If you want better Mop lifting system
Choose Roomba Combo j7+ Robot Vacuum & Mop. It scores 4.8 vs 1.0 for Mop lifting system, with a 3.8 overall score.
Roomba i5+ Combo Robot Vacuum and Mop Review
Bottom Line
Choose the Roomba Combo i5+ for easy self-emptying and carpet-first cleaning; Skip if you expect dependable mopping or advanced obstacle avoidance.
Best for
Busy households with mostly carpet (and/or pets) that want hands-off self-emptying and quick room-by-room cleans through the app or voice assistants.
Not for
Hard-floor-heavy homes counting on true mopping, or anyone who needs reliable obstacle avoidance and granular no-go/keep-out zones.
Verdict
Roomba Combo i5+ is at its best as a self-emptying, carpet-leaning robot for people who want simple automation and iRobot’s dual-rubber-roller cleaning. Room-based mapping and voice control make quick touch-ups easy, and the base can store weeks of debris. The tradeoff is that the mopping system is a light-maintenance wipe with a small tank and few controls, and several reviewers noted finicky wet-bin behavior. Navigation and obstacle handling are also less advanced than camera or LiDAR bots, so you’ll do more pre-tidying and may see longer, bumpier runs.
Feature Scorecards
Pros
-
Unboxing experiences are positive, with well-organized packaging and clear documentation noted.
-
The clean base is noted to have built-in cable-routing channels to help it sit flush to a wall and keep cords tidy.
-
Most reviews describe straightforward unboxing and fast app pairing, with minimal friction to get cleaning.
-
Hard-floor tests and owner reports suggest strong pickup of fine debris like flour and dust, with vacuuming doing more of the work than the mop.
-
Reviews commonly report good intake of crumbs and larger debris on hard floors, especially in vacuum-only mode.
-
Several reviewers like the two-tone textures and fabric-style top accents, and the clean base design is generally seen as modern and unobtrusive.
-
Kits commonly include interchangeable bins, a microfiber mop pad, and spare consumables like extra bags or filters depending on the package.
-
Value looks strong when discounted, but at typical pricing the tradeoffs in mopping reliability and navigation features make some competitors more compelling.
-
Day-to-day usability is a recurring pro thanks to self-emptying, scheduling, and simple controls, but the mop workflow (bin swap, pad care) adds friction.
-
The dual rubber rollers reduce performance loss from hair tangles, but hair still collects at roller ends and on the side brush and needs periodic clearing.
-
Users generally report good day-to-day pickup of light pet hair on hard floors, especially when run frequently.
-
Bagged self-emptying adds recurring costs, but bags are often described as lasting weeks (up to around 60 days) so annual cost can be modest; brushes and filters may add extra upkeep.
-
Dual rubber rollers and self-emptying reduce hands-on pet-hair cleanup, but the i5+ lacks camera-based pet-waste avoidance, so homes with pets still need pre-tidying.
-
At roughly 3.6 inches tall, it is average for modern robots and fits under many, but not all, low-clearance furniture pieces.
-
Average robot height enables reasonable under-furniture reach for routine dusting, though it will not match ultra-low models.
-
The i5+ uses a self-emptying bagged base plus interchangeable bins for vacuum-only vs vacuum-and-mop. Convenience is high, but wet-bin misdetection can contaminate the bag in worst cases.
-
Results vary by reviewer: a controlled comparison measured below-average pickup on carpet, while other reviewers describe excellent carpet cleaning speed and finish.
-
One reviewer highlights iRobot’s focus on ongoing software updates, though the i5+ platform remains feature-limited compared with higher-end Roombas.
-
Measured airflow is described as modest in one review, but iRobot’s dual-rubber-roller system is repeatedly credited with strong real-world pickup on carpet and hard floors.
-
Mentioned as an available safety feature, though the included reviews do not deeply test it in real households.
-
Setup and pairing are widely described as easy and the app is simple to use, but advanced controls are limited (e.g., fewer zone/barrier options) and at least one review reported buggy map behavior.
Cons
-
The base is a major convenience and often works well, but multiple reviews flag failure modes such as poor dense-debris clearing and wet-bin misdetection that can soak the bag/dock.
-
Scheduling, room cleaning, and voice control are highlights, but the i5+ lacks advanced automation found on higher-end models (such as robust keep-out zones or vision-based avoidance) and some users report map/app quirks.
-
It supports room-based cleaning after learning a map, but efficiency can be weaker than LiDAR bots; one test showed notably longer runs and less confident coverage.
-
With the mop bin installed, the robot cannot intelligently avoid rugs, so rug-heavy homes may need manual blocking. As a vacuum, it can traverse typical rugs using its large wheels.
-
Recharge-and-resume is repeatedly referenced, but reported runtimes vary; efficiency can lag behind faster LiDAR robots on whole-home runs.
-
Cleaning noise is described as typical, but the robot can be loud when bumping into objects and the base’s emptying cycle is often called a jet-engine-like burst.
-
Reported tank sizes are small-to-middling for a combo robot, suitable for light maintenance passes rather than large-area wet cleaning.
-
Auto-emptying is frequently described as very loud, but usually only for a short burst per empty cycle.
