Compare Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones (2nd Gen) vs Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear Bluetooth Headphones

P1 Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones (2nd Gen)
P2 Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear Bluetooth Headphones

Comparison Takeaways

Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones (2nd Gen)

Where It Has the Edge

  • aptX is 4.5 vs 2.0. aptX support is treated as a meaningful upside for compatible newer Android devices, even though the transcript renders...
  • Built-in DAC and hi-res playback is 4.5 vs 2.0. The built-in DAC/USB-C hi-res path is repeatedly praised for clearer, more detailed, or higher-quality wired playback.
  • Codec support is 4.5 vs 2.0. Codec support is viewed positively where aptX Adaptive/Snapdragon Sound support is relevant, especially for compatible Android devices.
  • Wear detection performance is 4.8 vs 2.8. Wear detection performance is praised as excellent in daily use.

Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear Bluetooth Headphones

Where It Has the Edge

  • Streaming service integration is 5.0 vs 2.0. Streaming service integration was praised strongly for Spotify Tap, especially for starting playback without pulling out a phone.
  • LE Audio readiness is 4.1 vs 1.8. LE Audio readiness was treated as a positive future-proofing feature by multiple reviewers.
  • Preset EQ profile quality is 4.5 vs 2.3. The preset EQ experience was praised in one review, especially the bass boost setting for adding dynamic sound...
  • Button control usability is 4.8 vs 3.2. Button controls were a standout strength, with reviewers preferring the tactile joystick and physical buttons over touch controls.
Average score
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.0
Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.0
3.5mm analog input availability
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.0

Analog input is useful and dedicated, though one reviewer notes the headphone-side cable connection is less common.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
2.1

The lack of a built-in 3.5mm analog jack was a repeated drawback, even though USB-C-to-3.5mm wired listening is possible.

Active noise cancellation
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.7

Active noise cancellation is the product’s strongest consensus win, repeatedly described as elite, best-in-class, or among the best available.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.8

ANC was usually judged good, solid, or decent for daily use, but several reviewers said it still trails Bose, Sony, or the top tier.

Advanced software features
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
3.7

Advanced software features are mixed: CustomTune and acoustic compensation impress some reviewers, while others complain that Bose offers little new.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.0

Advanced software features were considered solid and modern, but reviewers did not see them as uniquely class-leading.

Aesthetics / discreet profile
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.5

The profile is seen as discreet and attractive, with reviewers saying the headphones look good without standing out too much.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.4

Aesthetics were distinctive and often praised, but some reviewers noted the retro Marshall look will not suit everyone.

ANC background noise level
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.6

ANC background noise is generally improved or very low, with reviewers praising quiet operation and reduced hiss, though not every review is flawless.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.0

ANC background noise performance was decent: one review measured strong overall noise reduction, and another said white noise was not bad.

ANC effect on sound signature
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
3.2

ANC-off mode is a sonic caveat because one reviewer says tonality worsens with ANC disabled.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.8

ANC-off listening measured slightly better in one review, suggesting ANC can subtly affect the sound signature.

ANC sound impact on audio
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
5.0

ANC is praised for not changing the headphone’s sonic character in one review’s listening.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.8

ANC slightly affects audio performance, with one review noting higher sound-quality scores when ANC is disabled.

Android compatibility
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.0

Android compatibility is positive where reviewers mention Google Fast Pair and Snapdragon/aptX Adaptive support.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.0

Android compatibility was positive in one review that found the headphones sounded good on Android.

App
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
3.6

The app is generally easy to use, but reviewers often describe it as limited, basic, or not as feature-rich as rivals.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.4

The app was viewed positively for customization, controls, battery options, and a generally intuitive experience.

aptX
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.5

aptX support is treated as a meaningful upside for compatible newer Android devices, even though the transcript renders it as AEX.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
2.0

aptX support was criticized as absent, especially for Android or lossless-codec users.

Audio-video sync accuracy
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.2

Wired USB-C listening is credited with reducing Bluetooth latency, giving it a practical audio-video sync benefit.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
2.8

Audio-video sync was a concern for gaming because one reviewer tied the lack of low-latency codecs to more noticeable latency.

