Kenmore 400 Series Bagged Canister Vacuum Cleaner

Kenmore 400 Series Bagged Canister Vacuum Cleaner Review

Brand: Kenmore
Released: October 10, 2020
Updated: 1 week ago
4.2
Consolidated expert score
81
Review insights
38
Scored features
6
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the Kenmore 400 Series if you want strong suction, HEPA filtration, easy bag changes and canister maneuverability at a good value. Skip it if you need the 600 Series’ motorized pet attachment, fully hidden tool storage, or a wider crevice tool.

Best for

Best for people who want a powerful bagged canister vacuum with HEPA-style filtration, easy movement, good reach, and strong value. The evidence especially favors general household cleaning across floors, rugs, couches, curtains, and tight spaces.

Not for

Not for shoppers who specifically want the 600 Series’ motorized pet attachment, fully hidden onboard tools, or every accessory to feel premium. It is also not ideal if a narrow crevice tool or slightly tricky bag/filter handling would frustrate you.

Verdict

Across the supplied reviews, the Kenmore 400 Series lands as a strong bagged canister pick because reviewers repeatedly praise suction, easy movement, filtration, and value. It performed well in direct pickup testing, including low-pile outdoor carpet with dirt, mulch, bird seed, and salt. Reviewers also like the telescoping wand, long cord, cord rewind, and bag system, while calling the vacuum powerful and versatile. The tradeoff is accessory convenience: the 600 Series gets a motorized pet attachment and more integrated tool storage, and one unboxing found the crevice tool thin and bag handling a little tricky. The evidence still favors the 400 for most users who want cleaning power without paying more for extras.

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

Dyson animal

  • Worse: cleaning performance and price The reviewer says the 400 Series works better than the Dyson Animal they previously owned for about half the price.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

38 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0 39% 15 features
  • Positive 3.5-4.4 58% 22 features
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4 3% 1 feature
  • Negative 1.5-2.4 0% 0 features
  • Very negative below 1.5 0% 0 features

