Shark Navigator Lift-Away Upright Vacuum Feature Scores
Explore all 48 feature scores for Shark Navigator Lift-Away Upright Vacuum, organized into pros and cons.
Scores by Feature
Summary
48 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.011 (23%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.424 (50%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.411 (23%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.42 (4%)
Pros
Sort
-
Filtration is one of the strongest points: reviewers repeatedly praise the sealed HEPA system and dust containment for allergy-sensitive homes.
-
Value is a major strength: many reviews call it affordable, a budget standout, or an excellent deal given its suction, filtration, and lift-away design.
-
Versatility is a major consensus strength because the vacuum handles carpets, hard floors, stairs, upholstery, and handheld tasks with multiple tools.
-
Reviewers consistently describe strong suction and airflow, especially for a budget upright, though one direct comparison measured weaker suction than a Kenmore rival.
-
Stair cleaning benefits from Lift-Away portability and handheld use, with several reviewers specifically praising stairs or portable above-floor reach.
-
Maneuverability is mostly praised for swivel steering, light weight, and easy handling, though one test found it stiffer than higher-end uprights.
-
The Lift-Away/portable canister design is a repeated strength, making stairs, furniture, upholstery, and above-floor cleaning easier.
-
Ease of use is mostly positive because of simple operation, light handling, and Lift-Away utility, though pushing can be harder with strong suction.
-
The dust cup/bin is usually reviewed positively for capacity, easy emptying, and a straightforward open design, with one sealed-bin test also supporting containment.
-
Pet-hair opinions are mixed: several sources praise pet pickup and pet tools, while others report mediocre embedded fur pickup or missing powered pet attachments.
-
Above-floor and upholstery pickup are broadly positive, especially with Lift-Away and pet tools, but one test found tougher cushion cleaning required effort.
-
Overall sentiment is positive: reviewers call it a strong budget performer, an excellent deal, and a time-tested model, with some caveats.
-
Carpet hair pickup is split: many sources praise pet and long-hair pickup, while one lab test found embedded pet hair mediocre.
-
Low-pile carpet pickup is a strength, with reviewers citing strong low-pile results and best-in-test budget carpet performance.
-
Attachments are generally useful, with praise for pet, upholstery, crevice, and broad above-floor tools, though one pillow/upholstery test found the brush only okay.
-
Medium-pile/deep carpet evidence is very strong, including perfect-score and deep-clean praise for embedded sand pickup.
-
Emptying is generally easy and clean, but one comparison disliked the two-clip canister removal compared with a one-button Kenmore.
-
Hard-floor fine-debris pickup is mixed-to-positive: some reviewers praise hardwood results, while one lab review found sand left behind.
-
Weight is a strength for this upright class, though one pet-hair roundup still considered a related Navigator Professional slightly heavy.
-
Comparative performance is generally good for the price, but named comparisons show some rivals beat it on hard-floor pickup, suction, or overall score.
-
Floorhead design is seen as a strength for budget handling and carpet agitation, though its older/simple geometry contributes to larger-debris limits elsewhere.
-
Noise is generally acceptable for a corded upright, with some tests calling it relatively quiet, though one comparison still described both vacuums as fairly loud.
-
Long-term sentiment is strong because the NV352 is repeatedly described as having stood the test of time despite newer competitors.
-
Cord length is acceptable-to-good in reviewed variants, with reviewers calling reach good or sufficient.
-
Hard-floor hair pickup receives positive evidence where a pet-focused review says the Navigator handled pet hair across carpet and hardwood floors.
-
Cyclone performance has limited but positive evidence, with one review praising cyclonic suction for capturing fine dust and debris.
-
Support and reliability evidence is positive where reviewers note replacement-part availability and a five-year warranty adding long-term value.
-
Edge/baseboard cleaning is mixed: one test found no edge issues, another praised head-on edge pickup, while a third said the model struggled.
-
Competitive design evidence is positive because reviewers describe sealed filtration at this price as rare and the budget design as unusually enduring.
-
Storage footprint evidence is positive because one review calls it compact and far less bulky than most upright vacuums.
-
Small-space suitability is positive where reviewers call it compact and less bulky than most upright vacuums.
-
Maintenance is mixed: the canister and parts are easy to maintain, but hair wrap and regular upkeep remain necessary.
-
Assembly evidence is limited but favorable, with one test saying the Shark took only a couple of minutes despite needing more assembly than others.
-
Controls are simple, with one comparison calling the Navigator simpler than newer Shark models, though fewer advanced settings are available.
-
Heavy-duty evidence is limited but positive, with one review calling it a no-frills workhorse when given extra passes and basic maintenance.
Cons
Sort
-
Hair-wrap resistance is a weakness, with multiple reviews noting long hair tangles or regular brush-roll clearing.
-
High-pile carpet and shag rugs are a recurring weakness because the lack of height adjustment makes deep or tall pile harder to handle.
-
Hair-removal channel evidence is negative because reviewers advise routine roller clearing to avoid hair buildup.
-
Hose and wand reach are common concerns, with several reviews saying the hose or wand is shorter than ideal.
-
Crevice/groove pickup is a weakness, with multiple reviews reporting struggles in cracks or crevices despite strong suction elsewhere.
-
Hair-related clogging evidence is weak-to-negative, with one test describing embedded pet hair as prone to clumping.
-
Tool-change and lift-away button convenience drew criticism in a head-to-head comparison, where the controls were described as less convenient than Kenmore.
-
Under-furniture pickup is limited; one review specifically noted the Navigator could not fully reach under chairs.
-
Area rug handling is mixed-to-negative: reviewers note smooth surface transitions, but shag and larger particles can require extra effort.
-
LED/headlight evidence is limited; one comparison noted the Shark lacks a headlight, but also said it was not a major issue for that test.
-
Large-debris hard-floor pickup is mixed: some tests report strong rice/Cheerios pickup, while others say the head pushed or scattered debris.
-
Low-profile design is mixed; it can help around furniture but can also bump into overhanging objects or struggle with taller debris.
-
Build quality is serviceable but not premium; reviewers mention plastic construction as a drawback while also linking it to low weight and price.