Auracast support
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
No score yet
Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.2

Auracast support was treated as a positive future-facing feature, especially for Android and LE Audio readiness.

Auto-play/wear detection
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.8

Wear detection for wake/play behavior is praised for quickly waking and connecting when the headphones are put on.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.2

Auto-play and wear detection worked but was slow to react in one test.

Auto on/off reliability
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.7

Auto on/off behavior is praised for quick wake, sleep, and battery-saving reliability.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
No score yet
Award recognition
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
5.0

Award recognition is strong in the RecordingNow review, which gives the headphones an Editor’s Choice-style recognition.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
No score yet
Bass performance
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.3

Bass is frequently praised as strong, deep, and enjoyable, though a few reviewers call the default balance bass-heavy or V-shaped.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.0

Bass was usually described as punchy or well-balanced, though several reviewers said it could use more impact, cleaner control, or stronger low-end weight.

Battery
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.0

Battery life is improved and usually adequate, but reviewers commonly frame it as average, mid-pack, or not class-leading.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.9

Battery life had the strongest agreement: reviewers repeatedly described it as class-leading, incredible, extraordinary, or far ahead of competitors.

Bluetooth
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.5

Bluetooth pairing is described as straightforward, supporting an easy day-to-day connection experience.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.5

Bluetooth performance was praised in one review as stable and high-performance.

Bluetooth version
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.0

Bluetooth 5.4 is viewed mildly positively as a useful modern update rather than a major advantage.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.5

Bluetooth version support was tied to a stable, high-performance wireless connection in one review.

Build quality
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
3.8

Build quality is acceptable to good, but reviewers split between reassuring solidity and complaints about plasticky or less premium feel.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.6

Build quality was generally strong and rugged, with praise for durability and materials, offset by one report of creaking.

Built-in DAC and hi-res playback
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.5

The built-in DAC/USB-C hi-res path is repeatedly praised for clearer, more detailed, or higher-quality wired playback.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
2.0

Hi-res playback support was a weakness because reviewers repeatedly noted no hi-res Bluetooth audio support.

Button control usability
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
3.2

Button usability is mixed, with some reviewers liking the balance of buttons and touch and others criticizing overloaded controls.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.8

Button controls were a standout strength, with reviewers preferring the tactile joystick and physical buttons over touch controls.

Cable quality
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
No score yet
Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
5.0

Cable quality received praise in one review for the black cable with brass tips and premium-feeling presentation.

Carry case quality
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.1

The carry case is usually praised as compact, protective, or sturdy, though a few reviewers find the fit awkward or the zip case less convenient.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.5

The carry case was usually praised as sturdy, compact, premium, or travel-friendly, though a few reviewers found it bulky or unnecessary.

Charging
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.2

Charging gets positive evidence from the quick-charge result and ability to recover several hours quickly.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.9

Charging was praised for fast top-ups, with reviewers citing up to 12 hours of playback from a short charge.

Clamping force comfort
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.6

Clamping force is usually praised as gentle or well judged, though one reviewer found the fit snug.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.8

Clamping comfort was rated very highly, with reviewers reporting little to virtually zero pressure.

Codec support
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.5

Codec support is viewed positively where aptX Adaptive/Snapdragon Sound support is relevant, especially for compatible Android devices.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
2.0

Codec support was a clear weakness because reviewers noted no hi-res, lossless, or low-latency codec support.

Comfort during long use
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.8

Comfort during long use is one of the most consistent strengths, with reviewers repeatedly saying the headphones can be worn for hours.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.9

Comfort was one of the strongest consensus wins, with reviewers repeatedly praising all-day wear, soft fit, and low fatigue.

Connectivity options
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.8

Connectivity options are a strength because reviewers say USB-C, analog, and Bluetooth make it hard to be stuck without a usable connection.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.5

Connectivity options were mixed: wired and wireless playback were useful, but the lack of a built-in 3.5mm jack and coiled cable hurt convenience.

