Compare Kenmore 400 Series Bagged Canister Vacuum Cleaner vs Dyson Big Ball Multi Floor Canister Vacuum

The included tools and telescoping wand are generally praised for versatility, but one reviewer criticizes the crevice tool as too thin.

Included tools are seen as useful, especially for moving between messes, stairs, and specialty cleaning tasks, though the evidence is stronger for usefulness than variety.

Two reviewers like the look, with praise for the overall appearance and the dark red finish.

Design impressions are positive, with reviewers calling it sleek enough for a modern home and one of the coolest vacuums they had seen.

Area-rug handling is supported by one comparison review saying it performs as intended on carpets, rugs, and flat floors.

Area rug handling is weak for thick small rugs, where suction can lift the rug and the release feature may not help enough.

Setup evidence is limited but positive, with the hose/pipe connection described as very easy.

The bag-full indicator receives clear praise as helpful for knowing when to change the bag.

The bag system is viewed positively overall, with easy replacement and a large, quality-feeling bag, though one unboxing notes some figuring out was needed.

The dust bin is viewed positively for its debris-pushing design, larger usable capacity, and convenient 1.6L size.

Build-related comments are positive but narrow, focusing on a good-quality hose and thick bag material.

Build quality is strongly praised, with reviewers calling it top-notch and comparable to other well-built Dysons.

High-pile carpet pickup is mostly good for smaller debris, but cereal remains a recurring limitation.

Low-pile carpet pickup performs very well in one direct test where debris cleanup was described as a breeze.

Low-pile carpet pickup is excellent in the scored reviews, with near-perfect test results and praise for easy pickup.

Debris-prevention evidence is mixed: one lab review criticized larger debris pickup, while an owner said the vacuum rarely clogged.

Comparative evidence is strong: reviewers say suction is very close to the 600 Series and performance rivals much more expensive canisters.

Comparative performance is very strong in the reviews, including better carpet dirt removal than typical vacuums and pet-hair performance comparable to top uprights.

The suction adjustment and handle controls are liked, though one reviewer notes the adjustment location is unusual.

The handle trigger and suction controls help surface transitions, but one reviewer disliked needing to hold the trigger continuously.

Cord reach is praised, with one review calling the cord very long and another saying it provides plenty of reach.

Cord length is praised because it supports multi-room cleaning and is called a favorite feature by one owner.

Cord management is positive, with praise for the cord rewind and easier put-away compared with hand-winding.

Cord management is a strength, with reviewers liking the retractable cord and describing it as effortless or a favorite feature.

Crevice pickup has a clear limitation from one reviewer who says the crevice tool is too thin for dirt to pass easily.

Crevice and corner pickup receives positive owner feedback, mainly because the vacuum’s power improved performance in corners and crevices.

Cyclone performance is praised in one review for improving airflow and capturing fine dust very well.

The dual-motor system is praised for power and deep-cleaning capability.

Ease of use is a repeated strength, with reviewers saying vacuuming is easy and the swiveling powerhead is easy to use.

Ease of use is a broad strength across reviews, though it coexists with canister handling and weight caveats.

One comparison review says the floorhead movement helps reach room corners more easily.

Edge and baseboard cleaning is only average to slightly above average, with one test noting it did not remove all edge debris.

Emptying is praised through the bag system: reviewers describe grabbing the full bag, throwing it away, and replacing it.

Emptying is praised for pushing debris out, reducing mess, and allowing longer cleaning before trash-emptying becomes a concern.

Filtration receives positive comments across reviews, including HEPA/allergy benefits and praise for keeping dust from being pushed back into the room.

Filtration and dust containment receive positive but limited support through praise for the washable lifetime filter, hypoallergenic framing, and dirt-ejecting design.

The floorhead earns positive remarks for swivel usability and for being wand-connected, which improves maneuverability.

The floorhead earns praise for self-adjustment and roller-speed control, but several reviews say the main head struggles with larger debris.

Hair-removal channel evidence is limited but positive, with the owner describing excess hair removal as easy.

Carpet hair pickup is excellent, with one lab result above 98% and an owner saying it handled dog hair flawlessly.

Fine debris pickup on hard floors is consistently strong for sugar, kitty litter, flour, rice, and ordinary dust.

Large debris intake on hard floors is the clearest weakness, with cereal and other thick debris repeatedly pushed, missed, or requiring direct hose use.

