Compare Kenmore Intuition Bagged Upright Vacuum vs Dyson Ball Animal 2 Upright Vacuum Cleaner

Accessories vary by model/package: multiple reviews highlight useful upholstery/pet tools and, in some versions, turbo tools. Value is higher when the kit includes more tools and extra bags, but quality/fit of tools is debated in at least one review.

Included tools (combination/crevice, stair, turbine/pet tools, and variant-specific extras) are generally seen as useful, though at least one review finds the turbine tool underpowered.

Design/finish gets some positive mentions (e.g., sleek styling, chrome/rose-gold accents on certain versions). At least one reviewer considers it more utilitarian/old-school or bulky in practice.

Area rug handling can be challenging: several reviewers note the vacuum may stick, pull up mats, or feel overly aggressive on certain rugs due to strong suction and head design.

Assembly is typically described as quick and easy, with straightforward snap-in steps and minimal setup time reported by at least one hands-on review.

Assembly is consistently described as straightforward with a few click-in parts and minimal setup time.

A bag-full/level indicator is mentioned as a helpful convenience feature that reduces guesswork and prompts timely bag replacement to keep performance steady.

Bagged operation is a defining feature. Many reviewers like the cleaner disposal and note synthetic bags can maintain suction reasonably well, but bag capacity and sealing details are debated, and you must keep bags stocked.

Bagless bin capacity is described as large (roughly 0.48–0.55 gal / about 2L), supporting longer sessions; sealing is generally good, with occasional minor leakage notes in lab testing.

Build quality feedback is split. Some reviews describe a well-designed, feature-rich product for the price, while a technician-style review calls materials and mechanisms cheap/chintzy and not up to older Kenmore expectations.

Build quality is often described as robust with durable plastics, but a minority of comments call out cheaper-feeling hose/handle plastics.

High-pile/shag performance is described as strong by at least one test source, while other reviewers caution that very thick carpet can be harder to push due to no height adjustment and strong suction (mitigated by a suction release valve on some variants).

High-pile carpet results are mixed: suction is strong, but several reviews report it can be difficult to push or it may struggle to capture larger debris sitting high in the pile.

Low-pile carpet cleaning is widely described as excellent, with testing-focused sources reporting near-top collection results and strong single-pass pickup on typical debris.

Low-pile carpet performance is a consistent strength, with strong debris and hair pickup reported across both consumer and test-focused reviews.

Medium-pile carpet deep-clean performance is repeatedly called out as a strength, including embedded sand/debris test outcomes described as top-tier.

No summary yet.

Debris flow is generally reliable, but a narrow wand/tube can clog if large items are picked up, and hair tangling around the brush can add periodic clearing.

Comparative discussions often place it among the most powerful uprights tested, though some reviewers prefer newer or less expensive competitors depending on features and value.

Controls are simple and functional, commonly including suction-level selection and brush control; most feedback is positive with few learning-curve complaints.

Cord length is often listed as long (commonly cited as 30 ft), though at least one review suggests a shorter effective reach depending on how the cord is routed/managed. Overall, corded coverage is viewed as adequate to strong.

Cord length and reach are strong for a corded upright (often cited around 30–35 ft cord and extended total reach), reducing outlet changes during cleaning.

Cord management gets mixed notes: some appreciate the overall reach, while others complain about hooks being stiff or the routing getting in the way of certain lift-off configurations.

Cord wrap and basic cord management are mentioned as straightforward and adequate for storage.

Crevice/groove pickup is frequently highlighted as a strength relative to some competitors, supported by test commentary and the usefulness of the integrated wand for hard-to-reach debris.

Crevice and groove pickup is often called out as a strong point thanks to high suction, though fine powder in floor gaps can still require extra passes or tool use.

Cyclone system is repeatedly credited for strong, consistent pickup and maintaining performance room-to-room, with only occasional notes that floorhead design (not suction) limits large-debris pickup.

Maneuverability is often described as better than expected for its size, helped by swivel steering and a relatively light chassis. Still, some note it can feel dense/hefty in hand or less ideal in tight, low-clearance spaces.

No summary yet.

Reviews mention this area with mixed to positive feedback overall (average score about 4.20), with performance varying by flooring, settings, and user expectations.

Edge and baseboard cleaning is repeatedly rated near the top, with strong edging tests and effective side channels at the floorhead.

No-touch / low-mess disposal is frequently cited as a major advantage. Several sources describe a bag release that reduces contact with dust and makes disposal quick and hygienic.

Emptying is commonly described as quick and hygienic (one-button or point-and-shoot style), with minimal need to touch debris.

Filtration and dust containment are repeatedly praised: sealed system language, HEPA-oriented bags/filters, and reduced dust exposure during disposal are common. This is positioned as a strong fit for allergy concerns.

Whole-machine HEPA filtration and washable filters are praised for allergen control, though one lab-style review noted the system can be only partially sealed over years of use.

Self-adjusting floorhead design improves sealing and surface adaptation, but multiple reviewers say it can sit too close and push larger debris or reduce usability on some rugs.

Hair pickup on carpets is good overall, but multiple reviews note that hair can remain on or wrap around the brushroll, reducing the 'clean it and forget it' experience for heavy-shedding homes.

Carpet hair pickup, especially pet hair, is repeatedly rated excellent and aligns with the product positioning for homes with shedding animals.

Hair-wrap/tangle resistance is a consistent weak spot across several sources. Even when hair-focused branding is mentioned, reviewers still report wrap and that brushroll cleaning can be tedious.