Design and Aesthetics
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.4

Design feedback is generally positive, with reviewers liking the modern look, finish options, and refined styling.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.5

Design and aesthetics were mostly praised for the distinctive Marshall look, premium detailing, and rugged styling, though taste varied.

Dongle
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
2.0

The lack of a low-latency dongle is a drawback when compared with more flexible rivals.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
No score yet
Durability over time
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.6

Durability evidence is positive but limited, mostly based on case wear and confidence in long-term construction.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.8

Durability over time was viewed positively because reviewers described more durable, repairable construction and long-term toughness.

Ear cup padding quality
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.8

Earcup padding is strongly praised as plush, cushy, soft, and supportive.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.9

Ear cup padding was widely praised as extremely soft, plush, pillow-like, and important to comfort and sealing.

Ear cup swivel/rotation range
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
No score yet
Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.1

Ear cup rotation and swivel helped portability, though one reviewer found the twisting mechanism odd on the head.

Earpad noise
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
No score yet
Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
2.0

Earpad/body-borne noise was a notable negative for one reviewer, who heard footsteps and heartbeat-like sounds.

Equalizer customization
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
2.8

EQ customization is one of the most repeated complaints because Bose still relies on a simple three-band EQ.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.3

EQ customization was broadly useful and responsive, though one reviewer wanted more precision than the five-band setup provides.

Features at launch
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
No score yet
Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.7

Features at launch were adequate but not standout, with one reviewer saying the standard feature set lacked a truly distinctive tool.

Frequency response accuracy
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
3.9

Frequency balance is debated: some reviewers hear an impressively balanced profile after EQ, while others find the default tuning bassy, safe, or not neutral.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.4

The default frequency response was judged broadly listener-friendly, especially for casual listeners.

Headband adjustability
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
No score yet
Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.3

Headband adjustability earned a small positive note for visible adjustment numbering.

Headband padding quality
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.7

Headband padding is praised as soft and supportive, helping the headphones stay comfortable for long sessions.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.8

Headband comfort was praised for reducing top-of-head pressure through light weight and support-strap design.

Hinge durability
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.2

The hinge and moving hardware are described positively because the moving parts use high-quality metal.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
5.0

Hinge durability was praised for being able to twist without showing signs of breaking.

Immersive audio quality
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
3.3

Immersive audio quality is highly split, with some reviewers loving cinema/spatial effects and others preferring normal stereo.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.6

Immersive audio quality was mixed, with some reviewers enjoying the added atmosphere and others finding the effect limited or not truly immersive.

Included accessories
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.5

Included accessories are appreciated, especially the case plus charging and audio cables.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.5

Included accessories received praise for the attractive red-velvet case and included cables.

Instrument separation
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.3

Instrument separation is usually seen as good to excellent, though one reviewer notes it can struggle when mixes get busy.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.4

Instrument separation was a consistent strength when mentioned, with reviewers noting solid layering, instrument placement, and separation across bass, mids, and highs.

Integrated microphone
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
3.6

The integrated microphone is serviceable to good, with clear call presence, though not always exceptional.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.9

Integrated microphone feedback was mixed, with clear/crisp quiet-room results but criticism of vocal clarity or noisy-environment performance.

LDAC
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
No score yet
Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
2.0

LDAC was only discussed as an absent higher-quality codec, making it a codec-support weakness.

LE Audio readiness
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
1.8

LE Audio readiness is weak because one reviewer specifically complains that low-energy goodies are still missing.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.1

LE Audio readiness was treated as a positive future-proofing feature by multiple reviewers.

Maximum volume clarity
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
3.5

Reviewers note that fine detail and micro-detail are not class-leading, even when the overall sound is enjoyable.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.8

Maximum-volume clarity was strong in the reviews that addressed it, with no audible or max-volume distortion reported.

Microphone noise reduction
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.3

Microphone noise handling is generally positive, with reviewers saying voices stay clear and background noise is reduced well in common noisy settings.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.7

Microphone noise reduction was praised for handling simulated or real wind well, despite some vocal-clarity caveats elsewhere.

