Tales of Berseria Remastered

Tales of Berseria Remastered Feature Scores

Explore all 85 feature scores for Tales of Berseria Remastered, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

85 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    28 (33%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    24 (28%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    13 (15%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    18 (21%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    2 (2%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.9
    28 reviews strong consensus
    character roster: 4.9, 28 reviews, strong consensus
    The cast is the most consistently praised element after the story, with strong chemistry, memorable personalities, and unusually compelling anti-hero dynamics.
  • 4.8
    35 reviews strong consensus
    narrative quality: 4.8, 35 reviews, strong consensus
    The revenge story is the clearest consensus strength, praised for its darker perspective, twists, emotional weight, and willingness to center morally gray characters.
  • 5.0
    9 reviews strong consensus
    emotional impact: 5.0, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    The revenge story repeatedly lands with real emotional force; reviewers describe tears, goosebumps, poignancy, and a strong attachment to Velvet’s journey.
  • 4.8
    12 reviews moderate consensus
    protagonist appeal: 4.8, 12 reviews, moderate consensus
    Velvet is overwhelmingly praised as a distinctive, compelling anti-heroine whose anger, vulnerability, and growth give the story its identity.
  • 4.6
    16 reviews strong consensus
    DLC value: 4.6, 16 reviews, strong consensus
    Bundled DLC is one of the remaster’s clearest wins: most reviewers liked getting the original costumes and extras included, especially for newcomers.
  • 4.7
    13 reviews moderate consensus
    voice acting: 4.7, 13 reviews, moderate consensus
    Voice work is a major strength, especially the performances behind Velvet and the main cast, though one reviewer strongly preferred Japanese audio over the English dub.
  • 5.0
    7 reviews strong consensus
    faithfulness to franchise: 5.0, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Despite its darker tone, Berseria still feels recognizably Tales, retaining the series’ charm, party chemistry, visual identity, and action-RPG character.
  • 4.6
    13 reviews moderate consensus
    accessibility options: 4.6, 13 reviews, moderate consensus
    Encounter toggles, difficulty controls, Grade Shop modifiers, button mapping, and other conveniences give players strong control over how demanding or time-consuming the journey feels, though one review noted the lack of colorblind modes.
  • 5.0
    6 reviews strong consensus
    originality: 5.0, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The anti-hero revenge structure and morally gray party help Berseria stand apart from the brighter, more traditional hero stories associated with the series.
  • 4.5
    10 reviews low consensus
    gameplay mechanics: 4.5, 10 reviews, low consensus
    Soul management, Break Souls, combo trees, and character-specific systems can create satisfying tactical depth, though some critics think the systems do not always harmonize.
  • 5.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    battle mode quality: 5.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers who clicked with the battle system found fights fast, satisfying, and highly engaging, with especially strong moment-to-moment action.
  • 4.6
    8 reviews low consensus
    dialogue quality: 4.6, 8 reviews, low consensus
    Skits, banter, and party conversations are often funny, warm, and character-rich, though one remaster review noticed awkwardly compressed dialogue timing.
  • 4.9
    5 reviews strong consensus
    character development: 4.9, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Character growth is one of Berseria’s strongest qualities, especially Velvet’s arc and the way major party members evolve across the story.
  • 4.7
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    art direction: 4.7, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    The anime and watercolor-inspired art direction continues to hold up well, with reviewers praising its style even when textures and environments look dated.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    atmosphere: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Berseria’s darker, morally gray tone is a standout strength, giving the familiar Tales formula a more mature and emotionally charged identity.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    lore depth: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    The story’s moral ambiguity, revenge themes, free-will questions, and philosophical framing give reviewers more to think about than a typical straightforward hero narrative.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    save system reliability: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Autosave is a welcome modern convenience that reduces the risk of lost progress and makes the long RPG easier to play casually.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    side character depth: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    The supporting party is praised for distinct motivations, chemistry, banter, and storylines that make them more than simple companions to Velvet.
  • 4.4
    8 reviews strong consensus
    fun factor: 4.4, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Even reviewers who criticize the remaster often still call Berseria itself fun, entertaining, or a must-play first experience.
