Shark Pet Plus Cordless Vacuum, IX141

Shark Pet Plus Cordless Vacuum, IX141 Review

Brand: Shark
Released: October 23, 2019
Updated: 2 months ago
3.5
Overall review score
137
Review evidence points
50
Scored features
8
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose it for a low-cost cordless that is easy to use, compact, and solid on hard floors. Skip it if you need true pet-hair performance on carpet or upholstery, HEPA-level assurance, or a balanced feel.

Best for

Best for renters, small homes, and hard-floor households that want a simple cordless for daily crumbs, loose pet hair, stairs, and quick handheld jobs.

Not for

Not for homes that need deep carpet cleaning, long-hair pet cleanup, strong upholstery pickup, or allergy-focused dust containment across all versions.

Verdict

The Shark IX141 lands as a budget cordless that is easiest to defend for hard floors, stairs, small homes, and quick daily messes. Reviewers repeatedly liked the simple setup, handheld conversion, compact storage, LEDs, and runtime, especially when bought on sale. The tradeoff is that its pet positioning is shaky: several reviewers found hair wrap, weak upholstery results, fine-dust carpet misses, or a top-heavy feel. Evidence is also inconsistent on filtration, with one review praising HEPA/allergen sealing and others warning about non-HEPA versions. It works best as a convenient secondary stick vacuum rather than a deep-cleaning pet machine.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

50 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    9 (18%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    17 (34%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    9 (18%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    14 (28%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    1 (2%)

Pros

  • 4.4
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Convertible handheld design: 4.4, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The handheld conversion was a major strength, repeatedly praised for stairs, small messes, and flexible above-floor cleaning.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Stair Cleaning: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Stair cleaning was consistently praised because the handheld setup was light, easy, and convenient on stairs.
  • 4.2
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake: 4.2, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Large-debris hard-floor pickup was consistently positive, with reviewers praising pickup of coffee, Cheerios, litter, crumbs, and dirt.
  • 4.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Ease of use: 4.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Ease of use was usually strong, with praise for intuitive controls, assembly, and handling everyday messes.
  • 4.3
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Hair Pickup — Hard Floors: 4.3, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Hard-floor hair pickup was generally positive, including loose pet hair and larger pet-related messes.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Versatility: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Versatility split by reviewer: the vacuum could work as an all-in-one handheld stick, but limitations on carpet and attachments reduced range.

Cons

  • 1.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Onboard tool storage: 1.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Onboard tool storage was consistently criticized because attachments had no obvious or onboard storage spot.
  • 2.1
    4 reviews low consensus
    Upholstery / Above-Floor Pickup: 2.1, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Upholstery and above-floor results were weak to mixed: handheld use helped, but the pet/upholstery brush drew strong criticism.
  • 1.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Hair-removal channel issues: 1.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Hair removal was a weakness because reviewers had to cut or remove wrapped hair manually.
  • 2.4
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance: 2.4, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    Hair-wrap resistance was a recurring weakness, with several reviewers finding hair wrapped around the brush roll.
  • 2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Low-pile carpet pickup was a repeated weak spot, especially for flour and deeper carpet debris.
  • 2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Maintenance requirements: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Maintenance was mixed to negative, with complaints about stuck fur, tool-required cleaning, and awkward roller/head access.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Stick Vacuums & Electric Brooms, this product is above average in Airflow blowback, Support and Reliability, Tool-change simplicity, near average in Price and Value, Weight, below average in Low-profile design, Onboard tool storage, Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup.

Comparison summary

50 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    6 (12%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    18 (36%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    26 (52%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
Low-profile design 2.0 4.3 -2.3
Onboard tool storage 1.3 3.5 -2.2
Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup 2.0 4.2 -2.2
Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup 2.0 4.2 -2.2
Upholstery / Above-Floor Pickup 2.1 4.1 -1.9
Build quality and durability 2.0 4.0 -2.0
Carpet — High-Pile Pickup 1.5 3.4 -1.9
Comparative performance 2.0 3.9 -1.9

Consider This Instead

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

FAQ

Is the Shark IX141 good for pet hair?

It can pick up loose pet hair, and one reviewer found it did well on rugs and carpet. Several others criticized hair wrap, weak upholstery pickup, or the lack of stronger pet-specific tools.

How does it perform on hard floors?

Hard-floor feedback was one of its stronger areas. Reviewers reported good pickup of coffee, Cheerios, litter, crumbs, loose pet hair, and fine flour on hard floors.

Is it good on carpet?

Carpet results were weaker and more mixed. Reviewers flagged poor fine-dust pickup on low-pile carpet, limited deep carpet cleaning, and fur left behind on an area rug.

How long does the battery last?

Several reviews treated the 40-minute runtime as enough for small homes or everyday sessions. Caveats included shorter boost-mode use and reports that battery life may decline after months.

Is it easy to store?

It can store compactly when broken down, which reviewers liked for renters and small spaces. The downside is no proper dock or onboard tool storage, and some reviewers disliked taking it apart before storing.

Is it worth the price?

The value case is strongest on sale. Reviewers praised discounted pricing, but one review said the performance did not justify the regular $200 price.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Stick Vacuums & Electric Brooms to Consider

#1 UWANT D100 Wet Dry Vacuum Cleaner
4.6

Choose the UWANT D100 for value-focused hard-floor vacuuming, wet-mess pickup, lay-flat reach, and self-cleaning drying. Skip it for large homes needing fast recharges, heavy dry debris, quiet drying, or carpet-first...

Pros: Pet-Ready Features, Assembly and Setup

Cons: Dock noise, Reverse cleaning performance

#2 Dyson V8 Animal Cordless Vacuum
4.6

Choose the Dyson V8 Animal for a lightweight cordless vacuum that reviewers say handles pet hair, dust, stairs, cars, and small homes easily. Skip it for whole-house deep cleans, big...

Pros: Suction and Airflow, Noise level

Cons: Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake, Suitability for heavy-duty use

#3 DREAME R10 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner
4.5

Choose the Dreame R10 if you want strong suction, LED-lit cleaning, easy handling, and good value for everyday floors and pet hair. Skip it if you need quiet turbo cleaning,...

Pros: Pet-Ready Features, Assembly and Setup

Cons: AI, Smart

#4 Narwal S20 Pro Cordless Vacuum Mop with Self-Cleaning
4.5

Choose the Narwal S20 Pro for hard-floor homes that need strong one-pass pickup, edge cleaning, quiet self-drying, and light handling. Skip it if reverse cleaning, LED headlights, rug cleaning, or...

Pros: Pet-Ready Features, Noise level

Cons: Reverse cleaning performance, Suitability for heavy-duty use