Explore all 59 feature scores for Shark Rotator Powered Lift-Away Upright Vacuum, NV752, organized into pros and cons.
Scores by Feature
Summary
59 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.019 (32%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.424 (41%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.412 (20%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.44 (7%)
Pros
Sort
-
Reviewers consistently describe the NV752 as a strong-suction corded upright with high airflow, especially through the hose and on carpets.
-
Overall opinion is strongly positive across professional and customer sources, with caveats around hard floors, weight, hose length, and tangles.
-
The Lift-Away/convertible design is one of the product’s core strengths, making it easier to use as an upright, pod, canister-like, or handheld-style cleaner.
-
Filtration is one of the strongest consensus points, with sealed HEPA performance and smoke-test results keeping dust and allergens contained.
-
Hair pickup on carpets is a strength across tests and customer reviews, with many reviewers saying it pulls up pet hair effectively.
-
Under-furniture pickup is a major advantage because Powered Lift-Away lets the head or wand reach under beds and furniture.
-
Pet performance is a major strength in most sources, with reviewers praising pet-hair pickup, though tool and tangle issues appear in some use cases.
-
Versatility is a standout strength, with reviewers praising the ability to clean floors, stairs, furniture, cars, corners, and under-furniture areas.
-
Stair cleaning is a consistent benefit because Lift-Away mode and attachments make stairs easier than with a fixed upright.
-
Value is a strong theme: reviewers repeatedly say the Shark delivers high-end flexibility and suction for a midrange or reasonable price.
-
The accessory package is valued for crevice, upholstery, pet, dusting, and hard-floor tools, though some customers wished more tools were included or stored onboard.
-
Headlights are strongly praised for showing debris on floors, dark corners, and attachment work.
-
Ease of use is mostly strong thanks to Lift-Away, handle controls, and easy emptying, but weight and hose issues create exceptions.
-
Upholstery and above-floor cleaning are generally good with pet and upholstery tools, but some reviewers find the pet tool weak or prone to resistance.
-
Maneuverability is generally good thanks to swivel steering, but the top-heavy pod and strong pull make handling mixed for some users.
-
Assembly and setup are praised as easy, with convenient clips and customer comments that it is simple to put together.
-
Emptying is usually praised as easy and mess-controlled, though bin capacity and packed pet hair create some complaints.
-
Comparative performance is strong overall, with reviewers often favoring the NV752 over similarly priced uprights while noting pricier models can beat it in some tests.
-
The self-propelled feel helps carpet cleaning for many users, though the pull can feel too strong in tight spaces.
-
Edge and baseboard cleaning is mostly positive, though one review notes some debris may remain in corners or along walls.
-
Tool changes are generally easy, with click-on accessories and a removable handheld piece praised for quick transitions.
-
Low-pile carpet performance is broadly positive, though heavy debris can require extra passes.
-
Heavy-duty suitability is favorable, with professional and customer reviewers describing it as appropriate for pets, kids, carpets, and cleaning-house use.
-
Automatic brush/standby behavior is praised where mentioned, with the roller stopping when upright or locked.
-
Controls are praised for being on the handle and intuitive, though isolated customer feedback says the power button can be hard to keep engaged.
-
Maintenance is generally easy for filters and dust-bin cleaning, but brush-roll hair maintenance can be frustrating for pet owners.
-
High-pile carpet performance is positive in review and customer evidence, with suction and settings helping rugs and high-pile carpet.
-
Design impressions are mostly positive, with reviewers noting modern styling, appealing color, and a premium-looking finish.
-
Surface safety is generally positive where addressed, especially brush-roll shutoff and soft hard-floor use, though some hard-floor concerns remain.
-
Debris illumination is a standout practical feature, with users saying the lights reveal crud and missed dirt.
-
Fine-dust hard-floor pickup is split: CNET found excellent sand pickup, while other reviewers and customers mention fine-particle or bare-floor weaknesses.
-
Longevity evidence is mixed-positive, with warranty praise and several long-term owner reports balanced against isolated failures.
-
Dust-bin feedback is mixed: reviewers like easy emptying and size in some tests, while Amazon customers complain the usable capacity can feel low.
-
Automatic obstruction shutoff has positive customer evidence because it protects the motor and warns when the brush stops or clogs.
-
Innovation is tied to Powered Lift-Away; reviewers and customers describe the configuration as unusually flexible compared with other uprights.
-
Low-profile reach is praised when the detachable head or wand gets under beds, chairs, and furniture.
-
Ownership costs are favorable where discussed because the vacuum is bagless with washable filters and little routine replacement.
-
Airflow blowback is positively addressed in customer evidence where the Shark avoids spitting debris back at the user.
-
Medium-pile or shag-style rug feedback is positive in customer evidence, with one user saying it revived a mid-cut shag area rug.
-
Small-space usefulness is positive when using the portable pod and tools for stairs, pantries, and tight spaces.
-
Large-debris hard-floor intake is mixed, with strong customer pellet pickup but CNET criticism that Cheerios were too tall for the head.
-
Cord length is mixed: some reviewers call it long, while customers often want several more feet.
-
Packaging has limited but positive customer evidence, with one buyer saying it was packed well and worked as described.
Cons
Sort
-
Hair-removal channel and brush-cleaning access are notable weaknesses for long pet hair, with owners reporting lengthy brush-head cleaning.
-
Hard-floor seal and intake are weak in some evidence, especially where the head struggles with large debris or sounds rough on hard floors.
-
Crevice and grouted-floor pickup has negative customer evidence, especially on grouted tile where grit required repeated passes.
-
Upright stability is a weakness in customer feedback, especially when the pod or wand is used and the unit tips easily.
-
Cord management is a downside because the cord is manual, non-retractable, and can get in the way.
-
Weight is a repeated drawback, with reviewers calling the unit hefty, heavy on the wrist, or difficult for some users.
-
Hair-wrap resistance is one of the most mixed attributes: some reviewers report minor tangles, while pet-hair tests and long-hair owners report serious wrapping.
-
Onboard tool storage is a weakness because the vacuum cannot hold all attachments and tools can fall or require the bag.
-
Clogging evidence is mixed-negative: one CNET test found large carpet debris did not clog, but pet-hair and head-clog complaints recur elsewhere.
-
Reliability and support are mixed: one review praises the long warranty, while a customer describes a poor warranty/support experience.
-
Hose length is mixed to negative: one reviewer measured useful reach, but others say the hose is short and limits range.
-
Build quality is mixed: professional reviewers often call it solid, while some customers report flimsy parts, broken lids, or cheaper-feeling plastics.
-
Hard-floor hair pickup is mixed, with one test favoring the Shark over Bissell and CNET/customer evidence showing weakness without the right tool.
-
Noise feedback is moderate: one reviewer found it quieter than a Dyson DC65 but not truly quiet overall.
-
Area-rug handling is mixed: settings help some rugs, but several customers say suction is too strong for smaller rugs.
-
Floorhead design is mixed: it helps carpet pickup and maneuverability, but its lip and size cause hard-floor and width complaints.