  • 4.2
    12 reviews low consensus
    map and navigation design: 4.2, 12 reviews, low consensus
    New objective markers, collectible icons, and minimap changes are genuinely useful, although a few reviewers found them inconsistent or absent when most needed.
  • 4.9
    4 reviews strong consensus
    world-building: 4.9, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Midgand’s moral conflicts, regional stories, and changing societies give the setting a stronger sense of history and consequence than its plain environments suggest.
  • 4.2
    9 reviews low consensus
    controls responsiveness: 4.2, 9 reviews, low consensus
    Most versions feel smooth and responsive in combat, but one Switch review reported severe input lag that made both fighting and exploration unwieldy.
  • 4.8
    4 reviews strong consensus
    load times: 4.8, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Modern versions generally load faster, with several reviewers calling the improvements noticeable or nicely brisk.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    content variety: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Minigames, battle arenas, collectibles, exploration rewards, and other side activities help break up the main loop and give the package welcome variety.
  • 3.9
    16 reviews low consensus
    movement feel: 3.9, 16 reviews, low consensus
    The 20% movement-speed boost is one of the most appreciated QoL changes, though some reviewers still find traversal floaty, sluggish, or detached from the world.
  • 4.1
    7 reviews low consensus
    grind level: 4.1, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Encounter toggles and Grade Shop XP boosts make grinding far easier to control, a widely appreciated convenience for story-focused or returning players.
  • 3.8
    33 reviews low consensus
    combat system: 3.8, 33 reviews, low consensus
    Combat is the biggest point of disagreement: many reviewers love its speed, combo freedom, and risk-reward systems, while others find it button-mashy, overcomplicated, poorly balanced, or repetitive.
  • 3.9
    9 reviews low consensus
    fast travel convenience: 3.9, 9 reviews, low consensus
    Earlier and less restrictive travel tools are a meaningful improvement, though some reviewers still found warping limited or awkwardly structured.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    animation quality: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Character and battle animation was praised as smooth and effective, even when other visual elements still showed the game’s age.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    visual effects quality: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Battle effects and flashy ultimate attacks add energy and spectacle to the real-time combat.
  • 4.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    innovation: 4.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Berseria’s anti-hero lead, darker story, and freer combat represented meaningful departures from older Tales conventions that several reviewers still appreciate.
  • 3.8
    13 reviews low consensus
    performance optimization: 3.8, 13 reviews, low consensus
    PS5 performance is usually smooth, while PC and especially Switch reports are more variable; the harshest Switch review described serious input-lag and image-quality problems.
  • 3.8
    11 reviews low consensus
    writing quality: 3.8, 11 reviews, low consensus
    Characterization and emotional writing are often excellent, especially around Velvet and the party, but a few reviewers criticize tropey sections, weaker villains, or missed thematic opportunities.
  • 3.7
    13 reviews low consensus
    soundtrack quality: 3.7, 13 reviews, low consensus
    The soundtrack divides reviewers more than the story or voice acting: some rank it highly, while others call most of it average or forgettable outside standout themes.
  • 3.8
    8 reviews low consensus
    user interface design: 3.8, 8 reviews, low consensus
    New icons and clearer indicators improve navigation and inventory clarity, but older build menus can still feel convoluted.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    skill tree depth: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Arte and combo customization gives combat meaningful flexibility, letting players experiment with large move sets and different strings.
  • 3.9
    5 reviews low consensus
    boss design: 3.9, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Boss opinions were split: several reviewers enjoyed the stronger encounters, while another found boss battles uninspired.
  • 3.9
    5 reviews low consensus
    character customization: 3.9, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Costumes and cosmetic options are fun and plentiful, but deeper build customization can feel limited or inflexible in places.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews low consensus
    immersion: 4.0, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Strong art and music can bring Midgand to life, but pop-in and dated environmental presentation can noticeably break immersion.
  • 3.5
    20 reviews low consensus
    graphics quality: 3.5, 20 reviews, low consensus
    The visual picture is mixed: the anime style still looks appealing and some remaster versions are crisp, but many reviewers see only minor upgrades and Switch can look noticeably worse.
