Roomba i5+ Combo Robot Vacuum and Mop

Roomba i5+ Combo Robot Vacuum and Mop Review

Brand: Roomba
Released: August 2023
Updated: 2 weeks ago
3.3
Consolidated expert score
119
Review insights
54
Scored features
7
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the Roomba i5+ for self-emptying convenience, strong carpet cleaning, and easy app setup. Skip it if mopping, obstacle avoidance, reliable wet-bin detection, or no-go-zone control matters more than routine vacuum automation.

Best for

Best for households that want routine vacuum automation, self-emptying convenience, easy app setup, and mostly carpet or hard-floor maintenance. It especially fits users who value reduced mental load over deep mopping.

Not for

Not for people expecting advanced obstacle avoidance, reliable no-go zones, automated mop lifting, or deep wet cleaning. It is also a poor fit if rugs and carpets cannot be blocked off during mopping.

Verdict

The Roomba i5+ Combo lands as a convenience-first robot with a sharp split between vacuuming and mopping. Reviewers praised the self-empty base, room-by-room control, easy app pairing, carpet cleaning, and hair-friendly rubber rollers, and some found the sale pricing compelling. The tradeoff is that its smart navigation is basic beside J-series or lidar competitors, with weak obstacle avoidance and no no-go zones in several accounts. Mopping is the bigger compromise: reviewers described it as light maintenance, damp-paper-towel level cleaning, or in one case a failed wet-bin experience that soaked the dock bag. Overall, the evidence supports it as a useful routine vacuum, not a polished all-floor cleaning system.

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

j7

  • Better: navigation system The j7 is grouped with J-series models that have advanced camera-based navigation not found on the i5+.
  • Similar: motor and suction platform The reviewer says the i5 uses the same motor as the j7, suggesting comparable core suction hardware.

J5

  • Better: no-mop zones The J5 can use Precision Vision navigation for no-mop zones, a mapping advantage over the i5+.
  • Better: navigation system The J5 is grouped with higher J-series robots that use a more advanced navigation system than the i5+.

combo j7 plus

  • Better: mop lifting system The combo j7 plus uses the retracting mop design while the i5+ relies on interchangeable bins.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

54 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0 22% 12 features
  • Positive 3.5-4.4 33% 18 features
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4 22% 12 features
  • Negative 1.5-2.4 17% 9 features
  • Very negative below 1.5 6% 3 features

