Tom Clancy’s The Division Resurgence

Tom Clancy’s The Division Resurgence Feature Scores

Explore all 83 feature scores for Tom Clancy’s The Division Resurgence, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

83 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    32 (39%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    28 (34%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    18 (22%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    5 (6%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.6
    12 reviews strong consensus
    content variety: 4.6, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    Story missions, side activities, bounties, world events, co-op, PvP, clans, and the Dark Zone create an unusually full mobile package.
  • 4.7
    9 reviews strong consensus
    faithfulness to franchise: 4.7, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    The game closely preserves The Division's cover combat, loot chase, snowy New York setting, and tactical identity despite the mobile format.
  • 4.6
    8 reviews strong consensus
    fun factor: 4.6, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Most players found the game surprisingly enjoyable and compelling, even when mobile clutter, repetition, or technical compromises caused frustration.
  • 4.8
    6 reviews strong consensus
    core gameplay loop: 4.8, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The cycle of completing missions, finding better gear, and improving builds is highly addictive and repeatedly inspires one more activity.
  • 4.6
    8 reviews strong consensus
    combat system: 4.6, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Cover shooting is consistently praised as punchy, responsive, and tactical, preserving the satisfying feel of the mainline games.
  • 4.6
    7 reviews strong consensus
    class balance: 4.6, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Specializations feel distinct, flexible, and complementary, with tanks, medics, gadget users, and damage roles supporting different solo and co-op styles.
  • 4.4
    10 reviews moderate consensus
    open-world design: 4.4, 10 reviews, moderate consensus
    The shared Manhattan map offers plentiful activities and organic player encounters, though one player found parts of it lifeless and dated.
  • 4.4
    8 reviews strong consensus
    loot system: 4.4, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Frequent weapons, gear, mods, and build options make looting deeply satisfying, although one critic found the long-term chase less engaging.
  • 4.5
    7 reviews strong consensus
    battle mode quality: 4.5, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The Dark Zone remains a tense, high-risk highlight, while PvP and extraction activities add worthwhile competitive variety.
  • 4.4
    7 reviews strong consensus
    co-op experience: 4.4, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Shared-world encounters and easy drop-in teaming make cooperation one of the strongest parts of the game, especially for harder activities.
  • 4.1
    11 reviews strong consensus
    controls responsiveness: 4.1, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Touch controls work better than expected and offer strong customization, but controller play is usually smoother while some menu and aiming roughness remains.
  • 4.2
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    frame rate stability: 4.2, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    Supported devices can deliver smooth 45fps or 60fps play, but higher frame rates often require lower resolution and visual settings.
  • 4.4
    5 reviews strong consensus
    onboarding experience: 4.4, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Systems are generally introduced in stages, with prompts, guides, and career objectives helping newcomers understand a dense game.
  • 4.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    upgrade system: 4.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Quick equip and item leveling make upgrades convenient, useful, and capable of keeping favorite gear relevant.
  • 4.1
    7 reviews strong consensus
    handheld play suitability: 4.1, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    It delivers a convincing portable Division experience for short or long sessions, though small screens, older hardware, and connectivity can hold it back.
  • 4.1
    7 reviews low consensus
    platform-specific feature support: 4.1, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Broad controller compatibility is a major strength, but controller menus, aim acceleration, and occasional responsiveness issues need more polish.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    social features: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Shared-world encounters, spontaneous squads, and clans make it easy to cooperate and build longer-term groups.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    soundtrack quality: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Subtle cinematic music supports the atmosphere and can make exploration and major story moments more memorable.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    community features: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Organic alliances and a full clan system give players meaningful ways to cooperate, earn rewards, and stay connected.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    exploration quality: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Roaming patrols, events, safe houses, and side activities frequently pull players away from their planned route in an enjoyable way.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    sound design: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Punchy gunfire and tense environmental audio stand out as some of the game's strongest presentation work.
  • 3.8
    10 reviews low consensus
    graphics quality: 3.8, 10 reviews, low consensus
    Visuals range from exceptional for mobile on strong hardware to muddy, dated, or heavily reduced on weaker devices.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    fast travel convenience: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Direct travel to discovered locations and open-world activities cuts down unnecessary running and suits short sessions.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    horror tension: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Street firefights and Dark Zone encounters create strong white-knuckle tension, especially when valuable loot or survival is at risk.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    immersion: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Story framing, presentation, music, and active combat can make the mobile world feel coherent and absorbing.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    gameplay mechanics: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Core systems are streamlined for mobile without losing their tactical character, and abilities remain quick and satisfying to use.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    tutorial quality: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The opening and class guides introduce systems gradually without becoming overly intrusive.
