Shark Rotator Powered Lift-Away Upright Vacuum, NV752

Shark Rotator Powered Lift-Away Upright Vacuum, NV752 Feature Scores

Explore all 59 feature scores for Shark Rotator Powered Lift-Away Upright Vacuum, NV752, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

59 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    19 (32%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    24 (41%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    12 (20%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    4 (7%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.7
    10 reviews strong consensus
    Suction and Airflow: 4.7, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers consistently describe the NV752 as a strong-suction corded upright with high airflow, especially through the hose and on carpets.
  • 4.5
    10 reviews strong consensus
    Overall opinion: 4.5, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Overall opinion is strongly positive across professional and customer sources, with caveats around hard floors, weight, hose length, and tangles.
  • 4.6
    8 reviews strong consensus
    Convertible handheld design: 4.6, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    The Lift-Away/convertible design is one of the product’s core strengths, making it easier to use as an upright, pod, canister-like, or handheld-style cleaner.
  • 4.7
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Filtration / Dust Containment: 4.7, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Filtration is one of the strongest consensus points, with sealed HEPA performance and smoke-test results keeping dust and allergens contained.
  • 4.5
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Hair Pickup — Carpets: 4.5, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Hair pickup on carpets is a strength across tests and customer reviews, with many reviewers saying it pulls up pet hair effectively.
  • 4.5
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Under-Furniture Pickup: 4.5, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Under-furniture pickup is a major advantage because Powered Lift-Away lets the head or wand reach under beds and furniture.
  • 4.4
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Pet-Ready Features: 4.4, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Pet performance is a major strength in most sources, with reviewers praising pet-hair pickup, though tool and tangle issues appear in some use cases.
  • 4.6
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Versatility: 4.6, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Versatility is a standout strength, with reviewers praising the ability to clean floors, stairs, furniture, cars, corners, and under-furniture areas.
  • 4.4
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Stair Cleaning: 4.4, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Stair cleaning is a consistent benefit because Lift-Away mode and attachments make stairs easier than with a fixed upright.
  • 4.4
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Price and Value: 4.4, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Value is a strong theme: reviewers repeatedly say the Shark delivers high-end flexibility and suction for a midrange or reasonable price.
  • 4.4
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Accessories and Tools: 4.4, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The accessory package is valued for crevice, upholstery, pet, dusting, and hard-floor tools, though some customers wished more tools were included or stored onboard.
  • 4.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Headlight and LED lights: 4.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Headlights are strongly praised for showing debris on floors, dark corners, and attachment work.
  • 4.4
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Ease of use: 4.4, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Ease of use is mostly strong thanks to Lift-Away, handle controls, and easy emptying, but weight and hose issues create exceptions.
  • 4.0
    7 reviews moderate consensus
    Upholstery / Above-Floor Pickup: 4.0, 7 reviews, moderate consensus
    Upholstery and above-floor cleaning are generally good with pet and upholstery tools, but some reviewers find the pet tool weak or prone to resistance.
  • 4.1
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Maneuverability and Handling: 4.1, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Maneuverability is generally good thanks to swivel steering, but the top-heavy pod and strong pull make handling mixed for some users.
  • 4.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Assembly and Setup: 4.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Assembly and setup are praised as easy, with convenient clips and customer comments that it is simple to put together.
  • 4.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Emptying and Mess Control: 4.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Emptying is usually praised as easy and mess-controlled, though bin capacity and packed pet hair create some complaints.
  • 4.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Comparative performance: 4.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Comparative performance is strong overall, with reviewers often favoring the NV752 over similarly priced uprights while noting pricier models can beat it in some tests.
  • 4.4
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Self-propel feature: 4.4, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The self-propelled feel helps carpet cleaning for many users, though the pull can feel too strong in tight spaces.
  • 4.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors): 4.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Edge and baseboard cleaning is mostly positive, though one review notes some debris may remain in corners or along walls.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Tool-change simplicity: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Tool changes are generally easy, with click-on accessories and a removable handheld piece praised for quick transitions.
  • 4.1
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup: 4.1, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Low-pile carpet performance is broadly positive, though heavy debris can require extra passes.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Suitability for heavy-duty use: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Heavy-duty suitability is favorable, with professional and customer reviewers describing it as appropriate for pets, kids, carpets, and cleaning-house use.
  • 4.4
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Automatic standby switch: 4.4, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Automatic brush/standby behavior is praised where mentioned, with the roller stopping when upright or locked.
  • 4.4
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Controls and UI: 4.4, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Controls are praised for being on the handle and intuitive, though isolated customer feedback says the power button can be hard to keep engaged.
  • 4.4
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Maintenance requirements: 4.4, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Maintenance is generally easy for filters and dust-bin cleaning, but brush-roll hair maintenance can be frustrating for pet owners.
  • 4.4
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Carpet — High-Pile Pickup: 4.4, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    High-pile carpet performance is positive in review and customer evidence, with suction and settings helping rugs and high-pile carpet.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Aesthetic design and finish: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Design impressions are mostly positive, with reviewers noting modern styling, appealing color, and a premium-looking finish.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Scratch resistance: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Surface safety is generally positive where addressed, especially brush-roll shutoff and soft hard-floor use, though some hard-floor concerns remain.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Debris illumination: 5.0, 1 review
    Debris illumination is a standout practical feature, with users saying the lights reveal crud and missed dirt.
  • 3.7
    4 reviews low consensus
    Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup: 3.7, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Fine-dust hard-floor pickup is split: CNET found excellent sand pickup, while other reviewers and customers mention fine-particle or bare-floor weaknesses.
  • 4.6
    1 review
    Overall durability/longevity: 4.6, 1 review
    Longevity evidence is mixed-positive, with warranty praise and several long-term owner reports balanced against isolated failures.
  • 3.7
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    Bin and Bag: 3.7, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    Dust-bin feedback is mixed: reviewers like easy emptying and size in some tests, while Amazon customers complain the usable capacity can feel low.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Automatic shutoff for obstructions: 4.5, 1 review
    Automatic obstruction shutoff has positive customer evidence because it protects the motor and warns when the brush stops or clogs.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Innovation compared to competitors: 4.5, 1 review
    Innovation is tied to Powered Lift-Away; reviewers and customers describe the configuration as unusually flexible compared with other uprights.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Low-profile design: 4.5, 1 review
    Low-profile reach is praised when the detachable head or wand gets under beds, chairs, and furniture.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Ongoing ownership costs (bags, filters, batteries): 4.5, 1 review
    Ownership costs are favorable where discussed because the vacuum is bagless with washable filters and little routine replacement.
  • 4.4
    1 review
    Airflow blowback: 4.4, 1 review
    Airflow blowback is positively addressed in customer evidence where the Shark avoids spitting debris back at the user.
  • 4.4
    1 review
    Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup: 4.4, 1 review
    Medium-pile or shag-style rug feedback is positive in customer evidence, with one user saying it revived a mid-cut shag area rug.
  • 4.4
    1 review
    Suitability for small spaces: 4.4, 1 review
    Small-space usefulness is positive when using the portable pod and tools for stairs, pantries, and tight spaces.
  • 3.6
    3 reviews low consensus
    Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake: 3.6, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Large-debris hard-floor intake is mixed, with strong customer pellet pickup but CNET criticism that Cheerios were too tall for the head.
  • 3.6
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Cord length: 3.6, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Cord length is mixed: some reviewers call it long, while customers often want several more feet.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Packaging quality: 4.0, 1 review
    Packaging has limited but positive customer evidence, with one buyer saying it was packed well and worked as described.