Pros

  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    Assembly and Setup: 5.0, based on 1 review
    Setup was strongly praised in one review for being easy to unbox, connect, and pair with the app.
  • 4.8
    based on 2 reviews
    Overall cleaning convenience: 4.8, based on 2 reviews
    Cleaning convenience was a clear strength when reviewers emphasized not thinking about vacuuming and praised the self-empty base.
  • 4.5
    based on 3 reviews
    Suction and Airflow: 4.5, based on 3 reviews
    Reviewers praised the iRobot cleaning system and reported strong deep-cleaning or suction results, including easy handling of fine dust and larger debris.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Aesthetic design and finish: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    Design impressions were positive, with reviewers liking the textured finish, clean-looking top, and overall appearance after use.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Ease of use: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    Ease of use was strong in the positive reviews, especially for room-by-room cleaning and app pairing.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Large debris handling: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    Large debris handling was positive in reviews that said suction or the cleaning system could pick up larger objects and debris.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Pet-Ready Features: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    Pet-readiness was positive where reviewers discussed pet hair and hair-heavy households, especially on hard floors and with rubber rollers.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Value-for-money: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    Value-for-money was strong in sale-price and affordability-focused reviews, especially when the self-emptying feature was considered.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Versatility: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    Versatility was positive when reviewers valued the combination of smart mapping, self-emptying, and vacuum-mop use in one robot.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Cord management: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Cord management was positive because the base includes channels that route the cord neatly.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Filtration / Dust Containment: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Dust containment was positive in the auto-empty particle test because the non-Switchbot vacuums, including the i5+ group, showed no particle increase.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Packaging quality: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Packaging was rated positively because the retail box and packaging were described as looking great.
  • 4.3
    based on 3 reviews
    Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake: 4.3, based on 3 reviews
    Large hard-floor debris pickup was generally positive, including 97.2% test pickup and praise for handling fine-to-large debris.
  • 4.0
    based on 3 reviews
    Price and Value: 4.0, based on 3 reviews
    Price sentiment was generally favorable at sale or lower pricing, though one reviewer warned it remained a tempered-expectations purchase.
  • 4.0
    based on 2 reviews
    Adaptive chassis lift: 4.0, based on 2 reviews
    Adaptive floor contact and chassis behavior scored well because reviewers described uneven-floor adjustment and wheels that climb carpet.
  • 4.0
    based on 2 reviews
    Bin and Bag: 4.0, based on 2 reviews
    Bag and bin feedback was positive because the self-emptying setup reduced bin handling and the bag design was described as sealed.
  • 4.0
    based on 2 reviews
    Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance: 4.0, based on 2 reviews
    Tangle resistance was mixed-to-positive: one reviewer noted periodic hair clearing, while another called the anti-tangling system among the best.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Clogging and debris prevention: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Clog handling received a positive maintenance note because the base could be opened for self-empty clog access.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Hair Pickup — Hard Floors: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Hard-floor hair pickup was positive in one review that specifically praised light pet-hair handling on hardwood floors.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Low-profile design: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Low-profile design was positive because the robot was said to reach under many pieces of furniture.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Ongoing ownership costs (bags, filters, batteries): 4.0, based on 1 review
    Disposable bag ownership costs and upkeep were framed positively because bags were described as cleaner to use and change.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Software-update support / feature longevity: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Software-update support received a positive forward-looking judgment because the reviewer framed updates as a way the product can improve automatically.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Storage footprint and upright-stand stability: 4.0, based on 1 review
    The base footprint earned a positive note because the cord routing helped it sit flush against a wall.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Under-Furniture Pickup: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Under-furniture pickup was positive where the reviewer said the robot had enough reach to get under many furniture pieces.
  • 3.8
    based on 3 reviews
    Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup: 3.8, based on 3 reviews
    Carpet pickup was highly inconsistent: one comparison test put it near the bottom, while other reviewers praised carpet cleaning and deep-cleaning results.
  • 3.8
    based on 4 reviews
    Emptying and Mess Control: 3.8, based on 4 reviews
    Emptying and mess control ranged from poor dense-debris clearing in one test to strong self-emptying convenience in everyday use.
  • 3.6
    based on 4 reviews
    Controls and UI: 3.6, based on 4 reviews
    Controls and UI were sharply mixed: several reviewers found the app easy and enjoyable, but one found the Roomba app buggy and map-forgetting.
  • 3.6
    based on 4 reviews
    Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup: 3.6, based on 4 reviews
    Hard-floor fine-dust pickup was mixed: some reviews reported strong dust pickup, while one hard-floor experience stayed dirty after cleaning.
  • 3.6
    based on 5 reviews
    Overall opinion: 3.6, based on 5 reviews
    Overall opinion was mixed: reviewers ranged from enthusiastic convert to hesitant or disappointed, with the main split around mopping and smart-feature limits.
  • 3.5
    based on 1 review
    Battery and Charging: 3.5, based on 1 review
    Battery and charging were acceptable in one review because recharge-and-resume reduced the practical impact of runtime limits.