Pros

  • 4.8
    based on 1 review
    Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup: 4.8, based on 1 review
    Low-pile carpet pickup performs very well in one direct test where debris cleanup was described as a breeze.
  • 4.8
    based on 1 review
    Suitability for small spaces: 4.8, based on 1 review
    One reviewer highlights the canister design as a strong option for smaller rooms and tight spaces.
  • 4.8
    based on 1 review
    Under-Furniture Pickup: 4.8, based on 1 review
    Under-furniture cleaning is a clear positive in one review, which calls it a huge advantage for hard-to-reach areas.
  • 4.7
    based on 2 reviews
    Dual motors: 4.7, based on 2 reviews
    The dual-motor system is praised for power and deep-cleaning capability.
  • 4.6
    based on 6 reviews
    Suction and Airflow: 4.6, based on 6 reviews
    Reviewers consistently describe the vacuum as powerful, with nice suction power, strong brush-roll performance, and successful pickup in direct debris testing.
  • 4.5
    based on 6 reviews
    Overall opinion: 4.5, based on 6 reviews
    Every review that gave an overall judgment was positive, ranging from good and impressive to extremely satisfied.
  • 4.5
    based on 4 reviews
    Maneuverability and Handling: 4.5, based on 4 reviews
    Maneuverability is a repeated strength, with reviewers praising easy movement, lightweight handling, comfortable movement, and tight-space maneuverability.
  • 4.5
    based on 4 reviews
    Price and Value: 4.5, based on 4 reviews
    Value is a major strength, with reviewers calling the price good, a great buy, and the best bang for the buck.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Comparative performance: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    Comparative evidence is strong: reviewers say suction is very close to the 600 Series and performance rivals much more expensive canisters.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Cord length: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    Cord reach is praised, with one review calling the cord very long and another saying it provides plenty of reach.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Area Rug Handling: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Area-rug handling is supported by one comparison review saying it performs as intended on carpets, rugs, and flat floors.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Bag-full indicator: 4.5, based on 1 review
    The bag-full indicator receives clear praise as helpful for knowing when to change the bag.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Emptying and Mess Control: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Emptying is praised through the bag system: reviewers describe grabbing the full bag, throwing it away, and replacing it.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Suitability for heavy-duty use: 4.5, based on 1 review
    One direct pickup test supports heavier-duty use by showing tough debris was no match for the sweeper.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Weight: 4.5, based on 1 review
    One reviewer praises the vacuum as lightweight and easy to move around.
  • 4.4
    based on 4 reviews
    Filtration / Dust Containment: 4.4, based on 4 reviews
    Filtration receives positive comments across reviews, including HEPA/allergy benefits and praise for keeping dust from being pushed back into the room.
  • 4.4
    based on 3 reviews
    Versatility: 4.4, based on 3 reviews
    Versatility is praised across reviews, especially because the attachments and canister design cover varied cleaning tasks.
  • 4.4
    based on 2 reviews
    Ease of use: 4.4, based on 2 reviews
    Ease of use is a repeated strength, with reviewers saying vacuuming is easy and the swiveling powerhead is easy to use.
  • 4.3
    based on 4 reviews
    Bin and Bag: 4.3, based on 4 reviews
    The bag system is viewed positively overall, with easy replacement and a large, quality-feeling bag, though one unboxing notes some figuring out was needed.
  • 4.3
    based on 2 reviews
    Aesthetic design and finish: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
    Two reviewers like the look, with praise for the overall appearance and the dark red finish.
  • 4.3
    based on 2 reviews
    Cord management: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
    Cord management is positive, with praise for the cord rewind and easier put-away compared with hand-winding.
  • 4.2
    based on 5 reviews
    Accessories and Tools: 4.2, based on 5 reviews
    The included tools and telescoping wand are generally praised for versatility, but one reviewer criticizes the crevice tool as too thin.
  • 4.2
    based on 1 review
    Storage footprint and upright-stand stability: 4.2, based on 1 review
    One unboxing praises the way the hard-floor tool fits snugly into the back of the vacuum for storage.
  • 4.1
    based on 2 reviews
    Floorhead design: 4.1, based on 2 reviews
    The floorhead earns positive remarks for swivel usability and for being wand-connected, which improves maneuverability.
  • 4.1
    based on 2 reviews
    Upholstery / Above-Floor Pickup: 4.1, based on 2 reviews
    Above-floor cleaning is supported by comments about couches, curtains, car floors, crevices, and attachment-based versatility.
  • 4.0
    based on 2 reviews
    Build quality and durability: 4.0, based on 2 reviews
    Build-related comments are positive but narrow, focusing on a good-quality hose and thick bag material.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Assembly and Setup: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Setup evidence is limited but positive, with the hose/pipe connection described as very easy.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Controls and UI: 4.0, based on 1 review
    The suction adjustment and handle controls are liked, though one reviewer notes the adjustment location is unusual.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Edge and Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors): 4.0, based on 1 review
    One comparison review says the floorhead movement helps reach room corners more easily.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Ongoing ownership costs (bags, filters, batteries): 4.0, based on 1 review
    Ownership cost evidence is tied to the bagged design being described as not very high maintenance despite requiring bags.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Overall durability/longevity: 4.0, based on 1 review
    One reviewer describes the vacuum as reliable, supporting a positive but limited durability/longevity score.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Packaging quality: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Packaging evidence is limited to one reviewer describing the box as compact and containing everything needed.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Support and Reliability: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Reliability is supported by one reviewer calling it a reliable vacuum, but there is no separate customer-support evidence.
  • 3.9
    based on 3 reviews
    Tool-change simplicity: 3.9, based on 3 reviews
    Tool changes and attachment fit are mostly easy, though one comparison says the 600 Series makes the wider attachment easier to pick up.
  • 3.9
    based on 2 reviews
    Maintenance requirements: 3.9, based on 2 reviews
    Maintenance is mostly positive, though one unboxing finds bag/filter handling a little tricky to figure out.
  • 3.7
    based on 3 reviews
    Onboard tool storage: 3.7, based on 3 reviews
    Onboard storage is mixed: some tools fit nicely, but the 600 Series is considered more convenient because it hides all attachments.
  • 3.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Pet-Ready Features: 3.5, based on 2 reviews
    Pet-related evidence is mixed: one comparison frames the 400 as better for people without pets, while another review says the included attachments can handle pet-hair cleanup.