  • 3.8
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    performance optimization: 3.8, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    Performance can be excellent and smooth on supported hardware, yet device age and settings produce large differences in quality and stability.
  • 3.8
    7 reviews low consensus
    character customization: 3.8, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Loadout and cosmetic options can be extensive, but several players found face and appearance creation much shallower than the build system.
  • 3.9
    5 reviews low consensus
    atmosphere: 3.9, 5 reviews, low consensus
    At its best, snowy streets, weather, and sound preserve The Division's tense atmosphere. Lower settings, flat lighting, and pop-in can noticeably weaken it.
  • 4.0
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    aiming precision: 4.0, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Aim assist, optional first-person aiming, and controller support can make shooting precise, though default controller acceleration may need adjustment.
  • 4.0
    4 reviews low consensus
    pacing: 4.0, 4 reviews, low consensus
    The structure works well for quick mobile sessions or longer grinds, but campaign level gates can badly slow the later story.
  • 3.9
    4 reviews strong consensus
    difficulty balance: 3.9, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Combat rewards cover use and smart positioning, though harder missions can become punishing for solo players or underpowered builds.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    matchmaking quality: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Quick mission matching can make difficult content easier to tackle, though server problems occasionally block access.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    art direction: 5.0, 1 review
    Snow-covered New York convincingly recreates the original game's visual identity and post-crisis mood.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    innovation: 5.0, 1 review
    The franchise's first fully shared open world is seen as a major improvement that should influence future Division games.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    multiplayer design: 5.0, 1 review
    Four-player co-op, shared-world teaming, clans, dedicated PvP, and the Dark Zone form a strong multiplayer package.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    sandbox freedom: 5.0, 1 review
    Once Manhattan opens up, players can freely choose missions, bounties, exploration, or tougher activities instead of following a rigid path.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    visual effects quality: 5.0, 1 review
    Lighting effects, firefights, and explosions can look especially impressive on capable mobile hardware.
  • 3.6
    6 reviews low consensus
    progression system: 3.6, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Meaningful gear growth and flexible item leveling can feel rewarding, but layered menus, currencies, and overlapping upgrades also create confusion.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    polish: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The overall game feels impressively finished for mobile, although controller and interface edge cases expose rough spots.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    animation quality: 4.5, 1 review
    Impactful hit reactions help gunfire feel powerful and responsive.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    battle pass value: 4.5, 1 review
    The Classified Ops Pass is relatively inexpensive and offers an early exotic plus useful materials.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    character development: 4.5, 1 review
    A fully voiced agent feels more like a real character than the silent protagonists in earlier entries.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    cross-play support: 4.5, 1 review
    iOS, Android, and emulated players can play together, provided everyone chooses the same isolated regional server.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    level design: 4.5, 1 review
    Enemy nests, alleys, rooftops, and urban squares provide lively, action-focused combat arenas.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    lore depth: 4.5, 1 review
    The story fills gaps between earlier games and adds unseen events without requiring newcomers to know the full series history.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    movement feel: 4.5, 1 review
    Movement is smooth, fast, and well suited to cover-based combat.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    protagonist appeal: 4.5, 1 review
    The voiced player character has more personality and presence than earlier silent Division agents.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    weapon balance: 4.5, 1 review
    Weapon categories feel distinct, giving rifles, SMGs, shotguns, and snipers clear identities and uses.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    world interactivity: 4.5, 1 review
    Constant patrols and spontaneous fights make travel feel active and can redirect players toward unexpected activities.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    world-building: 4.5, 1 review
    Narrative framing connects missions and side activities into a coherent version of post-outbreak Manhattan.
  • 3.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    live-service support: 3.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Daily tasks, weekly activities, and recurring bounties offer reasons to return, though the long-term handling of FOMO remains uncertain.
  • 3.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    replay value: 3.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Co-op, PvP, build experimentation, and the Dark Zone add strong replay potential, though reduced depth may limit long-term investment for veterans.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    boss design: 4.0, 1 review
    Missions build toward dedicated boss fights that reward tactical play and useful loot.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    originality: 4.0, 1 review
    The story finds a fresh position in the existing timeline without disrupting established lore.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    puzzle design: 4.0, 1 review
    Combination lockboxes provide simple environmental puzzles with worthwhile early rewards.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    value for money: 4.0, 1 review
    Free entry makes the substantial campaign, open world, and multiplayer offering easy to try despite its store.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    skill tree depth: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Specialization talents add useful choices, but the trees are less extensive than those in the PC and console games.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    voice acting: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Voice performances range from solid to merely adequate, supporting the story without consistently standing out.