Hose/reach feedback is positive but limited, with one lab review impressed by the reach of just over 33 feet.

Innovation evidence centers on the self-righting and hassle-reducing design, which reviewers frame as clever and efficient.

Low-profile design is praised because the head can get under furniture more easily.

Maintenance is mostly positive, though one unboxing finds bag/filter handling a little tricky to figure out.

Maintenance is generally light and straightforward, helped by washable filters and removable components.

Maneuverability is a repeated strength, with reviewers praising easy movement, lightweight handling, comfortable movement, and tight-space maneuverability.

Handling is generally strong, with praise for gliding, turning, following, and flat head movement, but canister drag and small hallways create a learning curve.

Noise feedback is limited but positive, with one reviewer surprised by how quiet the vacuum sounded during use.

Onboard storage is mixed: some tools fit nicely, but the 600 Series is considered more convenient because it hides all attachments.

Ownership cost evidence is tied to the bagged design being described as not very high maintenance despite requiring bags.

Ownership-cost evidence is favorable because reviewers emphasize the washable lifetime filter and corded design that avoids battery replacement.

One reviewer describes the vacuum as reliable, supporting a positive but limited durability/longevity score.

Longevity evidence is limited to one owner connecting likely durability to an older Dyson that was still working after seven years.

Every review that gave an overall judgment was positive, ranging from good and impressive to extremely satisfied.

Overall opinion is strongly positive across most reviews, though the higher-level praise sits alongside repeated caveats about weight and large debris.

Packaging evidence is limited to one reviewer describing the box as compact and containing everything needed.

Pet-related evidence is mixed: one comparison frames the 400 as better for people without pets, while another review says the included attachments can handle pet-hair cleanup.

Pet-related evidence is very positive: reviewers say it handles pet hair and broader pet messes well, with one review explicitly recommending it for pet owners.

Value is a major strength, with reviewers calling the price good, a great buy, and the best bang for the buck.

Value is mixed-positive: reviewers often say performance justifies the price, while still repeatedly noting that Dyson pricing is high.

Runtime is a non-issue in the positive evidence because reviewers treat the corded design as letting users clean as long as needed.

Stair-cleaning evidence is limited but positive, centered on the stair tool being easy to attach and push along stair surfaces.

One unboxing praises the way the hard-floor tool fits snugly into the back of the vacuum for storage.

Reviewers like the self-righting and anti-topple behavior, and one owner also found the vacuum easy to fit into a small closet.

Reviewers consistently describe the vacuum as powerful, with nice suction power, strong brush-roll performance, and successful pickup in direct debris testing.

Reviewers consistently praise the vacuum’s strong suction, describing it as potent, extremely powerful, and able to pull dirt, dust, and even carpet upward.

One direct pickup test supports heavier-duty use by showing tough debris was no match for the sweeper.

Heavy-duty suitability is supported mainly by one reviewer saying the vacuum works well for large spaces and offices.

One reviewer highlights the canister design as a strong option for smaller rooms and tight spaces.

Small-space suitability is split: articulation helps tight spaces, but a canister layout can be problematic in a narrow hallway.

Reliability is supported by one reviewer calling it a reliable vacuum, but there is no separate customer-support evidence.

Attachment surface safety is supported by one reviewer using distance and airflow to clean delicate fabric without pulling on it.

Tool changes and attachment fit are mostly easy, though one comparison says the 600 Series makes the wider attachment easier to pick up.

Tool changes are repeatedly described as fast and simple, with parts snapping apart or into position with very little effort.

Under-furniture cleaning is a clear positive in one review, which calls it a huge advantage for hard-to-reach areas.

Under-furniture cleaning is a strength thanks to the low-clearance head, articulating handle, and nearly flat cleaning position.

Above-floor cleaning is supported by comments about couches, curtains, car floors, crevices, and attachment-based versatility.

Above-floor cleaning is positive, with the extension arm praised for reaching vaulted ceilings and higher dust without difficulty.

Versatility is praised across reviews, especially because the attachments and canister design cover varied cleaning tasks.

Versatility is a clear strength, with reviewers praising all-floor use, attachment swaps, hose-and-tool cleaning, and broad household-surface coverage.

One reviewer praises the vacuum as lightweight and easy to move around.

Weight is a consistent drawback, with reviewers calling it heavy and potentially too much for children or older users to carry.