  • 3.6
    9 reviews low consensus
    handheld play suitability: 3.6, 9 reviews, low consensus
    Portable Berseria is a major selling point for some reviewers, but Switch-specific image quality, 30fps limits, and one severe input-lag report make handheld recommendations platform-sensitive.
  • 3.6
    9 reviews low consensus
    polish: 3.6, 9 reviews, low consensus
    Quality-of-life tweaks add welcome smoothness, but dated assets, unresolved rough edges, and the small scale of the update keep the remaster from feeling comprehensively polished.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    collector appeal: 5.0, 1 review
    A physical release with extra presentation value was specifically appreciated by a longtime Tales fan.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    crafting system: 5.0, 1 review
    Equipment enhancement earned praise for making dropped materials useful and giving gear management a satisfying purpose between battles.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    HUD clarity: 5.0, 1 review
    New objective and collectible indicators make the minimap more useful and reduce friction when tracking goals and pickups.
  • 3.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    co-op experience: 3.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Local battle multiplayer is welcomed as a useful extra, though it is described as serviceable rather than essential.
  • 3.6
    5 reviews low consensus
    tutorial quality: 3.6, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Some reviewers think the game teaches its mechanics well, while others find the explanations confusing or insufficient for the combat’s complexity.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    world interactivity: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Collectibles, Katz rewards, treasure, and other field pickups add small reasons to explore otherwise straightforward spaces.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    economy and resource balance: 4.5, 1 review
    The Soul system’s give-and-take creates an enjoyable resource rhythm when earning and spending Souls is working well.
  • 3.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    couch co-op quality: 3.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Local battle co-op is functional and welcome for players who want to share fights, but it is not presented as a major reason to buy.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    camera behavior: 4.0, 1 review
    The combat camera was described as mostly well behaved, helping the fast battle system keep a cohesive flow.
  • 3.5
    1 review
    multiplayer design: 3.5, 1 review
    Battle multiplayer was described as serviceable but superfluous: usable for shared play, yet far from central to the experience.

Cons

Sort
  • 1.7
    15 reviews strong consensus
    level design: 1.7, 15 reviews, strong consensus
    Dungeon design is one of the clearest weaknesses, repeatedly described as linear, bland, maze-like, repetitive, or too long.
  • 1.5
    9 reviews strong consensus
    environmental detail: 1.5, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Environments are widely criticized as bland, sparse, low-detail, or dated, especially beside the stronger character models and art direction.
  • 2.3
    13 reviews low consensus
    bug frequency: 2.3, 13 reviews, low consensus
    Technical polish varies sharply by platform. PS5 reports are often smooth, while Switch reviews repeatedly mention pop-in, flicker, shimmering, and other visual glitches.
  • 2.3
    10 reviews low consensus
    exploration quality: 2.3, 10 reviews, low consensus
    Exploration is often dragged down by backtracking, long corridors, repetitive dungeons, and repeated fights, although faster movement and encounter toggles improve it in the remaster.
  • 2.1
    5 reviews low consensus
    enemy variety: 2.1, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Enemy variety is a recurring weakness in dungeons, with repeated foes and samey encounter waves undercutting otherwise lively combat.
  • 2.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    mission design: 2.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Repeated objectives and forced backtracking can turn progression into a routine trek through already visited maps.
  • 1.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    companion AI: 1.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Companion AI is a weak spot, with basic behavior and unreliable healing leaving the player to handle much of the important decision-making.
  • 1.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    class balance: 1.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Velvet’s power is a recurring balance problem in the more critical combat takes, where her Break Soul loop can make other party members feel unnecessary.
  • 2.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    age appropriateness: 2.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The darker story includes death, killing, child-directed violence, and revealing costumes, making it a more mature Tales entry than some reviewers expected.
  • 2.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    family friendliness: 2.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The revenge plot’s violence, mature themes, and occasional revealing costumes make this a less family-friendly Tales entry than the series’ lighter adventures.
  • 2.6
    39 reviews low consensus
    remake/remaster quality: 2.6, 39 reviews, low consensus
    The dominant complaint is that this feels more like a port or convenience-focused rerelease than a transformative remaster. The QoL work is useful, but many existing owners see too little reason to rebuy.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    endgame content: 1.0, 1 review
    One detailed review found the endgame side content rushed, typo-heavy, and noticeably less polished than the main story.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    monetization fairness: 1.0, 1 review
    One PC-focused review went beyond calling the remaster unnecessary and described the commercial proposition as potentially predatory for existing owners.