Cons

  • 3.3
    based on 4 reviews
    Docking and Auto-Empty Reliability (Robot): 3.3, based on 4 reviews
    Auto-empty reliability was mixed: one comparison found debris left behind, while other reviews praised the base as a time saver; one wet-bin case created a serious failure.
  • 3.2
    based on 3 reviews
    Runtime: 3.2, based on 3 reviews
    Runtime was mixed: a comparison run used a lot of battery, but other reviewers found recharge behavior or short-use battery status acceptable.
  • 3.0
    based on 7 reviews
    AI, Smart, App and Automation: 3.0, based on 7 reviews
    Smart features were polarizing: reviewers liked routines, mapping, and app use, but also criticized missing AI detection, no-go zones, and wet-bin detection failures.
  • 3.0
    based on 2 reviews
    Floorhead design: 3.0, based on 2 reviews
    Floorhead feedback was split between a brush failure complaint and praise for rubber rollers that pick up debris well.
  • 3.0
    based on 2 reviews
    Maintenance requirements: 3.0, based on 2 reviews
    Maintenance was mixed: one reviewer warned about regular brush replacement, while another praised easy roller cleaning.
  • 3.0
    based on 1 review
    Tool-change simplicity: 3.0, based on 1 review
    Tool swapping was only lightly positive-to-mixed because the mop attachment could be a little difficult to install when visibility was poor.
  • 2.8
    based on 2 reviews
    Area Rug Handling: 2.8, based on 2 reviews
    Area-rug handling was split: wheels were praised for climbing carpet, but mopping was cautioned for homes with rugs or carpets.
  • 2.8
    based on 2 reviews
    Hair Pickup — Carpets: 2.8, based on 2 reviews
    Carpet hair pickup was split: one comparison found it left the most hair, while another praised the dual rubber rollers for hair-heavy homes.
  • 2.8
    based on 2 reviews
    Noise level: 2.8, based on 2 reviews
    Noise feedback was mixed: one reviewer called impact noise jarring, while another measured it as roughly typical for robot vacuums.
  • 2.6
    based on 5 reviews
    Map and Path Efficiency (Robot Vacuums): 2.6, based on 5 reviews
    Mapping and path efficiency were highly mixed, from useful room learning to basic, limited, or worse path planning with no no-go zones.
  • 2.5
    based on 1 review
    Dock noise: 2.5, based on 1 review
    Dock noise was a caveat because the self-emptying cycle was described as jet-engine loud, even if brief and infrequent.
  • 2.5
    based on 1 review
    Water tank: 2.5, based on 1 review
    The water tank was judged limited in one review because the reviewer described the tank system as not huge.
  • 2.3
    based on 2 reviews
    Overall durability/longevity: 2.3, based on 2 reviews
    Durability was split: one reviewer had brushes fail quickly, while another said the robot still functioned fine after cosmetic impacts.
  • 2.2
    based on 5 reviews
    Mopping performance: 2.2, based on 5 reviews
    Mopping was the main weak spot: reviewers called it basic, carpet-risky, or failed in one case, though one saw it as useful light maintenance.
  • 2.2
    based on 3 reviews
    Build quality and durability: 2.2, based on 3 reviews
    Build quality was mixed-to-negative: reviewers noted no hardware upgrade and one brush failure, while another felt the bumper could handle impacts.
  • 2.0
    based on 3 reviews
    Comparative performance: 2.0, based on 3 reviews
    Comparative performance was mostly unfavorable, with the i5+ described as worse in a budget roundup, very similar to the I3, or behind Narwal overall.
  • 2.0
    based on 2 reviews
    Innovation compared to competitors: 2.0, based on 2 reviews
    Innovation scored low because reviewers said it was not built around the best tech and felt years behind competitors.
  • 2.0
    based on 1 review
    Dried-On Stain Removal: 2.0, based on 1 review
    Dried-on or sticky mess performance was weak because the mop was not expected to handle sticky messes or ground-in stains.
  • 2.0
    based on 1 review
    Maneuverability and Handling: 2.0, based on 1 review
    Maneuverability was weak in the comparison review because the robot was described as clumsily bumping around while navigating.
  • 1.7
    based on 3 reviews
    Solution / Liquid system: 1.7, based on 3 reviews
    The liquid system was a repeated weakness due to leaking risk, wet-bin failure, and lack of water-flow controls.
  • 1.5
    based on 1 review
    Support and Reliability: 1.5, based on 1 review
    Reliability scored poorly in the ZDNET review because the wet-cleaning function failed and undermined the recommendation.
  • 1.3
    based on 2 reviews
    Mop lifting system: 1.3, based on 2 reviews
    Mop lifting scored poorly because reviewers described missing mop-lift automation and no reliable carpet awareness during mopping.
  • 1.3
    based on 2 reviews
    Obstacle Avoidance (Robot): 1.3, based on 2 reviews
    Obstacle avoidance was a consistent weakness because budget models were described as plowing through objects and the i5+ lacks camera-based avoidance.
  • 1.0
    based on 1 review
    Odor control: 1.0, based on 1 review
    Odor control was poor in one wet-bin failure case where the collection bag and second floor were affected by odor.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Robotic Vacuums, this product is below average in Odor control, Mop lifting system, Obstacle Avoidance (Robot).