Microphone quality for calls
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
3.9

Call microphone quality is usually good enough to excellent, but not every reviewer finds it full-bodied or exceptional.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.8

Call microphone quality received strong praise from one reviewer, especially for windy phone calls.

Midrange clarity
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.0

Midrange feedback is mixed: several reviewers like vocal clarity and texture, while others hear recessed or dull low mids.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.0

Midrange impressions were mixed: some praised vocals and instruments, while others heard under-emphasized mids, prominent high mids, or occasional clutter.

Multi-platform compatibility
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.8

Multi-platform compatibility is a strength, especially for users switching across phones, laptops, Android, iOS, and other operating systems.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.0

Multi-platform compatibility was positive where tested on both iOS and Android.

Multipoint connectivity reliability
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.6

Multipoint is a clear strength in the reviews, with seamless switching and reliable two-device behavior praised repeatedly.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
5.0

Multipoint reliability was strong where tested, with seamless switching or extremely reliable two-device use.

Noise isolation (passive)
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.0

Passive isolation is considered useful and fairly good, but one reviewer notes the foam is not the thickest.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.5

Passive isolation was praised for the soft cushions and seal, which helped block noise even before ANC was considered.

Overall recommendation
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.3

Overall recommendations are positive for new buyers and travel users, but several reviewers temper that with Gen 1 upgrade and price caveats.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.3

Overall recommendations were positive but caveated: reviewers liked the package, especially for travel and rock-focused listening, while noting ANC, codecs, and wired tradeoffs.

Portability/foldability
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.6

Portability is a strength because reviewers like the foldable frame and compact travel form.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.8

Portability and foldability were major strengths thanks to the compact folding design and small travel footprint.

Premium feel
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
3.4

Premium feel is mixed: the Gen 2 can feel nicer than before, but multiple reviewers still call out plastic, rattling, or non-premium materials.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.8

Premium feel was praised through richer materials, superior build impressions, and a luxurious presentation.

Preset EQ profile quality
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
2.3

Preset EQ quality is weak in the evidence, with reviewers calling presets ineffective or lackluster.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.5

The preset EQ experience was praised in one review, especially the bass boost setting for adding dynamic sound without excess bass.

Replaceable earpads
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.5

Replaceable earpads are a practical upside for cleaning, wear, and possible third-party pad swaps.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.5

Replaceable earpads were praised as easy to remove or replace and useful for longevity.

Replaceable pads/headband
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
No score yet
Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.5

Replaceable pads and headband parts were a repairability plus where described.

Sensors
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
No score yet
Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
2.8

Sensor performance was a concern because one reviewer reported random wear-sensor triggers.

Smart listening features
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.1

Smart listening features such as ActiveSense and immersive audio are appreciated when they solve practical problems, but the enthusiasm is not universal.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.1

Smart listening features were mixed: adaptive volume, Spotify Tap, and battery preservation drew praise, while missing convenience features held the score down.

Smart Pause performance
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
2.8

Smart Pause works but has a caveat: folding the headphones can defeat the lay-flat pause behavior and waste battery.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
2.8

Smart Pause performance was criticized for random triggering in one longer test.

Smudge resistance
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
2.7

Smudge resistance is a downside because glossy accents pick up fingerprints and dust.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
No score yet
Software/setup simplicity
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.2

Setup and navigation are generally easy, with reviewers praising stability, intuitive menus, and simple access to features.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.8

Setup simplicity received praise from one reviewer who called pairing/setup easy.

Sound leakage
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
No score yet
Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.2

Sound leakage was viewed positively in one review because the plush ear cups helped minimize leak.

Sound quality
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.2

Reviews are broadly positive on sound quality, especially after EQ or over USB-C, but several reviewers still found the tuning less refined than top sonic rivals.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.3

Reviewers generally liked the sound, describing it as pleasing, energetic, balanced, or excellent, with the strongest praise for rock and instrument-driven listening.

