WACACO Nanopresso Portable Espresso Machine

WACACO Nanopresso Portable Espresso Machine Review

Brand: WACACO
Released: January 18, 2018
Updated: 3 weeks ago
3.9
Consolidated expert score
156
Review insights
25
Scored features
12
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the Wacaco Nanopresso if you want a compact, durable travel espresso maker that can make tasty, espresso-like shots. Skip it if you expect café-level texture, larger drinks, built-in water heating, or a no-fuss cleanup.

Best for

Best for travelers, hikers, campers, road-trippers, and minimalists who value a tiny manual brewer that can make good espresso-like coffee without electricity. It also suits users who want pod convenience or double-shot flexibility through optional adapters and kits.

Not for

Not for espresso purists who expect café-level texture, professional-machine flavor, or a large drink from one brew. It is also a poor fit for ultralight packers, anyone who dislikes handling hot water, or users who want zero-fuss cleanup.

Verdict

The Wacaco Nanopresso earns praise as a genuinely portable, sturdy manual brewer that can make satisfying espresso-like coffee far from a kitchen. Reviewers liked the compact design, forgiving pressurized system, easy basic cleaning, and useful upgrades such as the Barista Kit and NS adapter. The tradeoff is that it is still manual and small: the base basket produces modest output, it needs externally heated water, and several reviewers found dialing in fresh grounds or cleaning multiple little parts fussy. Its best role is travel, camping, hiking, or road use, where near-espresso quality matters more than café-level body, large servings, or effortless workflow.

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

WACACO Picopresso

  • Better: enthusiast appeal The WACACO Picopresso is presented as the more professional, higher-end Wacaco option.
  • More expensive: price after accessories After adding the Barista Kit, the reviewer says the Nanopresso is not much cheaper than the Wacaco Picopresso.
  • Better: espresso quality The reviewer says the Nanopresso is decent, but the Wacaco Picopresso makes a better drink.

compresso

  • Better: espresso quality The reviewer says the Nanopresso offers a better user experience, but compresso wins on espresso quality.

Flair

  • Better: manual home espresso quality The reviewer suggests manual espresso machines such as the Flair are better for true home espresso.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

25 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0 32% 8 features
  • Positive 3.5-4.4 44% 11 features
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4 24% 6 features
  • Negative 1.5-2.4 0% 0 features
  • Very negative below 1.5 0% 0 features

Pros

  • 4.6
    based on 9 reviews
    Design, ergonomics and footprint: 4.6, based on 9 reviews
    Design and ergonomics are a major strength, with reviewers praising the compact, attractive, palm-sized body and good hand feel.
  • 4.6
    based on 4 reviews
    Speed and time-to-cup: 4.6, based on 4 reviews
    Several reviewers described quick brewing once set up, with shots made in under a minute or several shots in minutes, though one reviewer felt the espresso moment ended too quickly.
  • 4.5
    based on 12 reviews
    Portability and travel-friendliness: 4.5, based on 12 reviews
    Portability is the strongest consensus attribute, with every reviewer describing it as suitable for travel, hiking, camping, road trips, or compact packing.
  • 4.5
    based on 9 reviews
    Assembly and Setup: 4.5, based on 9 reviews
    Setup and use are repeatedly described as straightforward, easy, or beginner-friendly, especially for a manual espresso device.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Cup, tray and carafe handling: 4.5, based on 1 review
    One reviewer specifically praised the cup and tank nesting as efficient, space-saving design.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Environmental packaging sustainability: 4.5, based on 1 review
    One reviewer praised the ground-coffee workflow for avoiding pod-related packaging waste.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Popularity: 4.5, based on 1 review
    One reviewer described the Nanopresso as among the most popular manual espresso makers, indicating strong category awareness.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Warranty and Customer support: 4.5, based on 1 review
    One long-term reviewer expressed confidence in the one-year warranty and Wacaco support based on past experience with the company.
  • 4.4
    based on 7 reviews
    Capsules, pods and consumables: 4.4, based on 7 reviews
    Pod and capsule support is viewed positively for travel convenience, consistency, and cleanup, though it is mainly relevant when using the optional adapter.
  • 4.4
    based on 8 reviews
    Accessories: 4.4, based on 8 reviews
    Accessories are a clear strength, especially the Barista Kit, pod adapter, case, and other add-ons that improve capacity, convenience, or travel use.
  • 4.3
    based on 9 reviews
    Build quality and durability: 4.3, based on 9 reviews
    Build quality receives mostly positive marks for sturdy plastic, durability, and solid feel, with one reviewer noting it feels cheaper than the Picopresso.
  • 4.3
    based on 11 reviews
    Overall user experience: 4.3, based on 11 reviews
    Overall experience is mostly positive, with many reviewers recommending or continuing to use it, although one prominent reviewer did not enjoy the workflow.
  • 4.0
    based on 11 reviews
    Espresso and beverage quality: 4.0, based on 11 reviews
    Reviewers generally liked the drink quality for a portable brewer, praising smooth, rich, or surprisingly good shots, while some said the result is closer to strong coffee or lacks professional espresso texture.
  • 4.0
    based on 11 reviews
    Brewing performance and consistency: 4.0, based on 11 reviews
    Brewing performance is strongest after some dialing in: many reviewers got good or consistent results, but several noted practice, grind adjustment, or finicky setup is needed.
  • 3.9
    based on 9 reviews
    Value and Price: 3.9, based on 9 reviews
    Value is generally favorable because the brewer is affordable and useful over time, though accessories and price comparisons make it less of a clear bargain for some reviewers.
  • 3.8
    based on 3 reviews
    Scoop-storage convenience: 3.8, based on 3 reviews
    Storage is generally convenient because parts pack together, but the larger accessory setup can exceed the included pouch.
  • 3.7
    based on 6 reviews
    Pump pressure consistency: 3.7, based on 6 reviews
    Reviewers often found the pump capable of espresso-like pressure and crema, though some questioned the relevance of 18-bar marketing and the feel of pressure control.
  • 3.6
    based on 3 reviews
    Mess-free used-puck disposal: 3.6, based on 3 reviews
    Used-puck cleanup is mixed: basic removal can be reasonably easy, but grounds and cleanup are less fun unless using the pod adapter.
  • 3.5
    based on 10 reviews
    Water system, maintenance and descaling: 3.5, based on 10 reviews
    Cleaning is often described as easy with rinsing, but reviewers also noted hot-water handling, leaks, preheating, descaling, drying, and thermal limitations as practical caveats.