-
Expect regular upkeep: side-brush hair removal, periodic filter changes, mop-pad washing, and occasional brush replacement; some owners report quicker side-brush wear.
-
Consistently framed as a light, damp-wipe system for day-to-day maintenance. It is not a deep scrubber, and at least one review reports the wet mode failing due to bin detection issues.
-
Durability feedback is mixed: some users report broken side brushes within weeks, while others note solid day-to-day operation aside from cosmetic scuffs from bumping.
-
In a sub-$400 comparison, the i5+ scored poorly on carpet pickup and especially on dense-debris auto-emptying versus LiDAR competitors, though other reviewers still liked its carpet results in daily use.
-
Edge work is more bump-driven than precision-guided; some reviewers note clumsy wall interactions and potential scuffs compared with LiDAR or camera bots.
-
The liquid system is basic with limited control (often described as gravity-fed) and no auto-refill; wet-bin auto-detection can be finicky, with some reports of messy failures.
-
Hair pickup on carpet is inconsistent: one test found it left the most long hair behind, while other reviewers emphasize strong pet-hair handling overall.
-
Obstacle avoidance is limited without a front camera: tests show poor cord and pet-waste avoidance, though cliff sensors help prevent falls on stairs.
-
Dry debris generally stays contained in the bagged base, but a reported wet-bin emptying mishap led to lingering odor for one owner.
-
Self-emptying is convenient, but dense debris can be left behind in the robot bin in some tests, and wet-bin emptying mistakes can create mess and odor.
-
The i5+ does not have an auto-lifting mop; it relies on swapping in a mop bin, which limits carpet safety and automation.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Robotic Vacuums, this product is below average in Mop lifting system, Emptying and Mess Control, Odor control.
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mop lifting system | 1.0 | 4.1 | -3.1 |
| Emptying and Mess Control | 1.4 | 4.0 | -2.7 |
| Odor control | 1.5 | 4.0 | -2.5 |
| Hair Pickup — Carpets | 1.8 | 4.1 | -2.3 |
| Obstacle Avoidance (Robot) | 1.8 | 3.7 | -1.9 |
| Solution / Liquid system | 1.9 | 3.8 | -1.9 |
| Comparative performance | 2.2 | 4.1 | -1.9 |
| Build quality and durability | 2.2 | 4.1 | -1.9 |
FAQ
Does it clean carpet well?
Opinions are split: some reviewers reported very fast, thorough carpet cleaning with visible vacuum lines, while one budget-bot comparison test placed its carpet pickup near the bottom of the group. If carpet is your priority, expect solid results but not class-leading performance for the price.
Is the mopping function a real replacement for mopping?
No. Across reviews it behaves more like a damp maintenance wipe for dust, crumbs, and small spills. It struggles with sticky or ground-in messes, and at least one reviewer reported the wet-bin mode was unreliable.
Will it avoid cords, clutter, or pet waste?
Not reliably. Multiple reviews note the i5+ lacks camera-based obstacle avoidance and can plow into cords or problematic items, so you will need to pre-tidy and block off risky areas before runs.
How loud is it in daily use?
During regular cleaning it is in the typical robot-vac range, but the auto-empty cycle is often described as very loud for a short burst (around 10 seconds).
How often do you deal with bags, filters, and brush maintenance?
The self-empty bag is commonly described as lasting up to about 60 days depending on debris and pets, but you will still need to clean hair from the side brush and periodically replace filters and brushes. Some owners reported faster-than-expected side-brush wear.
What are these scores based on?
They are derived from the full text of the supplied review transcripts for this product.
Consider This Instead
If you want better Odor control
Choose Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni Robot Vacuum and Mop. It scores 4.8 vs 1.5 for Odor control, with a 4.3 overall score.
If you want better Emptying and Mess Control
Choose Roborock Qrevo MaxV Robot Vacuum and Mop. It scores 4.6 vs 1.4 for Emptying and Mess Control, with a 4.2 overall score.
If you want better Obstacle Avoidance (Robot)
Choose Mova Mobius 60. It scores 4.8 vs 1.8 for Obstacle Avoidance (Robot), with a 4.2 overall score.
Overall Top Robotic Vacuums Alternatives
Choose the Roborock Qrevo Curv for a low-touch vacuum+mop that cleans edges/corners well and clears thresholds better than most. Skip if you have lots of floor-level cables or you don’t...
Pros: Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup, Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake
Cons: None
Choose Saros 10 if you want a slim, premium robot that vacuums hard, climbs thresholds, and runs a truly hands-off dock. Skip it if your top priority is aggressive stain...
Pros: Pet-Ready Features, Low-profile design
Cons: Streaking / Residue, Stuck resistance
Best for low-maintenance hard-floor mopping, hair control, and premium automation. Skip it if deep carpet agitation, quiet max-suction runs, or best-value pricing matter most.
Pros: Clogging and debris prevention, Floor shine after cleaning
Cons: Edge‑Following Accuracy (Robot), Noise level
Choose the Dreame X50 Ultra for powerful all‑around cleaning with standout step/threshold climbing and low‑tangle brushes; Skip it if you need consistently perfect edge/corner results or the longest runtimes, as...
Pros: Adaptive chassis lift, Innovation compared to competitors
Cons: Support &, Reliability