Soundstage width
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.4

Reviewers often describe the soundstage as wide, spacious, or open, especially for closed-back ANC headphones.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.7

Soundstage width drew mixed reactions, from solid or opened-up presentation to narrow, cluttered, or not true-spatial enough.

Spatial audio
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.0

Spatial and cinema modes are divisive: movie use receives praise, while music-focused immersive modes are less consistently liked.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.4

Spatial audio was divisive: some liked the extra space, but others found it unnatural, underwhelming, or below true Atmos-style experiences.

Stability
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
3.8

Stability is adequate for light movement, but not ideal for dynamic workouts or smaller heads.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.5

Connection stability was praised as stable and high-performance in one review.

Streaming service integration
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
2.0

Streaming integration is a limitation because the app lacks built-in music service or internet radio integration.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
5.0

Streaming service integration was praised strongly for Spotify Tap, especially for starting playback without pulling out a phone.

Sustainability and repairability
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
No score yet
Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.5

Sustainability and repairability were praised for replaceable parts and repair-minded design, with a caveat that batteries are not user-replaceable.

Sustainability materials
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
No score yet
Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.0

Sustainability materials received a modest positive note for recycled plastic use.

Touch control responsiveness
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
3.3

Touch control feedback is mixed: some reviewers find the slider responsive, while others call it imprecise or annoying.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
No score yet
Transparency mode quality
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.2

Transparency mode is generally praised as natural and useful, though several reviewers note hiss, reduced level, or weaker performance than AirPods Max or Sony.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.8

Transparency mode was considered usable and sometimes natural, but reviewers also noted hiss, limited realism, or weaker performance than the best rivals.

Travel friendliness
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.7

Travel friendliness is a major strength because reviewers highlight comfort, ANC, foldability, and long-flight usefulness.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.8

Travel friendliness was a major strength due to battery life, compact folding, wired flexibility, and protective case design.

Treble clarity
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.1

Treble is generally smooth or crisp enough, but reviewers do not treat it as the strongest part of the tuning.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.8

Treble feedback was split between clear, impressive highs and complaints about sibilance, fatigue, or sharpness on some tracks.

USB-C
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.5

USB-C audio is one of the clearest feature upgrades, praised for lossless listening and practical wired use.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.3

USB-C was useful for charging and wired listening, but reviewers criticized the one-port limitation and need for power in wired use.

Value for money
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
3.4

Value is mixed: reviewers like the feature set and experience, but price and weak upgrade logic for Gen 1 owners are repeated caveats.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.9

Value was generally fair to good, especially on sale, but reviewers noted strong cheaper or better-performing rivals.

Voice prompts/feedback
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
No score yet
Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.5

Voice prompts and feedback added personality through Marshall-style guitar sounds during power and pairing.

Volume output
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.5

USB-C playback is praised for giving more output headroom for listeners who want louder playback.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
5.0

One reviewer found the headphones plenty loud, with comfortable listening volume well below maximum.

Water/sweat resistance rating
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
1.8

Water and sweat resistance is a weakness because reviewers call out the lack of an ingress protection rating.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
1.5

Water and sweat resistance was a weakness because reviewers noted the headphones are not waterproof and should avoid rain or gym use.

Wear detection auto-pause
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.3

Auto-pause is generally positive, with reviewers noting automatic pause and power-up behavior when the headphones are removed or worn.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.2

Wear detection auto-pause was only moderately successful, working but reacting slowly.

Wear detection performance
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.8

Wear detection performance is praised as excellent in daily use.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
2.8

Wear detection performance was a weakness in one longer test because the sensor randomly triggered.

Weight comfort
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
4.8

Reviewers repeatedly connect the low weight to comfort, calling the headphones light and easy to wear.

Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
4.8

Weight comfort was a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly calling the headphones light for the class and easy to wear.

Wind noise handling
Product 1: Bose QuietComfort Ultra Bluetooth Headphones...
No score yet
Product 2: Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear...
3.7

Wind handling was mixed: one reviewer found wind susceptibility in ANC/transparency, while another found moderate wind manageable.