Simplicity Vacuums Allergy Upright Vacuum, S20EZM Feature Scores
Explore all 55 feature scores for Simplicity Vacuums Allergy Upright Vacuum, S20EZM, organized into pros and cons.
Scores by Feature
Summary
55 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.018 (33%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.423 (42%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.48 (15%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.46 (11%)
Pros
Sort
-
Overall opinion is positive but not unanimous: reviewers praise cleaning power while noting convenience and durability tradeoffs.
-
Filtration and dust containment are among the strongest themes, especially for allergies and bagged dust control.
-
High-pile and thick carpet performance is generally strong, helped by brush agitation and height adjustment.
-
Suction is the strongest recurring praise, with multiple reviewers calling it powerful or excellent.
-
Assembly is treated as very easy, with reviewers emphasizing the simple handle and hose setup.
-
Onboard tool storage is a clear convenience when the tools stay accessible and easy to use.
-
Medium/all-pile carpet evidence is favorable, with reviewers calling the carpet performance outstanding or broadly ideal.
-
Value is generally favorable, especially against higher-end vacuums, but ongoing parts costs temper the score.
-
The bagged system is a strength because users like simple bag changes, contained dust, and steady suction.
-
The finish and styling draw light but positive comments, with reviewers liking the color or clean design.
-
Pet-ready performance is a major strength for carpet hair and allergens, though long-haired pets can expose brushroll issues.
-
Tools are useful and available, but Amazon reviewers split over whether the included set is adequate.
-
Ease of use is mostly positive, though physical effort and control quirks keep it from being universally easy.
-
Comparative comments often favor the Simplicity over Shark-type vacuums, though Rainbow-style deep cleaning can outperform it.
-
The headlight is consistently useful in positive feedback, though one reviewer questioned non-LED longevity.
-
Build quality is disputed: video reviewers praise durable parts, while Amazon complaints cite cheap plastic and failures.
-
Cord length is mixed across homes: some call it long, while others say larger spaces still require replugging.
-
The floorhead has strong agitation but mixed design feedback because the brush roll cannot be shut off.
-
Tool changes are usually easy with the included setup, though compatibility with older attachments is limited.
-
Edge and baseboard cleaning gets positive mentions from both the attachment layout and edge-cleaning system.
-
Cord management earns praise for simple wrapping and top cord routing, with some wishing for retractability.
-
Hose reach is mixed: videos praise long reach, while some owners find the attached hose too short or awkward.
-
Innovation centers on the five-level height system, described as unusual for uprights in this class.
-
The forward-propel feel helps some users, but others still miss true self-propelled drive.
-
Versatility is good for carpets, tools, and above-floor cleaning, but hard-floor limitations reduce flexibility.
-
Above-floor pickup is mixed: hose suction can be strong, but upholstery and long cat hair disappoint some owners.
-
Crevice pickup is praised when using the crevice tool for narrow gaps and hard-to-reach areas.
-
Emptying and mess control are strong because the bag avoids the dirty, dusty bin-cleaning process users dislike.
-
Low-profile reach is favorable when reviewers say it gets under furniture better.
-
Heavy-duty suitability is good for frequent pet-home use when the unit stays intact, with workhorse praise from some owners.
-
Small-space suitability is strong because several users cite compact footprint and easy closet storage.
-
Under-furniture pickup is favorable when the machine or tools reach beneath furniture well.
-
Carpet hair pickup is usually praised, especially for dogs, cats, and high-shedding homes.
-
Support and reliability are mixed: warranty backing and refunds help, but some service attempts disappoint.
-
Handling is mixed: it rolls or maneuvers well for some, but weight and suction make pushing difficult for others.
-
Low-pile carpet evidence is positive but less detailed, mainly tied to nap revival and general carpet cleaning.
-
Wool-rug evidence is limited but positive, with one owner saying wool rugs looked better after use.
-
Area-rug handling is polarized: some rugs revived, while one flat-weave rug was damaged by the roller.
-
The bag-full indicator receives both praise for usefulness and complaints when it fails to reset.
-
Controls are mixed: the height dial is easy, but many users dislike the always-on roller and limited suction control.
-
Storage is mostly good thanks to compact footprint, though stability concerns appear in owner feedback.
Cons
Sort
-
Hard-floor debris blowback appears in negative Amazon feedback when litter was thrown back at the user.
-
Large-debris hard-floor intake is a weakness because users report thrown particles and litter blowback.
-
Hard-floor sealing is weak where reviewers report no squeegee effect and debris being thrown back.
-
Hair-channel and brushroll serviceability is a concern where users cannot easily clean a locked beater bar.
-
Hair-wrap/tangle resistance is a concern in pet homes when long hair is linked to brushroll lockup.
-
Clogging prevention is a weakness in Amazon feedback, with users reporting easy clogs and teardown hassle.
-
Maintenance is mixed-to-negative because belts, filters, and brushroll cleaning can require ongoing attention.
-
Noise is a recurring concern, though a few users find the tone tolerable or quieter than prior vacuums.
-
Ownership costs are a concern because OEM bags, belts, and optional pet tools add expense.
-
Stair use is limited by weight and lift-handle complaints despite useful step/edge attachments.
-
Surface safety is a serious caveat because the active brush can damage rugs or beat one spot while using the hose.
-
Weight is one of the clearest tradeoffs, with users calling it substantial or hard to push despite cleaning power.
-
Fine dust hard-floor evidence is mixed, with some strong cleaning praise and other hard-floor complaints.
-
Longevity feedback is mixed, ranging from multi-year praise to early belt, hose, motor, and handle failures.