Cons

Sort
  • 2.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    grind level: 2.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Campaign level gates, daily limits, and slower free progression can force repetitive activities before players can continue the story.
  • 2.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    mission variety: 2.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Repeated enemy waves, rotating maps, and familiar objective structures make missions predictable despite the large overall content count.
  • 2.5
    6 reviews low consensus
    menu usability: 2.5, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Menus are one of the weakest areas, with layered currencies, constant notifications, and awkward controller cursors making management feel tedious.
  • 2.6
    5 reviews strong consensus
    microtransaction impact: 2.6, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Paid currencies, battle passes, cosmetics, and repeated offers remain visible throughout play even when they can mostly be ignored.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    companion AI: 2.0, 1 review
    AI allies are limited and unreliable when difficulty rises, making real teammates much more useful.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    endgame content: 2.0, 1 review
    Endgame build management looks deep but already feels tedious because of layered gear, mods, and overlapping progression systems.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    HUD clarity: 2.0, 1 review
    The small-screen HUD can become crowded during intense fights, making enemies, effects, and controls harder to track.
  • 2.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    server reliability: 2.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Regional separation can divide friends, and server errors have occasionally prevented multiplayer modes from launching.
  • 2.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    crafting system: 2.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Crafting supports build experimentation, but long timers, heavy RNG, and material costs make it less appealing than looting or upgrading.
  • 2.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    mission design: 2.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Combat arenas can be fun and energetic, but some campaign objectives feel trivial or poorly matched to the serious tactical setting.
  • 3.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    learning curve: 3.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The many menus, currencies, builds, and progression layers can feel overwhelming, but gradual introductions keep them manageable for many players.
  • 3.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    accessibility options: 3.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Automation and control assists make touchscreen play easier, but subtitle, colorblind, and audio accessibility settings are notably limited.
  • 3.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    economy and resource balance: 3.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Upgrade materials become valuable and sometimes scarce, encouraging players to spend carefully rather than improve every item.
  • 3.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    quest design: 3.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Some side objectives receive useful narrative context, while others feel mundane or tonally out of place.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    bug frequency: 3.0, 1 review
    One controller sensitivity bug appeared suddenly, though reconnecting the controller fixed it.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    dialogue quality: 3.0, 1 review
    Mission dialogue is serviceable and clear but rarely memorable.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    online stability: 3.0, 1 review
    Reliable Wi-Fi is strongly preferred because difficult missions, progression features, and multiplayer depend heavily on a stable connection.
  • 3.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    writing quality: 3.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The writing can keep routine missions engaging, but the central story sometimes feels underdeveloped and slow.
  • 3.3
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    AI behavior: 3.3, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    Enemy behavior is inconsistent: some foes flank and pressure careless players, while others act predictably or foolishly.
  • 3.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    monetization fairness: 3.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The full game can be enjoyed without paying, but free progress is slower and not every store offer provides good value.
  • 3.3
    7 reviews moderate consensus
    narrative quality: 3.3, 7 reviews, moderate consensus
    Opinions vary sharply: some found the story engaging and well presented, while others called it plain, small-scale, cheesy, or slow.
  • 3.4
    6 reviews low consensus
    environmental detail: 3.4, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Cars, snow, weather, and street clutter can look impressively detailed, but generic buildings, muddy textures, and pop-in appear on reduced settings.
  • 3.4
    6 reviews low consensus
    user interface design: 3.4, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Customizable touch layouts are strong, but dense menus, small-screen crowding, and layered systems often undermine usability.