Summary

8 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher 0% 0 features
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower 100% 8 features
Attribute This product Category average Difference
Odor control 1.0 3.9 -2.9
Mop lifting system 1.3 3.9 -2.7
Obstacle Avoidance (Robot) 1.3 3.6 -2.4
Innovation compared to competitors 2.0 4.3 -2.3
Maneuverability and Handling 2.0 4.1 -2.1
Comparative performance 2.0 4.0 -2.0
Build quality and durability 2.2 4.1 -1.9
Support and Reliability 1.5 3.4 -1.9

FAQ

Is the Roomba i5+ good on carpet?

The evidence is mixed but leans positive outside the budget roundup. One reviewer said it cleaned carpet quickly and to perfection, while a comparison test put its carpet pickup near the bottom.

Does the self-emptying base work well?

Everyday convenience reviews were strong, with one reviewer saying they had not touched the dustbin for weeks. A comparison test, however, found debris left in the bin, and one wet-bin failure caused a dock-bag mess.

Can it replace regular mopping?

No. Reviewers described the mop as light maintenance, not deep cleaning, and one reviewer could not use wet cleaning because bin detection failed.

Does it avoid obstacles and pet messes?

Not well in the reviewed evidence. Reviewers repeatedly noted that the i5+ lacks the camera-based obstacle avoidance found on higher J-series models.

Is the app easy to use?

Some reviewers found pairing and app controls very easy, and one liked room-by-room cleaning. Another found the Roomba app limited, buggy, and prone to forgetting the map.

Is it a good choice for pet hair?

It can be good for pet and human hair because reviewers praised the rubber rollers and pet-hair hard-floor pickup. In one carpet hair test, though, the Roomba left the most hair behind.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Consider This Instead

If you want better Obstacle Avoidance (Robot)

Choose Mova Mobius 60. It scores 4.9 vs 1.3 for Obstacle Avoidance (Robot), with a 4.1 overall score.

Compare

Overall Top Robotic Vacuums Alternatives

#1 Roborock Qrevo Curv Vacuum and Mop
4.5

Choose the Roborock Qrevo Curv if you want premium hands-off vacuuming and mopping with strong pet-hair results. Skip it if the high price, missing solution tank, or imperfect cable avoidance...

Pros: Overall cleaning convenience, Runtime

Cons: Solution / Liquid system, Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors)

#2 Mova V50 Ultra Complete
4.4

Best for powerful vacuuming, excellent mopping, pet-focused automation, and strong accessory value. Skip it if you need flawless obstacle avoidance, simple plug-and-play software, or the smallest possible dock.

Pros: Accessories and Tools, Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup

Cons: Airflow blowback, Scratch resistance

#3 Eureka J15 Ultra Self Emptying Robot Vacuum
4.3

Choose the Eureka J15 Ultra for hands-free vacuuming/mopping, strong suction, edge coverage, and value. Skip it if you need the most advanced obstacle avoidance, compact dock, detergent dispensing, or quieter...

Pros: Kid-friendliness, Reverse cleaning performance

Cons: Solution / Liquid system, Low-profile design

#4 Roborock Saros 10R Robot Vacuum and Mop
4.3

Choose the Saros 10R for low-profile reach, strong mopping, hair resistance, and a hands-off dock. Skip it if low-pile carpet pickup, cord avoidance, faster cleaning, or a lower price matter...

Pros: Tool-change simplicity, Battery and Charging

Cons: Cord management, Support and Reliability