Cons

Sort
  • 1.9
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Hair-removal channel issues: 1.9, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Hair-removal channel and brush-cleaning access are notable weaknesses for long pet hair, with owners reporting lengthy brush-head cleaning.
  • 2.2
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Floorhead Seal on Hard Floors: 2.2, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Hard-floor seal and intake are weak in some evidence, especially where the head struggles with large debris or sounds rough on hard floors.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors): 2.0, 1 review
    Crevice and grouted-floor pickup has negative customer evidence, especially on grouted tile where grit required repeated passes.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    Storage footprint and upright-stand stability: 2.0, 1 review
    Upright stability is a weakness in customer feedback, especially when the pod or wand is used and the unit tips easily.
  • 2.6
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Cord management: 2.6, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Cord management is a downside because the cord is manual, non-retractable, and can get in the way.
  • 2.8
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Weight: 2.8, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Weight is a repeated drawback, with reviewers calling the unit hefty, heavy on the wrist, or difficult for some users.
  • 2.8
    5 reviews low consensus
    Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance: 2.8, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Hair-wrap resistance is one of the most mixed attributes: some reviewers report minor tangles, while pet-hair tests and long-hair owners report serious wrapping.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    Onboard tool storage: 2.5, 1 review
    Onboard tool storage is a weakness because the vacuum cannot hold all attachments and tools can fall or require the bag.
  • 2.9
    3 reviews low consensus
    Clogging and debris prevention: 2.9, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Clogging evidence is mixed-negative: one CNET test found large carpet debris did not clog, but pet-hair and head-clog complaints recur elsewhere.
  • 2.9
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Support and Reliability: 2.9, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Reliability and support are mixed: one review praises the long warranty, while a customer describes a poor warranty/support experience.
  • 2.9
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    Hose length: 2.9, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    Hose length is mixed to negative: one reviewer measured useful reach, but others say the hose is short and limits range.
  • 3.1
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    Build quality and durability: 3.1, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    Build quality is mixed: professional reviewers often call it solid, while some customers report flimsy parts, broken lids, or cheaper-feeling plastics.
  • 3.1
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    Hair Pickup — Hard Floors: 3.1, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    Hard-floor hair pickup is mixed, with one test favoring the Shark over Bissell and CNET/customer evidence showing weakness without the right tool.
  • 3.4
    1 review
    Noise level: 3.4, 1 review
    Noise feedback is moderate: one reviewer found it quieter than a Dyson DC65 but not truly quiet overall.
  • 3.4
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Area Rug Handling: 3.4, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Area-rug handling is mixed: settings help some rugs, but several customers say suction is too strong for smaller rugs.
  • 3.4
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Floorhead design: 3.4, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Floorhead design is mixed: it helps carpet pickup and maneuverability, but its lip and size cause hard-floor and width complaints.