware alerts, while another noted unsubscribed alerts lacked detection details.
-
Access-log evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer noting individual pins can show who opened the door.
-
Auto-lock support was viewed as useful and configurable, though the evidence centers on one reviewer’s setup experience.
-
Door-fit evidence was limited but positive: one reviewer’s older steel door prep worked with the included jig and deadbolt drilling guidance.
-
Door-sense worked in the reviewer’s test, with the app state updating once the door closed.
-
User access management was described as easy for users, PIN codes, and alerts.
-
The touch-sensitive keypad divided preference, with one reviewer noting some people may prefer physical buttons instead.
Cons
-
Integration evidence was split: myQ ecosystem control was praised, but multiple reviews criticized or warned about limited popular smart-home platform support.
-
Value depends heavily on use case: reviewers praised the feature bundle and recommendations, but flagged overkill, subscriptions, and fee concerns.