Cons

  • 3.4
    based on 6 reviews
    Grinder, hopper and dosing system: 3.4, based on 6 reviews
    The pressurized system makes grind size more forgiving for some users, but fresh-ground use can still be hard to dial in and light roasts or finer grinds may expose limitations.
  • 3.4
    based on 2 reviews
    Guided tamper convenience: 3.4, based on 2 reviews
    Tamper convenience is mixed: the Barista Kit's dedicated tamper helps control, but the base basket can trap the tamp.
  • 3.3
    based on 2 reviews
    Filter: 3.3, based on 2 reviews
    Filter feedback is mixed: the pressurized system can improve body and forgiveness, but grounds can also get into the cup in some use.
  • 3.2
    based on 7 reviews
    Accuracy of marketing claims: 3.2, based on 7 reviews
    Marketing accuracy is mixed: reviewers agree it can make espresso-like coffee, but several push back on professional-machine comparisons and 18-bar claims.
  • 2.7
    based on 8 reviews
    Capacity: 2.7, based on 8 reviews
    Capacity is the main recurring limitation because the base shot is small; the Barista Kit improves output but adds accessories.
  • 2.6
    based on 5 reviews
    Design flaws: 2.6, based on 5 reviews
    Design flaws center on burns, spillage, many small parts, and fiddly cleaning or storage rather than core brewing failure.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Coffee Machines, this product is above average in Environmental packaging sustainability, Portability and travel-friendliness, Capsules, pods and consumables, below average in Capacity, Guided tamper convenience.

Summary

8 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher 75% 6 features
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower 25% 2 features
Attribute This product Category average Difference
Environmental packaging sustainability 4.5 3.0 +1.5
Capacity 2.7 3.8 -1.2
Portability and travel-friendliness 4.5 3.7 +0.8
Capsules, pods and consumables 4.4 3.7 +0.7
Accessories 4.4 3.7 +0.7
Warranty and Customer support 4.5 3.7 +0.8
Guided tamper convenience 3.4 4.1 -0.8
Cup, tray and carafe handling 4.5 3.7 +0.8

FAQ

Does the Wacaco Nanopresso make real espresso?

Reviewers generally found that it can make espresso-like shots with crema, but several said it does not match the texture, body, or flavor of a professional espresso machine.

Is it good for travel and camping?

Yes. The strongest agreement across reviews is that its small, light body makes it easy to pack for hiking, camping, road trips, hotels, and outdoor breaks.

Do I need to heat the water separately?

Yes. Reviewers repeatedly noted that the Nanopresso pressurizes hot water but does not heat it, so you need a kettle, stove, thermos, or other hot-water source.

Is the base capacity enough?

It depends. Reviewers often liked the quality from the small basket, but several said the single-shot output is modest and recommended the Barista Kit for larger or back-to-back shots.

Are pods worth using with it?

Several reviewers liked the NS adapter because pods simplify travel use and cleanup. Others preferred fresh grounds for flavor, so the best choice depends on convenience versus control.

Is it easy to clean?

Most reviewers said basic rinsing is easy, but some complained about small parts, wet grounds, hot water left in the chamber, or the need for deeper cleaning after repeated use.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Consider This Instead

Overall Top Coffee Machines Alternatives

#1 YETI Pour Over Coffee Maker
4.5

Choose the YETI Pour Over if you want a tough, travel-ready dripper that makes good coffee with standard V60 filters. Skip it if you need the lightest, cheapest setup or...

Pros: Assembly and Setup, Build quality and durability

Cons: Design flaws, Accessories

#2 Espro P7 French Press
4.3

Choose the Espro P7 if you want rich, smooth French-press coffee with less grit and strong heat retention. Skip it if the premium price, hand-cleaning, hot exterior, or occasional chaff...

Pros: Speed and time-to-cup, Espresso and beverage quality

Cons: Design flaws

#3 OXO Brew 8 Cup Coffee Maker
4.3

Choose the OXO Brew 8-Cup if you want fast, consistent drip coffee in small or full batches. Skip it if you need programming, app controls, a larger pot, or the...

Pros: Brewing performance and consistency, Build quality and durability

Cons: Design flaws, Capsules

#4 Technivorm Moccamaster KBT Coffee Brewer
4.2

Choose the Moccamaster KBT for fast, excellent drip coffee, durable build, and a thermal carafe that keeps coffee hot. Skip it if you need programmability, a compact footprint, or a...

Pros: Heating-element power, Espresso and beverage quality

Cons: Design flaws, Automation and sensors