Sennheiser CX 80U Wired Earbuds

Sennheiser CX 80U Wired Earbuds Feature Scores

Explore all 32 feature scores for Sennheiser CX 80U Wired Earbuds, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

32 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    19 (59%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    5 (16%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    6 (19%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    2 (6%)

Pros

Sort
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Comfort during long use: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Comfort was excellent across both reviews, including multi-hour listening with no irritation and full marks for long-period wear.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    USB-C: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    USB-C was a major advantage in both reviews, improving fit with modern devices and making the earbuds more versatile.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Value for money: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Value was a standout strength in both reviews, with strong praise for the sub-$40 sound and overall bang for the buck.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Ear tip size options: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Both reviews valued the supplied eartip options because they helped users find a better fit and seal.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Eartips fit: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Fit was a major positive, with the right seal improving comfort and Tom’s Guide’s chosen tips staying put securely.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Noise isolation (passive): 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Passive noise isolation was repeatedly praised, with the seal and eartips blocking office chatter and reducing external sounds well.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Sound quality: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Reviewers strongly praised the CX 80U’s sound for detail and refinement, while one review framed it as mostly superb because the lowest bass was weaker.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Treble clarity: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Treble was a strength in both reviews, staying vivid and bright without turning harsh, tinny, or shrill.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Midrange clarity: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Mids and vocals came through clearly, with one review praising robust balance and the other emphasizing intelligible, separated vocals.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Soundstage width: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Both reviewers found a convincing sense of space, including defined treble placement and a notably wide soundstage.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Design and Aesthetics: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Design reactions were split: TechRadar loved the classy look, while Tom’s Guide found the lowkey all-black design unflashy.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Frequency response accuracy: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The tonal balance was broadly praised as full-range and accurate, but Tom’s Guide still noted the lowest frequencies were less refined.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Instrument separation: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Instrument and vocal separation were praised, with layers avoiding muddiness and words not bleeding together.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Android compatibility: 5.0, 1 review
    Android-style USB-C use was strong in Tom’s Guide testing, where the earbuds worked seamlessly with a Google Pixel phone.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Built-in DAC and hi-res playback: 5.0, 1 review
    Tom’s Guide treated the built-in DAC and hi-res playback support as a major selling point for budget wired earbuds.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Lossless audio support: 5.0, 1 review
    Tom’s Guide praised the earbuds for lossless, low-latency playback support up to 24-bit/96KHz.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Multi-platform compatibility: 5.0, 1 review
    Multi-platform compatibility was strong, with Tom’s Guide reporting seamless use across a Pixel phone, MacBooks, and an iPad.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Software/setup simplicity: 5.0, 1 review
    Setup simplicity was excellent because the USB-C plug-and-play interface worked without friction.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Stability: 5.0, 1 review
    Stability was excellent in Tom’s Guide testing, with the earbuds staying in place while stationary and walking.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Bass performance: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Bass was generally described as clean, responsive, punchy, and powerful, though both transcripts noted the deepest sub-bass lacked some weight.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Build quality: 4.5, 1 review
    TechRadar explicitly praised the earbuds’ build quality as impressive for the budget category.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Maximum volume clarity: 4.5, 1 review
    At peak volume, the TechRadar review found the treble stayed controlled instead of becoming harsh or tinny.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Weight comfort: 4.5, 1 review
    Tom’s Guide tied comfort and stability partly to the very light individual earbud weight.
  • App
    3.5
    1 review
    App: 3.5, 1 review
    Tom’s Guide noted there is no companion app, but judged that absence as not a major drawback for these wired earbuds.

Cons

Sort
  • 2.0
    1 review
    Microphone noise reduction: 2.0, 1 review
    The mic picked up noticeable background static, suggesting weak noise handling during recording or calls.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    Water/sweat resistance rating: 2.0, 1 review
    Water resistance was a limitation because TechRadar wanted at least IPX4-style splash protection and found no waterproofing claim.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    Cable quality: 2.5, 1 review
    Cable quality drew criticism from Tom’s Guide because the wires lack anti-tangle design and bunch up in a pocket.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    Microphone quality for calls: 2.5, 1 review
    Call mic performance was a weakness in TechRadar’s testing, with acceptable voice clarity but below-best call quality.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    Equalizer customization: 3.0, 1 review
    Equalizer customization is limited, but Tom’s Guide did not feel a need to tailor the sound profile during use.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    Integrated microphone: 3.0, 1 review
    The integrated mic was usable but not impressive, with decent voice clarity offset by static and limited call quality.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    Portability/foldability: 3.0, 1 review
    Pocket portability is undercut by the cable tangling and bunching, which Tom’s Guide found annoying to manage.
  • 3.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Button control usability: 3.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Control usability was mixed: TechRadar disliked the missing volume buttons, while Tom’s Guide praised the button feel and responsiveness.