Schlage Encode Smart Lock

Schlage Encode Smart Lock Feature Scores

Explore all 37 feature scores for Schlage Encode Smart Lock, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

37 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    19 (51%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    12 (32%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    3 (8%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    3 (8%)

Pros

Sort
  • 5.0
    9 reviews strong consensus
    Hub requirement: 5.0, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers strongly agreed that built-in Wi-Fi and no hub, bridge, or adapter is one of the lock’s clearest advantages.
  • App
    4.6
    14 reviews strong consensus
    App: 4.6, 14 reviews, strong consensus
    Most reviewers found the Schlage Home or Key app easy, responsive, and useful, with some caveats about simplicity or setup complexity.
  • 5.0
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Physical attack resistance: 5.0, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Physical security was repeatedly praised through Grade 1/AAA ratings, reinforced hardware, and confidence against forced entry.
  • 4.6
    11 reviews strong consensus
    Remote access: 4.6, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Remote access was strongly praised for checking status, letting people in, locking from away, and fast reliable remote operation.
  • 4.7
    9 reviews strong consensus
    Locking reliability: 4.7, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Locking reliability was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers reporting perfect tests, flawless keyless entry, smooth unlocking, and dependable performance.
  • 4.5
    13 reviews strong consensus
    Guest Codes and Access: 4.5, 13 reviews, strong consensus
    Guest access was a major strength, with praise for many codes, scheduling, temporary access, texts, and family/service-person use; single-use code absence was the main caveat.
  • 4.6
    9 reviews strong consensus
    Access logs: 4.6, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers found the history/audit trail useful for seeing who entered and when, especially for family, guests, and rental-style access.
  • 4.7
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Keypad: 4.7, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The keypad was generally praised as easy, bright, backlit, and accessible, with one reviewer noting a nighttime first-press annoyance.
  • 4.3
    16 reviews moderate consensus
    Installation and Setup: 4.3, 16 reviews, moderate consensus
    Installation was usually described as easy and quick, although programming, Wi-Fi setup, or third-party app setup could be confusing.
  • 4.5
    9 reviews strong consensus
    Value and Price: 4.5, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Value was mixed but leaned positive: several reviewers called it pricey, yet many found the security, reliability, and features worth the cost.
  • 4.4
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    Auto-lock: 4.4, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    Auto-lock was widely useful for forgotten doors, though reviewers warned that timing and lack of door awareness can create practical issues.
  • 4.6
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Key override reliability: 4.6, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers valued the physical key backup, especially as protection against dead batteries or smart-function failures.
  • 4.9
    4 reviews strong consensus
    User access management: 4.9, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    User management was praised for quick code creation, schedules, granular options, and caregiver/parent use cases.
  • 4.4
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    Wi-Fi: 4.4, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    Wi-Fi was strongly valued for direct remote control without extra hardware, though battery drain and one weak connection were caveats.
  • 4.1
    10 reviews moderate consensus
    Notifications: 4.1, 10 reviews, moderate consensus
    Notifications were usually useful for lock status and user activity, but reviewers noted missed battery warnings and no active invalid-code alert.
  • 4.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Build quality and durability: 4.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers consistently described the lock as solid, sturdy, beefy, heavy, or secure-feeling.
  • 4.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Door compatibility (deadbolt fit): 4.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers generally found the lock fit existing deadbolt openings or aligned well after adjustment, with no structural door changes needed in tested installs.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Lock/unlock speed: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Lock/unlock response was usually fast or instant, with one reviewer describing it as only somewhat more responsive than another lock.
  • 4.2
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Voice control: 4.2, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Voice control generally worked well, especially with Alexa, but Google unlocking limits lowered the overall score.
  • 3.9
    10 reviews low consensus
    Smart-home integration (Alexa, Google, Siri, HomeKit, Matter, Thread): 3.9, 10 reviews, low consensus
    Smart-home integration was useful with Alexa, Google, Ring, Amazon Key, and Home Assistant, but limited by HomeKit, IFTTT, SmartThings, Google unlock, and Ring Alarm gaps.
  • 4.0
    5 reviews low consensus
    Industrial design: 4.0, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Exterior design earned praise for style and curb appeal, but interior hardware size and appearance drew criticism.
  • 4.2
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    Touchscreen: 4.2, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    Touchscreen feedback was mostly positive for responsiveness and cold-use practicality, though one reviewer stressed it is not a true modern glass touchscreen.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Bluetooth: 5.0, 1 review
    The only explicit Bluetooth judgment was positive, emphasizing encrypted Bluetooth in the lock.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Security features (encryption): 5.0, 1 review
    The only direct encryption evidence was positive, with the reviewer praising the lock’s encrypted Bluetooth.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Warranty and support: 5.0, 1 review
    Warranty evidence was limited but positive, with one locksmith calling its electronics warranty the longest among reviewed locks.
  • 3.7
    3 reviews low consensus
    Camera and doorbell performance: 3.7, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Ring doorbell/live-view control was praised when supported, but Ring Alarm compatibility created a major limitation in one review.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Backset compatibility: 4.5, 1 review
    A locksmith praised the adjustable backset as working with almost any door in normal installations.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Pick/drill resistance (if rated): 4.5, 1 review
    Only one review directly tied the lock’s construction to pick/key resistance, saying it would be difficult for a thief to duplicate the key.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Auto-relock after failed attempts: 4.0, 1 review
    A locksmith observed that repeated invalid codes temporarily disable the keypad, showing the lockout behavior works, though active alerts were missing.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Alarm/siren loudness (if included): 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Alarm loudness was split: one review called the siren quiet, while a locksmith found it very loud and annoying.
  • 3.5
    1 review
    Keyway quality: 3.5, 1 review
    A locksmith judged the cylinder well-made but not impossible to pick, making keyway quality respectable rather than exceptional.

Cons

Sort
  • 1.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Geofencing: 1.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Geofencing was repeatedly identified as missing, with reviewers noting the lack of hands-free auto-unlock as a meaningful convenience gap.
  • 1.5
    1 review
    Door-sense: 1.5, 1 review
    The main door-sense evidence was negative: the lock can auto-lock without knowing whether the door is actually shut.
  • 1.5
    1 review
    Fingerprint: 1.5, 1 review
    One reviewer specifically wished the lock added fingerprint recognition, so the lack of it counted as a limitation.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    Existing hardware reuse: 2.5, 1 review
    One review treated hardware reuse as a drawback because Encode replaces the whole deadbolt instead of modifying the existing one.
  • 3.0
    8 reviews low consensus
    Battery: 3.0, 8 reviews, low consensus
    Battery feedback was mixed: built-in Wi-Fi drains AA batteries faster, but warnings and at least one long-term experience were positive.
  • 3.1
    4 reviews low consensus
    Locking motor: 3.1, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Motor feedback was mixed: one reviewer found it quiet, another said it was strong, while others complained it was loud or grinding.