Edge‑Following Accuracy (Robot)

Edge‑Following Accuracy (Robot)

Best

#1
Edge tracking is repeatedly described as very tight, with the extending mop pad keeping minimal distance from walls for more complete edge coverage.
#2
Edge-following is a standout: multiple reviews cite edge reach within roughly 15 mm and strong wall-tracking, especially when paired with the extending brush and mop pad.
#3
Edge-following is generally tight, and the extendable mop improves baseboard and furniture-leg edge mopping.
#4
Edge-following behavior is often described as precise, with the roller/brush extending to stay close to walls and work around furniture legs. This contributes to consistently strong edge and near-edge coverage in multiple reviews.
#5
Edge-following behavior is generally praised for getting close to baseboards/edges, helped by the extendable brush and the mop extension mechanism.
#6
Edge-following accuracy is generally strong—tests describe the robot hugging walls closely and using repeated back-and-forth edge motions that improve perimeter pickup.
#7
Edge-following and path control are methodical, often hugging room contours and furniture closely. A few users note corner misses can happen depending on room geometry and settings.
#8
Edge-following behavior is typically accurate and consistent, supporting good wall-hugging coverage and reliable baseboard passes in most reports.
#9
Edge-following is strong, with the robot staying close to walls and the mop pad reaching into baseboard lines. Reviewers often show it maintaining contact better than typical robot mops.
#10
Edge-following behavior is generally accurate and consistent for wall lines, though performance still depends on clutter and the robot’s reliance on bump-based interactions for close passes.
#11
Edge-following is generally accurate and methodical when mapping is stable, enabling consistent perimeter passes.
#12
Edge-following and perimeter vacuuming are typically solid and can be improved with edge-hugging settings, but true edge mopping coverage still lags models with extending mop arms or side mops.
#13
Generally good edge following, but some zone-clean runs don’t fully hug walls or miss narrow strips near the dock.
#14
Edge-following accuracy is generally strong during vacuuming paths (tight wall tracking), but mopping edge reach varies because the pads don’t extend outward.
#15
Edge-following is solid along straight walls, but multiple reviews mention occasional path offsets or wide turns that reduce precision in tight areas.
#16
Pathing is typically orderly and systematic, but some note occasional bumps and that edge-following can leave a small missed band near walls.
#17
Edge-following accuracy is generally decent with orderly perimeter passes, but several owners report it keeps extra distance from legs/frames or avoids under-table zones, reducing true edge contact in busy rooms.
#18
Edge-following is adequate but not precise: it can run close enough to edges to clear them over time, yet its turning behavior can kick debris back toward edges before later passes pick it up.
#19
Obstacle avoidance can make the robot play it safe near walls and furniture, which helps prevent bumps but can leave a wider dirty strip than expected.