  • 2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    AI behavior: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Party and enemy AI drew criticism for being basic, with players often expected to do most of the meaningful work themselves.
  • 2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    facial animations: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Facial models can still look stiff, one of several presentation details that make the game’s older technical foundation visible.
  • 2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    open-world design: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Berseria is notably linear rather than truly open, and a couple of reviewers felt the zones were smaller or more constrained than they first appeared.
  • 2.6
    9 reviews moderate consensus
    difficulty balance: 2.6, 9 reviews, moderate consensus
    Difficulty can swing too far toward easy when Grade Shop bonuses or Velvet’s strongest loops are used, while harder settings do a better job exposing the combat’s strategic depth.
  • 1.5
    1 review
    cross-save support: 1.5, 1 review
    The lack of PS4 save transfer was called a missed opportunity for returning players considering the remaster.
  • 1.5
    1 review
    mission variety: 1.5, 1 review
    One review specifically criticized repeated tasks and story padding for making the adventure feel longer than its central conflict needed.
  • 1.5
    1 review
    quest design: 1.5, 1 review
    One review specifically lamented the absence of a meaningful side-quest system alongside the game’s uninspired dungeon structure.
  • 1.5
    1 review
    replay value: 1.5, 1 review
    One repeat player felt the magic faded on subsequent runs and explicitly recommended experiencing Berseria once rather than replaying it repeatedly.
  • 2.6
    7 reviews low consensus
    menu usability: 2.6, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Menu impressions are mixed: new item indicators can help, but build management, DLC claiming, and some older interfaces are still cumbersome.
  • 2.7
    22 reviews low consensus
    value for money: 2.7, 22 reviews, low consensus
    Value depends heavily on ownership: newcomers often get the best package with bundled DLC and QoL upgrades, while existing PS4/PC owners repeatedly see little reason to pay again.
  • 2.6
    5 reviews low consensus
    puzzle design: 2.6, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Dungeon puzzles are usually considered simple or underdeveloped, with only occasional later sections standing out positively.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    core gameplay loop: 2.0, 1 review
    One reviewer felt the long combat-exploration-upgrade cycle stopped introducing enough new systems to stay fresh through the full runtime.
  • 2.8
    5 reviews low consensus
    sound design: 2.8, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Audio opinions are mixed: battle effects can be excellent, but some remaster versions have distracting menu mixing or unusually loud effects.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    onboarding experience: 2.5, 1 review
    The opening combat hours can feel overwhelming as Artes and interconnected systems arrive before every player feels comfortable with them.
  • 3.0
    7 reviews low consensus
    upgrade system: 3.0, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Gear and ability systems can support steady growth, but several critics see them as shallow, overly menu-heavy, or unnecessary because combat can be trivialized.
  • 3.1
    9 reviews low consensus
    learning curve: 3.1, 9 reviews, low consensus
    Combat can be approachable at first yet overwhelming as systems stack up; reviewers disagree on whether the tutorials and gradual introductions make that complexity manageable.
  • 3.2
    5 reviews low consensus
    pacing: 3.2, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Story pacing is often strong, but repetitive dungeons and backtracking can interrupt emotional highs; the remaster’s faster travel helps without eliminating the issue.
  • 3.2
    7 reviews low consensus
    progression system: 3.2, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Progression has useful depth through equipment, Grade Shop options, and evolving combat choices, but some reviewers feel growth is muted because the game can be too easy or bonuses too incremental.
  • 3.4
    10 reviews low consensus
    platform-specific feature support: 3.4, 10 reviews, low consensus
    Bringing Berseria to Switch and Xbox expands access, but missing upgrade paths, sparse PC options, screenshot restrictions, and no native Switch 2 version disappointed some reviewers.
  • 3.4
    14 reviews low consensus
    frame rate stability: 3.4, 14 reviews, low consensus
    Performance is strong on PS5 in several reviews, but Switch impressions are much less consistent, with 30fps caps and occasional dips drawing criticism.