Yale August Smart Lock

Yale August Smart Lock Feature Scores

Explore all 30 feature scores for Yale August Smart Lock, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

30 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    11 (37%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    14 (47%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    3 (10%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    2 (7%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.7
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Existing hardware reuse: 4.7, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Keeping the outside hardware and existing deadbolt was repeatedly praised, especially for renters, maintenance access, and preserving exterior appearance.
  • 4.4
    8 reviews low consensus
    Installation and Setup: 4.4, 8 reviews, low consensus
    Most reviewers found setup easy, quick, and well guided by the app, with one strong dissent reporting freezes, verification issues, and calibration trouble.
  • 4.8
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Notifications: 4.8, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Notifications were a clear strength, with reviewers praising flexible smart alerts, quick push alerts, and better door-status awareness.
  • 4.4
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    Auto-lock: 4.4, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    Auto-lock was one of the strongest features, praised for flexibility and peace of mind, though one reviewer disabled it because it could lock them out.
  • 4.5
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Door compatibility (deadbolt fit): 4.5, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers valued the retrofit deadbolt fit for renters and existing-door setups, though one installation was complicated by tight door trim.
  • 4.3
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    Lock/unlock speed: 4.3, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    App/manual locking was often described as instant, smooth, or quick, but one reviewer found physical keys faster than app, Siri, or watch workflows.
  • App
    4.1
    7 reviews low consensus
    App: 4.1, 7 reviews, low consensus
    The app was widely praised as intuitive, responsive, and feature-rich, though one reviewer had severe app freezing during setup.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Remote access: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Remote access was praised as convenient for controlling the lock from elsewhere in the house or anywhere with a phone connection.
  • 4.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Hub requirement: 4.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers liked that built-in Wi-Fi removes the need for an add-on bridge or Connect module.
  • 3.9
    7 reviews low consensus
    Smart-home integration (Alexa, Google, Siri, HomeKit, Matter, Thread): 3.9, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Smart-home integration was broad and often praised, but Alexa/Google setup hitches, HomeKit offline issues, and one severe HomeKit complaint made reliability mixed.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Build quality and durability: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Build quality drew praise where discussed, with reviewers calling out high-quality materials and a solidly built feel.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Guest Codes and Access: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Guest access was easy and useful, with virtual keys, sharing by text, and scheduled codes highlighted positively.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    User access management: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    User access management was praised for free virtual keys and scheduled access codes.
  • 3.6
    7 reviews low consensus
    Value and Price: 3.6, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Value was mixed: several reviewers called it pricey but worthwhile, while others weighed the high price against batteries, keypad add-ons, and reliability frustrations.
  • 3.7
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    Key override reliability: 3.7, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    The retained physical key was useful as a fallback and for renters, but one long-term tester still ended up carrying keys because smart unlocking was not fast enough.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Locking motor: 5.0, 1 review
    The motor was praised for quiet operation in PCMag testing.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Physical attack resistance: 5.0, 1 review
    Physical security received strong praise from TechGearLab, which highlighted the ANSI Grade 1 strength rating and intruder resistance.
  • 3.6
    6 reviews low consensus
    Wi-Fi: 3.6, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Built-in Wi-Fi was praised for freshness, range, and eliminating a bridge, but reviewers tied it to battery drain and one reported mesh/Wi-Fi frustration.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Warranty and support: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Support was viewed positively through a resolved battery-warning bug and confidence that August/Assa Abloy support would keep software maintained.
  • 3.6
    4 reviews low consensus
    Door-sense: 3.6, 4 reviews, low consensus
    DoorSense was praised when it worked and was considered worth installing, but one reviewer reported repeated calibration failures and incorrect open/closed status.
  • 3.6
    4 reviews low consensus
    Voice control: 3.6, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Voice control worked quickly in one test and was supported broadly, but other reviewers reported password recognition issues or slow/failing Siri and Google Assistant use.
  • 3.5
    6 reviews low consensus
    Geofencing: 3.5, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Geofencing and auto-unlock were the most mixed smart feature: some reviewers found it handy or excellent, while others found it slow, inconsistent, or stopped working.
  • 3.7
    3 reviews low consensus
    Locking reliability: 3.7, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Locking reliability was excellent in most formal testing and one six-month review, but one reviewer reported serious state confusion and unreliable locking status.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Security features (encryption): 4.5, 1 review
    Security software features were reassuring in the CNET review, especially authentication and encryption protections around the app and account.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Bluetooth: 4.0, 1 review
    Bluetooth-range control was described as responsive in one review, with the lock reacting nearly immediately when pressed.

Cons

Sort
  • 2.3
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Battery: 2.3, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Battery life was the most consistent weakness, with repeated concern about CR123 batteries, shorter lifespan, replacement cost, and one six-to-eight-week real-world result.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    Fingerprint: 2.0, 1 review
    Fingerprint entry was treated as a missing keyless feature rather than a strength of this lock.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    Touchscreen: 2.5, 1 review
    The lack of a built-in outside touchpad/touchscreen was a drawback for the reviewer who preferred that style of lock.
  • 2.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Access logs: 2.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The activity log was useful in one review, but another reviewer reported a serious failure where an unlock event was not logged.
  • 3.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Keypad: 3.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The optional keypad works and can be useful, but reviewers noted it is not included and may disappoint buyers who want a built-in keypad experience.