Long-hair management is a weak spot on the main brush in some objective testing (notable tangling reported), even though pet-hair pickup is strong and some turbine tools resist tangles.

Fine dust pickup on hard floors is described as decent but not class-leading; some sources report improved results with additional passes or technique, and a minority note dragging/pushing behavior in certain situations.

On hard floors, fine dust pickup is generally strong, but multiple tests note residue can remain in cracks/crevices (e.g., flour between boards) depending on technique and settings.

Large debris intake on hard floors is generally good for the class, with some mention of larger debris handling aided by the floorhead/gate design. A few reviewers note occasional snowplow/drag or a couple pieces left behind on hard floors.

Large-debris pickup is inconsistent: some reviewers get solid results with the correct head setting, while others report the self-adjusting head can push cereal/large bits instead of ingesting them.

Headlights/LEDs are consistently noted as a helpful usability feature for spotting debris in dim areas, and reviewers generally treat them as a meaningful perk at this price level.

Multiple sources note the floorhead lacks LED headlights, which can make it harder to see debris in darker spaces.

Hose length/behavior is inconsistent across sources. Some mention long reach, while a technician-style review calls the hose short, stiff, and prone to tipping/pulling the unit, which can hurt real-world above-floor ergonomics.

Hose and wand reach are frequently praised for above-floor work (stairs, corners, behind furniture), though one reviewer notes the wand/tube can feel narrow for larger items.

A few comments suggest kid-friendliness via safety behavior when parked upright (rollers/brush not spinning), though overall usability still depends on handling the unit's weight.

Low-profile reach is a common limitation. Multiple sources note it can be tricky under low furniture, and the overall body shape/positioning can restrict access compared with more under-furniture-focused designs.

Maintenance is shaped by the bagged system (cleaner disposal) but complicated by brushroll hair wrap and, for some, finicky small mechanisms. Several reviewers flag brushroll cleaning as annoying or difficult.

Maintenance is viewed as simple: wash filters on a schedule, empty the bin, and occasionally clear hair/debris from the brush or airway.

Noise impressions vary. Some sources call it quieter than certain competitors or surprisingly reasonable for performance, while at least one review describes it as loud during testing. Overall it lands around mid-pack rather than ultra-quiet.

Noise impressions vary by test: some measurements place it in the high-60s/low-70s dB range while others find it louder; overall it is not silent, but generally within typical upright ranges.

Onboard tool storage is mentioned positively by some as convenient, but criticized by at least one reviewer who reports tools not locking well and being easy to knock off, implying variability by model and expectations.

Onboard storage for key tools and brackets is appreciated for keeping frequently used attachments accessible without a separate bag.

Ongoing costs are a recurring tradeoff: bags (and some filters) add ownership expense over time. Multiple sources frame this as the main downside versus bagless convenience, even if disposal is cleaner.

No summary yet.

Overall sentiment trends positive on cleaning power and results, with the most common drawbacks being weight, high price, and occasional usability quirks on rugs/tight spaces.

Pet-focused performance is a highlight, with strong pet-hair pickup and useful pet tools, though tool effectiveness can vary by included kit and expectations.

Value is generally described as strong for a bagged upright with these features, especially when priced under typical premium uprights. However, some reviewers argue the value depends heavily on sale pricing and expectations around build/tool refinement.

Price is a frequent criticism: many reviewers call it expensive, recommending it most when discounted or when maximum suction matters more than cost.

Stair cleaning benefits from the lift-off/lift-up pod concept, and several reviewers like the idea for above-floor work. A technician-style review warns the short/stiff hose and stability can make stairs feel awkward in practice.

Stair cleaning is a standout: the long hose/wand reach lets users clean many steps from one position, reducing the need to carry the main body upstairs.

Bulky storage footprint and upright-stand behavior show tradeoffs: some users report an finicky click/lock into the upright position and overall size that can be harder to store.

Strong suction is a recurring theme, including measured airflow/suction reporting and subjective comments about a solid carpet seal and strong pickup. Some sources note strong head performance versus similarly priced uprights, though a few mention limits on hard floors or thick carpet push resistance tied to high suction.

Reviews consistently describe class-leading suction that deep-cleans carpets and pulls embedded debris, but the strength can make the vacuum feel grabby on plush carpet and some rugs.

Tool-change is generally described as straightforward (quick-release wand/tools), though a few sources mention a learning curve for reseating the wand/bag mechanism or frustration with attachment retention.

Tool swaps are typically described as quick click-on/click-off, making it easy to move between floor cleaning and above-floor attachments.

Under-furniture reach is limited for an upright; bulk and the ball housing prevent cleaning far under low-clearance furniture without moving items or switching to the wand.

Above-floor and upholstery cleaning is generally described as a strong use case thanks to included tools (e.g., upholstery brushes/turbo tools/pet tools on some kits) and the detachable pod, though tool fit/retention quality is disputed by at least one reviewer.

Above-floor and upholstery cleaning are frequently praised when using the turbine and combination tools, especially for furniture and blankets with hair.

No summary yet.

Versatility is good for an upright via wand and tools, but it is not a true convertible handheld and can feel less flexible than lift-away or cordless designs.

Weight is commonly reported around the mid-teens (about 14 lb) in some reviews, but other sources describe it as heavier/dense or cite higher numbers for certain variants. Perceived carrying comfort can vary, especially on stairs.

Multiple reviewers flag the unit as heavy (roughly 16–17.5 lb), which can add arm strain during whole-home cleaning or when carrying it between floors.