Cons

  • 2.5
    based on 1 review
    Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors): 2.5, based on 1 review
    Crevice pickup has a clear limitation from one reviewer who says the crevice tool is too thin for dirt to pass easily.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Canister Vacuums, this product is above average in Suitability for small spaces, Suitability for heavy-duty use, Packaging quality, below average in Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors).

Summary

8 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher 88% 7 features
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower 13% 1 feature
Attribute This product Category average Difference
Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors) 2.5 4.7 -2.2
Suitability for small spaces 4.8 3.6 +1.2
Suitability for heavy-duty use 4.5 3.4 +1.1
Packaging quality 4.0 3.0 +1.0
Carpet — Low-Pile Pickup 4.8 3.9 +0.9
Bag-full indicator 4.5 3.6 +0.9
Area Rug Handling 4.5 3.7 +0.8
Weight 4.5 3.7 +0.8

FAQ

Does the Kenmore 400 Series have strong suction?

Yes. Reviewers repeatedly call it powerful, and one pickup test shows it clearing salt, dirt, mulch, and bird seed from low-pile outdoor carpet.

Is the 400 Series better value than the 600 Series?

The review evidence leans yes for most people. Reviewers say the 400 has similar suction and strong value, while the 600 mainly adds pet-focused and storage conveniences.

Is it good for pet hair?

It has some pet-hair usefulness through its attachments, but the comparison review says people who really need the motorized pet attachment may prefer the 600 Series.

Is the bag system easy to manage?

Mostly yes. Reviewers praise easy bag replacement and cleaner disposal, though one unboxing says figuring out the bag/filter area was a little tricky.

Is it easy to move around?

Yes. Multiple reviewers praise easy movement, lightweight handling, swivel action, and canister maneuverability in tighter spaces.

What are the main downsides?

The main caveats are accessory-related: the 600 Series has more convenient hidden tool storage, the 400 lacks the 600’s motorized pet attachment, and one crevice tool is described as thin.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Consider This Instead

If you want better Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors)

Choose Miele C2 Canister Vacuum. It scores 5.0 vs 2.5 for Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors), with a 4.4 overall score.

Compare

Overall Top Canister Vacuums Alternatives

#1 Dyson Big Ball Multi Floor Canister Vacuum
4.4

Choose the Dyson Big Ball if you want powerful corded suction, pet-hair pickup, easy tools, and long cleaning sessions. Skip it if heavy canisters, thick rugs, or large hard-floor debris...

Pros: Pet-Ready Features, Noise level

Cons: Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake, Area Rug Handling

#2 Miele C2 Canister Vacuum
4.4

Choose the Miele C2 if you want a compact, quiet, high-suction bagged canister for hard floors, mixed flooring, stairs, and dust control. Skip it if you need cordless convenience, no...

Pros: Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup, Crevice / Groove Pickup (Hard Floors)

Cons: Floorhead Seal on Hard Floors, Ongoing ownership costs (bags

#3 SEBO Airbelt K3 Premium Canister Vacuum
4.3

Choose the SEBO Airbelt K3 if you want a compact, durable canister with strong carpet cleaning, filtration, and quiet handling. Skip it for mostly hardwood homes or heavy long-haired pet...

Pros: Versatility, Overall durability/longevity

Cons: Suitability for heavy-duty use, Hair-removal channel issues

#4 Miele C3 Vacuum Cleaner
4.3

Choose the Miele C3 for strong suction, filtration, maneuverability, and pet hair cleanup. Skip it if you need flawless large-debris pickup, low ownership costs, or a budget-friendly vacuum.

Pros: Stair Cleaning, Upholstery / Above-Floor Pickup

Cons: Packaging quality, Hair-removal channel issues